Jeremy Smelt

Simulation-based learning of transesophageal echocardiography in cardiothoracic surgical trainees: A prospective, randomized study.

OBJECTIVES The Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum now recommends that cardiac surgical trainees should be able to understand and interpret transesophageal echocardiography images. However, cardiac surgical trainees receive limited formal transesophageal echocardiography training. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of simulation-based teaching versus more traditional operating room teaching on transesophageal echocardiography knowledge in cardiac surgical trainees. METHODS A total of 25 cardiac surgical trainees with no formal transesophageal echocardiography learning experience were randomly assigned by computer to a study group receiving simulation-based transesophageal echocardiography teaching via the Heartworks (Inventive Medical, London, UK) simulator (n = 12) or a control group receiving transesophageal echocardiography teaching during elective cardiac surgery (n = 13). Each subject undertook a video-based test composed of 20 multiple choice questions on standard transesophageal echocardiography views before and after teaching. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the pretest scores between the 2 groups (P = .89). After transesophageal echocardiography teaching, subjects within each group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in transesophageal echocardiography knowledge. Although the subjects within the simulation group outperformed their counterparts in the operating room teaching group in the post-test scores, this difference was not significant (P = .14). CONCLUSIONS Despite the familiarity with transesophageal echocardiography images during surgery, subjects in the simulation group performed at least as well as those in the operating room group. Surgical trainees will benefit from formal transesophageal echocardiography teaching incorporated into their training via either learning method.

Trainees can learn minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without compromising safety

OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (Mini-AVR) is a technically advanced procedure. However, it results in equivalent operative mortality, less bleeding and reduced intensive care/hospital stay when compared with conventional AVR. Our aim was to assess the impact of trainee performance on short-term outcomes of patients undergoing elective and urgent Mini-AVR where a significant proportion were performed by trainees. METHODS All patients undergoing non-emergency, elective and urgent, isolated Mini-AVR between September 2005 and December 2012 were studied. Operative details and short-term outcomes, with particular attention to trainee performance, were analysed. RESULTS During the study period, there were 205 Mini-AVR with a median age of 67 years (range 29-86); 74 (36%) operations were performed by trainees. The overall median cross-clamp and bypass times were 42 (range 33-63) and 59 min (range 59-94) for the attending surgeon and 52 (range 42-63) and 71 min (range 59-94) for the trainee (P = 0.03). Five Mini-AVR patients (2.4%) required conversion to full sternotomy for ascending aortic replacement, right ventricular bleeding, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and failure to cardiovert. None of these cases were performed by trainees. Median lengths of intensive care and hospital stay were 1 and 5 days and were not different for attending surgeon and trainee. Only 1 (0.5%) patient died in hospital. CONCLUSIONS Mini-AVR can be performed with a low conversion rate and hospital stay and taught to trainees without compromising safety.

Simulator Teaching of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Complications: A Prospective, Randomized Study

OBJECTIVE Complications of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are rare, but life-threatening events that need prompt and rehearsed actions involving a team. This is not adequately taught to cardiothoracic surgical trainees. The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge of cardiothoracic trainees required to manage these events after simulation-based vs. lecture-based teaching. PARTICIPANTS AND DESIGN Totally, 17 cardiac surgical trainees with no formal teaching in intraoperative complications of CPB management were randomly assigned by computer to either a study group receiving simulation-based complications of CPB teaching via the Orpheus simulator (n = 9) or a control group receiving complications of CPB teaching via a lecture (n = 8). Each subject undertook a written test comprising 20 multiple choice questions on complications of CPB before and after teaching. Trainees were then asked to rate their satisfaction with each session from 1 to 5, with 5 being most satisfied. SETTING St George Simulation and Clinical Skills Laboratory, St Georges Hospital, London. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the pretest scores between the 2 groups (p = 0.29). After teaching, both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in their knowledge (p < 0.05). The trainees in the simulation group performed better than the lecture-based group; however, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.21). Satisfaction levels in both the lecture session and the simulation session were very high with means of 4.4/5 and 4.8/5, respectively. CONCLUSION Despite the familiarity with CPB during surgery, the simulation group performed at least as well as the lecture group. Cardiothoracic trainees would benefit from formal teaching of complications of CPB management via either learning modality being incorporated into their training.

High-Volume Practice by a Single Specialized Team Reduces Mortality and Morbidity of Elective and Urgent Aortic Root Replacement.

BACKGROUND Elective aortic root replacement (ARR), or the Bentall procedure, is associated with significant mortality and complications. Recent studies have shown that high procedure volume has an inverse association with postoperative mortality. The outcomes of patients undergoing elective/urgent ARR by a single, high-volume surgical team were assessed in this study. METHODS Patients undergoing nonemergency, elective/urgent ARR for non-Marfan aortic root dilatation, from October 2005 to March 2011, were studied. Valve-preserving procedures, extra-anatomic bypass, and arch and descending aortic repairs were excluded. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively. Surgical techniques included central cannulation and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at 35°C. Following aneurysm excision, a composite valve-conduit reconstruction with coronary button reimplantation was performed. Tissue glue, Teflon pledgets, and blood products were seldom used. Patients were followed locally at 8 weeks, 6 months, and annually thereafter with echocardiography and computed tomographic (CT) scanning. RESULTS From October 2005 to March 2011, 163 ARRs were performed. Of these, 131 (80%) were isolated first time procedures (four in pregnant women), six were redo (4%), and in 26 (16%) ARR was combined with concomitant valve or coronary artery revascularization procedures. Median age was 63 years (range 19-84). Median cross-clamp and CPB times were 73 (range 69-87) and 86 minutes (range 85-126), respectively. There was one in-hospital death (mortality = 0.6%), one patient underwent resternotomy for bleeding, two required hemofiltration, and there were no strokes. Median hospital stay was 6 days (range 5-11). Median follow-up was 2.9 years (range 6 months-4.3 years) with 100% freedom from reoperation. There was no late distal ascending aorta/arch dilatation. There were two late deaths (1.2%) due to pneumonia and stroke. CONCLUSIONS High-volume surgery, with minimal use of hemostatic adjuncts and sustained follow-up, leads to excellent outcomes, with low morbidity and mortality following ARR.

A Survey of Cardiothoracic Surgical Training in the United Kingdom: Realities of a 6-Year Integrated Training Program

BACKGROUND In recent years, cardiothoracic (CT) surgical training has faced several challenges, including a reduction in working hours and trainees favoring shorter training programs. We carried out a national survey in the United Kingdom (UK) to assess the CT 6-year training program. METHODS All CT trainees in the UK (n = 121) were sent an online survey. This was combined with a debate at the Society for CT Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland. RESULTS Ninety-one (75.2%) of all trainees responded. Despite 56 (68.1%) being rostered for more than a 48-hour week, 31 (34.1%) of all trainees work an extra 10 hours. The majority (56, 61.5%) thought that on-calls and night duty are useful. Just over half of the trainees (47, 51.6%) spend at least 2 full days in the operating room, but 79 (86.8%) thought that this is too little and would spend voluntary time operating. Simulation of operations is thought to be useful; however, few thought that this should take more precedence in their training program. The majority of trainees thought that the current assessment of surgical training is suboptimal and does not examine surgical skill. Similarly, the majority thought that a defined number of operations is required before qualification. CONCLUSIONS Trainees remain committed to their profession and are willing to dedicate more time perfecting their art. They believe that despite wanting extra operating experience, they will be ready for independent practice at the completion of their training. It rests with training bodies to find alternative assessments for surgical ability and to define experience at the exit point of training.

Cardiac sarcoma presenting with abdominal pain and mimicking myxoma on echocardiogram

Cardiac sarcoma’s are highly aggressive tumours. Clear resection margins ± autotransplant, followed by chemotherapy, offers the best survival chance. Therefore, frozen section should be preformed when there is ambiguity in diagnosis.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a 38-year-old: stenting and/or surgery?

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is a rare but important differential diagnosis in fit young women presenting with chest pain.