Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jill Fantauzzacoffin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jill Fantauzzacoffin.


human factors in computing systems | 2012

Digital art: evaluation, appreciation, critique (invited SIG)

David England; Jill Fantauzzacoffin; Nick Bryan-Kinns; Celine Latulipe; Linda Candy; Jennifer G. Sheridan

This SIG examines the vexed question of evaluation of Digital Art and how lessons on evaluation can be exchanged between the arts and mainstream HCI. We start by looking at critiques of standard approaches to evaluation in HCI. We then look at approaches, which have been developed in Digital Art to merge qualitative and quantitative methods. These investigations set the agenda for the SIG with the aim of uncovering the audiences knowledge and attempts at Digital Art evaluation, appreciation and critique. The chief outcome will be an exchange of experiences and proposals for ways forward for both the Digital Arts community and the broader CHI community.


human factors in computing systems | 2013

Digital arts: did you feel that?

Ernest A. Edmonds; Steve Benford; Zafer Bilda; Jill Fantauzzacoffin; Roger F. Malina; Hugues Vinet

This panel considers the relationships between the interactive arts, audience engagement and experience design. What might each offer the other? Engagement and experience are central to current HCI thinking. We will present and argue about the research issues of defining and understanding audience/user engagement and experience in the context of art.


human factors in computing systems | 2012

The arts, HCI, and innovation policy discourse: invited panel

Jill Fantauzzacoffin; Joanna Berzowska; Ernest A. Edmonds; Ken Goldberg; D. Fox Harrell; Brian Smith

Although both HCI and innovation policy discourse have a STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) basis, both also include trends that incorporate the arts. The purpose of this panel is to show how HCI/arts discourse and innovation policy/arts discourse inform each other. We then discuss with the audience how innovation initiatives configure programs and roles for artists and HCI professionals working in HCI/arts.


tangible and embedded interaction | 2012

Articulating creative practice: teleological and stochastic strategies in a case study of an artist and an engineering team developing similar technologies

Jill Fantauzzacoffin; Juan D. Rogers; Jay David Bolter

We describe teleological and stochastic patterns in creative strategy using a case from our comparative, multiple-case study of the work practices of artists and engineers separately developing similar technologies.


human factors in computing systems | 2012

Articulating lines of research in digital arts, HCI, and interaction (invited SIG)

Jill Fantauzzacoffin; Linda Candy; Ayoka Chenzira; Ernest A. Edmonds; David England; Thecla Schiphorst; Atau Tanaka

The establishment of a Digital Arts Featured Community at CHI 2012 indicates the general acceptance of mutually beneficial synergies between digital arts and HCI. At this juncture, the Digital Arts Community has an opportunity to build upon this established community platform to begin articulating lines of research. This SIG initiates this essential step in establishing traditions of contribution.


Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design | 2011

Negotiating uncertainty: process, artifact, and discourse in a case study of technologies to address SIDS

Jill Fantauzzacoffin; Juan D. Rogers; Jay David Bolter

We describe the creative strategies used to develop two technologies that address sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). An engineer and his team developed one of the technologies and an artist developed the other. We discuss the creative strategies and the resulting technologies in terms of their negotiation of uncertainties occurring at many levels: the uncertainty of the creative process, the uncertainty of SIDS, and the uncertainty inherent in technological interventions for SIDS.


human factors in computing systems | 2013

Digital art: challenging perspectives

David England; Jill Fantauzzacoffin; Thecla Schiphorst; Celine Latulipe; Linda Candy

In this SIG for the Digital Arts Community, we respond to the conference theme of changing perspectives by offering challenging perspectives. The challenge comes in a two-way exchange between Digital Art and HCI. On the one side we have the making of new and unique forms, i.e. synthesis. Whilst on the other, we have knowledge-making grounded in the human sciences and engineering, in other words, predicting and validating analysis. In this SIG session we will provoke a discussion on these contrasting challenging perspectives. How does knowledge emerge between synthesis and analysis?


human factors in computing systems | 2013

Science vs. science: the complexities of interdisciplinary research

Clare J. Hooper; David E. Millard; Jill Fantauzzacoffin; Joseph 'Jofish' Kaye

Human-Computer Interaction and Web Science are radically interdisciplinary fields, but what does this mean in practical terms? Undertaking research (and writing papers) that encompass multiple disciplinary perspectives and methods is a serious challenge and it is difficult to maintain conferences that fairly review and host contributions from multiple disciplines. The colocation of the ACM WebSci conference with CHI in Paris, offers an unusual opportunity to bring these two communities together. Previous discussions have considered how to conduct interdisciplinary work that bridges HCI/WebSci with specific areas. Our objective is to provide a space for interested researchers from both communities to share their views and approaches to tackling the tensions and complexities associated with interdisciplinary work, whatever fields are being bridged.


Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design | 2011

Research summary: multiple-case study of artists' and engineers' technology development practices

Jill Fantauzzacoffin

This research summary describes a comparative, multiple-case study of the work practices of artists and engineers independently developing similar technologies. The goal of the study is to develop evidence-based articulations, or vocabularies, to support the discourse of creative practice particularly with respect to technological innovation in the arts and engineering. This study informs part of my dissertation research, the overall project of which is to contribute to the body of scholarship that acts as ongoing articulation, clarification, and discourse about technological art, specifically when that art contributes to technological invention.


integrated stem education conference | 2012

From STEAM research to education: An integrated art and engineering course at Georgia Tech

Jill Fantauzzacoffin; Juan D. Rogers; Jay David Bolter

Collaboration


Dive into the Jill Fantauzzacoffin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jay David Bolter

Georgia Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Juan D. Rogers

Georgia Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David England

Liverpool John Moores University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Celine Latulipe

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clare J. Hooper

University of Southampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nick Bryan-Kinns

Queen Mary University of London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge