Jill Denning

Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin Prevent Recurrence of HCV Infection After Liver Transplantation: An Open-Label Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS Patients with detectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at the time of liver transplantation universally experience recurrent HCV infection. Antiviral treatment before transplantation can prevent HCV recurrence, but existing interferon-based regimens are poorly tolerated and are either ineffective or contraindicated in most patients. We performed a trial to determine whether sofosbuvir and ribavirin treatment before liver transplantation could prevent HCV recurrence afterward. METHODS In a phase 2, open-label study, 61 patients with HCV of any genotype and cirrhosis (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score, ≤7) who were on waitlists for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, received up to 48 weeks of sofosbuvir (400 mg) and ribavirin before liver transplantation. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with HCV-RNA levels less than 25 IU/mL at 12 weeks after transplantation among patients with this HCV-RNA level at their last measurement before transplantation. RESULTS Sixty-one patients received sofosbuvir and ribavirin, and 46 received transplanted livers. The per-protocol efficacy population consisted of 43 patients who had HCV-RNA level less than 25 IU/mL at the time of transplantation. Of these 43 patients, 30 (70%) had a post-transplantation virologic response at 12 weeks, 10 (23%) had recurrent infection, and 3 (7%) died (2 from nonfunction of the primary graft and 1 from complications of hepatic artery thrombosis). Of all 61 patients given sofosbuvir and ribavirin, 49% had a post-transplantation virologic response. Recurrence was related inversely to the number of consecutive days of undetectable HCV RNA before transplantation. The most frequently reported adverse events were fatigue (in 38% of patients), headache (23%), and anemia (21%). CONCLUSIONS Administration of sofosbuvir and ribavirin before liver transplantation can prevent post-transplant HCV recurrence. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01559844.

Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin for Treatment of Compensated Recurrent Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS Interferon alfa-based regimens used to treat recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation are poorly tolerated, associated with generally modest efficacy, and can interact with immunosuppressive agents. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of an interferon-free regimen of the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir combined with ribavirin for 24 weeks in treating post-transplantation HCV infection. METHODS In a prospective, multicenter, open-label pilot study, we enrolled patients with compensated recurrent HCV infection of any genotype after a primary or secondary liver transplantation. All patients received 24 weeks of sofosbuvir 400 mg daily and ribavirin starting at 400 mg daily, which was adjusted according to creatinine clearance and hemoglobin values. The primary end point was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment. RESULTS Of the 40 patients enrolled and treated, 78% were male, 85% were white, 83% had HCV genotype 1, 40% had cirrhosis (based on biopsy), and 88% had been previously treated with interferon. Sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment was achieved by 28 of 40 patients (70%; 90% confidence interval: 56%-82%). Relapse accounted for all cases of virologic failure. No patients had detectable viral resistance during or after treatment. The most common adverse events were fatigue (30%), diarrhea (28%), and headache (25%). In addition, 20% of the subjects experienced anemia. Two patients discontinued study treatment because of adverse events, which were considered unrelated to study treatment. No deaths, graft losses, or episodes of rejection occurred. No interactions with any concomitant immunosuppressive agents were reported. CONCLUSIONS Sofosbuvir and ribavirin combination therapy for 24 weeks is an effective and well-tolerated interferon-free treatment for post-transplantation HCV infection. EudraCT, Number: 2012-002417-19; ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT01687270.

Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients with genotype 1 or 4 hepatitis C virus infection and advanced liver disease: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Treatment options are limited for patients infected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) with advanced liver disease. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 and advanced liver disease. METHODS We did an open-label study at 34 sites in Europe, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Cohort A included patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B (CTP-B) or CTP-C cirrhosis who had not undergone liver transplantation. Cohort B included post-transplantation patients who had either no cirrhosis; CTP-A, CTP-B, or CTP-C cirrhosis; or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Patients in each group were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive 12 or 24 weeks of ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) once daily (combination tablet), plus ribavirin (600-1200 mg daily). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). All patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis and all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and did not undergo liver transplantation during treatment were included in the efficacy analyses. Estimates of SVR12 and relapse rates and their two-sided 90% CI (Clopper-Pearson method) were provided. This exploratory phase 2 study was not powered for formal comparisons among treatment groups; no statistical hypothesis testing was planned or conducted. The trial is registered with EudraCT (number 2013-002802-30) and ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT02010255). FINDINGS Between Jan 14, 2014, and Aug 19, 2014, 398 patients were screened. Of 333 patients who received treatment, 296 had genotype 1 HCV and 37 had genotype 4 HCV. In cohort A, among patients with genotype 1 HCV, SVR12 was achieved by 20 (87%, 90% CI 70-96) of 23 CTP-B patients with 12 weeks of treatment; 22 (96%, 81-100) of 23 CTP-B patients with 24 weeks of treatment; 17 (85%, 66-96) of 20 CTP-C patients (12 weeks treatment); and 18 (78%, 60-91) of 23 CTP-C patients (24 weeks treatment). In cohort B, among patients with genotype 1 HCV, SVR12 was achieved by 42 (93%, 84-98) of 45 patients without cirrhosis (12 weeks treatment); 44 (100%, 93-100) of 44 patients without cirrhosis (24 weeks treatment); 30 (100%, 91-100) of 30 CTP-A patients (12 weeks treatment); 27 (96%, 84-100) of 28 CTP-A patients (24 weeks treatment); 19 (95%, 78-100) of 20 CTP-B patients (12 weeks treatment); 20 (100%, 86-100) of 20 CTP-B patients (24 weeks treatment); one (50%, 3-98) of two CTP-C patients (12 weeks treatment); and four (80%, 34-99) of five CTP-C patients (24 weeks treatment). All five patients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis achieved SVR12 (100%, 90% CI 55-100). Among all patients with genotype 4 HCV, SVR12 was achieved by 14 (78%, 56-92) of 18 patients (12 weeks treatment) and 16 (94%, 75-100) of 17 patients (24 weeks treatment). Seven patients (2%) discontinued ledipasvir-sofosbuvir prematurely due to adverse events. 17 patients died, mainly from complications of hepatic decompensation. INTERPRETATION Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and ribavirin provided high rates of SVR12 for patients with advanced liver disease, including those with decompensated cirrhosis before or after liver transplantation. FUNDING Gilead Sciences.

Sofosbuvir compassionate use program for patients with severe recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with accelerated progression of liver disease, frequently leading to graft loss and early death. Existing treatment options for severe recurrent HCV infection are limited by suboptimal efficacy, poor tolerability, and numerous drug interactions. We provided sofosbuvir (SOF) and ribavirin (RBV) on a compassionate‐use basis to patients with severe recurrent hepatitis C, including those with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) and decompensated cirrhosis who had a life expectancy of 1 year or less. All patients were to receive 24‐48 weeks of SOF plus RBV. Investigators could add pegylated interferon to the regimen at their discretion. Data from the first 104 patients who completed or prematurely discontinued treatment by January 1, 2014 are presented. Of the 104 patients analyzed, 52 had an early severe recurrence (diagnosed <12 months after LT) and 52 had cirrhosis (diagnosed >12 months after LT). Twelve patients who underwent retransplantation were excluded from our efficacy analysis. Of the 92 patients assessed, 54 (59%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR) at 12 weeks after the end of treatment, with a higher rate (73%; 35 of 48) in patients with early severe recurrence. Of the 103 patients assessed for clinical outcome, 59 (57%) reported clinical improvement at the last study visit, 23 (22%) were unchanged, 3 (3%) had a worsened clinical status, and 13 (13%) died. Overall, 123 serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 49 patients (47%). SAEs associated with hepatic decompensation were the most frequent, with 26 SAEs occurring in 19 patients (18%). Conclusion: SOF and RBV provide high rates of SVR in patients with severe recurrent HCV, including patients with early severe recurrence, FCH, and cirrhosis. (Hepatology 2015;61:1485–1494)

Analysis of hepatitis C viral kinetics during administration of two nucleotide analogues: sofosbuvir (GS-7977) and GS-0938.

BACKGROUND Sofosbuvir (GS-7977) and GS-0938 are nucleotide analogue HCV polymerase inhibitors, with sofosbuvir being a pyrimidine and GS-0938 being a purine. Mathematical modelling has provided important insights for characterizing HCV RNA decline and for estimating the in vivo effectiveness of single direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs); however it has not been used to characterize viral kinetics with combination DAA therapy. METHODS We evaluated the antiviral activity of sofosbuvir and GS-0938 given alone and in combination for 14 days in 32 HCV genotype 1 treatment-naive patients (P2938-0212; NUCLEAR study). RESULTS Viral load declined rapidly in a biphasic manner in all subjects and could be well fitted by assuming that both drugs had a similar and additive level of effectiveness in reducing viral production equal to 99.96%, on average. The model predicted that this level of effectiveness was not reached until 0.6 and 2 days for GS-0938 and sofosbuvir, respectively, and likely represents the time needed to accumulate intracellular triphosphates. Subsequently, both drugs led to a rapid second phase of viral decline with a mean rate of 0.35 d(-1). No effect of IL28B-polymorphism was found on viral kinetic parameters. CONCLUSIONS Both sofosbuvir and GS-0938 are highly effective at blocking viral production from HCV-infected cells. Both drugs led to a rapid and consistent second phase viral decline and exhibited no breakthroughs or other signs of resistance. From a kinetics perspective, because both drugs were of the same class there was little benefit in combining them, suggesting that future DAA combinations should consider utilizing drugs with different modes of action.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of GS-9851, a Nucleotide Analog Polymerase Inhibitor for Hepatitis C Virus, following Single Ascending Doses in Healthy Subjects

ABSTRACT To investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of GS-9851 (formerly PSI-7851), a new nucleotide analog inhibitor of hepatitis C virus (HCV), we conducted a double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-ascending-dose study. Healthy subjects received oral doses of 25 to 800 mg GS-9851. Peak concentrations of GS-9851 in plasma were achieved more rapidly than those of the metabolites GS-566500 (formerly PSI-352707) and GS-331007 (formerly PSI-6206), with time to maximum concentration of drug in plasma (tmax) values of 1.0 to 1.8 h, 1.5 to 3.0 h, and 3.0 to 6.0 h, respectively. The majority of systemic drug exposure was from the nucleoside GS-331007, with maximum concentration of drug in plasma (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve to the last measurable concentration (AUC0–t) values at least 7- and 41-fold higher, respectively, than those obtained for GS-9851 after adjusting for differences in molecular weight. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of GS-331007 increased with the dose, achieving a t1/2 of 25.7 h at 800 mg GS-9851. Dose proportionality was not observed for GS-331007. The majority of drug recovered in urine was in the form of GS-331007, with the percentage of this metabolite in urine samples ranging from 57% to 27% with increasing dose. GS-9851 was generally well tolerated, with no maximum tolerated dose identified. In conclusion, GS-9851 and its metabolites demonstrated a favorable pharmacokinetic profile consistent with once-daily dosing, and therefore, further clinical studies evaluating GS-9851 in HCV-infected patients are warranted.

On-treatment HCV RNA in patients with varying degrees of fibrosis and cirrhosis in the SOLAR-1 trial.

BACKGROUND In the Phase II SOLAR-1 study, 12 or 24 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and ribavirin yielded high sustained virological response rates at 12 weeks (SVR12) in patients with chronic HCV infection and advanced liver disease, including untransplanted patients with decompensated cirrhosis and liver transplant recipients with all stages of liver disease. METHODS We performed a post hoc analysis using data from this study to investigate associations between baseline characteristics and early on-treatment HCV RNA, and to determine the utility of early virological response (week 2 and 4) to predict SVR12. Serum HCV RNA was quantified using the Roche COBAS® Ampliprep®/Cobas TaqMan HCV Test, Version 2.0 with a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 15 IU/ml. RESULTS Most patients achieved HCV RNA <LLOQ by treatment week 4 and target not detected (TND) by week 6. Baseline factors significantly associated with HCV RNA <LLOQ at week 2 were low HCV RNA (<800,000 IU/ml), absence of cirrhosis, age <60 years and no prior treatment experience. At week 4, low HCV RNA, absence of cirrhosis and IL28B CC were associated with <LLOQ, TND. No baseline factors were associated with week 6 response. There was no association between early on-treatment HCV RNA and SVR12. CONCLUSIONS On-treatment HCV RNA quantification is of limited clinical use in patients with advanced liver disease and/or liver transplantation and does not predict SVR12. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01938430.