Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jill M. Mhyre is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jill M. Mhyre.


Anesthesiology | 2011

3,423 emergency tracheal intubations at a university hospital: airway outcomes and complications.

Lizabeth D. Martin; Jill M. Mhyre; Amy Shanks; Kevin K. Tremper; Sachin Kheterpal

Background: There are limited outcome data regarding emergent nonoperative intubation. The current study was undertaken with a large observational dataset to evaluate the incidence of difficult intubation and complication rates and to determine predictors of complications in this setting. Methods: Adult nonoperating room emergent intubations at our tertiary care institution from December 5, 2001 to July 6, 2009 were reviewed. Prospectively defined data points included time of day, location, attending physician presence, number of attempts, direct laryngoscopy view, adjuvant use, medications, and complications. At our institution, a senior resident with at least 24 months of anesthesia training is the first responder for all emergent airway requests. The primary outcome was a composite airway complication variable that included aspiration, esophageal intubation, dental injury, or pneumothorax. Results: A total of 3,423 emergent nonoperating room airway management cases were identified. The incidence of difficult intubation was 10.3%. Complications occurred in 4.2%: aspiration, 2.8%; esophageal intubation, 1.3%; dental injury, 0.2%; and pneumothorax, 0.1%. A bougie introducer was used in 12.4% of cases. Among 2,284 intubations performed by residents, independent predictors of the composite complication outcome were as follows: three or more intubation attempts (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% CI, 3.2–14.2), grade III or IV view (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1–3.5), general care floor location (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2–3.0), and emergency department location (odds ratio, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.1–20.4). Conclusions: During emergent nonoperative intubation, specific clinical situations are associated with an increased risk of airway complication and may provide a starting point for allocation of experienced first responders.


Anesthesiology | 2007

A Series of Anesthesia-related Maternal Deaths in Michigan, 1985-2003

Jill M. Mhyre; Monica N. Riesner; Linda S. Polley; Norah N. Naughton

Background:Maternal Mortality Surveillance has been conducted by the State of Michigan since 1950, and anesthesia-related maternal deaths were most recently reviewed for the years 1972–1984. Methods:Records for pregnancy-associated deaths between 1985 and 2003 were reviewed to identify 25 cases associated with a perioperative arrest or major anesthetic complication. Four obstetric anesthesiologists independently classified these cases, and disagreements were resolved by discussion. Precise definitions of anesthesia-related and anesthesia-contributing maternal death were constructed. Anesthesia-related deaths were reviewed to identify the chain of medical errors or care management problems that contributed to each patient death. Results:Of 855 pregnancy-associated deaths, 8 were anesthesia-related and 7 were anesthesia-contributing. There were no deaths during induction of general anesthesia. Five resulted from hypoventilation or airway obstruction during emergence, extubation, or recovery. Lapses in either postoperative monitoring or anesthesiology supervision seemed to contribute to 5 of the 8 anesthesia-related deaths. Other characteristics common to these cases included obesity (n = 6) and African-American race (n = 6). Conclusions:The 8 anesthesia-related and seven anesthesia-contributing maternal deaths in Michigan between 1985 and 2003 illustrate three key points. First, all anesthesia-related deaths from airway obstruction or hypoventilation took place during emergence and recovery, not during the induction of general anesthesia. Second, system errors played a role in the majority of cases. Of concern, lapses in postoperative monitoring and inadequate supervision by an anesthesiologist seemed to contribute to more than half of the deaths. Finally, this report confirms previous work that obesity and African-American race are important risk factors for anesthesia-related maternal mortality.


Circulation | 2015

Part 4: Advanced life support

Jasmeet Soar; Clifton W. Callaway; Mayuki Aibiki; Bernd W. Böttiger; Steven C. Brooks; Charles D. Deakin; Michael W. Donnino; Saul Drajer; Walter Kloeck; Peter Morley; Laurie J. Morrison; Robert W. Neumar; Tonia C. Nicholson; Jerry P. Nolan; Kazuo Okada; Brian O’Neil; Edison Ferreira de Paiva; Michael Parr; Tzong-Luen Wang; Jonathan Witt; Lars W. Andersen; Katherine Berg; Claudio Sandroni; Steve Lin; Eric J. Lavonas; Eyal Golan; Mohammed A. Alhelail; Amit Chopra; Michael N. Cocchi; Tobias Cronberg

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Advanced Life Support (ALS) Task Force performed detailed systematic reviews based on the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies1 and using the methodological approach proposed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group.2 Questions to be addressed (using the PICO [population, intervention, comparator, outcome] format)3 were prioritized by ALS Task Force members (by voting). Prioritization criteria included awareness of significant new data and new controversies or questions about practice. Questions about topics no longer relevant to contemporary practice or where little new research has occurred were given lower priority. The ALS Task Force prioritized 42 PICO questions for review. With the assistance of information specialists, a detailed search for relevant articles was performed in each of 3 online databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library). By using detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria, articles were screened for further evaluation. The reviewers for each question created a reconciled risk of bias assessment for each of the included studies, using state-of-the-art tools: Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (RCTs),4 Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 for studies of diagnostic accuracy,5 and GRADE for observational studies that inform both therapy and prognosis questions.6 GRADE evidence profile tables7 were then created to facilitate an evaluation of the evidence in support of each of the critical and important outcomes. The quality of the evidence (or confidence in the estimate of the effect) was categorized as high, moderate, low, or very low,8 based on the study methodologies and the 5 core GRADE domains of risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and other considerations (including publication bias).9 These evidence profile tables were then used to create a …


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2012

Prevalence, trends, and outcomes of chronic hypertension: a nationwide sample of delivery admissions

Brian T. Bateman; Pooja Bansil; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Jill M. Mhyre; William M. Callaghan; Elena V. Kuklina

OBJECTIVE We sought to define the prevalence, trends, and outcomes of primary and secondary chronic hypertension in a population-based sample of deliveries. STUDY DESIGN An estimated 56,494,634 deliveries were identified from the 1995 through 2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The association of primary and secondary chronic hypertension with adverse fetal and maternal outcomes was evaluated using regression modeling and adjusted population-attributable fractions were calculated. RESULTS During the study period, the prevalence of primary and secondary hypertension increased from 0.90% in 1995 through 1996 to 1.52% in 2007 through 2008 (P for trend < .001) and from 0.07% to 0.24% (P for trend < .001), respectively. The population-attributable fraction for chronic hypertension was considerable for many maternal adverse outcomes, including acute renal failure (21%), pulmonary edema (14%), preeclampsia (11%), and in-hospital mortality (10%). CONCLUSION Primary and secondary chronic hypertension were both strongly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and accounted for a substantial fraction of maternal morbidity. Prioritizing research efforts in this area is needed.


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 2013

The risk and outcomes of epidural hematomas after perioperative and obstetric epidural catheterization: a report from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group Research Consortium.

Brian T. Bateman; Jill M. Mhyre; Jesse M. Ehrenfeld; Sachin Kheterpal; Kenneth R. Abbey; Maged Argalious; Mitchell F. Berman; Paul St. Jacques; Warren J. Levy; Robert G. Loeb; William C. Paganelli; Kelly W. Smith; Kevin L. Wethington; David B. Wax; Nathan L. Pace; Kevin K. Tremper; Warren S. Sandberg

BACKGROUND:In this study, we sought to determine the frequency and outcomes of epidural hematomas after epidural catheterization. METHODS:Eleven centers participating in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group used electronic anesthesia information systems and quality assurance databases to identify patients who had epidural catheters inserted for either obstetrical or surgical indications. From this cohort, patients undergoing laminectomy for the evacuation of hematoma within 6 weeks of epidural placement were identified. RESULTS:Seven of 62,450 patients undergoing perioperative epidural catheterizations developed hematoma requiring surgical evacuation. The event rate was 11.2 × 10−5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5 × 10−5 to 23.1 × 10−5). Four of the 7 had anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy that deviated from American Society of Regional Anesthesia guidelines. None of 79,837 obstetric patients with epidural catheterizations developed hematoma (upper limit of the 95% CI, 4.6 × 10−5). The hematoma rate in obstetric epidural catheterizations was significantly lower than in perioperative epidural catheterizations (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS:In this series, the 95% CI for the frequency of epidural hematoma requiring laminectomy after epidural catheter placement for perioperative anesthesia/analgesia was 1 event per 22,189 placements to 1 event per 4330 placements. Risk was significantly lower in obstetric epidurals.


Anesthesiology | 2014

Cardiac Arrest during Hospitalization for Delivery in the United States, 1998–2011

Jill M. Mhyre; Lawrence C. Tsen; Sharon Einav; Elena V. Kuklina; Lisa Leffert; Brian T. Bateman

Background:The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the frequency, distribution of potential etiologies, and survival rates of maternal cardiopulmonary arrest during the hospitalization for delivery in the United States. Methods:By using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample during the years 1998 through 2011, the authors obtained weighted estimates of the number of U.S. hospitalizations for delivery complicated by maternal cardiac arrest. Clinical and demographic risk factors, potential etiologies, and outcomes were identified and compared in women with and without cardiac arrest. The authors tested for temporal trends in the occurrence and survival associated with maternal arrest. Results:Cardiac arrest complicated 1 in 12,000 or 8.5 per 100,000 hospitalizations for delivery (99% CI, 7.7 to 9.3 per 100,000). The most common potential etiologies of arrest included hemorrhage, heart failure, amniotic fluid embolism, and sepsis. Among patients with cardiac arrest, 58.9% of patients (99% CI, 54.8 to 63.0%) survived to hospital discharge. Conclusions:Approximately 1 in 12,000 hospitalizations for delivery is complicated by cardiac arrest, most frequently due to hemorrhage, heart failure, amniotic fluid embolism, or sepsis. Survival depends on the underlying etiology of arrest.


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 2014

The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Consensus Statement on the Management of Cardiac Arrest in Pregnancy

Steven Lipman; Sheila E. Cohen; Sharon Einav; Farida M. Jeejeebhoy; Jill M. Mhyre; Laurie J. Morrison; Vern L. Katz; Lawrence C. Tsen; Kay Daniels; Louis P. Halamek; Maya S. Suresh; Julie Arafeh; Dodi Gauthier; Jose C. A. Carvalho; Maurice L. Druzin; Brendan Carvalho

This consensus statement was commissioned in 2012 by the Board of Directors of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology to improve maternal resuscitation by providing health care providers critical information (including point-of-care checklists) and operational strategies relevant to maternal cardiac arrest. The recommendations in this statement were designed to address the challenges of an actual event by emphasizing health care provider education, behavioral/communication strategies, latent systems errors, and periodic testing of performance. This statement also expands on, interprets, and discusses controversial aspects of material covered in the American Heart Association 2010 guidelines.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2012

Peripartum hysterectomy in the United States: nationwide 14 year experience.

Brian T. Bateman; Jill M. Mhyre; William M. Callaghan; Elena V. Kuklina

OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to examine the trends in the rate of peripartum hysterectomy and the contribution of changes in maternal characteristics to these trends. STUDY DESIGN This was a cross-sectional study of peripartum hysterectomy identified from hospitalizations for delivery recorded in the 1994-2007 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. RESULTS The overall rate of peripartum hysterectomy increased by 15% during the study period. The rate of hysterectomy for abnormal placentation increased by 1.2-fold; adjustment for previous cesarean delivery explained nearly all of this increase. The rate of hysterectomy for uterine atony following repeat cesarean delivery increased nearly 4-fold, following primary cesarean delivery approximately 2.5-fold, and following vaginal delivery about 1.5-fold. This fast growing trend in peripartum hysterectomy secondary to uterine atony was also largely explained by increasing rates of primary and repeat cesareans. CONCLUSION Rates of peripartum hysterectomy increased substantially in the United States from 1994 to 2007; much of this increase was due to rising rates of cesarean delivery.


Anesthesiology | 2016

Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology ∗

Jeffrey L. Apfelbaum; Joy L. Hawkins; Madhulika Agarkar; Brenda A. Bucklin; Richard T. Connis; David R. Gambling; Jill M. Mhyre; David G. Nickinovich; Heather Sherman; Lawrence C. Tsen; Edward Yaghmour

<zdoi;10.1097/ALN.0000000000000935> Anesthesiology, V 124 • No 2 270 February 2016 P RACTICE guidelines are systematically developed recommendations that assist the practitioner and patient in making decisions about health care. These recommendations may be adopted, modified, or rejected according to the clinical needs and constraints and are not intended to replace local institutional policies. In addition, practice guidelines developed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) are not intended as standards or absolute requirements, and their use cannot guarantee any specific outcome. Practice guidelines are subject to revision as warranted by the evolution of medical knowledge, technology, and practice. They provide basic recommendations that are supported by a synthesis and analysis of the current literature, expert and practitioner opinion, open-forum commentary, and clinical feasibility data. This document updates the “Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia: An Updated Report by the ASA Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia,” adopted by ASA in 2006 and published in 2007.†


Circulation | 2015

Cardiac Arrest in Pregnancy: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Farida M. Jeejeebhoy; Carolyn M. Zelop; Steve Lipman; Brendan Carvalho; Jose A. Joglar; Jill M. Mhyre; Vern L. Katz; Stephen E. Lapinsky; Sharon Einav; Carole A. Warnes; Richard L. Page; Russell E. Griffin; Amish Jain; Katie N. Dainty; Julie Arafeh; Rory Windrim; Gideon Koren; Clifton W. Callaway

This is the first scientific statement from the American Heart Association on maternal resuscitation. This document will provide readers with up-to-date and comprehensive information, guidelines, and recommendations for all aspects of maternal resuscitation. Maternal resuscitation is an acute event that involves many subspecialties and allied health providers; this document will be relevant to all healthcare providers who are involved in resuscitation and specifically maternal resuscitation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jill M. Mhyre's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brian T. Bateman

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elena V. Kuklina

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William M. Callaghan

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lawrence C. Tsen

Brigham and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sharon Einav

Shaare Zedek Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge