Jerre Levy

Asymmetry of perception in free viewing of chimeric faces

We have devised a new free-vision task to index functional cerebral asymmetry for processing facial characteristics. Confirming its sensitivity to properties of lateralized hemispheric functions, left- and right-handers were clearly differentiated on this task with respect to several aspects of performance that conform with known differences between handedness groups in hemispheric asymmetry. Additionally, there were highly reliable and stable individual differences in perceptual asymmetries within handedness. Analyses of items in the task revealed that most of the differences between items in the asymmetries they elicited were random.

Are variations among right-handed individuals in perceptual asymmetries caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres?

We propose that much of the variance among right-handed subjects in perceptual asymmetries on standard behavioral measures of laterality arises from individual differences in characteristic patterns of asymmetric hemispheric arousal. Dextrals with large right-visual-field (RVF) advantages on a tachistoscopic syllable-identification task (assumed to reflect characteristically higher left-hemisphere than right-hemisphere arousal) outperformed those having weak or no visual-field asymmetries (assumed to reflect characteristically higher right-hemisphere than left-hemisphere arousal). The two groups were equal, however, in asymmetries of error patterns that are thought to indicate linguistic or nonlinguistic encoding strategies. For both groups, relations between visual fields in the ability to discriminate the accuracy of performance followed the pattern of syllable identification itself, suggesting that linguistic and metalinguistic processes are based on the same laterally specialized functions. Subjects with strong RVF advantages had a pessimistic bias for rating performance, and those with weak or no asymmetries had an optimistic bias, particularly for the left visual field (LVF). This is concordant with evidence that the arousal level of the right hemisphere is closely related to affective mood. Finally, consistent with the arousal model, leftward asymmetries on a free-vision face-processing task became larger as RVF advantages on the syllable task diminished and as optimistic biases for the LVF, relative to the RVF, increased.

Perception and expression of emotion in right-handers and left-handers

Abstract Photographs of facial composites, half the face smiling and the other half not smiling, were tachistoscopically presented to right-handed and left-handed subjects. Both handedness groups perceived faces as happier when it was the left side of the posers face that was smiling, and this held for both left- and right-handed posers. Additionally, right-handed, but not left-handed, subjects perceived faces as happier when the smiling half-face was in the left visual field.

Perceptual Asymmetries for Free Viewing of Several Types of Chimeric Stimuli

We examined perceptual biases of right-handers on six free-vision chimeric tasks; two involving a judgement of happiness of a facial expression in photographic and cartoon chimeras, two involving a judgement of femininity in male/female photographic and cartoon chimeras, and two involving a spatial judgement of nonface chimeric stimuli. All four of the face tasks and one of the nonface tasks elicited left spatial field biases of varying magnitudes, and perceptual asymmetries on all tasks were positively correlated. However, multiple correlational analyses revealed that these tests shared differing proportions of variance with each other. Results indicate that, in addition to a common factor or set of factors contributing to lateral biases that is independent of both the nature of the stimulus and whether the stimulus engages lateralized mechanisms, there are distinct lateralized mechanisms which yield different patterns of perceptual asymmetries for different stimuli.

Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: effects of stimulus and task factors.

Although neurotogical and physiological studies indicate a right hemisphere superiority in global processing and a left hemisphere superiority in local processing of Navon-type hierarchical letters (D. Navon, 1977), most investigations of lateralized perception in healthy participants report neither asymmetry. In 6 experiments the authors examined the influence of attentional demands, stimulus properties, and mode of response on perceptual asymmetries for global and local perception. Consistent with their theoretical predictions, asymmetries were more robust on divided- than focused-attention tasks and in response to stimuli in which local and global levels were equally salient compared with those with greater global than local saliency. Contrary to their prediction, perceptual asymmetries were not influenced by the complexity of the motor response.

Sex differences in the lateralized processing of facial emotion

Two reaction time tasks were administered to male and female normal subjects, involving judgments of facial emotion. In the Word-Face task, judgments of similarity or difference of a centrally presented emotion word and an emotional face presented in the left or right visual field were required, and in the Face-Face task, comparisons of a centrally presented and a laterally presented emotional face were required. Results were significant for the matching trials only. Reaction times to negative emotions were faster overall than to positive emotions, and an Emotional Valence by Visual Field interaction was found such that reaction times were faster for negative emotions in the left visual field and for positive emotions in the right visual field. This interaction was significant for the female but not the male subjects, although similar patterns were observed in both sexes. Further, an interaction of Gender, Task, and Emotional Valence was found, such that the two tasks had opposite effects for the two sexes. The Face-Face task appeared to inhibit the performance of the male subjects and facilitate the performance of the female subjects in terms of reaction time. It was suggested that specifying the target emotion by an emotional face elicits a greater emotional response on the part of the subject than specification by a word, and that this emotional elicitation may result in a reactive inhibition in the male subjects and in an elaboration of the emotional response in the female subjects.

Gender Differences in Human Neuropsychological Function

Scientific studies of sex differences in cognitive abilities have been stimulated by a long history of popular interest in psychological differences between men and women. According to Anastasi, when Samuel Johnson was asked whether men or women were more intelligent, he replied by asking, “Which man, which woman?” (p. 453, Anastasi, 1958). Johnson’s reply highlights the fact that for a very large number of cognitive capacities (e.g., vocabulary, verbal reasoning, the ability to recognize an object from incomplete parts), no consistent sex differences exist. For other cognitive characteristics, the average difference between sexes is very small compared to within-gender variations. As Anastasi (1958) says, “Owing to the large extent of individual differences within any one group as contrasted to the relatively small difference between group averages, an individual’s membership in a given group furnishes little or no information about his status in most traits” (p. 453).

Interhemispheric Cooperation: Left Is Left and Right Is Right, but Sometimes the Twain Shall Meet

Interhemispheric cooperation in the processing of nonsense syllables projected simultaneously to both hemispheres was investigated in 2 experiments. Stimuli were projected unilaterally in the left and right visual fields (LVF, RVF) and bilaterally (the same syllable in both fields, BVF; Experiment 1, 64 right-handed subjects) or centrally (CVF; Experiment 2, 32 right-handed subjects). Accuracy and error patterns differed for the LVF and RVF. Error patterns were intermediate for the BVF-CVF and were partly shifted toward the RVF for subjects with large RVF advantages and toward the LVF for those with small asymmetries. Regression analyses showed that variance in BVF-CVF error patterns was jointly predicted by LVF and RVF variances. Both hemispheres, as demonstrated by means and regression analyses, contribute to the processing of bihemispherically presented syllables. In focusing on the functional differences of the two halves of the human brain, investigators sometimes lose sight of the fact that both hemispheres contribute to and collaborate in producing most behaviors. Some of the central questions regarding interhemispheric integration are as follows: Do the functionally distinct cerebral hemispheres share the processing load? If they do, under what conditions? What kinds of information and tasks are processed cooperatively, and when is information shared? Studies of interhemisphe ric collaboration have investigated the speed with which two stimuli, presented in the same or opposite visual fields, can be compared. This design can yield information on the efficiency of intra- versus interhemispheric processing because bihemispheric integration must occur when the two stimuli to be compared are presented in opposite visual fields (crossed-field condition) but is not necessary when stimulus pairs are presented in the same visual field (within-field condition). Processing load is spread more evenly across the hemispheres on crossed-field trials, which may result in a processing advantage. This has

Perceptual asymmetries in left- and right-handers for cartoon and real faces

We examined 40 left-handers and 40 right-handers on two free-vision tests of face processing. A chimeric face composed of a smiling half-face joined to either a neutral half-face (real faces) or a sad half-face (cartoon faces) and its mirror image were presented on each trial. Subjects judged which chimeric face looked happier, the one with the smile to the left or the one with the smile to the right. Right-handers, but not left-handers, had a highly significant leftward attentional bias, since chimeras with the smile to the left were judged happier than those with the smile to the right. The cartoon- and real-face tasks did not differ in the mean perceptual asymmetries they elicited. However, correlations between attentional-asymmetry scores for the two tasks, although high for both left- and right-handers, were significantly smaller than task reliabilities. Thus, the cartoon- and real-face tasks overlap to a major extent in the lateralized processes they measure, but to a lesser extent, they also index different lateralized processes.

Neural Correlates of the Left-Visual-Field Superiority in Face Perception Appear at Multiple Stages of Face Processing

Studies in healthy individuals and split-brain patients have shown that the representation of facial information from the left visual field (LVF) is better than the representation of facial information from the right visual field (RVF). To investigate the neurophysiological basis of this LVF superiority in face perception, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) to centrally presented face stimuli in which relevant facial information is present bilaterally (B faces) or only in the left (L faces) or the right (R faces) visual field. Behavioral findings showed best performance for B faces and, in line with the LVF superiority, better performance for L than R faces. Evoked potentials to B, L, and R faces at 100 to 150-msec poststimulus showed no evidence of asymmetric transfer of information between the hemispheres at early stages of visual processing, suggesting that this factor is not responsible for the LVF superiority. Neural correlates of the LVF superiority, however, were manifested in a shorter latency of the face-specific N170 component to L than R faces and in a larger amplitude to L than R faces at 220280 and 400600 msec over both hemispheres. These ERP amplitude differences between L and R faces covaried across subjects with the extent to which the face-specific N170 component was larger over the right than the left hemisphere. We conclude that the two hemispheres exchange information symmetrically at early stages of face processing and together generate a shared facial representation, which is better when facial information is directly presented to the right hemisphere (RH; L faces) than to the left hemisphere (LH; R faces) and best when both hemispheres receive facial information (B faces).