Jill E. Scott
University of Iowa
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jill E. Scott.
eLife | 2015
Lee R. Berger; John Hawks; Darryl J. de Ruiter; Steven E. Churchill; Peter Schmid; Lucas K. Delezene; Tracy L. Kivell; Heather M. Garvin; Scott A. Williams; Jeremy M. DeSilva; Matthew M. Skinner; Charles M. Musiba; Noel Cameron; Trenton W. Holliday; William E. H. Harcourt-Smith; Rebecca Rogers Ackermann; Markus Bastir; Barry Bogin; Debra R. Bolter; Juliet K. Brophy; Zachary Cofran; Kimberly A. Congdon; Andrew S. Deane; Mana Dembo; Michelle S.M. Drapeau; Marina Elliott; Elen M Feuerriegel; Daniel García-Martínez; David J. Green; Alia N. Gurtov
Homo naledi is a previously-unknown species of extinct hominin discovered within the Dinaledi Chamber of the Rising Star cave system, Cradle of Humankind, South Africa. This species is characterized by body mass and stature similar to small-bodied human populations but a small endocranial volume similar to australopiths. Cranial morphology of H. naledi is unique, but most similar to early Homo species including Homo erectus, Homo habilis or Homo rudolfensis. While primitive, the dentition is generally small and simple in occlusal morphology. H. naledi has humanlike manipulatory adaptations of the hand and wrist. It also exhibits a humanlike foot and lower limb. These humanlike aspects are contrasted in the postcrania with a more primitive or australopith-like trunk, shoulder, pelvis and proximal femur. Representing at least 15 individuals with most skeletal elements repeated multiple times, this is the largest assemblage of a single species of hominins yet discovered in Africa. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09560.001
Journal of Anatomy | 2015
Nathan E. Holton; Laura L. Bonner; Jill E. Scott; Steve D. Marshall; Robert G. Franciscus; Thomas E. Southard
The presence of a prominent chin in modern humans has been viewed by some researchers as an architectural adaptation to buttress the anterior corpus from bending stresses during mastication. In contrast, ontogenetic studies of mandibular symphyseal form suggest that a prominent chin results from the complex spatial interaction between the symphysis and surrounding soft tissue and skeletal anatomy during development. While variation in chin prominence is clearly influenced by differential growth and spatial constraints, it is unclear to what degree these developmental dynamics influence the mechanical properties of the symphysis. That is, do ontogenetic changes in symphyseal shape result in increased symphyseal bending resistance? We examined ontogenetic changes in the mechanical properties and shape of the symphysis using subjects from a longitudinal cephalometric growth study with ages ranging from 3 to 20+ years. We first examined whether ontogenetic changes in symphyseal shape were correlated with symphyseal vertical bending and wishboning resistance using multivariate regression. Secondly, we examined ontogenetic scaling of bending resistance relative to bending moment arm lengths. An ontogenetic increase in chin prominence was associated with decreased vertical bending resistance, while wishboning resistance was uncorrelated with ontogenetic development of the chin. Relative to bending moment arm lengths, vertical bending resistance scaled with significant negative allometry whereas wishboning resistance scaled isometrically. These results suggest a complex interaction between symphyseal ontogeny and bending resistance, and indicate that ontogenetic increases in chin projection do not provide greater bending resistance to the mandibular symphysis.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology | 2016
Myra F. Laird; Nathan E. Holton; Jill E. Scott; Robert G. Franciscus; Steven D. Marshall; Thomas E. Southard
OBJECTIVES The curve of Spee (COS) is a mesio-distally curved alignment of the canine through distal molar cusp tips in certain mammals including modern humans and some fossil hominins. In humans, the alignment varies from concave to flat, and previous studies have suggested that this difference reflects craniofacial morphology, including the degree of alveolar prognathism. However, the relationship between prognathism and concavity of the COS has not been tested in craniofacially variant populations. We tested the hypothesis that greater alveolar prognathism covaries with a flatter COS in African-American and European-American populations. We further examined this relationship in fossil Homo including Homo neanderthalensis and early anatomically modern Homo sapiens, which are expected to extend the amount of variation in the COS from the extant sample. METHODS AND MATERIALS These hypotheses were tested using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics. Landmarks were recorded from the skulls of 166 African-Americans, 123 European-Americans, and 10 fossil hominin mandible casts. Landmarks were subjected to generalized Procrustes analysis, principal components analysis, and two-block partial least squares analysis. RESULTS We documented covariation between the COS and alveolar prognathism such that relatively prognathic individuals have a flatter COS. Mandibular data from the fossil hominin taxa generally confirm and extend this correlation across a greater range of facial size and morphology in Homo. DISCUSSION Our results suggest that the magnitude of the COS is related to a suite of features associated with alveolar prognathism in modern humans and across anthropoids. We also discuss the implications for spatial interactions between the dental arches.
Journal of Human Evolution | 2018
James D. Pampush; Jill E. Scott; Chris A. Robinson; Lucas K. Delezene
The rate of change in primate mandibular symphyseal angles was modeled with particular aim of locating a rate-shift within the hominin clade. Prior work noted that the human symphyseal angle must have experienced a rapid rate of change in order to assume the modern human form, suggestive of the non-random work of natural selection. This study indicates that the rate of symphyseal evolution rose dramatically between Australopithecus anamensis and Australopithecus afarensis and continued throughout the diversification of the hominin clade. Noting the timing of this event, we speculate as to what ecological factors could have been at play in driving this rearrangement of the anterior mandible, contributing to the eventual appearance of the human chin.
Journal of Human Evolution | 2016
Mana Dembo; Davorka Radovčić; Heather M. Garvin; Myra F. Laird; Lauren Schroeder; Jill E. Scott; Juliet K. Brophy; Rebecca Rogers Ackermann; Charles M. Musiba; Darryl J. de Ruiter; Arne Ø. Mooers; Mark Collard
Journal of Human Evolution | 2017
Lauren Schroeder; Jill E. Scott; Heather M. Garvin; Myra F. Laird; Mana Dembo; Davorka Radovčić; Lee R. Berger; Darryl J. de Ruiter; Rebecca Rogers Ackermann
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics | 2011
Steven D. Marshall; Laura E. Low; Nathan E. Holton; Robert G. Franciscus; Mike Frazier; Fang Qian; Kyle R. Mann; Galen B. Schneider; Jill E. Scott; Thomas E. Southard
Journal of Human Evolution | 2017
Myra F. Laird; Lauren Schroeder; Heather M. Garvin; Jill E. Scott; Mana Dembo; Davorka Radovčić; Charles M. Musiba; Rebecca Rogers Ackermann; Peter Schmid; John Hawks; Lee R. Berger; Darryl J. de Ruiter
American Journal of Physical Anthropology | 2014
Jill E. Scott
Archive | 2018
Lucyna A. Bowland; Jill E. Scott; Tracy L. Kivell; Biren A. Patel; Matthew W. Tocheri; Caley M. Orr