Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jillian Clark is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jillian Clark.


Journal of Neurotrauma | 2016

Early decompression following cervical spinal cord injury: examining the process of care from accident scene to surgery

Camila R. Battistuzzo; Alex Armstrong; Jillian Clark; Laura Worley; Lisa N. Sharwood; Peny Lin; Gareth Rooke; Peta Skeers; Sherilyn Nolan; Timothy Geraghty; Andrew Nunn; Doug J. Brown; Steven Hill; Janette Alexander; Melinda Millard; Susan F Cox; Sudhakar Rao; Ann Watts; Louise Goods; Garry Allison; Jacqui Agostinello; Peter Cameron; Ian Mosley; Susan Liew; Tom Geddes; James Middleton; John Buchanan; Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld; Stephen Bernard; Sridhar Atresh

Early decompression may improve neurological outcome after spinal cord injury (SCI), but is often difficult to achieve because of logistical issues. The aims of this study were to 1) determine the time to decompression in cases of isolated cervical SCI in Australia and New Zealand and 2) determine where substantial delays occur as patients move from the accident scene to surgery. Data were extracted from medical records of patients aged 15-70 years with C3-T1 traumatic SCI between 2010 and 2013. A total of 192 patients were included. The median time from accident scene to decompression was 21 h, with the fastest times associated with closed reduction (6 h). A significant decrease in the time to decompression occurred from 2010 (31 h) to 2013 (19 h, p = 0.008). Patients undergoing direct surgical hospital admission had a significantly lower time to decompression, compared with patients undergoing pre-surgical hospital admission (12 h vs. 26 h, p < 0.0001). Medical stabilization and radiological investigation appeared not to influence the timing of surgery. The time taken to organize the operating theater following surgical hospital admission was a further factor delaying decompression (12.5 h). There was a relationship between the timing of decompression and the proportion of patients demonstrating substantial recovery (2-3 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grades). In conclusion, the time of cervical spine decompression markedly improved over the study period. Neurological recovery appeared to be promoted by rapid decompression. Direct surgical hospital admission, rapid organization of theater, and where possible, use of closed reduction, are likely to be effective strategies to reduce the time to decompression.


Spinal Cord | 2017

Achieving assessor accuracy on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury

Alex Armstrong; Jillian Clark; Diwei Ho; C J Payne; S Nolan; L M Goodes; L A Harvey; Ruth Marshall; Mary P. Galea; Sarah A. Dunlop

Study design:A retrospective audit of assessor accuracy using the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) in three multicentre randomised controlled trials (SCIPA: Spinal Cord Injury and Physical Activity) spanning 2010–2014 with standards revised in 2011.Objectives:To investigate assessor accuracy of neurological classification after spinal cord injury.Setting:Australia and New Zealand.Methods:ISNCSCI examinations were undertaken by trained clinicians prior to randomisation. Data were recorded manually and ISNCSCI worksheets circulated to panels, consensus reached and worksheets corrected. An audit team used a 2014 computerised ISNCSCI algorithm to check manual worksheets. A second audit team assessed whether the 2014 computerised algorithm accurately reflected pre- and post-2011 ISNCSCI standards.Results:Of the 208 ISNCSCI worksheets, 24 were excluded. Of the remaining 184 worksheets, 47 (25.5%) were consistent with the 2014 computerised algorithm and 137 (74.5%) contained one or more errors. Errors were in motor (30.1%) or sensory (12.4%) levels, zone of partial preservation (24.0%), motor/sensory scoring (21.5%), ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS, 8.3%) and complete/incomplete classification (0.8%). Other difficulties included classification when anal contraction/sensation was omitted, incorrect neurological levels and violation of the ‘motor follows sensory rule in non-testable myotomes’ (7.4%). Panel errors comprised corrections that were incorrect or missed or incorrect changes to correct worksheets.Conclusion:Given inaccuracies in the manual ISNCSCI worksheets in this long-term clinical trial setting, continued training and a computerised algorithm are essential to ensure accurate scoring, scaling and classification of the ISNCSCI and confidence in clinical trials.


Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair | 2017

SCIPA Switch-On: A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Functional Electrical Stimulation–Assisted Cycling and Passive Cycling Initiated Early After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury:

Mary P. Galea; Maya G. Panisset; Doa El-Ansary; Sarah A. Dunlop; Ruth Marshall; Jillian Clark; Leonid Churilov

Background. Substantial skeletal muscle atrophy after spinal cord injury (SCI) carries significant repercussions for functional recovery and longer-term health. Objective. To compare the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of functional electrical stimulation–assisted cycling (FESC) and passive cycling (PC) to attenuate muscle atrophy after acute SCI. Methods. This multicenter, assessor-blinded phase I/II trial randomized participants at 4 weeks post-SCI to FESC or PC (4 sessions per week, 1 hour maximum per session, over 12 weeks). The primary outcome measure was mean maximum cross-sectional area (CSA) of thigh and calf muscles (magnetic resonance imaging), and secondary outcome measures comprised body composition (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), anthropometry, quality of life, and adverse events (AEs). Results. Of 24 participants, 19 completed the 12-week trial (10 FESC, 9 PC, 18 male). Those participants completed >80% of training sessions (FESC, 83.5%; PC, 85.9%). No significant between-group difference in postintervention muscle CSA was found. No significant between-group difference was found for any other tissue, anthropometric parameter, or behavioral variable or AEs. Six participants experienced thigh hypertrophy (FESC = 3; PC = 3). Atrophy was attenuated (<30%) in 15 cases (FESC = 7; PC = 8). Conclusions. Both cycle ergometry regimens examined were safe, feasible, and well tolerated early after SCI. No conclusions regarding efficacy can be drawn from our data. Further investigation of both modalities early after SCI is required.


Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine | 2017

Can targeted job-information for adults with spinal cord dysfunction be effectively delivered online? A pilot study

Diana Dorstyn; Rachel M. Roberts; Gregory C. Murphy; Ian I. Kneebone; Ashley Craig; Anna Chur-Hansen; Christine Migliorini; Elizabeth Potter; Ruth Marshall; Jillian Clark; Sharron Neeson; Peter Stewart

Objective: To pilot a novel email-based information package (Work and SCI) for job-seekers with an acquired spinal cord injury (SCI) or spinal cord dysfunction (SCI/D). Study design: Prospective, non-randomized, repeated measures trial. Setting: Community dwelling cohort in Australia. Participants: Five people with SCI (mean age 46.4 years, SD = 10.2; 4 female) initially reviewed Work and SCI. Twenty-four with SCI/D subsequently enrolled, of whom 16 (mean age 46.4 years, SD = 11.1; 7 female), completed the intervention. Intervention: Intervention participants accessed Work and SCI over a 4-week period. Outcome measures: Individual changes in pre-post scores for the My Vocational Situation Scale, Job Procurement Self-Efficacy Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Life Orientation Test-Revised were examined. Results: Reliable change in pre-post scores across outcomes were reported by 38% (n = 6) of participants. Favorable comments on the Work and SCI resource were provided in addition to suggestions for improvement. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that Work and SCI may help to establish vocational interests among job-seekers with a SCI/D, however further work is needed to enhance participant compliance. This might include moderator support to promote and maintain participation. A controlled design will also help to identify factors that influence engagement with the Work and SCI resource.


Spinal Cord | 2018

Changes in psychotropic prescription medication use and their relationship with mortality among people with traumatic spinal cord injury

Yue Cao; Jillian Clark; James S. Krause

Study designProspective cohort study.ObjectiveTo identify the relationship of frequency of prescription medication use to treat pain, spasticity, sleep, and depression/stress, and change in prescription medication use with risk of all-cause mortality.SettingThis study was initiated at a specialty hospital in the Southeastern USA, with follow-up and data analysis at an academic medical center in the Southeastern United States.MethodsProspective data were collected in 1997–1998 (Time 1) and 2007–2009 (Time 2), with mortality determined as of 31 December 2014. The initial participant cohort was comprised of 1386 participants with traumatic SCI who were adults and a minimum of 1-year post-injury at enrollment in 1997–1998. Of these, 863 participated at follow-up and 861 were included in the current mortality analysis.ResultsThe frequency of taking prescription medication increased over the 10-year timeframe, particularly for sleep and pain. Each type of prescription medication at Time 1 was associated with later mortality, and an increase in medication use over time was associated with a greater risk of mortality for three of the four conditions (all except spasticity). A decrease in the frequency of pain medication use over time was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause mortality.ConclusionsMore frequent use of prescription medication to treat pain, sleep, and depression/stress is related to all-cause mortality, and increases in the use of medications to treat these conditions is associated with elevated risk of all-cause mortality.


Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair | 2018

SCIPA Full-On: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intensive Whole-Body Exercise and Upper Body Exercise After Spinal Cord Injury

Mary P. Galea; Sarah A. Dunlop; Timothy Geraghty; Glen M. Davis; Andrew Nunn; Liudmyla Olenko; Melanie Hurley; Royal Rehab; Ruth Marshall; Jillian Clark; Rick Acland; Jo Nunnerley

Background. While upper body training has been effective for improving aerobic fitness and muscle strength after spinal cord injury (SCI), activity-based therapies intended to activate the paralyzed extremities have been reported to promote neurological improvement. Objective. To compare the effectiveness of intensive whole-body exercise compared with upper body exercise for people with chronic SCI. Methods. A parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted. Participants with a range of SCI levels and severity were randomized to either full-body exercise (FBE) or upper body exercise (UBE) groups (3 sessions per week over 12 weeks). FBE participants underwent locomotor training, functional electrical stimulation-assisted leg cycling, and trunk and lower extremity exercises, while UBE participants undertook upper body strength and aerobic fitness training only. The primary outcome measure was the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score for upper and lower extremities. Adverse events were systematically recorded. Results. A total of 116 participants were enrolled and included in the primary analysis. The adjusted mean between-group difference was −0.04 (95% CI −1.12 to 1.04) for upper extremity motor scores, and 0.90 (95% CI −0.48 to 2.27) for lower extremity motor scores. There were 15 serious adverse events in UBE and 16 in FBE, but only one of these was definitely related to the experimental intervention (bilateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau subchondral fractures). No significant between-group difference was found for adverse events, or functional or behavioral variables. Conclusions. Full-body training did not lead to improved ASIA motor scores compared with upper body training in people with chronic SCI.


Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation | 2017

Nature of the Non-traumatic Spinal Cord Injury Literature: A Systematic Review

Jillian Clark; Ruth Marshall

Background: Non-traumatic SCI (NTSCI) etiologies represent a markedly heterogeneous cluster of conditions defined within the consensus NTSCI taxonomy. This meta-analysis assembles evidence about the occurrence of NTSCI and its clinical outcomes with respect to 6 research domains. Purpose: To investigate the quality and quantity of clinical NTSCI evidence published in the peer reviewed literature with reference to prognosis, diagnosis, intervention, process of care, methodology, and qualitative approaches. Methods: PubMed and MEDLINE OVID MeSH heading searches were conducted for 5 common-language NTSCI descriptors. Filters were English language and Entrez date (1997-2016). Filters also controlled for case reports, editorials or errata, and invited reviews. NTSCI etiologies incorrectly classified, animal studies, and multidimensional mapping studies were excluded. Full texts were retrieved and ranked for evidence quality according to PRISMA statement guidelines, or PEDro criteria. Data were extracted and simple descriptive statistics applied. Results: The search terms non traumatic and non-traumatic SCI retrieved 282 articles, with 39 duplicates. After exclusion of 117 articles: Level 1V (60); NTSCI incorrectly evaluated (14); publication bias (2); non-English language (1); and animal experiments (1), 126 titles/abstracts were screened and ranked against criteria. Of the 8 papers allocated for full-text review, a subset of 3 articles was ranked level 1A (1) or level 11A (2); mean PEDro score 5.75±0.5. Reasons for full-text exclusions (5) were NTSCI incorrectly classified (1) and statistical limitations (4). Of the 6 domains, prognostics had adequate data yield (86) for evidence synthesis (4.8% ranked level 1A, or 11A). Notable evidence gaps were identified in qualitative (1), methodological (2), and diagnostic (8) domains. Conclusion: Therapeutic approaches require an evidence-based understanding of the distinct contexts in which NTSCI occurs, especially in less resourced settings. Our findings underscore the need for qualitative and quantitative research on the occurrence of NTSCI in all contexts.


Current Osteoporosis Reports | 2017

Musculoskeletal Health in the Context of Spinal Cord Injury

Jillian Clark; David M. Findlay

Purpose of ReviewThis review assembles recent understanding of the profound loss of muscle and bone in spinal cord injury (SCI). It is important to try to understand these changes, and the context in which they occur, because of their impact on the wellbeing of SC-injured individuals, and the urgent need for viable preventative therapies.Recent FindingsRecent research provides new understanding of the effects of age and systemic factors on the response of bone to loading, of relevance to attempts to provide load therapy for bone in SCI. The rapidly growing dataset describing the biochemical crosstalk between bone and muscle, and the cell and molecular biology of myokines signalling to bone and osteokines regulating muscle metabolism and mass, is reviewed. The ways in which this crosstalk may be altered in SCI is summarised.SummaryTherapeutic approaches to the catabolic changes in muscle and bone in SCI require a holistic understanding of their unique mechanical and biochemical context.


Trials | 2015

Early exercise after spinal cord injury (‘Switch-On’): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Mary P. Galea; Sarah A. Dunlop; Ruth Marshall; Jillian Clark; Leonid Churilov


The Spine Journal | 2017

Traumatic subaxial cervical facet subluxation and dislocation: epidemiology, radiographic analyses, and risk factors for spinal cord injury

Ryan D. Quarrington; Claire F. Jones; Petar Tcherveniakov; Jillian Clark; Simon J.I. Sandler; Yu Chao Lee; Shabnam Torabiardakani; John J. Costi; Brian J. C. Freeman

Collaboration


Dive into the Jillian Clark's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sarah A. Dunlop

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary P. Galea

Royal Melbourne Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peta Skeers

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ashley Craig

Kolling Institute of Medical Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge