Ji-Hyeon Yim

A Comparative Study of Meniscectomy and Nonoperative Treatment for Degenerative Horizontal Tears of the Medial Meniscus

Background: It is still debated whether a degenerative horizontal tear of the medial meniscus should be treated with surgery. Hypothesis: The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic meniscectomy will be better than those of nonoperative treatment for a degenerative horizontal tear of the medial meniscus. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A total of 102 patients with knee pain and a degenerative horizontal tear of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus on magnetic resonance imaging were included in this study between January 2007 and July 2009. The study included 81 female and 21 male patients with an average age of 53.8 years (range, 43-62 years). Fifty patients underwent arthroscopic meniscectomy (meniscectomy group), and 52 patients underwent nonoperative treatment with strengthening exercises (nonoperative group). Functional outcomes were compared using a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, and patient subjective knee pain and satisfaction. Radiological evaluations were performed using the Kellgren-Lawrence classification to evaluate osteoarthritic changes. Results: In terms of clinical outcomes, meniscectomy did not provide better functional improvement than nonoperative treatment. At the final follow-up, the average VAS scores were 1.8 (range, 1-5) in the meniscectomy group and 1.7 (range, 1-4) in the nonoperative group (P = .675). The average Lysholm knee scores at 2-year follow-up were 83.2 (range, 52-100) and 84.3 (range, 58-100) in the meniscectomy and nonoperative groups, respectively (P = .237). In addition, the average Tegner activity scale and subjective satisfaction scores were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Although most patients initially had intense knee pain with mechanical symptoms, both groups reported a relief in knee pain, improved knee function, and a high level of satisfaction with treatment (P < .05 for all values). Two patients in the meniscectomy group and 3 in the nonoperative group with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1 progressed to grade 2 at the 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between arthroscopic meniscectomy and nonoperative management with strengthening exercises in terms of relief in knee pain, improved knee function, or increased satisfaction in patients after 2 years of follow-up.

Erratum to: Robotic-assisted TKA Reduces Postoperative Alignment Outliers and Improves Gap Balance Compared to Conventional TKA

In the third sentence of the Patients and Methods section it states, ‘‘We considered patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee and a mechanical axis between 20 and 5 valgus’’. However, the sentence should state, ‘‘We considered patients with primary osteoarthritis of the knee and a mechanical axis between 20 varus and 5 valgus’’. In addition, Dr. Yim’s degree is MD rather than MD, PhD. He currently is studying for his PhD degree.

Progression of osteoarthritis after double- and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Background: No consensus has been reached on the advantages of double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) over the single-bundle (SB) technique, particularly with respect to the prevention of osteoarthritis (OA) after ACLR. Purpose: To evaluate whether DB ACLR has any advantages in the prevention of OA or provides better stability and function after ACLR compared with the SB technique. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A total of 130 patients with an ACL injury in one knee were prospectively randomized into a DB group (n = 65) or an SB group (n = 65). For the radiologic evaluation, we determined the degree of OA based on the Kellgren-Lawrence grade before the operation and at the time of the final follow-up and determined the number of patients with progression of OA more than one grade from pre- to postoperation. We evaluated the stability results using the Lachman and pivot-shift tests and stress radiography. We also compared the functional outcomes based on the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scale. Results: Six patients (4 in the DB group and 2 in the SB group) suffered graft failure during the follow-up and had ACL revision surgery (P = .06). A total of 112 patients were observed for a minimum of 4 years (DB group, n = 52; SB group, n = 60). Five patients (9.6%) in the DB group and 6 patients (10%) in the SB group had more advanced OA at the final follow-up (P = .75). All patients recovered full range of motion within 6 months from surgery. Stability results of the Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and the radiographic stability test failed to reveal any significant intergroup differences (P = .37, .27, and .67, respectively). In the pivot-shift result, the DB group had 4 patients with grade 2 and the SB group had 3 patients with grade 2 (P = .27). Clinical outcomes, including Lysholm knee and Tegner activity scores, were similar in the 2 groups. Statistical significance was achieved only for the IKDC subjective scale (78.2 in DB group vs 73.1 in SB group; P = .03). Conclusion: The DB technique, compared with SB, was not more effective in preventing OA and did not have a more favorable failure rate. Although the DB ACLR technique produced a better IKDC subjective scale result than did the SB ACLR technique, the 2 modalities were similar in terms of clinical outcomes and stability after a minimum 4 years of follow-up.

Patellofemoral Alignment and Anterior Knee Pain After Closing- and Opening-Wedge Valgus High Tibial Osteotomy

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of opening- and closing-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for the treatment of medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis with a minimum follow-up of 3 years, with a focus on patellofemoral alignment and anterior knee pain. METHODS We performed a retrospective comparison of 50 patients who underwent closing-wedge HTO and 50 patients who underwent opening-wedge HTO for isolated medial joint arthritis of the knee with varus deformity. All patients were evaluated and the 2 study groups were compared after a minimum follow-up of 3 years with a focus on patellofemoral alignment, patellofemoral osteoarthritis, and anterior knee pain while climbing stairs. RESULTS Patellar alignment (patellar tilt and lateral patellar displacement) was not significantly different in the 2 groups either preoperatively or at follow-up. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the extent of patellofemoral arthritis and incidence of anterior knee pain at follow-up between the 2 groups. In addition, no significant intergroup difference was found in terms of the incidence of anterior knee pain (28% in closing-wedge group and 32% in opening-wedge group at follow-up). CONCLUSIONS The results of closing- and opening-wedge valgus HTO were not found to be significantly different with respect to patellar alignment, osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint, or anterior knee pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Comparison of High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum Follow-Up of 3 Years

The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes including return to recreational activities (cycling, swimming, exercise walking, dancing, jogging, and mountain climbing) after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Clinical outcomes were assessed using Tegner activity scores, ranges of motion, and Lysholm knee scores. In both groups, the number of patients participating in recreational activities was significantly reduced after surgery, but without a significant intergroup difference (1.3 activities in HTO group and in 1.6 activities in UKA group). Average Tegner activity scale scores, ranges of motion, and Lysholm knee scores did not show significant differences between the 2 groups. This study identified no significant differences between HTO and UKA for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis in terms of return to recreational activity and short-term clinical outcomes.

The Efficacy and Persistence of Selective Nerve Root Block under Fluoroscopic Guidance for Cervical Radiculopathy

Study Design Retrospective study. Objectives To investigate the outcomes of fluoroscopically guided selective nerve root block as a nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. Overview of Literature Only a few studies have addressed the efficacy and persistence of cervical nerve root block. Methods This retrospective study was conducted on 28 consecutive patients with radicular pain due to cervical disc disease or cervical spondylosis. Myelopathy was excluded. Cervical nerve root blocks were administered every 2 weeks, up to 3 times. Outcomes were measured by comparing visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, patient satisfaction, and medication usage before the procedure and at 1 week and 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. In addition, complications associated with the procedure and need for other treatments were evaluated. Results The average preoperative VAS score was 7.8 (range, 5 to 10), and this changed to 2.9 (range, 1 to 7) at 3 months and 4.6 (range, 2 to 7) at 12 months. Patient satisfaction was 71% at 3 months and 50% at 12 months. Five patients used medication at 3 months, whereas 13 used medication at 12 months. Average symptom free duration after the procedure was 7.8 months (range, 1 to 12 months). Two patients were treated surgically. Only two minor complications were noted; transient ptosis with Horners syndrome and transient causalgia. Conclusions Although selective nerve root block for cervical radiculopathy is limited as a definitive treatment, it appears to be useful in terms of providing relief from radicular pain in about 50% of patients at 12 months.