Jessica Kepplinger

Systemic thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke and Internal Carotid ARtery Occlusion: the ICARO study

Background and Purpose— The beneficial effect of intravenous thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator in these patients. Methods— ICARO was a case-control multicenter study on prospectively collected data. Patients with acute ischemic stroke and ICA occlusion treated with intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator within 4.5 hours from symptom onset (cases) were compared to matched patients with acute stroke and ICA occlusion not treated with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (controls). Cases and controls were matched for age, gender, and stroke severity. The efficacy outcome was disability at 90 days assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, dichotomized as favorable (score of 0–2) or unfavorable (score of 3–6). Safety outcomes were death and any intracranial bleeding. Results— Included in the analysis were 253 cases and 253 controls. Seventy-three cases (28.9%) had a favorable outcome as compared with 52 controls (20.6%; adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–3.15; P=0.037). A total of 104 patients died, 65 cases (25.7%) and 39 controls (15.4%; adjusted OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.36–3.22; P=0.001). There were more fatal bleedings (2.8% versus 0.4%; OR, 7.17; 95% CI, 0.87–58.71; P=0.068) in the cases than in the controls. Conclusions— In patients with stroke attributable to ICA occlusion, thrombolytic therapy results in a significant reduction in the proportion of patients dependent in activities of daily living. Increases in death and any intracranial bleeding were the trade-offs for this clinical benefit.

Early Recurrence and Cerebral Bleeding in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation Effect of Anticoagulation and Its Timing: The RAF Study

Background and Purpose— The best time for administering anticoagulation therapy in acute cardioembolic stroke remains unclear. This prospective cohort study of patients with acute stroke and atrial fibrillation, evaluated (1) the risk of recurrent ischemic event and severe bleeding; (2) the risk factors for recurrence and bleeding; and (3) the risks of recurrence and bleeding associated with anticoagulant therapy and its starting time after the acute stroke. Methods— The primary outcome of this multicenter study was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack, symptomatic systemic embolism, symptomatic cerebral bleeding and major extracranial bleeding within 90 days from acute stroke. Results— Of the 1029 patients enrolled, 123 had 128 events (12.6%): 77 (7.6%) ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack or systemic embolism, 37 (3.6%) symptomatic cerebral bleeding, and 14 (1.4%) major extracranial bleeding. At 90 days, 50% of the patients were either deceased or disabled (modified Rankin score ≥3), and 10.9% were deceased. High CHA2DS2-VASc score, high National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, large ischemic lesion and type of anticoagulant were predictive factors for primary study outcome. At adjusted Cox regression analysis, initiating anticoagulants 4 to 14 days from stroke onset was associated with a significant reduction in primary study outcome, compared with initiating treatment before 4 or after 14 days: hazard ratio 0.53 (95% confidence interval 0.30–0.93). About 7% of the patients treated with oral anticoagulants alone had an outcome event compared with 16.8% and 12.3% of the patients treated with low molecular weight heparins alone or followed by oral anticoagulants, respectively (P=0.003). Conclusions— Acute stroke in atrial fibrillation patients is associated with high rates of ischemic recurrence and major bleeding at 90 days. This study has observed that high CHA2DS2-VASc score, high National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, large ischemic lesions, and type of anticoagulant administered each independently led to a greater risk of recurrence and bleedings. Also, data showed that the best time for initiating anticoagulation treatment for secondary stroke prevention is 4 to 14 days from stroke onset. Moreover, patients treated with oral anticoagulants alone had better outcomes compared with patients treated with low molecular weight heparins alone or before oral anticoagulants.

Reliability of brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in telemedicine

Objective: To determine the reliability and therapeutic impact of standardized cerebral CT evaluation and quantification of early ischemic changes (EIC) with the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) by stroke neurologists in the Stroke Eastern Saxony Network (SOS-NET), which provides telemedical consultations for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Two neuroradiologists re-evaluated all CT scans of consecutive SOS-NET patients in 2009 blinded to clinical information providing reference standard. We defined discrepant CT findings as all false-positive or false-negative EIC and brain pathology findings and ASPECTS deviations >1 point. We subsequently discussed the clinical impact of discrepant CT findings unblinded to clinical information. Weighted kappa (κw) statistic was used to determine the interobserver agreement for ASPECTS. Results: Of 582 patients, complete imaging data were available for 536 patients (351 cerebral ischemic events, 105 primary intracranial hemorrhages, and 80 stroke mimics). The neuroradiologists detected discrepant CT findings in 43 patients (8.0%) that were rated as clinically relevant in 9 patients (1.7%). Stroke neurologists recommended IV thrombolysis in 8 patients despite extensive EIC (ASPECTS ≤5). One of these patients had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. In 1 nonthrombolyzed patient, the stroke neurologist missed subdural hematoma. The interobserver agreement on ASPECTS between stroke neurologists and expert readers was substantial (κw = 0.62; 95% confidence interval 0.54–0.71). Conclusions: Clinically relevant misinterpretation of the CT scans was rare in our acute telestroke service. ASPECTS is a reliable tool to assess the extent of EIC by stroke neurologists in telemedicine in real time.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to improve outcome in acute ischemic stroke: possible mechanisms and clinical evidence

Several clinical studies have indicated that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) administered in patients after acute ischemic stroke can improve clinical recovery independently of depression. Due to small sample sizes and heterogeneous study designs interpretability was limited in these studies. The mechanisms of action whereby SSRI might improve recovery from acute ischemic stroke are not fully elucidated.

Combined Treatment with Intravenous Abciximab and Intraarterial tPA Yields High Recanalization Rate in Patients with Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion

The best therapeutic approach in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) remains unclear. We report the results of a combined treatment approach with intravenous (IV) abciximab and intraarterial (IA) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in these patients.

Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in telestroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IV thrombolysis (IVT) with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) delivered through telestroke networks in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches on MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases covered prospective randomized controlled and nonrandomized studies comparing telemedicine-guided IVT to IVT administered at stroke centers and were published from the earliest date available until April 1, 2015. Outcomes of interest were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, mortality, and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale scores 0–1) at 3 months. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compute pooled effect estimates and the I2 statistic to assess heterogeneity. Results: Of 529 records identified, 7 studies totaling 1,863 patients fulfilled our eligibility criteria. Among these, thrombolysis was largely restricted to the 3-hour time window. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates were similar between patients subjected to telemedicine-guided IVT and those receiving tPA at stroke centers (risk ratio [RR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–2.80; p = 0.978) with low evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 37%; p = 0.189). There was no difference in mortality (RR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.74–1.48; p = 0.806) or in functional independence (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.78–1.57; p = 0.565) at 3 months between telemedicine-guided and stroke center thrombolysis. No heterogeneity was identified (I2 = 0%, p = 0.964 and I2 = 52%, p = 0.123, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that IV tPA delivery through telestroke networks is safe and effective in the 3-hour time window. Lack of prospective trials, however, emphasizes the need to further substantiate these findings in the 3- to 4.5-hour time window. PROSPERO registration information: URL: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO. Unique identifier: CRD42015017232.

Exploring the risk-factor association between depression and incident stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

There is growing evidence that depression increases the risk of incident stroke. However, few studies have considered possible residual confounding effects by preexistent cerebrovascular and cardiac diseases. Therefore, we synthesized data from cohort studies to explore whether depressed individuals free of cerebrovascular and cardiac diseases are at higher risk of incident stroke. We searched the electronic databases PubMed and Medline for eligible cohort studies that examined the prospective association between depression and first-ever stroke. A random-effects model was used for quantitative data synthesis. Sensitivity analyses comprised cohort studies that considered a lag period with exclusion of incident strokes in the first years of follow-up to minimize residual confounding by preexistent silent strokes and excluded cardiac disease at baseline. Overall, we identified 28 cohort studies with 681,139 participants and 13,436 (1.97%) incident stroke cases. The pooled risk estimate revealed an increased risk of incident stroke for depression (relative risk 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27–1.53; P<0.0001). When we excluded incident strokes that occurred in the first years of follow-up, the prospective association between depression and incident stroke remained significant (relative risk 1.64, 95% CI 1.27–2.11; P<0.0001). This positive association also remained after we considered only studies with individuals with cardiac disease at baseline excluded (relative risk 1.43, 95% CI 1.19–1.72; P<0.0001). The prospective association of depression and increased risk of first-ever stroke demonstrated in this meta-analysis appears to be driven neither by preexistence of clinically apparent cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases nor by silent stroke.

The Effects of Pretreatment versus De Novo Treatment with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors on Short-term Outcome after Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) administered in patients following acute ischemic stroke have shown to improve clinical recovery independently of changes in depression. Animal studies have demonstrated that sustained SSRI treatment is superior to short-term SSRI in evoking neurogenesis but how this benefit translates into humans remains to be answered. We hypothesized that in acute ischemic stroke patients, SSRI treatment started before the event leads to improved short-term outcomes compared to de novo SSRI treatment poststroke. METHODS We performed an exploratory analysis in consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients and compared patients already receiving fluoxetine, citalopram, or escitalopram with those who started treatment de novo. RESULTS Of 2653 screened patients, 239 were included (age, 69 ± 14 years; 42% men, baseline median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 7 [IQR, 10]). Of these patients, 51 started treatment with SSRI before stroke and 188 were prescribed newly SSRIs during hospitalization. In the adjusted multivariate logistic regression models, SSRI pretreatment was associated with favorable functional outcome at discharge defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 2 or less (odds ratio [OR], 4.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-9.57; P < .005), improved early clinical recovery (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.15-4.81; P = .02), and a trend toward prediction of superior motor recovery (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, .90-3.68; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that SSRI pretreatment may improve clinical outcomes in the early stages of acute ischemic stroke supporting the hypothesis that prolonged SSRI treatment started prestroke is superior to poststroke SSRI.

Telemedical Brain Computed Tomography Misinterpretation by Stroke Neurologists Is Not Associated with Thrombolysis-Related Intracranial Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND The Stroke Eastern Saxony Network (SOS-NET) provides telecare for acute stroke patients. Stroke neurologists recommend intravenous thrombolysis based on clinical assessment and cerebral computed tomography (CT) evaluation using Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS). We sought to assess whether ASPECTS misinterpretation by stroke neurologists was associated with thrombolysis-related symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed consecutive SOS-NET patients treated with thrombolytics from July 2007 to July 2012. Experienced neuroradiologists re-evaluated CT scans blinded to clinical information providing reference standard. We defined ASPECTS underestimation as ASPECTS stroke neurologist--ASPECTS neuroradiologist more than 1 point. Primary outcome was sICH by European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II criteria. Secondary outcome was unfavorable outcome at discharge defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 3 or more. RESULTS Of 1659 patients with acute ischemic stroke, thrombolysis was performed in 657 patients. Complete primary outcome and imaging data were available for 432 patients (median age, 75; interquartile range [IQR], 12 years; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 12 [IQR, 11]; 52.8% women). Nineteen patients (4.4%) had sICH, and 259 patients (60.0%) had an unfavorable outcome at discharge. Interobserver agreement between ASPECTS assessment was fair (κ = .51). ASPECTS underestimation was neither associated with sICH (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), .36-4.83, P = .68) nor unfavorable outcome (adjusted OR, 1.10; 95% CI, .47-2.54; P = .83). CONCLUSIONS Despite fair interrater agreement between stroke neurologists and expert neuroradiologists, underestimation of ASPECTS by the former was not associated with thrombolysis-related sICH in our telestroke network.

Increased Pulsatility of the Intracranial Blood Flow Spectral Waveform on Transcranial Doppler Does Not Point to Peripheral Arterial Disease in Stroke Patients

BACKGROUND Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is common in patients with acute cerebral ischemia. Indexes of resistance derived from the systolic and diastolic velocities are routinely used in diagnostic transcranial Doppler (TCD) to detect intracranial arterial disease. We sought to explore whether these indexes can predict the presence of PAD in acute cerebral ischemia. METHODS We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients with acute cerebral ischemia. On TCD, peak-systolic and end-diastolic velocities in both middle cerebral and basilar arteries were manually measured to calculate pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI). Increased resistance was defined as PI equal to 1.2 or more and RI equal to .75 or more. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurements were performed and an ABI equal to .9 or more was considered predictive of definite PAD. RESULTS We included 95 patients (45 male, 50 female) aged 66 ± 9 years with a median National Institutes Health Stroke Scale score of 3 (interquartile range, 8) points. The ABI was abnormal and consistent with definite PAD in 24 of 95 (25.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16.4-34.2) patients. Increased PI did not differ among patients with and without PAD (20.8% vs. 28.2%, P = .60). Only 1 patient with PAD had increased RI as opposed to 4 patients without PAD (4.2% vs. 5.6%, P = 1.0). Increased PI was not found to be an independent predictor of PAD (odds ratio [OR], .68; 95% CI, .22-2.12; P = .51). Increases in both PI and RI independently predicted arterial hypertension (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.19-2.21; P = .002 and OR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.51-6.77; P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that PAD cannot be inferred from intracranial flow parameters predictive of arterial disease and risk factors such as hypertension among patients with acute cerebral ischemia.