Jeroen K. J. Deegens

Comparison of three methods for isolation of urinary microvesicles to identify biomarkers of nephrotic syndrome.

Urinary microvesicles, such as 40-100 nm exosomes and 100-1000 nm microparticles, contain many proteins that may serve as biomarkers of renal disease. Microvesicles have been isolated by ultracentrifugation or nanomembrane ultrafiltration from normal urine; however, little is known about the efficiency of these methods in isolating microvesicles from patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria. Here we compared three techniques to isolate microvesicles from nephrotic urine: nanomembrane ultrafiltration, ultracentrifugation, and ultracentrifugation followed by size-exclusion chromatography (UC-SEC). Highly abundant urinary proteins were still present in sufficient quantity after ultrafiltration or ultracentrifugation to blunt detection of less abundant microvesicular proteins by MALDI-TOF-TOF mass spectrometry. The microvesicular markers neprilysin, aquaporin-2, and podocalyxin were highly enriched following UC-SEC compared with preparations by ultrafiltration or ultracentrifugation alone. Electron microscopy of the UC-SEC fractions found microvesicles of varying size, compatible with the presence of both exosomes and microparticles. Thus, UC-SEC following ultracentrifugation to further enrich and purify microparticles facilitates the search for prognostic biomarkers that might be used to predict the clinical course of nephrotic syndrome.

Microfiltration isolation of human urinary exosomes for characterization by MS

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to address the hypothesis that small vesicular urinary particles known as exosomes could be selectively microfiltered using low protein‐binding size exclusion filters, thereby simplifying their use in clinical biomarker discovery studies.

The soluble urokinase receptor is not a clinical marker for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

The soluble urokinase receptor (suPAR) promotes proteinuria and induces focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)-like lesions in mice. A serum suPAR concentration cutoff of 3000 pg/ml has been proposed as a clinical biomarker for patients with FSGS. Interestingly, several studies in patients with glomerulopathy found an inverse correlation between the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and suPAR. As patients with FSGS present at different eGFRs, we studied the relationship between eGFR and suPAR in a cohort of 476 non-FSGS patients and 54 patients with biopsy-proven idiopathic FSGS. In the non-FSGS patients, eGFR was the strongest significant determinant of suPAR. The proposed cutoff for suPAR in FSGS patients was exceeded in 17%, 39%, and 88% in patients with eGFRs of more than 60, 45-60, and 30-45 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively. In patients with eGFR of <30 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), suPAR exceeded the cutoff in 95% of patients. Levels of suPAR in patients with idiopathic FSGS overlapped with non-FSGS controls and for any given eGFR did not discriminate FSGS cases from non-FSGS controls. In the overall cohort, there was a negative association between idiopathic FSGS and suPAR, and idiopathic FSGS was not an independent predictor of FSGS concentration over 3000 pg/ml. Thus, this study does not support an absolute, eGFR-independent, suPAR concentration cutoff as a biomarker for underlying FSGS pathology and questions the validity of relative, eGFR-dependent suPAR cutoff values.

Podocyte foot process effacement as a diagnostic tool in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.

Podocyte foot process effacement is characteristic of proteinuric renal diseases. In minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) foot processes are diffusely effaced whereas the extent of effacement varies in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Here we measured foot process effacement in FSGS and compared it to that in MCNS and in normal kidneys. A clinical diagnosis was used to differentiate idiopathic FSGS from secondary FSGS. Median foot process width, determined morphometrically by electron microscopy, was 3236 nm in 17 patients with idiopathic FSGS, 1098 nm in 7 patients with secondary FSGS, and 1725 nm in 15 patients with MCNS, as compared to 562 nm in 12 control patients. Multivariate analysis showed that foot process width did not correlate with proteinuria or serum albumin levels but was significantly associated as an independent factor with the type of disease. Foot process width over 1500 nm differentiated idiopathic from secondary FSGS with high sensitivity and specificity. Our results show that quantitative analysis of foot processes may offer a potential tool to distinguish idiopathic from secondary FSGS.

Serum suPAR in patients with FSGS: trash or treasure?

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) has important functions in cell migration. uPAR can be shed from the cell membrane resulting in soluble uPAR (suPAR). Further cleavage gives rise to shorter fragments with largely unknown functions. Recent studies have demonstrated that both overexpression of uPAR on podocytes and the administration of suPAR cause proteinuria in mice. The common pathogenic mechanism involves the activation of podocyte β3-integrin. Increased activation of β3-integrin is also observed in patients with focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). These observations form the basis for the hypothesis that suPAR may be the circulating factor causing FSGS. A recent study fosters this idea by demonstrating increased suPAR levels in the serum of patients with FSGS and reporting an association with recurrence after transplantation and response to plasmapheresis. However, this study was heavily biased, and subsequent studies have given conflicting results. Although the experimental work is very suggestive, at present there is no proof that any known human suPAR fragment causes FSGS in humans. We therefore suggest that the measurement of suPAR using currently available assays has absolutely no value at the present time in decision-making in routine clinical practice.

Permeability factors in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: historical perspectives and lessons for the future

The term idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (iNS) traditionally covers minimal change disease and primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), now thought to be separate disease entities. Clinical and experimental evidence suggest that circulating permeability factors are involved in their pathogenesis. In the past four decades, many investigators have searched for the responsible factors, thus far with little success. The recent report of the soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor as a causative factor in FSGS has received much attention, but again the initially promising findings were not confirmed. We describe the history of the search for permeability factors, discuss the pitfalls that are likely responsible for the lack of success and propose criteria that should be used in future studies when evaluating candidate permeability factors.

Urinary excretion of fatty acid-binding proteins in idiopathic membranous nephropathy

BACKGROUND It is suggested that proteinuria contributes to progressive renal failure by inducing tubular cell injury. The site of injury is unknown. Most studies have used markers of proximal tubular cell damage. Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are intracellular carrier proteins with different expression in the kidney. Liver-type FABP (L-FABP) is found in the cytoplasm of proximal tubules, whereas heart-type FABP (H-FABP) is localized in the distal tubules. We evaluated the urinary excretion of L-FABP and H-FABP in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN). METHODS We have studied 40 patients (27 males, 13 females) with iMN. The mean age was 48 +/- 15 years, serum creatinine concentration 89 +/- 17 micromol/l and proteinuria 8.9 +/- 5.0 g/24 h. Urinary L-FABP and H-FABP were measured by ELISA. Renal failure was defined as an increase in serum creatinine >25% from baseline with a serum creatinine >135 micromol/l or an increase >50% from baseline. Urinary L-FABP excretion was detectable in all but one patient. The median (range) level was 3.29 (0.7-165.6) microg/mmol creatinine (normal <0.38 microg/mmol Cr). Urinary H-FABP was undetectable in nine patients. Median level was 1.53 (0.1-90.5) microg/mmol Cr (normal <0.1 microg/mmol Cr). Both L- and H-FABP correlated with urinary beta2-microglobulin, urinary alpha1-microglobulin and IgG. Urinary H-FABP paralleled L-FABP. RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 75 +/- 32 months, 16 (40%) patients have reached the predefined end point of renal failure. Both urinary L-FABP and H-FABP predicted renal outcome, with the calculated sensitivity and specificity of 81 and 83% for both. CONCLUSIONS Urinary L-FABP and urinary H-FABP are increased in patients with iMN. There was a high correlation between L-FABP and H-FABP, suggesting the concurrent development or existence of proximal and distal tubular cell injury. Both L-FABP and H-FABP predicted prognosis in patients with iMN. These markers may be of interest as research tools; however, they are not superior to more conventional marker proteins.

Beta-2-microglobulin is superior to N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase in predicting prognosis in idiopathic membranous nephropathy

BACKGROUND An accurate prediction of prognosis in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) would allow restriction of immunosuppressive treatment to patients who are at highest risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Several markers of proximal tubular cell injury have been used as predictors of prognosis. In this study we compared the accuracy of urinary beta-2-microglobulin (U beta 2m) and N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase (U beta-NAG) in predicting renal insufficiency and remission rates. METHODS Fifty-seven patients with iMN (38 M, 19 F; age 48 +/- 16 years), a nephrotic syndrome and a serum creatinine level <135 micromol/l were studied prospectively. At baseline, a standardised measurement was carried out to determine renal function and protein excretion. The end-point renal failure was defined as a serum creatinine exceeding 135 micromol/l or an increase in serum creatinine by >50%. Remission was defined as a proteinuria <2.0 g/day with stable renal function. RESULTS The mean follow-up was 80 +/- 36 months. The mean serum creatinine concentration was 89 +/- 20 micromol/l, serum albumin 24 +/- 5.3 g/l and proteinuria 8.9 +/- 4.8 g/24 h. Thus far, 28 (49%) patients have reached the predefined end point of renal failure. Multivariate analysis identified U beta 2m as the strongest independent predictor for the development of renal insufficiency. Sensitivity and specificity were 81 and 90% respectively for U beta 2m (threshold value 54 microg/mmol cr), and 74 and 81% respectively for U beta-NAG (threshold value 2.64 U/mmol cr). The overall remission rate was 44%. A remission occurred in 78% of patients with low U beta 2m and in 14% of patients with high U beta 2m, and respectively in 71% of patients with low U beta-NAG and 21% of patients with high U beta-NAG. CONCLUSIONS Although both U beta 2m and U beta-NAG predicted progression and remission in iMN, U beta 2m was more accurate. High specificity in predicting prognosis should be pursued to avoid unnecessary immunosuppressive therapy. We therefore conclude that U beta 2m is superior to U beta-NAG in predicting prognosis in patients with iMN.

Minimal change disease and idiopathic FSGS: manifestations of the same disease

Minimal change disease (MCD) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are the key histological findings in patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). Although MCD and idiopathic FSGS are often considered to represent separate entities based on differences in their presenting characteristics, histology and outcomes, little evidence exists for this separation. We propose that MCD and idiopathic FSGS are different manifestations of the same progressive disease. The gradual development of FSGS in patients with non-remitting or relapsing INS has been well documented. Moreover, FSGS is the uniform result of substantial podocyte loss in animal models, and a common feature of virtually all progressive human glomerulopathies. As evidence suggests a common aetiology, the pathogenesis of MCD and idiopathic FSGS should be studied together. In clinical trials, idiopathic FSGS should be considered to represent an advanced stage of disease progression that is less likely to respond to treatment than the earlier stage of disease, which is usually defined as MCD.

Membranous nephropathy in the older adult: epidemiology, diagnosis and management.

Membranous nephropathy is the most important cause of the nephrotic syndrome in elderly patients (aged >65 years). The clinical presentation is similar in older and younger patients, although elderly patients more often present with renal failure. Notably, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is usually lower in the elderly due to the physiological decline in GFR after the age of 30 years. Secondary causes, especially malignancies, are more common in older patients with membranous nephropathy. Therefore, elderly patients should undergo a thorough examination to exclude a secondary cause. The prognosis of elderly patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy is not very different from that of younger patients. All elderly patients should receive symptomatic treatment aimed at reducing hypertension, oedema, proteinuria and hyperlipidaemia. It is recommended that elderly patients with a low serum albumin (<2 g/dL) receive prophylactic anticoagulation because of a high risk for thrombosis. Immunosuppressive therapy should be reserved for elderly patients at high risk of progression to end-stage renal disease because the elderly are particularly prone to the adverse effects and infectious complications of immunosuppressive therapy. High-risk elderly patients are characterised by renal insufficiency (GFR <45 mL/min/1.73m2), an increase in serum creatinine of >25% or a severe persistent nephrotic syndrome not responding to symptomatic treatment. In addition, elderly patients with a relatively normal GFR (≥45 mL/min/1.73m2) and high urinary excretion of β2-microglobulin and IgG are also at increased risk of developing end-stage renal disease; however, the deterioration in renal function is usually a slow process. Therefore, such patients benefit from immunosuppressive therapy only if their life expectancy is good. If immunosuppressive therapy is started, first-line treatment consists of prednisone and cyclophosphamide. If cyclophosphamide is contraindicated or fails to induce a remission, ciclosporin could be used. Treatment with ciclosporin should be limited to patients with a relatively normal renal function (GFR >60 mL/min/1.73m2) in view of its nephrotoxicity in patients with renal dysfunction.