Jian Zeng Dong

Body Mass Index and Risk of Left Atrial Thrombus in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

This study sought to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the risk of left atrial (LA)/left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) before catheter ablation. From January 2007 to March 2008, 433 consecutive patients with nonvalvular AF were enrolled. Patients with valvular heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism were excluded. All patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography. Twenty-six of 433 patients (6.0%) had LA/LAA thrombus and the patients with thrombus had a significantly higher BMI (27.9 +/- 3.1 vs 26.0 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2), p = 0.005). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of BMI predicting thrombus was 0.662. With a cut-off point of 27.0 kg/m(2), the sensitivity and specificity of BMI for the diagnosis of thrombus were 69.2% and 83.1%, respectively. The incidence of LA/LAA thrombus was 10.6% in patients with BMI > or =27.0 kg/m(2) versus only 3.0% for patients with BMI <27.0 kg/m(2) (p = 0.001). In multivariable analysis, BMI > or =27.0 kg/m(2) (odds ratio 4.02, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 13.55, p = 0.025), Cardiac Failure, Hypertension, Age, Diabetes, Stroke Doubled score > or =2, and nonparoxysmal AF were independent risk factors of LA/LAA thrombus. In conclusion, BMI > or =27.0 kg/m(2) is an independent risk factor of LA/LAA thrombus in patients with AF.

Predictors of recurrence after a repeat ablation procedure for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: role of left atrial enlargement

AIMS This study sought to explore the predictors of recurrence in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing repeat catheter ablation, especially the impact of left atrial (LA) remodelling after the original procedure on the outcome of repeat procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS Ninety-five patients undergoing repeat ablation were enrolled in this study. Repeat procedure endpoints were pulmonary vein isolation, linear block when linear ablation is performed, and non-inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmia by burst pacing. Patients with LA enlargement between the pre-original procedure and pre-repeat procedure were categorized as Group 1 (35 patients), while individuals with no change or decrease of LA diameter were categorized as Group 2 (60 patients). The mean duration from the original procedure to the repeat procedure was 12 months (1-40 months). After 29.6 ± 20.5 (3-73) months follow-up from the repeat procedure, 33 patients experienced recurrence (34.7%). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (51.4 VS. 25.0%, P = 0.017). In univariate analysis, LA remodelling was the only predictor of recurrence. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age and LA diameter, Group 1 had a greater risk of recurrence after the repeat procedure (hazard ratio = 2.22, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-4.81, P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS Left atrial enlargement after undergoing the original catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF was an independent risk factor of recurrence after repeat ablation.

Electroanatomical Mapping of the Right Atrium during Atrial Tachycardia Originating from Right Superior Pulmonary Vein: Additional Insights on Differential Diagnosis

Atrial tachycardia (AT) from the right superior pulmonary vein (RSPV) may mimic right atrial (RA)‐AT due to its proximity to the superior vena cava (SVC) and the preferential connections between the left atrium and right atrium.

Reconstruction left atrium and isolation pulmonary veins of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using single contact force catheter with zero x-ray exposure: A CONSORT Study

Background: Conventional ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is associated with radiation risks for patients and laboratory staff. Three-dimensional (3D) mapping system capable of showing contact force (CF) and direction of catheter tip may compensate for nonfluoroscopic safety issues. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of zero x-ray exposure during reconstruction left atrium (LA) and ablation. Methods: Single, CF catheter, and 3D mapping system were used to reconstruct LA and isolate pulmonary veins (PV) in all patients. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups after LA angiography. In group 1, reconstruction LA and isolation PV was performed with the help of 3D system (without x-ray), whereas in group 2, x-ray and 3D system were utilized to reconstruct LA and ablate PV antrum. After ablation, Lasso catheter was used to confirm the PV isolation. All patients were followed up to 12 months. Results: A total of 342 PAF patients were continuously enrolled. The basic clinical characteristics between the 2 groups had no significant difference. Parameters related to the procedure, average procedure time, ablation procedure time, average contact force (CF) applied, the percentage of time within CF settings, and average power applied during radiofrequency application showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. In group 1, the average fluoroscopy time before LA reconstruction was similar to that in group 2 (2.8 ± 0.4 vs. 2.4 ± 0.6 minutes, P = .75). The average fluoroscopy time during ablation was significantly lower than that in group 2 (0 vs. 7.6 ± 1.3 minutes, P < .001). The total x-ray exposure dose of the procedure in group 1 was significantly lower than that in group 2 (19.6 ± 9.4 vs. 128.7 ± 62.5 mGy, respectively, P < .001). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that there were no statistical differences in the probability of freedom from atrial arrhythmia (AF/AFL/AT) recurrence at 12 months between group 1 and group 2 (P = .152). The success rate after a single ablation procedure and without drugs (Class I/III AAD) at 12 months was not significantly different between the 2 groups (67.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%–79.5% in group 1 and 68.9%, 95% CI: 63%–80.7% in group 2, P = .207). Procedural-related adverse events showed no significant different incidence between group 1 and group 2. A multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors was performed to evaluate the effectiveness outcome, which demonstrated that the percentage of CF (within the investigator-selected work ranges) during therapy was significantly associated with positive outcomes (odds ratio: 3.68; 95% CI: 1.65–10.6, P = .008), whereas the LA dimension was negatively associated with effectiveness outcomes (odds ratio: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.52–0.84, P = .016). Conclusions: Reconstruction LA and isolation PV ablation using single CF-assisted catheter without x-ray exposure was both safe and effective. CF was positively associated with effective outcomes and LA dimensions negatively with effective ones.