Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jillian Budd is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jillian Budd.


Education and Information Technologies | 2018

“Simply the best”: Professors nominated by students for their exemplary technology practices in teaching

Mary Jorgensen; Alice Havel; Catherine S. Fichten; Laura King; Evelyne Marcil; Alex Lussier; Jillian Budd; Crisitna Vitouchanskaia

Our goal was to explore the technology related pedagogical practices of college professors deemed by their students to be excellent in using technology in their teaching. We explored the views of 114 community/junior college professors who were nominated by their students as excellent in using technology in their teaching using both questionnaires and interview methods. Results were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results show no gender or years teaching in college differences in professors’ self rated proficiency or comfort with technologies. Results also show that most professors taught themselves how to use technologies with the help of online resources, through trial and error, and with help from colleagues and support staff. Challenges using technology were related primarily to technical problems, such as technologies not working and the institution’s computers and networks being slow. However, professors in our sample usually had a back-up plan and found ways to carry on even if the technology failed. Our findings report on the most and least frequently used technologies in face-to-face teaching, on how professors typically used the course management system, on how professors communicate with students, including the very small number who used social media to do this, and the likelihood of allowing students to use their personal mobile technology in class. Our findings also show that the professors showed their students how to use technologies required for the course. We discuss the practical significance of our findings and their implications for faculty, students, and the institution itself. In particular, we make recommendations about the need for ongoing collaboration between the institution, the professors, and the students and about technology related professional development professors would like to see their college provide.


British Journal of Visual Impairment | 2016

An exploratory study of college and university students with visual impairment in Canada: Grades and graduation

Catherine S. Fichten; Mai N. Nguyen; Jennison V. Asuncion; Natalie Martiniello; Mary Jorgensen; Jillian Budd; Rhonda Amsel; Eva Libman

The purpose of this investigation was to explore predictors and correlates of grades and intention to graduate among junior/community college and university students with visual impairments in Canada, and to compare students with low vision to students who are blind on variables related to academic success. In all, 66 junior/community college and university students with visual impairments (17 blind, 49 with low vision) in Canada completed an online questionnaire inquiring about grades, intention to graduate, and demographic, school-related, and personal aspects. Stepwise regression, discriminant, and correlational analyses of the data revealed that the following variables were associated with better grades and stronger intention to graduate: higher course self-efficacy expectations, greater perceived behavioral control over graduation, reporting a single rather than multiple disabilities, and more favorable attitude toward graduation. Students who are blind and those with low vision did not differ on most variables studied although a much larger proportion of students with low vision reported having additional disabilities. Recommendations are made to enhance course self-efficacy beliefs which include, providing a campus atmosphere that is welcoming, and ensuring that students with visual impairments have adequate opportunities to dialogue with faculty and fellow students. Postsecondary student services professionals need to ensure that workshops which teach study, research, and time management skills are inclusive and accessible to students with visual impairments.


Social Psychology of Education | 2014

How well does the Theory of Planned Behavior predict graduation among college and university students with disabilities

Catherine S. Fichten; Mai Nhu Nguyen; Rhonda Amsel; Shirley Jorgensen; Jillian Budd; Mary Jorgensen; Jennison V. Asuncion; Maria Barile


Archive | 2010

Sexual Self-Efficacy Scale—Erectile Functioning

Catherine S. Fichten; Jillian Budd; Ilana P. Spector; Rhonda Amsel; Laura Creti; William Brender; Sally Bailes; Eva Libman


Research in Learning Technology | 2012

Information and communication technology related needs of college and university students with disabilities

Catherine S. Fichten; Jennison V. Asuncion; Joan Wolforth; Maria Barile; Jillian Budd; Natalie Martiniello; Rhonda Amsel


Revue des sciences de l’éducation | 2011

Le développement de l'échelle POSITIVES : satisfaction des étudiants en situation de handicap concernant les technologies de l'information et de la communication*

Mai Nhu Nguyen; Catherine S. Fichten; Jillian Budd


The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability | 2010

The POSITIVES Scale: Development and Validation of a Measure of How Well the Information and Communication Technology Needs of Students with Disabilities Are Being Met.

Catherine S. Fichten; Jennison V. Asuncion; Mai N. Nguyen; Jillian Budd; Rhonda Amsel


The International Journal of Higher Education | 2016

Theory of Planned Behavior Predicts Graduation Intentions of Canadian and Israeli Postsecondary Students with and without Learning Disabilities/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Catherine S. Fichten; Tali Heiman; Mary Jorgensen; Mai Nhu Nguyen; Alice Havel; Laura King; Jillian Budd; Rhonda Amsel


The Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability | 2014

College and University Students with Disabilities: "Modifiable" Personal and School Related Factors Pertinent to Grades and Graduation.

Catherine S. Fichten; Mai N. Nguyen; Jillian Budd; Jennison V. Asuncion; Anthony Tibbs; Mary Jorgensen; Maria Barile; Rhonda Amsel


International journal of special education | 2014

How Well Do They Read? Brief English and French Screening Tools for College Students.

Catherine S. Fichten; Mai N. Nguyen; Laura King; Alice Havel; Zohra Mimouni; Maria Barile; Jillian Budd; Shirley Jorgensen; Alexandre Chauvin; Jennifer Gutberg

Collaboration


Dive into the Jillian Budd's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tali Heiman

Open University of Israel

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge