Jihad H. Kaouk

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques.

PURPOSE We describe our technique of and single institutional experience with purely laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor, wherein the focus is to duplicate established open techniques of oncologic nephron sparing surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since August 1999 laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor has been performed in 50 patients. Of the patients 24 (48%) had either a compromised contralateral kidney (20) or a solitary kidney (4). Mean tumor size was 3.0 cm. (range 1.4 to 7). In 9 patients (18%) the inner margin of the tumor was in close proximity to the pelvicaliceal system. Our current laparoscopic technique involves preoperative ureteral catheterization, laparoscopic renal ultrasonography, transient atraumatic clamping of the renal artery and vein, tumor excision with an approximate 0.5 cm. margin using cold endoshears and/or J-hook electrocautery, pelvicaliceal suture repair (if necessary) and suture repair of the renal parenchymal defect over surgicel bolsters. In 1 case renal surface hypothermia was achieved laparoscopically with ice slush. All suturing and knot tying were performed with free hand intracorporeal laparoscopic techniques exclusively. RESULTS All procedures were successfully completed without open conversion. Mean surgical time was 3.0 hours (range, 0.75 to 5.8) and mean blood loss was 270.4 cc (range 40 to 1,500). Mean warm ischemia time was 23 minutes (range, 9.8 to 40). Caliceal entry in 18 cases (36%) was suture repaired in a watertight manner. Following caliceal repair, none of these 18 patients had a postoperative urine leak. Hospital stay averaged 2.2 days (range 1 to 9). Major complications occurred in 3 patients (6%) including intraoperative hemorrhage in 1, delayed hemorrhage necessitating nephrectomy in 1 and urine leak in 1. Renal cell carcinoma was confirmed on pathological examination in 34 patients (68%), and all had negative inked surgical margins for cancer. During a mean followup of 7.2 months (range 1 to 17) no patient has had local or port site recurrence or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is a viable alternative for select patients with a renal tumor. The largest single institutional experience to date is presented wherein the open techniques of nephron sparing surgery have been duplicated laparoscopically.

Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery

Purpose  Laparoscopy is the approach of choice for the majority of colorectal disorders that require a minimally invasive abdominal operation. As the emphasis on minimizing the technique continues, natural orifice surgery is quickly evolving. The authors utilized an embryologic natural orifice, the umbilicus, as sole access to the abdomen to perform a colorectal procedure. Herein, we present our initial experience of single‐port laparoscopic colorectal surgery using a Uni‐X™ Single‐Port Access Laparoscopic System (Pnavel Systems, Morganville, New Jersey, USA) with a multi‐channel cannula and specially designed curved laparoscopic instrumentation.

Transumbilical Single-Port Surgery: Evolution and Current Status

CONTEXT Single-port transumbilical laparoscopy, also known as embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES), has emerged as an attempt to further enhance cosmetic benefits and reduce morbidity of minimally invasive surgery. Within a short span, several clinical reports have emerged in the urologic literature. As this field is poised to move forward, a complete understanding of its evolution and current status is timely. OBJECTIVE To summarize and review the history of E-NOTES across surgical disciplines. This review emphasizes nomenclature, surgical technique, instrumentation, and perioperative outcomes. Specific urological and nonurological applications of single-port surgery to date are summarized. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Using the National Library of Medicine database, the English-language literature was reviewed for the past 40 yr. Keyword searches included: scarless, scar free, single port/trocar/incision, intraumbilical, and transumbilical. Within the bibliography of selected references, additional sources were retrieved. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The gynecologic and general surgical literature includes approximately 19 papers fulfilling the search criteria, encompassing extirpative procedures only. The urologic literature contains eight published reports of single-trocar transumbilical procedures. These reports are summarized in a chronological manner and grouped by subject. No prospective studies comparing outcomes to standard laparoscopy have been reported. Technical feasibility has been demonstrated for a broad range of extirpative and reconstructive procedures on the upper and lower urinary tracts, including simple and radical nephrectomy, donor nephrectomy, renal cryotherapy, pyeloplasty, ileal ureteral replacement, sacrocolpopexy, and varicocelectomy. CONCLUSIONS E-NOTES has made its initial forays into laparoscopic surgery. Ongoing refinement in technique and instrumentation is likely to expand its future role.

Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology: Initial Experience

OBJECTIVES To present our initial experience with single-port laparoscopic urologic surgery using the Uni-X Single Port Access Laparoscopic System, a single port, multichannel cannula, with specially designed curved laparoscopic instrumentation. METHODS We performed single-port laparoscopic surgery in 10 patients, including renal cryotherapy in 4, wedge kidney biopsy in 1, radical nephrectomy in 1, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy in 4. For the transperitoneal approach, the multichannel port was inserted transumbilically, and for retroperitoneoscopy, the port was inserted at the tip of the 12th rib. Data were collected prospectively into our institutional review board-approved data registry. RESULTS Since September 25, 2007, a total of 10 patients have undergone single-port laparoscopic surgery for various upper abdominal and pelvic pathologic findings. All cases were completed successfully, without conversion to a standard laparoscopic approach. The total operative time for the various kidney procedures was 2.5 hours (range 2 to 3.2) and was 2.5 hours (range 2 to 3) for sacrocolpopexy. The mean blood loss was 100 mL for the renal procedures and 90 mL for sacrocolpopexy. The hospital stay was 2.8 days (range 1 to 8) for the kidney procedures and 2 days for sacrocolpopexy. One complication occurred in a patient with baseline congestive heart failure who underwent cryoablation and required oxygen mask ventilation postoperatively that delayed her hospital discharge for 1 week. The same patient, who was anemic preoperatively, was transfused with 3 U of packed red blood cells, although the postoperative computed tomography scan revealed a small perinephric hematoma. CONCLUSIONS Single-port laparoscopic renal cryotherapy, wedge kidney biopsy, radical nephrectomy, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy are safe and feasible. Additional experience and continued investigation are warranted.

Single port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE We present the initial 4 patients undergoing single port transumbilical live donor nephrectomy. Scar-free abdominal surgery via natural body orifices is called NOTES (natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery). In a similar manner the umbilicus, an embryonic (E) natural orifice, permits abdominal access with hidden scar of entry. We propose the term E-NOTES for embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Through an intra-umbilical incision a novel single access tri-lumen R-port was inserted into the abdomen. No extra-umbilical skin incisions were made whatsoever. A 2 mm Veress needle port, inserted via skin needle puncture to establish pneumoperitoneum, was used to selectively insert a needlescopic grasper for tissue retraction. Donor kidney was pre-entrapped and extracted transumbilically. RESULTS E-NOTES donor nephrectomy was successful in all 4 patients. Median operating time was 3.3 hours, blood loss was 50 cc, warm ischemia time was 6.2 minutes and hospital stay was 3 days. Median length of harvested renal artery was 3.3 cm, renal vein 4 cm and ureter 15 cm. No intraoperative complications occurred. Donor visual analog scores were 0/10 at 2 weeks. Each allograft functioned immediately on transplantation. CONCLUSIONS The initial experience with E-NOTES donor nephrectomy is encouraging. Excellent donor vascular and tissue dissection could be performed, and a quality donor kidney was retrieved transumbilically without any extra-umbilical skin incision. E-NOTES donor nephrectomy appears to have relevance and promise, especially for this typically younger, altruistic population. Natural orifices present an unprecedented opportunity for scar-free surgery.

Nephrectomy Induced Chronic Renal Insufficiency is Associated With Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Death and Death From Any Cause in Patients With Localized cT1b Renal Masses

PURPOSE Radical nephrectomy has traditionally been preferred to partial nephrectomy in patients with localized renal cell cancer because of its simplicity and established cancer control. Recent data suggest that these patients have significant competing risks of death, some of which may be increased by chronic renal insufficiency. Therefore, we compared overall survival, cancer specific survival and cardiac specific survival in patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy for cT1b tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 1999 to 2006, 1,004 patients with renal masses between 4 and 7 cm underwent extirpative surgery, partial nephrectomy (524) or radical nephrectomy (480). We generated a propensity model based on preoperative patient characteristics, and then modeled survival with the additional variables of pathological stage and new baseline renal function. RESULTS On multivariate analysis cancer specific survival was equivalent for patients treated with partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy. Those patients undergoing radical nephrectomy lost significantly more renal function than those undergoing partial nephrectomy. The average excess loss of renal function observed with radical nephrectomy was associated with a 25% (95% CI 3-73) increased risk of cardiac death and 17% (95% CI 12-27) increased risk of death from any cause on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Partial nephrectomy offers cancer specific survival equivalent to that of radical nephrectomy and is technically feasible in at least 50% of patients with cT1b tumors. Preservation of renal function was significantly better in patients treated with partial nephrectomy. Postoperative renal insufficiency was a significant independent predictor of overall and cardiovascular specific survival, and efforts should be made to limit the renal function loss associated with surgery for localized renal masses.

Single-port Urological Surgery: Single-center Experience With the First 100 Cases

OBJECTIVES To present perioperative outcomes in an observational cohort of patients who underwent LaparoEndoscopic Single Site (LESS) surgery at a single academic center. METHODS A prospective study was performed to evaluate patient outcomes after LESS urologic surgery. Demographic data including age, body mass index, operative time, estimated blood loss, operative indications, complications, and postoperative Visual Analog Pain Scale scores were accrued. Patients were followed postoperatively for evidence of adverse events. RESULTS Between September 2007 and February 2009, 100 patients underwent LESS urologic surgery. Specifically, 74 patients underwent LESS renal surgery (cryoablation, 8; partial nephrectomy, 15; metastectomy, 1; renal biopsy, 1; simple nephrectomy, 7; radical nephrectomy, 6; cyst decortication, 2; nephroureterectomy, 7; donor nephrectomy, 19; and dismembered pyeloplasty, 8) and 26 patients underwent LESS pelvic surgery (varicocelectomy, 3; radical prostatectomy, 6; radical cystectomy, 3; sacral colpopexy, 13; and ureteral reimplant, 1). Mean patient age was 54 years. Mean body mass index was 26.2 kg/m(2). Mean operative time was 199 minutes. Mean estimated blood loss was 136 mL. No intraoperative complications occurred. Six patients required conversion to standard laparoscopy. Mean length of hospitalization was 3 days. Mean Visual Analog Pain Scale score at discharge was 1.5/10. At a mean follow-up of 11 months, 9 Clavien Grade II (transfusion, 7; urinary tract infection, 1; deep vein thrombosis, 1) and 2 Clavien Grade IIIb (recto-urethral fistula, 1; angioembolization, 1) surgical complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, LESS urologic surgery is feasible, offers improved cosmesis, and may offer decreased pain. Complications are consistent with the published data. Whether LESS urologic surgery is superior in comparison with standard laparoscopy is currently speculative.

Robotic single‐port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report

To describe our initial clinical experience of robotic single‐port (RSP) surgery.

Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit performed completely intracorporeally: the initial 2 cases

OBJECTIVES To present the initial 2 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy, bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, and ileal conduit urinary diversion, with the entire procedure performed exclusively by intracorporeal laparoscopic techniques. METHODS Two male patients, 78 and 70 years old, with muscle-invasive, organ-confined, transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder underwent the procedure. The entire procedure, including radical cystoprostatectomy, pelvic node dissection, isolation of the ileal loop, restoration of bowel continuity with stapled side-to-side ileoileal anastomosis, retroperitoneal transfer of the left ureter to the right side, and bilateral stented ileoureteral anastomoses were all performed exclusively by intracorporeal laparoscopic techniques. Free-hand laparoscopic suturing and in situ knot-tying techniques were used exclusively. RESULTS The surgical time was 11.5 hours in the first patient and 10 hours in the second. The respective blood loss was 1200 mL and 1000 mL. In both patients, ambulation resumed on postoperative day 2, bowel sounds on day 3, and oral intake on day 4; the hospital stay was 6 days. Narcotic analgesia comprised 108.3 mg and 16.5 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent, respectively. Pathologic examination revealed pT4N0M0 (prostate) and pT2bN0M0 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder with the surgical margins negative for cancer in both patients. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred in either patient. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the initial report of laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion. We believe that with further experience and refinement in the operative technique, laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion may become an attractive treatment option for selected candidates with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery

Inderbir S. Gill • Arnold P. Advincula • Monish Aron • Jeffrey Caddedu • David Canes • Paul G. Curcillo II • Mihir M. Desai • John C. Evanko • Tomasso Falcone • Victor Fazio • Matthew Gettman • Andrew A. Gumbs • Georges-Pascal Haber • Jihad H. Kaouk • Fernando Kim • Stephanie A. King • Jeffrey Ponsky • Feza Remzi • Homero Rivas • Alexander Rosemurgy • Sharona Ross • Philip Schauer • Rene Sotelo • Jose Speranza • John Sweeney • Julio Teixeira