Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jessica D. Petersen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jessica D. Petersen.


Journal of Applied Ecology | 2015

Trait matching of flower visitors and crops predicts fruit set better than trait diversity

Lucas A. Garibaldi; Ignasi Bartomeus; Riccardo Bommarco; Alexandra M. Klein; Saul A. Cunningham; Marcelo A. Aizen; Virginie Boreux; Michael P. D. Garratt; Luísa G. Carvalheiro; Claire Kremen; Carolina L. Morales; Christof Schüepp; Natacha P. Chacoff; Breno Magalhães Freitas; Vesna Gagic; Andrea Holzschuh; Björn K. Klatt; Kristin M. Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Margaret M. Mayfield; Iris Motzke; Mark Otieno; Jessica D. Petersen; Simon G. Potts; Taylor H. Ricketts; Maj Rundlöf; Amber R. Sciligo; Palatty Allesh Sinu; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Hisatomo Taki

Understanding the relationships between trait diversity, species diversity and ecosystem functioning is essential for sustainable management. For functions comprising two trophic levels, trait matching between interacting partners should also drive functioning. However, the predictive ability of trait diversity and matching is unclear for most functions, particularly for crop pollination, where interacting partners did not necessarily co-evolve. World-wide, we collected data on traits of flower visitors and crops, visitation rates to crop flowers per insect species and fruit set in 469 fields of 33 crop systems. Through hierarchical mixed-effects models, we tested whether flower visitor trait diversity and/or trait matching between flower visitors and crops improve the prediction of crop fruit set (functioning) beyond flower visitor species diversity and abundance. Flower visitor trait diversity was positively related to fruit set, but surprisingly did not explain more variation than flower visitor species diversity. The best prediction of fruit set was obtained by matching traits of flower visitors (body size and mouthpart length) and crops (nectar accessibility of flowers) in addition to flower visitor abundance, species richness and species evenness. Fruit set increased with species richness, and more so in assemblages with high evenness, indicating that additional species of flower visitors contribute more to crop pollination when species abundances are similar.Synthesis and applications. Despite contrasting floral traits for crops world-wide, only the abundance of a few pollinator species is commonly managed for greater yield. Our results suggest that the identification and enhancement of pollinator species with traits matching those of the focal crop, as well as the enhancement of pollinator richness and evenness, will increase crop yield beyond current practices. Furthermore, we show that field practitioners can predict and manage agroecosystems for pollination services based on knowledge of just a few traits that are known for a wide range of flower visitor species. Despite contrasting floral traits for crops world-wide, only the abundance of a few pollinator species is commonly managed for greater yield. Our results suggest that the identification and enhancement of pollinator species with traits matching those of the focal crop, as well as the enhancement of pollinator richness and evenness, will increase crop yield beyond current practices. Furthermore, we show that field practitioners can predict and manage agroecosystems for pollination services based on knowledge of just a few traits that are known for a wide range of flower visitor species. Editors Choice


Journal of Applied Ecology | 2014

Landscape diversity moderates the effects of bee visitation frequency to flowers on crop production

Jessica D. Petersen; Brian A. Nault

Summary Reductions in natural habitat are implicated in declining honeybee Apis mellifera L. and wild bee populations, thereby threatening crop production. This concern has stimulated interest in identifying landscape-level impacts on bee-mediated pollination services, but previous studies have only inferred connections between landscape, bees and yield through generalized linear regressions. We examined landscape impacts on bee-mediated crop yield using both a traditional linear regression approach and conditional process modelling, which combined landscape features, bee visits to crop flowers, and the interactions between landscape and bee visits to flowers into a single model predicting crop yield. We used the pumpkin Cucurbita pepo L. system in New York State and recorded bees visiting pumpkin flowers in 2011 and 2012. Landscape diversity and percentage of semi-natural grassland around each pumpkin field were calculated. Results from the traditional approach indicated that landscape diversity, percentage of grassland in the landscape, bumblebee Bombus impatiens Cresson and honeybee visitation frequency each positively predicted yield. A common conclusion from these results is that pumpkins grown in highly diverse or high grassland coverage landscapes would have greater yields via bumblebee and honeybee visits to flowers. However, this inference does not preclude the possibility that landscape features may be associated with crop yield, independent of bee visits to flowers. Results from conditional process modelling indicated that only pumpkins grown in highly diverse landscapes were predicted to have greater yields as a consequence of more bumblebee visits to pumpkin flowers. None of the landscape features predicted greater fruit yields as a consequence of more honeybee visits to pumpkin flowers. This novel analysis indicated that traditional approaches may be misinterpreting the relationships between these variables. Synthesis and applications. Bumblebees benefited from a diverse landscape, and their visits to flowers positively impacted pumpkin production. Conservation of a diverse landscape should be promoted to support improved pumpkin production. Growers can use this information to decide where to plant pumpkins to improve the potential for high yields, to identify scenarios where landscape diversity could be increased, and where supplementation with bees might be beneficial.


PLOS ONE | 2013

Pollination services provided by bees in pumpkin fields supplemented with either Apis mellifera or Bombus impatiens or not supplemented.

Jessica D. Petersen; Stephen Reiners; Brian A. Nault

Pollinators provide an important service in many crops. Managed honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) are used to supplement pollination services provided by wild bees with the assumption that they will enhance pollination, fruit set and crop yield beyond the levels provided by the wild bees. Recent declines in managed honey bee populations have stimulated interest in finding alternative managed pollinators to service crops. In the eastern U.S., managed hives of the native common eastern bumble bee (Bombus impatiens Cresson) may be an excellent choice. To examine this issue, a comprehensive 2-yr study was conducted to compare fruit yield and bee visits to flowers in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) fields that were either supplemented with A. mellifera hives, B. impatiens hives or were not supplemented. We compared pumpkin yield, A. mellifera flower visitation frequency and B. impatiens flower visitation frequency between treatments. Results indicated that supplementing pumpkin fields with either A. mellifera or B. impatiens hives did not increase their visitation to pumpkin flowers or fruit yield compared with those that were not supplemented. Next, the relationship between frequency of pumpkin flower visitation by the most prominent bee species (Peponapis pruinosa (Say), B. impatiens and A. mellifera) and fruit yield was determined across all pumpkin fields sampled. Fruit yield increased as the frequency of flower visits by A. mellifera and B. impatiens increased in 2011 and 2012, respectively. These results suggest that supplementation with managed bees may not improve pumpkin production and that A. mellifera and B. impatiens are important pollinators of pumpkin in our system.


PLOS ONE | 2015

Spatial and Temporal Potato Intensification Drives Insecticide Resistance in the Specialist Herbivore, Leptinotarsa decemlineata.

Anders S. Huseth; Jessica D. Petersen; Katja Poveda; Zsofia Szendrei; Brian A. Nault; George G. Kennedy; Russell L. Groves

Landscape-scale intensification of individual crops and pesticide use that is associated with this intensification is an emerging, environmental problem that is expected to have unequal effects on pests with different lifecycles, host ranges, and dispersal abilities. We investigate if intensification of a single crop in an agroecosystem has a direct effect on insecticide resistance in a specialist insect herbivore. Using a major potato pest, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, we measured imidacloprid (neonicotinoid) resistance in populations across a spatiotemporal crop production gradient where potato production has increased in Michigan and Wisconsin, USA. We found that concurrent estimates of area and temporal frequency of potato production better described patterns of imidacloprid resistance among L. decemlineata populations than general measures of agricultural production (% cropland, landscape diversity). This study defines the effects individual crop rotation patterns can have on specialist herbivore insecticide resistance in an agroecosystem context, and how impacts of intensive production can be estimated with general estimates of insecticide use. Our results provide empirical evidence that variation in the intensity of neonicotinoid-treated potato in an agricultural landscape can have unequal impacts on L. decemlineata insecticide insensitivity, a process that can lead to resistance and locally intensive insecticide use. Our study provides a novel approach applicable in other agricultural systems to estimate impacts of crop rotation, increased pesticide dependence, insecticide resistance, and external costs of pest management practices on ecosystem health.


Biocontrol | 2014

Relationships between insect predator populations and their prey, Thrips tabaci, in onion fields grown in large-scale and small-scale cropping systems

Elaine J. Fok; Jessica D. Petersen; Brian A. Nault

Onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman, is the primary pest of onion, which is grown in either large-scale, monoculture systems surrounded by other onion fields, or in small-scale systems surrounded by multiple vegetable crops. In 2011 and 2012, populations of insect predators and their prey, T. tabaci, were assessed weekly in onion fields in both cropping systems. Insect predator taxa (eight species representing five families) were similar in onions grown in both systems and the most commonly occurring predators were from the family Aeolothripidae. Seasonal population dynamics of predators and T. tabaci followed similar trends within both cropping systems and tended to peak in late July and early August. Predator abundance was low in both systems, but predator abundance was nearly 2.5 to 13 times greater in onion fields in the small-scale system. T. tabaci abundance often positively predicted predator abundance in both cropping systems.


Science | 2013

Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance

Lucas A. Garibaldi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Rachael Winfree; Marcelo A. Aizen; Riccardo Bommarco; Saul A. Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Luísa G. Carvalheiro; Lawrence D. Harder; Ohad Afik; Ignasi Bartomeus; Faye Benjamin; Virginie Boreux; Daniel P. Cariveau; Natacha P. Chacoff; Jan H. Dudenhöffer; Breno Magalhães Freitas; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sarah S. Greenleaf; Juliana Hipólito; Andrea Holzschuh; Brad G. Howlett; Rufus Isaacs; Steven K. Javorek; Christina M. Kennedy; Kristin M. Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Yael Mandelik; Margaret M. Mayfield; Iris Motzke


PLOS ONE | 2015

Potato production history.

Anders S. Huseth; Jessica D. Petersen; Katja Poveda; Zsofia Szendrei; Brian A. Nault; George G. Kennedy; Russell L. Groves


PLOS ONE | 2015

Potato production history and imidacloprid resistance.

Anders S. Huseth; Jessica D. Petersen; Katja Poveda; Zsofia Szendrei; Brian A. Nault; George G. Kennedy; Russell L. Groves


PLOS ONE | 2015

Parameter estimates (±SE), AIC and difference in AIC from best models fitting log transformed LC 50 estimates of resistance in L . decemlineata populations.

Anders S. Huseth; Jessica D. Petersen; Katja Poveda; Zsofia Szendrei; Brian A. Nault; George G. Kennedy; Russell L. Groves


Science | 2014

Erratum for the report: "Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance" (Science (2013) (1608-1611))

Lucas A. Garibaldi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Rachael Winfree; Marcelo A. Aizen; Riccardo Bommarco; Saul A. Cunningham; Claire Kremen; Luísa G. Carvalheiro; Lawrence D. Harder; Ohad Afik; Ignasi Bartomeus; Faye Benjamin; Virginie Boreux; Daniel P. Cariveau; Natacha P. Chacoff; Jan-Hendrik Dudenhöffer; Breno Magalhães Freitas; Jaboury Ghazoul; Sarah S. Greenleaf; Juliana Hipólito; Andrea Holzschuh; Brad G. Howlett; Rufus Isaacs; Steven K. Javorek; Christina M. Kennedy; Kristin M. Krewenka; Smitha Krishnan; Yael Mandelik; Margaret M. Mayfield; Iris Motzke

Collaboration


Dive into the Jessica D. Petersen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anders S. Huseth

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George G. Kennedy

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Russell L. Groves

University of Wisconsin-Madison

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Zsofia Szendrei

Michigan State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claire Kremen

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lucas A. Garibaldi

National Scientific and Technical Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marcelo A. Aizen

National Scientific and Technical Research Council

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Natacha P. Chacoff

National Scientific and Technical Research Council

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge