Jesse Habets

Diagnostic Accuracy of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve Meta-Analysis

Background—Hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease is an important indication for revascularization. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging is a noninvasive alternative to invasive fractional flow reserve for evaluating hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. The aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging by single-photon emission computed tomography, echocardiography, MRI, positron emission tomography, and computed tomography compared with invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Methods and Results—The meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched until May 2014. Thirty-seven studies, reporting on 4721 vessels and 2048 patients, were included. Meta-analysis yielded pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, pooled likelihood ratios (LR), pooled diagnostic odds ratio, and summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The negative LR (NLR) was chosen as the primary outcome. At the vessel level, MRI (pooled NLR, 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13–0.21) was performed similar to computed tomography (pooled NLR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12–0.39) and positron emission tomography (pooled NLR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05–0.44), and better than single-photon emission computed tomography (pooled NLR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37–0.59). At the patient level, MRI (pooled NLR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.10–0.18) performed similar to computed tomography (pooled NLR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04–0.33) and positron emission tomography (pooled NLR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02–0.87), and better than single-photon emission computed tomography (pooled NLR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27–0.55) and echocardiography (pooled NLR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.30–0.59). Conclusions—Stress myocardial perfusion imaging with MRI, computed tomography, or positron emission tomography can accurately rule out hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease and can act as a gatekeeper for invasive revascularization. Single-photon emission computed tomography and echocardiography are less suited for this purpose.

Prosthetic heart valve assessment with multidetector-row CT: imaging characteristics of 91 valves in 83 patients

ObjectivesMultidetector CT (MDCT) has shown potential for prosthetic heart valve (PHV) assessment. We assessed the image quality of different PHV types to determine which valves are suitable for MDCT evaluation.MethodsAll ECG-gated CTs performed in our institutions since 2003 were reviewed for the presence of PHVs. After reconstruction in 3 specific PHV planes, image quality of the supravalvular, perivalvular, subvalvular and valvular regions was scored on a four-point scale (1 = non-diagnostic, 2 = moderate, 3 = good and 4 = excellent) by two independent observers.ResultsEighty-four CT examinations (66 cardiac, 18 limited-dose aortic protocols) of 83 patients with a total of 91 PHVs in the aortic (n = 71), mitral (n = 17), pulmonary (n = 1) and tricuspid (n = 2) position were included. CT was performed on a 16-slice (n = 4), 64-slice (n = 28) or 256-slice (n = 52) MDCT system. Median image quality scores for the supra-, peri- and subvalvular regions and valvular detail were (3.5, 3.3, 3.5 and 3.5, respectively) for bileaflet PHV; (3.0, 3.0, 3.5 and 3.0, respectively) for Medtronic Hall PHV; (1.0, 1.0, 1.0 and 1.0, respectively) for Björk-Shiley and Sorin monoleaflet PHV and (3.5, 3.5, 4.0 and 2.0 respectively) for biological PHV.ConclusionCurrently implanted PHVs have good image quality on MDCT and are suitable for MDCT evaluation.

Multidetector CT Angiography in Evaluation of Prosthetic Heart Valve Dysfunction

Prosthetic heart valves (PHVs) are commonly implanted to replace diseased native heart valves. PHV dysfunction is an infrequent but potentially life-threatening condition. In daily clinical practice, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and fluoroscopy are the imaging modalities used for diagnostic evaluation of suspected PHV dysfunction. These modalities may not allow determination of the cause of PHV dysfunction, mostly because of acoustic shadowing. Multidetector computed tomographic (CT) angiography is a promising complementary technique for evaluation of PHVs, especially in patients with PHV obstruction and endocarditis. The CT image quality of PHVs mainly depends on their composition, with most causing only limited artifacts. Retrospectively electrocardiographically gated acquisition is advisable for PHV imaging because it enables dynamic leaflet evaluation and anatomic assessment in both systole and diastole. For accurate image interpretation, dedicated reconstruction in plane with and perpendicular to the PHV leaflets is mandatory. Besides PHV assessment, CT also provides information on the coronary arteries, the location and patency of bypass grafts, the dimensions of the aorta, and the distance between the sternum and right ventricle, information valuable for planning repeat surgery. To achieve the optimal diagnostic yield in PHV imaging, multidisciplinary cooperation between the departments of cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery, and radiology is crucial.

CT Angiography and 18F-FDG-PET Fusion Imaging for Prosthetic Heart Valve Endocarditis

IN PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE (PHV) ENDOCARDITIS, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) may occasionally fail to recognize vegetations and periannular extensions (abscesses/mycotic aneurysms) due to acoustic shadowing by the metal PHV ring [(1)][1]. In

Differentiation of thrombus from pannus as the cause of acquired mechanical prosthetic heart valve obstruction by non-invasive imaging: a review of the literature

AIMS For acquired mechanical prosthetic heart valve (PHV) obstruction and suspicion on thrombosis, recently updated European Society of Cardiology guidelines advocate the confirmation of thrombus by transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and fluoroscopy. However, no evidence-based diagnostic algorithm is available for correct thrombus detection, although this is clinically important as fibrinolysis is contraindicated in non-thrombotic obstruction (isolated pannus). Here, we performed a review of the literature in order to propose a diagnostic algorithm. METHODS AND RESULTS We performed a systematic search in Pubmed and Embase. Included publications were assessed on methodological quality based on the validated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) II checklist. Studies were scarce (n = 15) and the majority were of moderate methodological quality. In total, 238 mechanical PHVs with acquired obstruction and a reliable reference standard were included for the evaluation of the role of fluoroscopy, echocardiography, or multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT). In acquired PHV obstruction caused by thrombosis, mass detection by TEE and leaflet restriction detected by fluoroscopy were observed in the majority of cases (96 and 100%, respectively). In contrast, in acquired PHV obstruction free of thrombosis (pannus), leaflet restriction detected by fluoroscopy was absent in some cases (17%) and mass detection by TEE was absent in the majority of cases (66%). In case of mass detection by TEE, predictors for obstructive thrombus masses (compared with pannus masses) were leaflet restriction, soft echo density, and increased mass length. In situations of inconclusive echocardiography, MDCT may correctly detect pannus/thrombus based on the morphological aspects and localization. CONCLUSION In acquired mechanical PHV obstruction without leaflet restriction and absent mass on TEE, obstructive PHV thrombosis cannot be confirmed and consequently, fibrinolysis is not advised. Based on the literature search and our opinion, a diagnostic algorithm is provided to correctly identify non-thrombotic PHV obstruction, which is highly relevant in daily clinical practice.

Coronary artery assessment by multidetector computed tomography in patients with prosthetic heart valves

AbstractObjectivesPatients with prosthetic heart valves may require assessment for coronary artery disease. We assessed whether valve artefacts hamper coronary artery assessment by multidetector CT.MethodsECG-gated or -triggered CT angiograms were selected from our PACS archive based on the presence of prosthetic heart valves. The best systolic and diastolic axial reconstructions were selected for coronary assessment. Each present coronary segment was scored for the presence of valve-related artefacts prohibiting coronary artery assessment. Scoring was performed in consensus by two observers.ResultsEighty-two CT angiograms were performed on a 64-slice (n = 27) or 256-slice (n = 55) multidetector CT. Eighty-nine valves and five annuloplasty rings were present. Forty-three out of 1160 (3.7%) present coronary artery segments were non-diagnostic due to valve artefacts (14/82 patients). Valve artefacts were located in right coronary artery (15/43; 35%), left anterior descending artery (2/43; 5%), circumflex artery (14/43; 32%) and marginal obtuse (12/43; 28%) segments. All cobalt-chrome containing valves caused artefacts prohibiting coronary assessment. Biological and titanium-containing valves did not cause artefacts except for three specific valve types.ConclusionsMost commonly implanted prosthetic heart valves do not hamper coronary assessment on multidetector CT. Cobalt-chrome containing prosthetic heart valves preclude complete coronary artery assessment because of severe valve artefacts.Key Points• Most commonly implanted prosthetic heart valves do not hamper coronary artery assessment • Prosthetic heart valve composition determines the occurrence of prosthetic heart valve-related artefacts • Björk–Shiley and Sorin tilting disc valves preclude diagnostic coronary artery segment assessment

Imaging of Prosthetic Heart Valve Dysfunction: Complementary Diagnostic Value of TEE and MDCT?

prosthetic heart valves are increasingly implanted worldwide to replace diseased native valves. Prosthetic heart valve (PHV) dysfunction is rare but potentially life-threatening. In clinical practice, transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography, and fluoroscopy for mechanical

CT attenuation measurements are valuable to discriminate pledgets used in prosthetic heart valve implantation from paravalvular leakage

OBJECTIVES Sutures with polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) felt pledgets are commonly used in prosthetic heart valve (PHV) implantation. Paravalvular leakage can be difficult to distinguish from PTFE felt pledgets on multislice CT because both present as hyperdense structures. We assessed whether pledgets can be discriminated from contrast-enhanced solutions (blood/saline) on CT images based on attenuation difference in an ex vivo experiment and under in vivo conditions. METHODS PTFE felt pledgets were sutured to the suture ring of a mechanical PHV and porcine aortic annulus, and immersed and scanned in four different contrast-enhanced (Ultravist®; 300 mg jopromide ml(-1)) saline concentrations (10.0, 12.0, 13.6 and 15.0 mg ml(-1)). Scanning was performed on a 256-slice scanner with eight different scan protocols with various tube voltage (100 kV, 120 kV) and tube current (400 mAs, 600 mAs, 800 mAs, 1000 mAs) settings. Attenuation of the pledgets and surrounding contrast-enhanced saline were measured. Additionally, the attenuation of pledgets and contrast-enhanced blood was measured on electrocardiography (ECG)-gated CTA scans of 19 patients with 22 PHVs. RESULTS Ex vivo CT attenuation differences between the pledgets and contrast-enhanced solutions were larger by using higher tube voltages. CT attenuation values of the pledgets were higher than contrast-enhanced blood in patients: 420±26 Hounsfield units (mean±SD, range 383-494) and 288±41 Hounsfield units (range 202-367), respectively. CONCLUSIONS PTFE felt pledgets have consistently higher attenuation than surrounding contrast-enhanced blood. CT attenuation measurements therefore may help to differentiate pledgets from paravalvular leakage, and detect paravalvular leakage in patients with suspected PHV dysfunction.

Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis

Please cite this article as: Tanis W, Scholtens A, Habets J, van den Brink RBA, van Herwerden LA, Chamuleau SAJ, Budde RPJ, Letter to the editor: Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: Increased Valvular 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake as a Novel Major Criterion, Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2013), doi: 10.1016/ j.jacc.2013.06.069.

An 8-channel Tx/Rx dipole array combined with 16 Rx loops for high-resolution functional cardiac imaging at 7 T

ObjectiveTo demonstrate imaging performance for cardiac MR imaging at 7 T using a coil array of 8 transmit/receive dipole antennas and 16 receive loops.Materials and methodsAn 8-channel dipole array was extended by adding 16 receive-only loops. Average power constraints were determined by electromagnetic simulations. Cine imaging was performed on eight healthy subjects. Geometrical factor (g-factor) maps were calculated to assess acceleration performance. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)-scaled images were reconstructed for different combinations of receive channels, to demonstrate the SNR benefits of combining loops and dipoles.ResultsThe overall image quality of the cardiac functional images was rated a 2.6 on a 4-point scale by two experienced radiologists. Imaging results at different acceleration factors demonstrate that acceleration factors up to 6 could be obtained while keeping the average g-factor below 1.27. SNR maps demonstrate that combining loops and dipoles provides a more than 50% enhancement of the SNR in the heart, compared to a situation where only loops or dipoles are used.ConclusionThis work demonstrates the performance of a combined loop/dipole array for cardiac imaging at 7 T. With this array, acceleration factors of 6 are possible without increasing the average g-factor in the heart beyond 1.27. Combining loops and dipoles in receive mode enhances the SNR compared to receiving with loops or dipoles only.