Jieming Fang

Ovarian Cancer: Prevalence in Incidental Simple Adnexal Cysts Initially Identified in CT Examinations of the Abdomen and Pelvis

Purpose To evaluate the rate of malignancy in incidentally detected simple adnexal cysts at computed tomography (CT) to determine if simple-appearing cysts require follow-up. Materials and Methods In this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study, an institutional database was searched for abdominal and pelvic CT studies performed between June 2003 and December 2010 in women reported to have adnexal cysts. Adnexal cyst characterization was determined by prospective report description as well as image review by a research fellow and by a fellowship-trained abdominal radiologist for examinations with disagreement between the original report and the research fellows assessment. Patients with known ovarian cysts or ovarian cancer at time of the index CT examination were excluded. Clinical outcome was assessed by using follow-up imaging studies, medical records, and the state cancer registry. Benign outcome was determined by benign findings at surgery, a decrease in size or resolution of a simple-appearing cyst at follow-up imaging, or stability of the cyst for at least 1 year. Descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results Among 42 111 women who underwent abdominal and pelvic CT examinations in the study period, 2763 (6.6%; 95% CI: 6.3%, 6.8%) (mean age, 48.1 years ± 18.1; range, 15-102 years) had a newly detected finding of ovarian cyst described in the body or impression section of the report. Median cyst size was 3.1 cm (range, 0.8-20.0 cm). Eighteen (0.7%; 95% CI: 0.4%, 1.0%) of 2763 patients were found to have ovarian cancer after an average follow-up of 5.1 years ± 3.8 (range, 0-12.8 years). None (95% CI: 0%, 0.4%) of 1031 women with simple-appearing cysts were given a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. This included none (95% CI: 0%, 0.4%) of 904 women with simple-appearing cysts with an adequate reference standard for benign outcome. Conclusion The prevalence of previously unknown adnexal cysts at CT was 6.6%, with an ovarian cancer rate of 0.7% (95% CI: 0.4%, 1.0%). All simple-appearing cysts were benign (95% CI: 99.6%, 100%).

Split-Bolus Injection Producing Simultaneous Late Arterial and Portal Venous Phases in CT Enterography: Preliminary Results

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to evaluate the image quality and added value of split-bolus contrast agent injection combining late arterial and portal venous phases compared with single-bolus contrast agent injection late arterial phase CT enterography. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent CT enterography before and after implementation of a single-bolus CT enterography protocol were included. Attenuation and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed by ROI measurements of the bowel wall and arterial and venous structures. Subjective enhancement of the bowel wall (1, arterial; 2, mucosal; 3, transmural; 4, transmural with mucosal hyperenhancement) and bowel abnormalities were assessed by two independent readers. MR enterography examinations, endoscopy reports, and surgery reports within 30 days after CT enterography were used to produce a composite outcome. RESULTS Sixty-six patients were included in our study: 33 (mean [± SD] age, 46.0 ± 19.8 years) who underwent split-bolus CT enterography and 33 (mean age, 49.9 ± 19.0 years) who underwent single-bolus CT enterography. Bowel wall attenuation and CNR were higher for split-bolus CT enterography than for single-bolus CT enterography at 120 kVp (enhancement, 98.7 ± 23.1 HU vs 85.1 ± 23.3 HU; CNR, 6.4 ± 2.5 vs 4.4 ± 2.3; p < 0.01). Subjective ratings of bowel wall enhancement were higher with the split-bolus CT enterography than the single-bolus CT enterography (2.6 ± 0.8 vs 2.3 ± 0.6; p < 0.001). Split-bolus CT enterography led to a higher detection rate of mucosal hyperenhancement than did single-bolus CT enterography in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease (100.0% [7/7; 95% CI, 59.0-100.0%] vs 33.3% [2/6; 95% CI, 4.3-77.7%]; p = 0.02), whereas both protocols had a specificity of 100.0% (9/9). CONCLUSION Split-bolus CT enterography led to improved CNR (47%) compared with single-bolus CT enterography and significantly increased the detection rate of mucosal hyperenhancement in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease.

What Is the Optimal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac Measurement on CT Images during Follow-up after Endovascular Repair?

Purpose To develop a computed tomographic (CT) angiographic postprocessing protocol with two- and three-dimensional measurements for follow-up of patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair. Materials and Methods This HIPAA-compliant institutional review board-approved retrospective study included 159 patients (129 men, 30 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 74.9 years ± 8.2) who underwent 824 CT examinations (median of five examinations per patient; range, two to 14) with unenhanced and arterial -phase imaging performed between September 2004 and March 2015. The largest diameter on the axial plane; coronal, sagittal, and maximal diameter perpendicular to the reconstructed centerline; volume of the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac; and volume from the lowest renal artery to the aortic bifurcation and to the common iliac artery bifurcation were measured. Endoleaks on contrast material-enhanced images were considered the reference standard, and the predictive value of diameter and volume changes was analyzed. Intraclass correlation was used to compare diameters and volumes. Results All diameters and volumes showed excellent correlation (intraclass coefficient, 0.95 and 0.94, respectively). Average interobserver difference for diameters and volumes was 2%-3% and 4%-12%, respectively. Endoleaks were observed in 80 (50%) of 159 patients (59 [74%] at initial and 21 [26%] at later CT angiography). New endo-leaks were associated with increased aneurysm size measured as the largest diameter on the axial plane (P = .04) and perpendicular to the centerline (P = .01), and volume was measured from the lowest renal artery to the aortic bifurcation (P = .03) and to the common iliac artery bifurcation (P = .01). With a 5% size threshold, sensitivity and specificity for detection of endoleaks was optimal for centerline diameter (64.3% and 81.7%, respectively) and volume from the lowest renal artery to the common iliac artery bifurcation (57.1% and 63.5%). Conclusion The maximal diameter and volume of an abdominal aortic aneurysm sac can be used for temporal monitoring after endovascular aortic repair, with excellent correlation and interobserver agreement. An increase in the centerline diameter and volume from the lowest renal artery to the iliac bifurcation were the most sensitive criteria for detecting endoleaks.