Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jill E. Keeffe is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jill E. Keeffe.


The Lancet Global Health | 2013

Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis

Rupert Bourne; Gretchen A Stevens; Richard A. White; Jennifer L. Smith; Seth R. Flaxman; Holly Price; Jost B. Jonas; Jill E. Keeffe; Janet Leasher; Kovin Naidoo; Konrad Pesudovs; Serge Resnikoff; Hugh R. Taylor

BACKGROUND Data on causes of vision impairment and blindness are important for development of public health policies, but comprehensive analysis of change in prevalence over time is lacking. METHODS We did a systematic analysis of published and unpublished data on the causes of blindness (visual acuity in the better eye less than 3/60) and moderate and severe vision impairment ([MSVI] visual acuity in the better eye less than 6/18 but at least 3/60) from 1980 to 2012. We estimated the proportions of overall vision impairment attributable to cataract, glaucoma, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, trachoma, and uncorrected refractive error in 1990-2010 by age, geographical region, and year. FINDINGS In 2010, 65% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 61-68) of 32·4 million blind people and 76% (73-79) of 191 million people with MSVI worldwide had a preventable or treatable cause, compared with 68% (95% UI 65-70) of 31·8 million and 80% (78-83) of 172 million in 1990. Leading causes worldwide in 1990 and 2010 for blindness were cataract (39% and 33%, respectively), uncorrected refractive error (20% and 21%), and macular degeneration (5% and 7%), and for MSVI were uncorrected refractive error (51% and 53%), cataract (26% and 18%), and macular degeneration (2% and 3%). Causes of blindness varied substantially by region. Worldwide and in all regions more women than men were blind or had MSVI due to cataract and macular degeneration. INTERPRETATION The differences and temporal changes we found in causes of blindness and MSVI have implications for planning and resource allocation in eye care. FUNDING Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Fight for Sight, Fred Hollows Foundation, and Brien Holden Vision Institute.


Ophthalmology | 2013

Global Prevalence of Vision Impairment and Blindness: Magnitude and Temporal Trends, 1990–2010

Gretchen A Stevens; Richard A. White; Seth R. Flaxman; Holly Price; Jost B. Jonas; Jill E. Keeffe; Janet Leasher; Kovin Naidoo; Konrad Pesudovs; Serge Resnikoff; Hugh R. Taylor; Rupert Bourne

PURPOSE Vision impairment is a leading and largely preventable cause of disability worldwide. However, no study of global and regional trends in the prevalence of vision impairment has been carried out. We estimated the prevalence of vision impairment and its changes worldwide for the past 20 years. DESIGN Systematic review. PARTICIPANTS A systematic review of published and unpublished population-based data on vision impairment and blindness from 1980 through 2012. METHODS Hierarchical models were fitted fitted to estimate the prevalence of moderate and severe vision impairment (MSVI; defined as presenting visual acuity <6/18 but ≥ 3/60) and the prevalence of blindness (presenting visual acuity <3/60) by age, country, and year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Trends in the prevalence of MSVI and blindness for the period 1990 through 2010. RESULTS Globally, 32.4 million people (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.4-36.5 million people; 60% women) were blind in 2010, and 191 million people (95% CI, 174-230 million people; 57% women) had MSVI. The age-standardized prevalence of blindness in older adults (≥ 50 years) was more than 4% in Western Sub-Saharan Africa (6.0%; 95% CI, 4.6%-7.1%), Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa (5.7%; 95% CI, 4.4%-6.9%), South Asia (4.4%; 95% CI, 3.5%-5.1%), and North Africa and the Middle East (4.6%; 95% CI, 3.5%-5.8%), in contrast to high-income regions with blindness prevalences of ≤ 0.4% or less. The MSVI prevalence in older adults was highest in South Asia (23.6%; 95% CI, 19.4%-29.4%), Oceania (18.9%; 95% CI, 11.8%-23.7%), and Eastern and Western Sub-Saharan Africa and North Africa and the Middle East (95% CI, 15.9%-16.8%). The MSVI prevalence was less than 5% in all 4 high-income regions. The global age-standardized prevalence of blindness and MSVI for older adults decreased from 3.0% (95% CI, 2.7%-3.4%) worldwide in 1990 to 1.9% (95% CI, 1.7%-2.2%) in 2010 and from 14.3% (95% CI, 12.1%-16.2%) worldwide to 10.4% (95% CI, 9.5%-12.3%), respectively. When controlling for age, womens prevalence of blindness was greater than mens in all world regions. Because the global population has increased and aged between 1990 and 2010, the number of blind has increased by 0.6 million people (95% CI, -5.2 to 5.3 million people). The number with MSVI may have increased by 19 million people (95% CI, -8 to 72 million people) from 172 million people (95% CI, 142-198 million people) in 1990. CONCLUSIONS The age-standardized prevalence of blindness and MSVI has decreased in the past 20 years. However, because of population growth and the relative increase in older adults, the blind population has been stable and the population with MSVI may have increased


British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2005

Impact of unilateral and bilateral vision loss on quality of life.

Hien T. V. Vu; Jill E. Keeffe; Catherine A. McCarty; Hugh R. Taylor

Aim: To investigate whether unilateral vision loss reduced any aspects of quality of life in comparison with normal vision and to compare its impact with that of bilateral vision loss. Methods: This study used cluster stratified random sample of 3271 urban participants recruited between 1992 and 1994 for the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. All predictors and outcomes were from the 5 year follow up examinations conducted in 1997–9. Results: There were 2530 participants who attended the follow up survey and had measurement of presenting visual acuity. Both unilateral and bilateral vision loss were significantly associated with increased odds of having problems in visual functions including reading the telephone book, newspaper, watching television, and seeing faces. Non-correctable by refraction unilateral vision loss increased the odds of falling when away from home (OR = 2.86, 95% CI 1.16 to 7.08), getting help with chores (OR = 3.09, 95% CI 1.40 to 6.83), and becoming dependent (getting help with meals and chores) (OR = 7.50, 95% CI 1.97 to 28.6). Non-correctable bilateral visual loss was associated with many activities of daily living except falling. Conclusions: Non-correctable unilateral vision loss was associated with issues of safety and independent living while non-correctable bilateral vision loss was associated with nursing home placement, emotional wellbeing, use of community services, and activities of daily living. Correctable or treatable vision loss should be detected and attended to.


British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2014

Prevalence and causes of vision loss in high-income countries and in Eastern and Central Europe: 1990–2010

Rupert Bourne; Jost B. Jonas; Seth R. Flaxman; Jill E. Keeffe; Janet Leasher; Kovin Naidoo; Maurizio Battaglia Parodi; Konrad Pesudovs; Holly Price; Richard A. White; Tien Yin Wong; Serge Resnikoff; Hugh R. Taylor

Background To assess prevalence and causes of blindness and vision impairment in high-income regions and in Central/Eastern Europe in 1990 and 2010. Methods Based on a systematic review of medical literature, prevalence of moderate and severe vision impairment (MSVI; presenting visual acuity <6/18 but ≥3/60 in the better eye) and blindness (presenting visual acuity <3/60) was estimated for 1990 and 2010. Results Age-standardised prevalence of blindness and MSVI decreased from 0.2% to 0.1% (3.314 million to 2.736 million people) and from 1.6% to 1.0% (25.362 million to 22.176 million), respectively. Women were generally more affected than men. Cataract was the most frequent cause of blindness in all subregions in 1990, but macular degeneration and uncorrected refractive error became the most frequent causes of blindness in 2010 in all high-income countries, except for Eastern/Central Europe, where cataract remained the leading cause. Glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy were fourth and fifth most common causes for blindness for all regions at both times. Uncorrected refractive error, followed by cataract, macular degeneration, glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy, was the most common cause for MSVI in 1990 and 2010. Conclusions In highly developed countries, prevalence of blindness and MSVI has been reduced by 50% and 38%, respectively, and the number of blind people and people with MSVI decreased by 17.4% and 12.6%, respectively, even with the increasing number of older people in the population. In high-income countries, macular degeneration has become the most important cause of blindness, but uncorrected refractive errors continue to be the leading cause of MSVI.


British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2006

Impact of age related macular degeneration on quality of life

Jennifer B. Hassell; Ecosse L. Lamoureux; Jill E. Keeffe

Aims: To describe the impact of age related macular degeneration (AMD) on quality of life and explore the association with vision, health, and demographic variables. Methods: Adult participants diagnosed with AMD and with impaired vision (visual acuity <6/12) were assessed with the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire. Participants rated the extent that vision restricted participation in activities affecting quality of life and completed the Short Form General Health Survey (SF-12) and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Results: The mean age of the 106 participants (66% female) was 83.6 years (range 64–98). One quarter had mild vision impairment, (VA<6/12–6/18) and 75% had moderate or severely impaired vision. Participants reported from at least “a little” concern on 23 of the 32 IVI items including reading, emotional health, mobility, and participation in relevant activities. Those with mild and moderate vision impairment were similarly affected but significantly different from those with severe vision loss (p<0.05). Distance vision was associated with IVI scores but not age, sex, or duration of vision loss. Conclusion: AMD affects many quality of life related activities and not just those related to reading. Referral to low vision care services should be considered for people with mild vision loss and worse.


British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2006

The economic impact and cost of visual impairment in Australia.

Hugh R. Taylor; M L Pezzullo; Jill E. Keeffe

Aims: To quantify the total economic costs of vision loss in Australia. Methods: Prevalence data of visual impairment, unpublished data on indirect costs, and national healthcare cost databases were used. Results: Vision disorders cost Australia an estimated A


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2010

The Psychometric Validity of the NEI VFQ-25 for Use in a Low-Vision Population

Manjula Marella; Konrad Pesudovs; Jill E. Keeffe; Patricia M O'Connor; Gwyneth Rees; Ecosse L. Lamoureux

9.85 billion in 2004. A


British Journal of Ophthalmology | 2002

Utilisation of eye care services by urban and rural Australians

Jill E. Keeffe; LeAnn M. Weih; Catherine A. McCarty; Hugh R. Taylor

4.8 billion is the loss of wellbeing (years of life lost as a result of disability and premature mortality). Vision disorders rank seventh and account for 2.7% of the national loss of wellbeing. Direct health system costs total A


British Journal of Ophthalmology | 1999

The need for cataract surgery: projections based on lens opacity, visual acuity, and personal concern

Catherine A. McCarty; Jill E. Keeffe; Hugh R. Taylor

1.8 billion. They have increased by A


Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | 2003

Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living

Geertje Noe; John G. Ferraro; Ecosse L. Lamoureux; Julian L Rait; Jill E. Keeffe

1 billion over the last 10 years and will increase a further A

Collaboration


Dive into the Jill E. Keeffe's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ecosse L. Lamoureux

National University of Singapore

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kovin Naidoo

Brien Holden Vision Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Serge Resnikoff

University of New South Wales

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Janet Leasher

Nova Southeastern University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rupert Bourne

Anglia Ruskin University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tien Yin Wong

National University of Singapore

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge