Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jesper Sjöström is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jesper Sjöström.


Archive | 2018

Reconsidering Different Visions of Scientific Literacy and Science Education Based on the Concept of Bildung

Jesper Sjöström; Ingo Eilks

Over the last 50 years, policy makers and STEM educators have argued for Scientific Literacy (SL). SL is a typical boundary object that everyone can agree on, but that is filled with different meanings by different stakeholders. Roberts (as published in Abell SK, Lederman NG (eds), Handbook of research on science education. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp. 729–780, 2007) has identified two main orientations of SL: Vision I starts from and focuses on scientific content and scientific processes to learn about corresponding applications later, while Vision II focuses on contextualizing scientific knowledge for giving its use in life and society meaning. The tension between Vision I and II can also be related to the tension between “pipeline science – preparing future scientists” and “science for all”. Recently, a more advanced vision of SL was suggested. It is called Vision III and emphasizes philosophical values, politicization and critical global citizenship education. Such an orientation can be well justified by the Central/Northern European educational and cultural tradition called Bildung. In its most contemporary understanding, it is agency-oriented. Bildung-oriented science education aims at making the student capable of a self-determined life in his/her socio-cultural environment, participation in a democratic society, and of empathy and solidarity with others. This concept is also closely connected to more recent educational paradigms that were defined also beyond Europe, e.g. the ideas of Education for Sustainability (EfS) and transformative learning. Both concepts aim on skills development for critical-democratic participation and for shaping our society and culture in a sustainable way. The different visions of SL have consequences for the content and culture of teaching and learning of science and technology. Accepting Vision III requires awareness that our view of selecting and teaching certain content is dependent on our culture, for example our norms, values and worldviews, and on the society we are living in. Learning (cognition) must be complemented with not only meta-learning (metacognition), but also transformative learning, where things are considered from multifaceted (e.g., cultural) perspectives. The discussion in this chapter focuses on educational implications of Vision III of SL and its connection to critical-reflexive Bildung, EfS and transformative learning.


Relevant Chemistry Education : from theory to practice | 2015

Chemistry education for sustainability

Jesper Sjöström; Franz Rauch; Ingo Eilks

Since the report Our Common Future, published by the United Nations in 1987, sustainable development has become one of the most frequently used key-terms in political debate.


Studies in Science Education | 2017

Use of the Concept of "Bildung" in the International Science Education Literature, Its Potential, and Implications for Teaching and Learning.

Jesper Sjöström; Nadja Frerichs; Vânia Gomes Zuin; Ingo Eilks

Abstract Bildung is a complex educational concept that emerged in Germany in the mid eighteenth century. Especially in Germany and Scandinavia conceptions of Bildung became the general philosophical framework to guide both formal and informal education. Bildung concerns the whole range of education from setting educational objectives in general towards its particular operation in different school subjects, among them science education. In more recent years, the concept of Bildung has slowly begun to be used in the international science and environmental education literature. This paper presents a systematic analysis of the international literature concerning the use of the concept of Bildung, with a view on its meaning in and for science education. At least five versions based on or closely connected to the tradition of Bildung can be identified: (a) Von Humboldt’s classical Bildung, (b) Anglo-American liberal education, (c) Scandinavian folk-Bildung, (d) democratic education, and (e) critical-hermeneutic Bildung. These different understandings of Bildung are discussed in relation to their historical roots, educational theory, critique, and their relation to philosophies of science education, such as different visions of scientific literacy. Based on critical-hermeneutic Bildung, the paper theoretically develops views of critical-reflexive Bildung as an educational metatheory. It is connected to ideas of transformative learning, sustainability education and a Vision III of scientific literacy. Finally, some implications of critical-reflexive Bildung for teaching and learning are discussed.


Science Education | 2013

Towards Bildung-Oriented Chemistry Education

Jesper Sjöström


Archive | 2007

The Discourse of Chemistry (and Beyond)

Jesper Sjöström


Journal of Chemical Education | 2014

Humanizing Chemistry Education: From Simple Contextualization to Multifaceted Problematization

Jesper Sjöström; Vicente Talanquer


Science Education | 2016

Towards Eco-Reflexive Science Education : A Critical Reflection About Educational Implications of Green Chemistry

Jesper Sjöström; Ingo Eilks; Vânia Gomes Zuin


Chemistry Education Research and Practice | 2014

Chemistry in context: analysis of thematic chemistry videos available online

Camilla Christensson; Jesper Sjöström


Archive | 2014

Teaching and learning for critical scientific literacy : communicating knowledge uncertainties, actors interplay and various discourses about chemicals

Jesper Sjöström; Emelie Stenborg


Science Education | 2013

Eco-Driven Chemical Research in the Boundary Between Academia and Industry

Jesper Sjöström

Collaboration


Dive into the Jesper Sjöström's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vânia Gomes Zuin

Federal University of São Carlos

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lena Hansson

Kristianstad University College

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Avi Hofstein

Weizmann Institute of Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge