Jian-Wen Li

Normal and modified urinary nucleosides represent novel biomarkers for colorectal cancer diagnosis and surgery monitoring

Background: Up to now, there is still no ideal tumor marker in early diagnosis and effective monitoring, especially for surgical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the application of urinary normal and modified nucleosides in diagnosis and surgery monitoring of CRC.

Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly.

Background and aims: Elderly patients have a high incidence of colorectal cancer, which may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to complex comorbidity and diminished cardiopulmonary reserves. The aims of this study were to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery with those observed in traditional open surgery in patients aged over 70 years. Methods: Between January 2003 and October 2004, 51 patients aged over 70 years with colorectal cancer, who underwent laparoscopic surgery (LAP group), were evaluated and compared with 102 controls (also over 70 years old) treated by traditional open surgery (OPEN group) in the same period. All patients were evaluated with respect to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, surgery-related complications, and postoperative recovery. Results: No surgery-related death was observed in the LAP group, whereas two deaths occurred in the OPEN group for severe post-operative pulmonary infection and anastomotic leak, respectively. No pneumoperitoneum-related complications were observed in the LAP group; 2 (3.9%) patients required conversion to open surgery, because of the unexpectedly bulky tumor and severe adhesions in the abdominal cavity. With the increase in patients’ age, increased ASA classification was observed. No significant differences were observed in gender, Dukes’ staging or types of procedures between LAP and OPEN groups. The overall morbidity in the LAP group was significantly less than that of the OPEN group [17.6% (9/51) vs 37.3% (38/102), p=0.013]. Mean blood loss, time to flatus passage, and time to semi-liquid diet in the LAP group were significantly shorter than those of the OPEN group (90.7±49.9 vs 150.3±108.7ml, 2.4±1.2 vs 3.5±2.9 d, 5.0±1.8 vs 5.9±1.2 d, respectively, p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in terms of mean operation time or hospital stay between LAP and OPEN groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in elderly patients with colon cancer has clinically significant advantages over traditional open surgery, and appears to be the ideal surgical choice for the elderly.

Clinical significance of human kallikrein 10 gene expression in colorectal cancer and gastric cancer

Background and Aim:  Recent evidence suggests that the human kallikrein 10 (KLK10) gene is differentially regulated in endocrine‐related tumors and has potential as diagnostic and/or prognostic marker; however, KLK10 expression has never been investigated in gastrointestinal cancers. The aims of this study were to demonstrate expression and single nucleotide polymorphisms of KLK10 in colorectal cancer (CRC) and gastric cancer (GC), and to correlate the relative KLK10 expression level with clinicopathological factors of CRC and GC.

Laparoscopic Gastric Resection Approaches for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of Stomach

Purpose To evaluate laparoscopic gastric resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Methods From June, 2003 to October, 2009, 56 patients with gastric GIST who underwent laparoscopic gastric resection were retrospectively reviewed, and their surgical procedure, perioperative outcomes, pathology, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Results All patients underwent laparoscopic gastric resection successfully, including 33 laparoscopic wedge resections, 19 laparoscopic transgastric tumor-everting resections, 3 laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomies, and 1 laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic resection. The operative approaches performed were mostly based on the tumor location. No conversions were observed. The mean operative duration was 90 minutes (30 to 210 min), blood loss was 55 mL (5 to 180 mL), time for passage of flatus was 2 days (1 to 11 d), and the postoperative hospital stay was 7 days (3 to 13 d). The resection margin was microscopic negative. After 21.5 months (6 to 76 mo) of follow-up, there was no operative recurrence and metastasis. Conclusions Laparoscopic gastric resection for selective cases of gastric GISTs is safe, feasible, and effective. Laparoscopic wedge resection procedure is the first choice for most GISTs located in fundus and anterior wall, laparoscopic transgastric tumor-everting resection procedure can be used in cases with the tumor located in esophagogastric junction area and in posterior wall of the stomach as well. For antral tumors, laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with gastrojejunostomy should be performed.

Surgical treatment for xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: a report of 74 cases.

Aims To be more aware of the presence of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC) and find a better surgical measure of its treatment. Methods Data from 74 cases of XGC treated between May 1996 and May 2008 at our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and reported here. Laparoscopic and laparotomy group were compared with respect to operative time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complication, etc. Results In the 74 cases, 47 underwent laparoscopic surgery, the rest 27 underwent laparotomy surgery. The mean operative time of laparotomy and laparoscopic cases were 113.9 minutes and 69.4 minutes, respectively, which shows statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P<0.01). The postoperative hospital stay of the laparotomy and laparoscopic group is 18.3 days and 8.66 days, respectively (P<0.01). The converting rate of the laparoscopic group is 10.6%. Conclusions Surgical treatment remains the most effective and feasible option for XGC.

Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation with an intra-abdominal fixation technique: a report of 53 cases.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, the safety, and outcomes of renal replacement therapy with the laparoscopic technique for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter implantation with an intra-abdominal fixation. Methods: Medical records of 53 patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent laparoscopic PD catheter implantation with an intra-abdominal fixation in our department from December 2008 to October 2009 were reviewed retrospectively. Their surgical procedure, operative outcomes, postoperative complications, and follow-up outcomes were analyzed. Results: All patients underwent laparoscopic PD catheter implantation with an intra-abdominal fixation successfully. Neither conversion to open surgery nor major intraoperative complications were observed. The median operative time was 24.2±10.5 minutes. The operative cost was 837.3±107.0 US

A study evaluating the safety of laparoscopic radical operation for colorectal cancer

. Two patients (3.8%) had catheter obstruction peritonitis 12 and 15 months after surgery, respectively, and both of them had the catheter removed. Conclusions: Laparoscopic PD catheter implantation with an intra-abdominal fixation of the catheter tip is feasible and safe. It had a low incidence of PD catheter migration and other PD-related postoperative complications with the benefit of minimal invasiveness, a shorter operation time, and quicker postoperative recovery.

Endoscopic Management for the Assessment and Treatment of Anastomotic Bleeding in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

Aim: This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic curative resection for colorectal cancer through the clinical practice and basic research. Material and Methods: From September 2001 to September 2002, 47 patients with colorectal cancer were treated using laparoscopic approach, compared with 113 patients underwent traditional operation. The length of intestinal segment excised, size of tumour, clearance of lymph nodes, local recurrence and distant metastasis rate during the period of follow-up in both groups were compared. The other part of the study involved the detection of exfoliated tumour cells in the peritoneal washing before and after surgery; flushing of the instruments was performed in both groups and the results compared. For the laparoscopic cases, the filtrated liquid of CO2 pneumoperitoneum was also checked for tumour cells. Results: No significant differences existed in tumour size, operative site and manner between the two groups. The exfoliated tumour cell was not detected in the CO2 filtrated liquid. Between both groups there was no difference in the incidence of exfoliated tumour cells in peritoneal washing before and after surgery as well as in the fluid used for flushing the instruments. The total number of lymph nodes harvested was 13.71±9.57 for the laparoscopic group and 12.10±9.74 for the traditional procedure. Similar length of colon was excised in both groups; this was (19.38±7.47) cm in the laparoscopic and (18.60±8.40) cm in the traditional groups. The distal margins of resection for rectal cancer were (4.19±2.52) cm and (4.16±2.00) cm respectively. The local recurrence rate was 2.13% (1/47) and 1.77% (2/113) with the distant metastasis rate 6.38% (3/47) and 6.19% (7/113) respectively. Both the statistics were comparable between the laparoscopic and traditional surgery for the colorectal cancer. Conclusion: Laparoscopic curative resection for colorectal cancer can be performed safely and effectively. In the treatment of colorectal malignancy, laparoscopic resection can achieve similar radicalilty as compared to the traditional laparotomy.

Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma

Objective: To evaluate the impact of routine intraoperative endoscopy (IOE) on postoperative anastomotic bleeding of laparoscopic anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer, and to investigate the value of the IOE in terms of prevention and treatment of postoperative anastomotic bleeding. Methods: Medical records of the 279 cases of LAR from January 2006 to December 2011 were retrospectively analyzed, of which postoperative anastomotic bleeding occurred in 18. Univariate analysis was taken to determine the possible influencing factors of the bleeding. Then related influencing factors were put into the multivariate logistic regression analysis to ultimately determine the independent influencing factors of anastomotic bleeding. The efficacy of treatments to the anastomotic bleeding was also evaluated. Results: The incidence of anastomotic bleeding after LAR is 6.5% (18/279).The rates of anastomotic bleeding in lower tumor location group and upper tumor location group were 9.2% (16/173) and 1.9% (2/106), respectively, as in intraoperative colonoscopy and nonintraoperative colonoscopy group were 3.3% (5/151), and 10.2% (13/128), respectively. Comparing the location of the tumor, the coefficient of regression and relative risk value for lower tumor were 1.564 and 4.776. Comparing the intraoperative colonoscopy and nonintraoperative colonoscopy group, the value for intraoperative colonoscopy group were −1.085 and 0.338. Sex, age, tumor stage, pathologic type, and preventive ileostomy had no relevance with the anastomotic bleeding. In 18 cases of the anastomotic bleeding, 7 received conservative treatments, 9 underwent endoscopic treatment, and 2 underwent reoperation. All the 18 cases had reached hemostasis. Conclusion: IOE is an independent protective factor of anastomotic bleeding after LAR. Endoscopic hemostasis is recommended for an anastomotic bleeding after LAR for rectal cancer with a stapling technique.