Jill Barker

Disparities in Fistula Maturation Persist Despite Preoperative Vascular Mapping

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Failure to mature (primary failure) of new fistulas remains a major obstacle to increasing the proportion of dialysis patients with fistulas. This failure rate is higher in women than in men, higher in older than in younger patients, and higher in forearm than in upper arm fistulas. These disparities in the frequency of failure to mature may be due in part to marginal vessels in the high-risk groups and should be reduced by routine preoperative vascular mapping. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS A prospective, computerized database was queried retrospectively to evaluate the frequency of primary fistula failure in 205 hemodialysis patients for whom preoperative mapping was obtained. The association between clinical characteristics and risk for primary fistula failure was analyzed by univariate and multiple variable regression analysis. RESULTS The overall primary fistula failure rate was 40% (82 of 205 patients). On multiple variable logistic regression, three clinical factors were associated with an increased risk for failure to mature among patients who underwent preoperative vascular mapping: Female gender, age > or =65 yr, and forearm location. The primary fistula failure rate varied from 22% in younger men with an upper arm fistula to 78% in older women with a forearm fistula. Dynamic preoperative vascular measurements (change in peak systolic velocity and resistive index after tight fist clenching) did not differ between patients with mature and immature forearm fistulas. CONCLUSION Disparities in fistula maturation persist despite the use of routine preoperative vascular mapping.

Predictors of arteriovenous graft patency after radiologic intervention in hemodialysis patients

Arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients are prone to recurrent stenosis and thrombosis, requiring frequent radiologic and surgical interventions to optimize their long-term patency. Little is known about the factors that determine graft outcome after a radiologic intervention. The present study examined the clinical and radiologic predictors of intervention-free graft survival after elective angioplasty or thrombectomy. A prospective computerized database was used to determine the outcomes subsequent to all graft angioplasties (n = 330) and thrombectomies (n = 326) performed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between April 1, 1996, and June 30, 1999. Primary graft survival rates after angioplasty and thrombectomy were 86% versus 43% at 1 month, 71% versus 30% at 3 months, 51% versus 19% at 6 months, and 28% versus 8% at 12 months, respectively. The median intervention-free graft survival time was substantially longer after angioplasty than thrombectomy (6.7 versus 0.6 months; P < 0.001). The superior outcome of angioplasty over thrombectomy was observed even for the subset of procedures with no residual stenosis (median survival, 6.9 versus 2.5 months; P < 0.001). The median graft survival was inversely related to the magnitude of residual stenosis for both elective angioplasty and thrombectomy. Median intervention-free graft survival after angioplasty was inversely related to the postangioplasty intragraft to systemic systolic pressure ratio (7.6, 6.9, and 5.6 months for ratios <0.4, 0.4 to 0.6, and >0.6, respectively; P < 0.001). Intervention-free graft survival after angioplasty or thrombectomy was not affected by graft location (forearm versus upper arm), number of stenotic sites, or presence of diabetes. In conclusion, graft survival is substantially longer after elective angioplasty than thrombectomy, even when the radiologic appearance after the procedure suggests complete resolution of the stenotic lesion. Moreover, the risk for requiring a subsequent graft intervention can be predicted from two simple radiologic measurements: grade of stenosis and intragraft to systemic systolic blood pressure ratio. These parameters may help determine the frequency of monitoring for recurrent stenosis in a given graft.

Comparison of survival of upper arm arteriovenous fistulas and grafts after failed forearm fistula

Although arteriovenous fistulas are considered superior to grafts, it is unknown whether that is true in the subset of patients with a previous failed fistula. For investigation of this question, a prospective vascular access database was queried retrospectively to compare the outcomes of 59 fistulas and 51 grafts that were placed in the upper arm after primary failure of an initial forearm fistula. Primary access failure was higher for subsequent fistulas than for subsequent grafts (44 versus 20%; P = 0.006). Fistulas required more interventions than grafts before their successful use (0.42 versus 0.16 per patient; P = 0.04). The time to catheter-free dialysis was longer for fistulas than for grafts (131 versus 34 d; P < 0.0001) and was associated with more episodes of bacteremia before permanent access use (1.3 versus 0.4 per patient; P = 0.003). Cumulative survival (from placement to permanent failure) was higher for fistulas than for grafts when primary failures were excluded (hazard ratio 0.51; 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.94; P = 0.03), but similar when primary failures were included (hazard ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.62; P = 0.97). Fistulas required fewer interventions to maintain long-term patency for dialysis after maturation (0.73 versus 2.38 per year; P < 0.001). In conclusion, as compared with grafts, subsequent upper arm fistulas are associated with a higher primary failure rate, more interventions to achieve maturation, longer catheter dependence, and more frequent catheter-related bacteremia. However, once the access is usable for dialysis, fistulas have superior cumulative patency than do grafts and require fewer interventions to maintain patency.

Comparison of Arteriovenous Grafts in the Thigh and Upper Extremities in Hemodialysis Patients

Placement of a thigh graft is an option in hemodialysis patients who have exhausted all upper extremity sites for permanent vascular access. The outcome of thigh grafts has been reported only in retrospective studies. The outcomes of 409 grafts placed at a single institution during a 3.5-yr period were evaluated prospectively, including 63 thigh grafts (15% of the total). Information was recorded on surgical complications, dates of radiologic and surgical interventions, and date of graft failure. The technical failure rate was approximately twice as high for thigh grafts, as compared with upper extremity grafts (12.7 versus 5.8%; P = 0.046). Intervention-free survival was similar for thigh and upper extremity grafts (median, 3.9 versus 3.5 mo; P = 0.55). Thrombosis-free survival was also comparable for thigh and upper extremity grafts (median, 5.7 versus 5.5 mo; P = 0.94). Cumulative survival (time to permanent failure) was similar for thigh and upper extremity grafts (median, 14.8 versus 20.8 mo; P = 0.62). When technical failures were excluded, the median cumulative survival was 27.6 mo for thigh grafts and 22.5 mo for upper extremity grafts (P = 0.72). The frequency of angioplasty (0.28 versus 0.57 per year), thrombectomy (1.58 versus 0.94 per year), surgical revision (0.28 versus 0.18 per year), and total intervention rate (2.15 versus 1.70 per year) was similar between thigh and upper extremity grafts. Access loss as a result of infection tended to be higher for thigh grafts than for upper extremity grafts (11.1 versus 5.2%; P = 0.07). In conclusion, placement of thigh grafts should be considered a viable option among hemodialysis patients who have exhausted all options for a permanent vascular access in both upper extremities.

316 NEEDLE INFILTRATIONS OF ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULAS IN HEMODIALYSIS: RISK FACTORS AND CONSEQUENCES.

Long-term use of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula for dialysis requires the ability of the dialysis staff to cannulate the fistula with large-bore needles three times a week. One complication of unsuccessful fistula cannulation is a needle infiltration, resulting in development of a subcutaneous hematoma, and precluding fistula use until resolution of the hematoma. Needle infiltrations of fistulas may result in the temporary inability to use the fistula for dialysis and may lead to fistula thrombosis, necessitating tunneled catheter use for maintenance hemodialysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for fistula infiltrations, and the clinical consequences arising from this complication. Using a prospective, computerized vascular access database, we identified all hemodialysis patients who suffered a fistula infiltration during a 5-year period (1/1/00-12/31/04) severe enough to require a follow-up diagnostic test, surgery appointment, or an intervention. This patient group was compared to a control group without fistula infiltrations. We also quantified subsequent access outcomes in patients with infiltrations. During a 5-year period, we identified 62 patients with fistula infiltrations, representing a 7% annual rate. On multiple variable regression analysis, the likelihood of fistula infiltration was strongly associated with patient age (odds ratio 1.038 per each year increment, 95% CI 1.014 to 1.063, p = .001). Fistula infiltration was not associated with sex, race, diabetes, presence of peripheral vascular disease, location of fistula, or body mass index. New fistulas (# 6 months in age) were more likely among patients with infiltrations as compared to a cross-section of patients without infiltrations (43.5% vs 20.5%; odds ratio 2.98, 95% CI 1.61 to 5.54, p = .0004). The 62 infiltrations resulted in 128 procedures or appointments. Fistula thrombosis occurred in 12 patients (or 19%). Prolongation of tunneled catheter dependence occurred in 48 (or 77%) patients with infiltrations, for a median of 97 days. Needle infiltration of fistulas occurs more commonly in older patients and in new fistulas. These infiltrations result in numerous procedures and prolongation of catheter dependence. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the causes of increased infiltrations in new fistulas, the relationship of dialysis nurse experience to infiltrations, and the role of fistula infiltration in causing thrombosis.