Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jessie L. Christiansen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jessie L. Christiansen.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

Characteristics of planetary candidates observed by Kepler II : Analysis of the first four months of data

William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Gibor Basri; Natalie M. Batalha; Timothy M. Brown; Stephen T. Bryson; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Edward W. Dunham; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jason F. Rowe; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Alan P. Boss; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman

On 2011 February 1 the Kepler mission released data for 156,453 stars observed from the beginning of the science observations on 2009 May 2 through September 16. There are 1235 planetary candidates with transit-like signatures detected in this period. These are associated with 997 host stars. Distributions of the characteristics of the planetary candidates are separated into five class sizes: 68 candidates of approximately Earth-size (R_p < 1.25 R_⊕), 288 super-Earth-size (1.25 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 2 R_⊕), 662 Neptune-size (2 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 6 R_⊕), 165 Jupiter-size (6 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 15 R_⊕), and 19 up to twice the size of Jupiter (15 R_⊕ ≤ R_p < 22 R_⊕). In the temperature range appropriate for the habitable zone, 54 candidates are found with sizes ranging from Earth-size to larger than that of Jupiter. Six are less than twice the size of the Earth. Over 74% of the planetary candidates are smaller than Neptune. The observed number versus size distribution of planetary candidates increases to a peak at two to three times the Earth-size and then declines inversely proportional to the area of the candidate. Our current best estimates of the intrinsic frequencies of planetary candidates, after correcting for geometric and sensitivity biases, are 5% for Earth-size candidates, 8% for super-Earth-size candidates, 18% for Neptune-size candidates, 2% for Jupiter-size candidates, and 0.1% for very large candidates; a total of 0.34 candidates per star. Multi-candidate, transiting systems are frequent; 17% of the host stars have multi-candidate systems, and 34% of all the candidates are part of multi-candidate systems.


Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2013

Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler III: Analysis of the First 16 Months of Data

Natalie M. Batalha; Jason F. Rowe; Stephen T. Bryson; Christopher J. Burke; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jessie L. Christiansen; Fergal Mullally; Susan E. Thompson; Timothy M. Brown; Andrea K. Dupree; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Ronald L. Gilliland; Howard Isaacson; David W. Latham; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Avi Shporer; William J. Borucki; David R. Ciardi; Thomas N. Gautier; Michael R. Haas; Jon M. Jenkins; David G. Koch; Jack J. Lissauer; William Rapin; Gibor Basri; Alan P. Boss

New transiting planet candidates are identified in 16 months (2009 May-2010 September) of data from the Kepler spacecraft. Nearly 5000 periodic transit-like signals are vetted against astrophysical and instrumental false positives yielding 1108 viable new planet candidates, bringing the total count up to over 2300. Improved vetting metrics are employed, contributing to higher catalog reliability. Most notable is the noise-weighted robust averaging of multi-quarter photo-center offsets derived from difference image analysis that identifies likely background eclipsing binaries. Twenty-two months of photometry are used for the purpose of characterizing each of the candidates. Ephemerides (transit epoch, T_0, and orbital period, P) are tabulated as well as the products of light curve modeling: reduced radius (R_P/R_★), reduced semimajor axis (d/R_★), and impact parameter (b). The largest fractional increases are seen for the smallest planet candidates (201% for candidates smaller than 2 R_⊕ compared to 53% for candidates larger than 2 R_⊕) and those at longer orbital periods (124% for candidates outside of 50 day orbits versus 86% for candidates inside of 50 day orbits). The gains are larger than expected from increasing the observing window from 13 months (Quarters 1-5) to 16 months (Quarters 1-6) even in regions of parameter space where one would have expected the previous catalogs to be complete. Analyses of planet frequencies based on previous catalogs will be affected by such incompleteness. The fraction of all planet candidate host stars with multiple candidates has grown from 17% to 20%, and the paucity of short-period giant planets in multiple systems is still evident. The progression toward smaller planets at longer orbital periods with each new catalog release suggests that Earth-size planets in the habitable zone are forthcoming if, indeed, such planets are abundant.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2013

THE FALSE POSITIVE RATE OF KEPLER AND THE OCCURRENCE OF PLANETS

Francois Fressin; Guillermo Torres; David Charbonneau; Stephen T. Bryson; Jessie L. Christiansen; Courtney D. Dressing; Jon M. Jenkins; Lucianne M. Walkowicz; Natalie M. Batalha

The Kepler mission is uniquely suited to study the frequencies of extrasolar planets. This goal requires knowledge of the incidence of false positives such as eclipsing binaries in the background of the targets, or physically bound to them, which can mimic the photometric signal of a transiting planet. We perform numerical simulations of the Kepler targets and of physical companions or stars in the background to predict the occurrence of astrophysical false positives detectable by the mission. Using real noise level estimates, we compute the number and characteristics of detectable eclipsing pairs involving main-sequence stars and non-main-sequence stars or planets, and we quantify the fraction of those that would pass the Kepler candidate vetting procedure. By comparing their distribution with that of the Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) detected during the first six quarters of operation of the spacecraft, we infer the false positive rate of Kepler and study its dependence on spectral type, candidate planet size, and orbital period. We find that the global false positive rate of Kepler is 9.4%, peaking for giant planets (6-22 R ⊕) at 17.7%, reaching a low of 6.7% for small Neptunes (2-4 R ⊕), and increasing again for Earth-size planets (0.8-1.25 R ⊕) to 12.3%. Most importantly, we also quantify and characterize the distribution and rate of occurrence of planets down to Earth size with no prior assumptions on their frequency, by subtracting from the population of actual Kepler candidates our simulated population of astrophysical false positives. We find that 16.5% ± 3.6% of main-sequence FGK stars have at least one planet between 0.8 and 1.25 R ⊕ with orbital periods up to 85 days. This result is a significant step toward the determination of eta-earth, the occurrence of Earth-like planets in the habitable zone of their parent stars. There is no significant dependence of the rates of planet occurrence between 0.8 and 4 Earth radii with spectral type. In the process, we also derive a prescription for the signal recovery rate of Kepler that enables a good match to both the KOI size and orbital period distribution, as well as their signal-to-noise distribution.


Nature | 2011

A closely packed system of low-mass, low-density planets transiting Kepler-11

Jack J. Lissauer; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; William J. Borucki; Francois Fressin; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jerome A. Orosz; Jason F. Rowe; Guillermo Torres; William F. Welsh; Natalie M. Batalha; Stephen T. Bryson; Lars A. Buchhave; Douglas A. Caldwell; Joshua A. Carter; David Charbonneau; Jessie L. Christiansen; William D. Cochran; Jean-Michel Desert; Edward W. Dunham; Michael N. Fanelli; Jonathan J. Fortney; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Michael R. Haas; Jennifer R. Hall; Matthew J. Holman; David G. Koch; David W. Latham

When an extrasolar planet passes in front of (transits) its star, its radius can be measured from the decrease in starlight and its orbital period from the time between transits. Multiple planets transiting the same star reveal much more: period ratios determine stability and dynamics, mutual gravitational interactions reflect planet masses and orbital shapes, and the fraction of transiting planets observed as multiples has implications for the planarity of planetary systems. But few stars have more than one known transiting planet, and none has more than three. Here we report Kepler spacecraft observations of a single Sun-like star, which we call Kepler-11, that reveal six transiting planets, five with orbital periods between 10 and 47 days and a sixth planet with a longer period. The five inner planets are among the smallest for which mass and size have both been measured, and these measurements imply substantial envelopes of light gases. The degree of coplanarity and proximity of the planetary orbits imply energy dissipation near the end of planet formation.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

KEPLER'S FIRST ROCKY PLANET: KEPLER-10b*

Natalie M. Batalha; William J. Borucki; Stephen T. Bryson; Lars A. Buchhave; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; David R. Ciardi; Edward W. Dunham; Francois Fressin; Thomas N. Gautier; Ronald L. Gilliland; Michael R. Haas; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; Hans Kjeldsen; David G. Koch; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Jason F. Rowe; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Sara Seager; Jason H. Steffen; Guillermo Torres; Gibor Basri; Timothy M. Brown; David Charbonneau; Jessie L. Christiansen; Bruce D. Clarke; William D. Cochran

NASAs Kepler Mission uses transit photometry to determine the frequency of Earth-size planets in or near the habitable zone of Sun-like stars. The mission reached a milestone toward meeting that goal: the discovery of its first rocky planet, Kepler-10b. Two distinct sets of transit events were detected: (1) a 152 ± 4 ppm dimming lasting 1.811 ± 0.024 hr with ephemeris T [BJD] = 2454964.57375^(+0.00060)_(–0.00082) + N * 0.837495^(+0.000004)_(–0.000005) days and (2) a 376 ± 9 ppm dimming lasting 6.86 ± 0.07 hr with ephemeris T [BJD] = 2454971.6761^(+0.0020)_(–0.0023) + N * 45.29485^(+0.00065) _(–0.00076) days. Statistical tests on the photometric and pixel flux time series established the viability of the planet candidates triggering ground-based follow-up observations. Forty precision Doppler measurements were used to confirm that the short-period transit event is due to a planetary companion. The parent star is bright enough for asteroseismic analysis. Photometry was collected at 1 minute cadence for >4 months from which we detected 19 distinct pulsation frequencies. Modeling the frequencies resulted in precise knowledge of the fundamental stellar properties. Kepler-10 is a relatively old (11.9 ± 4.5 Gyr) but otherwise Sun-like main-sequence star with T_(eff) = 5627 ± 44 K, M_⋆ = 0.895 ± 0.060 M_⊙ , and R_⋆ = 1.056 ± 0.021 R_⊙. Physical models simultaneously fit to the transit light curves and the precision Doppler measurements yielded tight constraints on the properties of Kepler-10b that speak to its rocky composition: M_P = 4.56^9+1.17)_(–1.29) M_⊕, R_P = 1.416^(+0.033)_(–0.036) R_⊕, and ρ_P = 8.8^(+2.1)_(–2.9) g cm^(–3). Kepler-10b is the smallest transiting exoplanet discovered to date.


Nature | 2012

Transiting circumbinary planets Kepler-34 b and Kepler-35 b

William F. Welsh; Jerome A. Orosz; Joshua A. Carter; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jack J. Lissauer; Andrej Prsa; Samuel N. Quinn; Darin Ragozzine; Donald R. Short; Guillermo Torres; Joshua N. Winn; Laurance R. Doyle; Natalie M. Batalha; S. Bloemen; Erik Brugamyer; Lars A. Buchhave; Caroline Caldwell; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jessie L. Christiansen; David R. Ciardi; William D. Cochran; Michael Endl; Jonathan J. Fortney; Thomas N. Gautier; Ronald L. Gilliland; Michael R. Haas; Jennifer R. Hall; Matthew J. Holman; Andrew W. Howard

Most Sun-like stars in the Galaxy reside in gravitationally bound pairs of stars (binaries). Although long anticipated, the existence of a ‘circumbinary planet’ orbiting such a pair of normal stars was not definitively established until the discovery of the planet transiting (that is, passing in front of) Kepler-16. Questions remained, however, about the prevalence of circumbinary planets and their range of orbital and physical properties. Here we report two additional transiting circumbinary planets: Kepler-34 (AB)b and Kepler-35 (AB)b, referred to here as Kepler-34 b and Kepler-35 b, respectively. Each is a low-density gas-giant planet on an orbit closely aligned with that of its parent stars. Kepler-34 b orbits two Sun-like stars every 289 days, whereas Kepler-35 b orbits a pair of smaller stars (89% and 81% of the Sun’s mass) every 131 days. The planets experience large multi-periodic variations in incident stellar radiation arising from the orbital motion of the stars. The observed rate of circumbinary planets in our sample implies that more than ∼1% of close binary stars have giant planets in nearly coplanar orbits, yielding a Galactic population of at least several million.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2011

Characteristics Of Kepler Planetary Candidates Based On The First Data Set

William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Gibor Basri; Natalie M. Batalha; Alan P. Boss; Timothy M. Brown; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Edward W. Dunham; Andrea K. Dupree; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; Hans Kjeldsen; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; David G. Monet; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Jill Tarter; David Charbonneau; Laurance R. Doyle; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman

In the spring of 2009, the Kepler Mission commenced high-precision photometry on nearly 156,000 stars to determine the frequency and characteristics of small exoplanets, conduct a guest observer program, and obtain asteroseismic data on a wide variety of stars. On 15 June 2010 the Kepler Mission released data from the first quarter of observations. At the time of this publication, 706 stars from this first data set have exoplanet candidates with sizes from as small as that of the Earth to larger than that of Jupiter. Here we give the identity and characteristics of 306 released stars with planetary candidates. Data for the remaining 400 stars with planetary candidates will be released in February 2011. Over half the candidates on the released list have radii less than half that of Jupiter. The released stars include five possible multi-planet systems. One of these has two Neptune-size (2.3 and 2.5 Earth-radius) candidates with near-resonant periods.


Science | 2012

Kepler-36: A Pair of Planets with Neighboring Orbits and Dissimilar Densities

Joshua A. Carter; Eric Agol; W. J. Chaplin; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; Lars A. Buchhave; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; Katherine M. Deck; Y. Elsworth; Daniel C. Fabrycky; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; S. J. Hale; R. Handberg; S. Hekker; Matthew J. Holman; Daniel Huber; Christopher Karoff; Steven D. Kawaler; Hans Kjeldsen; Jack J. Lissauer; Eric D. Lopez; Mikkel N. Lund; M. Lundkvist; T. S. Metcalfe; A. Miglio; Leslie A. Rogers; D. Stello; William J. Borucki; Steve Bryson

So Close and So Different In our solar system, the rocky planets have very distinct orbits from those of the gas giants. Carter et al. (p. 556, published online 21 June) report on a planetary system where this pattern does not apply, posing a challenge to theories of planet formation. Data from the Kepler space telescope reveal two planets with radically different densities orbiting the same star with very similar orbital periods. One planet has a rocky Earth-like composition and the other is akin to Neptune. The Kepler spacecraft detected a super-Earth and a Neptune-like planet in very tightly spaced orbits around the same star. In the solar system, the planets’ compositions vary with orbital distance, with rocky planets in close orbits and lower-density gas giants in wider orbits. The detection of close-in giant planets around other stars was the first clue that this pattern is not universal and that planets’ orbits can change substantially after their formation. Here, we report another violation of the orbit-composition pattern: two planets orbiting the same star with orbital distances differing by only 10% and densities differing by a factor of 8. One planet is likely a rocky “super-Earth,” whereas the other is more akin to Neptune. These planets are 20 times more closely spaced and have a larger density contrast than any adjacent pair of planets in the solar system.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2012

SEISMIC EVIDENCE FOR A RAPIDLY ROTATING CORE IN A LOWER-GIANT-BRANCH STAR OBSERVED WITH KEPLER

S. Deheuvels; R. A. García; W. J. Chaplin; Sarbani Basu; H. M. Antia; T. Appourchaux; O. Benomar; G. R. Davies; Y. Elsworth; Laurent Gizon; M. J. Goupil; Daniel Reese; C. Regulo; Jesper Schou; T. Stahn; Luca Casagrande; J. Christensen-Dalsgaard; Debra A. Fischer; S. Hekker; Hans Kjeldsen; S. Mathur; B. Mosser; Marc H. Pinsonneault; Jeff A. Valenti; Jessie L. Christiansen; Karen Kinemuchi; Fergal Mullally

Rotation is expected to have an important influence on the structure and the evolution of stars. However, the mechanisms of angular momentum transport in stars remain theoretically uncertain and very complex to take into account in stellar models. To achieve a better understanding of these processes, we desperately need observational constraints on the internal rotation of stars, which until very recently was restricted to the Sun. In this paper, we report the detection of mixed modes—i.e., modes that behave both as g modes in the core and as p modes in the envelope—in the spectrum of the early red giant KIC 7341231, which was observed during one year with the Kepler spacecraft. By performing an analysis of the oscillation spectrum of the star, we show that its non-radial modes are clearly split by stellar rotation and we are able to determine precisely the rotational splittings of 18 modes. We then find a stellar model that reproduces very well the observed atmospheric and seismic properties of the star. We use this model to perform inversions of the internal rotation profile of the star, which enables us to show that the core of the star is rotating at least five times faster than the envelope. This will shed new light on the processes of transport of angular momentum in stars. In particular, this result can be used to place constraints on the angular momentum coupling between the core and the envelope of early red giants, which could help us discriminate between the theories that have been proposed over the last few decades.


The Astrophysical Journal | 2012

Kepler-22b: A 2.4 Earth-radius Planet in the Habitable Zone of a Sun-like Star

William J. Borucki; David G. Koch; Natalie M. Batalha; Stephen T. Bryson; Jason F. Rowe; Francois Fressin; Guillermo Torres; Douglas A. Caldwell; Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard; William D. Cochran; Edna DeVore; Thomas N. Gautier; John C. Geary; Ronald L. Gilliland; Alan Gould; Steve B. Howell; Jon M. Jenkins; David W. Latham; Jack J. Lissauer; Geoffrey W. Marcy; Dimitar D. Sasselov; Alan P. Boss; David Charbonneau; David R. Ciardi; Lisa Kaltenegger; Laurance R. Doyle; Andrea K. Dupree; Eric B. Ford; Jonathan J. Fortney; Matthew J. Holman

A search of the time-series photometry from NASAs Kepler spacecraft reveals a transiting planet candidate orbiting the 11th magnitude G5 dwarf KIC 10593626 with a period of 290 days. The characteristics of the host star are well constrained by high-resolution spectroscopy combined with an asteroseismic analysis of the Kepler photometry, leading to an estimated mass and radius of 0.970 ± 0.060 M ☉ and 0.979 ± 0.020 R ☉. The depth of 492 ± 10 ppm for the three observed transits yields a radius of 2.38 ± 0.13 Re for the planet. The system passes a battery of tests for false positives, including reconnaissance spectroscopy, high-resolution imaging, and centroid motion. A full BLENDER analysis provides further validation of the planet interpretation by showing that contamination of the target by an eclipsing system would rarely mimic the observed shape of the transits. The final validation of the planet is provided by 16 radial velocities (RVs) obtained with the High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer on Keck I over a one-year span. Although the velocities do not lead to a reliable orbit and mass determination, they are able to constrain the mass to a 3σ upper limit of 124 M ⊕, safely in the regime of planetary masses, thus earning the designation Kepler-22b. The radiative equilibrium temperature is 262 K for a planet in Kepler-22bs orbit. Although there is no evidence that Kepler-22b is a rocky planet, it is the first confirmed planet with a measured radius to orbit in the habitable zone of any star other than the Sun.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jessie L. Christiansen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David R. Ciardi

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jon M. Jenkins

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason F. Rowe

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William J. Borucki

Rochester Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian J. M. Crossfield

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge