Jesper Durup

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic esophagitis in infants and children. A study of esophageal pH, multiple intraluminal impedance and endoscopic ultrasound.

Abstract Objective. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in childhood share aspects of symptomatology. In order to characterize EE and GERD in infants and children with symptoms of GERD we performed a prospective investigation including prolonged esophageal pH measurement, multiple intraluminal impedance (MII) and esophageal wall estimation by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Material and methods. Infants and children (0–15 years) with typical symptoms of GERD persisting after a 14-days proton pump inhibitor trial were included in a prospective study protocol. Upper endoscopy and EUS of the esophageal wall were performed followed by combined esophageal MII and pH measurement for 24 h. Results. A total of 78 infants and children were investigated: EE patients (n = 6), GERD patients (n = 28) and a group of infants and children with normal investigations (n = 44). The GERD group did not show a significantly higher number of non-acid reflux episodes (p = 0.9) than the patients with normal investigations. In all patients gastroesophageal reflux regularly extended into the proximal esophagus. EUS in four EE patients suggested an increased thickness of the mucosal layers both in the distal and in the proximal part of the esophagus. Conclusions. Esophageal MII indicated that neutral non-acid reflux episodes do not occur frequently in pediatric GERD or in EE. MII and pH-metry indicated that the majority of reflux episodes both in patients and controls pass into the proximal esophagus. EUS measurements suggested in EE patients a thickened mucosa both in the proximal and the distal part of the esophagus as compared to children with GERD and disease controls.

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease.

Background: It is not known whether initial endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is more cost effective than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Methods: A cost‐effectiveness analysis of EUS, MRCP and ERCP was performed on 163 patients. The effectiveness of an investigation was defined as the percentage of patients with no need for further evaluation after the investigation in question had been performed. Costs were assumed from the budget‐holders point of view. Results: MRCP, EUS and ERCP had a total accuracy of 0.91, 0.93 and 0.92, respectively. Eighty‐four (52%) patients needed endoscopic therapy in combination with ERCP, giving an effectiveness of MRCP, EUS, and ERCP of 0.44, 0.45 and 0.92, respectively. The cost‐effectiveness of MRCP, EUS, and ERCP was 6622, 7353 and 4246 Danish Kroner (DKK) per fully investigated and treated patient (1 DKK = 0.14 EUR). Conclusion: Within a patient population with a probability of therapeutic ERCP in 50% of the patients, ERCP was the most cost‐effective strategy.

Impact of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound in children

The impact and feasibility of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in younger children are unknown. We retrospectively reviewed the EUS procedures we had performed in children younger than 16 years with regard to feasibility, safety, and impact on further treatment. In all, 18 patients (12 boys, 6 girls; median age 12 years, range 0.5–15) underwent EUS. The indications were as follows: tumor (9), epigastric pain (3), recurrent pancreatitis (2), unexplained jaundice (2), hypoglycemia (1), and von Hippel-Lindau disease (1). We concluded that EUS had a significant impact in 78% of the cases. EUS seems to be a safe, feasible, and valuable diagnostic tool.

Combined endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasound as preoperative assessment of patients with pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND An accurate pre-therapeutic assessment of the resectability in pancreatic cancer patients is essential to reduce the number of futile surgical explorations. The aim of this study was to assess the combination of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) regarding the detection of patients with non-resectable tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 2002 to 2004, 179 consecutive patients with pancreatic cancer referred for surgical treatment were eligible. Thirty-one (17%) patients were excluded due to co-morbidity and poor performance status. Two patients (1%) were excluded due to metastasis seen on CT scans prior to referral. Thus, 146 patients entered the study. Patients were first examined with EUS followed by LUS, if EUS found no signs of non-resectability. Only patients with tumours found to be resectable or possibly resectable at EUS and LUS were offered surgical treatment. Resectability criteria were defined prior to the study. RESULTS In all, 108 (74%) patients had non-resectable tumours by the pre-defined criteria. EUS identified 68 (63%) patients and LUS identified an additional 26 (24%) patients. Thus, a total of 94 (87%) patients were non-resectable at either EUS or LUS. Fifty-two (36%) patients underwent surgery. Six patients had surgical exploration and three patients had palliative surgery. Forty-three patients (29%) were resected with curative intention, of whom 38 (88%) had an R0 resection and 5 (12%) had a palliative resection. DISCUSSION The combination of EUS and LUS is accurate in identifying the non-resectable patients and has a high predictive value for complete resection.

A new method for three-dimensional laparoscopic ultrasound model reconstruction

BackgroundLaparoscopic ultrasound is an important modality in the staging of gastrointestinal tumors. Correct staging depends on good spatial understanding of the regional tumor infiltration. Three-dimensional (3D) models may facilitate the evaluation of tumor infiltration. The aim of the study was to perform a volumetric test and a clinical feasibility test of a new 3D method using standard laparoscopic ultrasound equipment.MethodsThree-dimensional models were reconstructed from a series of two-dimensional ultrasound images using either electromagnetic tracking or a new 3D method. The volumetric accuracy of the new method was tested ex vivo, and the clinical feasibility was tested on a small series of patients.ResultsBoth electromagnetic tracked reconstructions and the new 3D method gave good volumetric information with no significant difference. Clinical use of the new 3D method showed accurate models comparable to findings at surgery and pathology.ConclusionsThe use of the new 3D method is technically feasible, and its volumetrically, accurate compared to 3D with electromagnetic tracking.

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected for pancreaticobiliary disease

BACKGROUND It is not known whether initial endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is more cost effective than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis of EUS, MRCP and ERCP was performed on 163 patients. The effectiveness of an investigation was defined as the percentage of patients with no need for further evaluation after the investigation in question had been performed. Costs were assumed from the budget-holders point of view. RESULTS MRCP, EUS and ERCP had a total accuracy of 0.91, 0.93 and 0.92, respectively. Eighty-four (52%) patients needed endoscopic therapy in combination with ERCP, giving an effectiveness of MRCP, EUS, and ERCP of 0.44, 0.45 and 0.92, respectively. The cost-effectiveness of MRCP, EUS, and ERCP was 6622, 7353 and 4246 Danish Kroner (DKK) per fully investigated and treated patient (1 DKK=0.14 EUR). CONCLUSION Within a patient population with a probability of therapeutic ERCP in 50% of the patients, ERCP was the most cost-effective strategy.