Jianliang Tong

Direction and extent of perceived motion smear during pursuit eye movement

Smooth pursuit eye movements superimpose additional motion on the retinal image of untracked visual targets, potentially leading to the perception of motion smear and a distortion of the perceived direction of motion. Previously, we demonstrated an attenuation of perceived motion smear when the untracked target moves in the opposite direction of an ongoing pursuit eye movement. In this study, the extent of perceived motion smear and the direction of perceived smear were compared for a single bright dot that moved in a wide range of directions with respective to horizontal pursuit at 8 deg/s. Comparable data were obtained during fixation as a control. The results indicate that a significant attenuation of perceived motion smear occurs when the dots motion includes a horizontal component in the opposite direction of eye movement. In contrast, the direction of perceived smear approximates the trajectory of the retinal image motion, during both fixation and pursuit. These results suggest a selective application of extra-retinal signals to compensate specific aspects of visual perception that results from the retinal image motion during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Asymmetry of perceived motion smear during head and eye movements: evidence for a dichotomous neural categorization of retinal image motion.

We measured perceived motion smear when retinal image motion was created either by a physically moving object or by movement of the eyes or head. Consistent with previous reports, the extent of perceived motion smear during an eye or head movement is less than that produced by physical object motion when the eyes are stationary. Moreover, perceived smear is substantially smaller when the motion of the retinal image is in the same direction as the eye or head movement compared to when image motion is in the opposite direction. These results imply that extra-retinal signals associated with eye and head movements contribute to a reduction of perceived motion smear, thereby fostering perceptual clarity. We hypothesize that the visual system uses a simple dichotomous strategy in applying these extra-retinal signals, based only on the direction of retinal image motion with respect to the ongoing eye or head movement.

The Attenuation of Perceived Motion Smear During Combined Eye and Head Movements

The extent of perceived motion smear was compared for targets that underwent similar velocities of retinal image motion during the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in the dark, the visually enhanced VOR (VVOR), VOR suppression, and fixation. Compared to the extent of perceived motion smear during fixation, observers reported significantly less smear when the target moved either in the same direction or against the direction of the head movement during the VVOR and VOR. We also confirmed a previous finding that perceived smear is attenuated asymmetrically during VOR suppression, with attenuation occurring primarily for targets that move against the direction of the observers head motion. The results support the hypothesis that the visual system employs extra-retinal signals that accompany eye and head movements to reduce the perception of motion smear for targets that move physically in the opposite direction of eye and/or head movements.

Orientation discrimination with macular changes associated with early AMD.

Purpose. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a condition that progressively reduces central vision in elderly individuals, resulting in a reduced capacity to perform many daily activities and a diminished quality of life. Recent studies identified clinical treatments that can slow or reverse the progression of exudative (wet) AMD and ongoing research is evaluating earlier interventions. Because early diagnosis is critical for an optimal outcome, the goal of this study is to assess psychophysical orientation discrimination for randomly positioned short line segments as a potential indicator of subtle macular changes in eyes with early AMD. Methods. Orientation discrimination was measured in a sample of 74 eyes of patients aged 47 to 82 years old, none of which had intermediate or advanced AMD. Amsler-grid testing was performed as well. A masked examiner graded each eye as level 0, 1, 2, or 3 on a streamlined version of the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) scale for AMD, based on the presence and extent of macular drusen or retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) changes. Visual acuity in the 74 eyes ranged from 20/15 to 20/40+1, with no significant differences among the grading levels. Humphrey 10–2 and Nidek MP-1 micro-perimetry were used to assess retinal sensitivity at test locations 1° from the locus of fixation. Results. Average orientation-discrimination thresholds increased systematically from 7.4° to 11.3° according to the level of macular changes. In contrast, only 3 of 74 eyes exhibited abnormalities on the Amsler grid and central-field perimetric defects occurred with approximately equal probability at all grading levels. Conclusions. In contrast to Amsler grid and central-visual-field testing, psychophysical orientation discrimination has the capability to distinguish between eyes with and without subtle age-related macular changes.

Direction-of-motion discrimination is facilitated by visible motion smear.

Recent evidence indicates that motion smear can provide useful information for the detection and discrimination of motion. Further, it has been shown that the perception of motion smear depends critically on the density of dots in a random-dot (RD) stimulus. Therefore, in the present experiments, the contribution of perceived motion smear to direction-of-motion discrimination was evaluated using RD targets of different densities. Thresholds for direction-of-motion discrimination and the extent of perceived motion smear were determined for RD stimuli with densities of 1, 2, and 10 dots/deg2, presented for 200 msec at a velocity of 4, 8, or 12 deg/sec. To evaluate the contribution of information about orientation from motion smear, thresholds for orientation discrimination were measured using parallel lines with the same length as the extent of perceived smear. Despite the opportunity for increased summation as RD density increases, our results indicate that direction-of-motion discrimination worsens. Because perception of motion smear is reduced with an increase in RD density, our results are consistent with a facilitation of direction-of-motion discrimination by visible motion smear.

The temporal impulse response function during smooth pursuit.

Recent studies indicate that the extent of perceived motion smear is attenuated asymmetrically during smooth pursuit eye movements, based on the relative directions of the target and eye motion. We conducted two experiments to determine if the reduction of perceived smear during pursuit might be associated with an acceleration of the temporal impulse response function (TIRF). In Experiment 1, two-pulse increment sensitivity was determined during fixation and rightward pursuit for sequential flashes of a long horizontal line, presented with stimulus-onset asynchronies between 5.9 and 234 ms. In Experiment 2, temporal contrast sensitivity was measured during fixation and rightward pursuit for a vertical 1 cpd grating with retinal image velocities between 4 and 30 Hz. During pursuit, grating motion was either in the same or the opposite direction as the eye movement. TIRFs were modeled as the impulse responses of a second-order, low-pass linear system, fit to the two-pulse increment sensitivity data by an optimization procedure and to the temporal contrast sensitivity results by iterative Fourier synthesis. The results indicate that the natural temporal frequency of the fitted TIRFs was approximately 10% higher during pursuit than fixation. In Experiment 2, the increased natural frequency of the TIRF was restricted to the condition in which the grating moved spatially in the opposite direction of the pursuit eye movement. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that extra-retinal signals reduce the extent of perceived motion smear during pursuit, in part by increasing the speed of visual processing preferentially for one direction of image motion.

Asymmetrical perception of motion smear in infantile nystagmus

Normal observers perceive less motion smear if a target moves in the opposite direction of a smooth eye movement than if the target moves to produce the same retinal image speed in the same direction as the eye movement. This study investigated whether a similar asymmetrical attenuation of perceived motion smear occurs in observers with infantile nystagmus (IN). Observers (N=3) viewed a laser spot that moved for 100 or 125ms to the right or left at a speed between 5 and 60 degrees /s during the slow phase of jerk IN. After each trial, the observer adjusted the length of a bright line to match the extent of the perceived smear. Across observers, the average duration of perceived smear was 39 and 106ms, respectively, for relative motion of the laser spot in the opposite vs. the same direction as the IN slow phase. In one observer with periodic alternating nystagmus, the direction of spot motion that produced less perceived smear reversed with an alternation in the direction of the IN slow phase. The reduction of perceived motion smear for relative target motion in the opposite direction of IN slow phases is attributed to extra-retinal signals that accompany IN. As during normal eye movements, the reduction of perceived smear for this direction of relative motion should foster the perception of clarity in the stationary visual world.

The temporal impulse response function in infantile nystagmus.

Despite rapid to-and-fro motion of the retinal image that results from their incessant involuntary eye movements, persons with infantile nystagmus (IN) rarely report the perception of motion smear. We performed two experiments to determine if the reduction of perceived motion smear in persons with IN is associated with an increase in the speed of the temporal impulse response. In Experiment 1, increment thresholds were determined for pairs of successively presented flashes of a long horizontal line, presented on a 65-cd/m2 background field. The stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA) between the first and second flash varied from 5.9 to 234 ms. In experiment 2, temporal contrast sensitivity functions were determined for a 3-cpd horizontal square-wave grating that underwent counterphase flicker at temporal frequencies between 1 and 40 Hz. Data were obtained for 2 subjects with predominantly pendular IN and 8 normal observers in Experiment 1 and for 3 subjects with IN and 4 normal observers in Experiment 2. Temporal impulse response functions (TIRFs) were estimated as the impulse response of a linear second-order system that provided the best fit to the increment threshold data in Experiment 1 and to the temporal contrast sensitivity functions in Experiment 2. Estimated TIRFs of the subjects with pendular IN have natural temporal frequencies that are significantly faster than those of normal observers (ca. 13 vs. 9 Hz), indicating an accelerated temporal response to visual stimuli. This increase in response speed is too small to account by itself for the virtual absence of perceived motion smear in subjects with IN, and additional neural mechanisms are considered.

Motion sensitivity during fixation in straight-ahead and lateral eccentric gaze

Despite motion of the entire retinal image that results from fixational eye-movements, the visual scene is perceived as stationary. One hypothesis to account for this observation is that normal motion sensitivity is limited by the variability of fixational eye velocity. The present experiments tested this hypothesis by comparing motion sensitivity and the variability of fixational eye velocity in corresponding meridians. Speed thresholds to detect horizontal, vertical, and rotary motion in a set of eight random-dot patches were measured, while normal observers monocularly viewed the stimulus with gaze either straight-ahead or deviated to the left by 45°. Eye-movement recordings using the search-coil technique were used to estimate the variability of eye velocity in the horizontal, vertical, and torsional meridians during fixation. As reported previously by Murakami (2004), the averaged thresholds for horizontal and vertical motion correlated with the averaged variability of eye velocity in the horizontal and vertical meridians when observers looked straight-ahead. However, no relationship existed between the threshold for rotary motion and the variability of eye velocity in the torsional meridian. Furthermore, no relationship existed between the motion threshold and the variability of eye velocity in any meridian during fixation in lateral eccentric gaze. These results are only partly consistent with the hypothesis that fixation variability limits motion sensitivity.

Relationships of orientation discrimination threshold and visual acuity with macular lesions in age-related macular degeneration

Purpose To measure visual acuity and metamorphopsia in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and to explore their relationship with macular lesions. Methods In this cross-sectional study, a total of 32 normal subjects (32 eyes) and 35 AMD patients (35 eyes) were recruited. They were categorized into 4 groups: normal, dry AMD, non-active wet AMD, and active wet AMD. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. Metamorphopsia was quantified with the orientation discrimination threshold (ODT). Macular lesions, including drusen, sub-retinal fluid (SRF), intra-retinal fluid (IRF), pigmented epithelium detachment (PED), and scarring, were identified with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). A linear regression model was established to identify the relationships between the functional and structural changes. Results BCVA progressively worsened across the normal, dry AMD, non-active wet AMD, and active wet AMD groups (P < 0.001), and ODT increased across the groups (P < 0.001). The correlation between BCVA and ODT varied among the groups. The partial correlation between BCVA and ODT was −0.61 (P < 0.001). Linear regression showed that ODT significantly depended on IRF (β = 0.61, P < 0.001), SRF (β = 0.34, P = 0.003), and scarring (β = 0.26, P = 0.050), while BCVA significantly depended only on scarring (β = −0.52, P < 0.001), and IRF (β = −0.36, P = 0.016). Conclusions From dry AMD to active wet AMD, BCVA gradually worsened while ODT increased. The correlation between BCVA and ODT varied among these groups, indicating that AMD lesions affect them differently. ODT and BCVA should be used concurrently for better monitoring of the disease.