Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jill Montaquila is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jill Montaquila.


Statistics in Medicine | 2010

Statistical and Practical Issues in the Design of a National Probability Sample of Births for the Vanguard Study of the National Children's Study

Jill Montaquila; J. Michael Brick; Lester R. Curtin

The National Childrens Study is a national household probability sample designed to identify 100,000 children at birth and follow the sampled children for 21 years. Data from the study will support examining numerous hypotheses concerning genetic and environmental effects on the health and development of children. The goals of the study present substantial challenges. For example, the need for preconception, prenatal, and postnatal data requires identifying women in the early stages of pregnancy, the collection of many types of data, and the retention of the children over time. In this paper, we give an overview of the sample design used in a pilot study called the Vanguard Study, and highlight the approaches used to address these challenges. We will also describe the rationale for the sampling choices made at each stage, the unique organizational structure of the NCS and issues we expect to face during implementation.


Public Opinion Quarterly | 2002

Estimating Residency Rates for Undetermined Telephone Numbers

J. Michael Brick; Jill Montaquila; Fritz Scheuren

The method for estimating residency rates in random digit dial (RDD) telephone surveys is important for computing response rates. This article reviews existing methods of estimating residency rates and introduces a new survival method that takes advantage of more information to provide improved estimates. Examples of applying this to large RDD samples are given along with suggestions for use of the method in other surveys


Handbook of Statistics | 2009

Chapter 8 - Nonresponse and Weighting

J. Michael Brick; Jill Montaquila

Publisher Summary Nonresponse is the failure to obtain a valid response from a sampled unit. It is of concern to survey methodologists and practitioners because complete response is assumed by the randomization or design-based theory that allows inference from a sample to the target population. Nonresponse has the potential to introduce bias into survey estimates and reduce the precision of survey estimates. As a result, survey practitioners make efforts to minimize nonresponse and its effects on inferences from sample surveys. However, even with the best efforts, there will be nonresponse; hence, it is essential to understand its potential effects and methods that can be used for limiting these effects. This chapter discusses nonresponse in surveys, the reasons for nonresponse, and the methods used for increasing response rates in surveys. Response rates and review methods of computing response rates are defined, and the trends in response rates over time are examined.


International Journal of Social Research Methodology | 2016

Effects of screening questionnaires on response in a two-phase postal survey

Douglas Williams; J. Michael Brick; Jill Montaquila; Daifeng Han

For surveys targeting specific population groups, the two-phase postal approach (screener followed by a topical survey sent to eligible households) has been demonstrated to be more effective at identifying population domains of interest than random digit dial telephone methods considering cost, coverage, and response. An important question is how best to motivate screener response from eligible households. In 2011, we conducted a large-scale field test to empirically test a number of methods for motivating response. We fielded screening surveys that varied content-influencing relevance, and also switched screener questionnaires for following up nonrespondents to the initial postal survey – an approach we have labeled responsive tailoring. In another experiment, we tested the effect of asking for first names in the screener questionnaire. In this article, we describe the effects of these experimental treatments on response to both the screener and the topical survey.


Public Opinion Quarterly | 2011

Address-Based Sampling for Subpopulation Surveys

J. Michael Brick; Douglas Williams; Jill Montaquila


Journal of Official Statistics | 2005

Implications for RDD design from an incentive experiment

J. Michael Brick; Jill Montaquila; Mary Hagedorn; Shelley Brock Roth; Christopher Chapman


Public Opinion Quarterly | 2011

Using a “Match Rate” Model to Predict Areas Where USPS-Based Address Lists May Be Used in Place of Traditional Listing

Jill Montaquila; Valerie Hsu; J. Michael Brick


Archive | 2009

A Comparative Evaluation of Traditional Listing vs. Address-Based Sampling Frames: Matching with Field Investigation of Discrepancies

Jill Montaquila; Valerie Hsu; J. Michael Brick; Ned English; E. Monroe


Journal of survey statistics and methodology | 2013

A Study of Two-Phase Mail Survey Data Collection Methods

Jill Montaquila; J. Michael Brick; Douglas Williams; Kwang Kim; Daifeng Han


Quality Engineering | 2004

Two-phase list-assisted RDD sampling

J. Michael Brick; David Judkins; Jill Montaquila; David Morganstein

Collaboration


Dive into the Jill Montaquila's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary Hagedorn

United States Department of Education

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stacey Bielick

United States Department of Education

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lester R. Curtin

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge