Jim Blake
AstraZeneca
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jim Blake.
Cancer Research | 2014
Kirk Robarge; Jacob B. Schwarz; Jim Blake; Michael Burkard; Jocelyn Chan; Huifen Chen; Kang-Jye Chou; John J. Gaudino; Stephen Jay Gould; Jonas Grina; Xin Linghu; Lichuan Liu; Matthew Martinson; David Moreno; Christine Orr; Patricia Pacheco; Ann Qin; Kevin Rasor; Li Ren; Sheerin Shahidi-Latham; Jeffrey Stults; Francis J. Sullivan; Weiru Wang; Peter Yin; Aihe Zhou; Marcia Belvin; Mark Merchant; John Moffat
Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2014; April 5-9, 2014; San Diego, CA The extracellular-signal-regulated kinases (ERK1 and ERK2) represent an essential node within the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling cascade that commonly is activated by oncogenic mutations in BRAF or RAS or by upstream oncogenic signaling, such as receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) activation. While targeting upstream nodes with RAF and MEK inhibitors has proven effective clinically, resistance frequently develops through reactivation of the pathway. Simultaneous targeting of multiple nodes in the pathway, such as MEK and ERK, offers the prospect of enhanced efficacy as well as reduced potential for acquired resistance. Here, we present the discovery and characterization of GDC-0994, an orally bioavailable, small molecule inhibitor of ERK kinase activity. GDC-0994 is highly selective for ERK1 and ERK2, with biochemical potency of 1.1 nM and 0.3 nM, respectively. Daily, oral dosing of GDC-0994 results in significant single-agent activity in multiple in vivo cancer models, including KRAS-mutant and BRAF-mutant human xenograft tumors in mice. PD biomarker inhibition of phospho-p90RSK in these tumors correlates with potency in vitro and in vivo. In contrast to other published ERK inhibitors, GDC-0994 neither increases nor decreases phospho-ERK, suggesting that different ERK inhibitors have alternative mechanisms of action with respect to feedback signaling. Furthermore, we demonstrate a novel approach for targeting the oncogenic signaling through the RAS pathway by combining ERK and MEK inhibitors. GDC-0994 is currently in Phase I clinical development. Citation Format: Kirk Robarge, Jacob Schwarz, Jim Blake, Michael Burkard, Jocelyn Chan, Huifen Chen, Kang-Jye Chou, Dolores Diaz, John Gaudino, Stephen Gould, Jonas Grina, Xin Linghu, Lichuan Liu, Matthew Martinson, David A. Moreno, Christine Orr, Patricia Pacheco, Ann Qin, Kevin Rasor, Li Ren, Sheerin Shahidi-Latham, Jeffrey Stults, Francis Sullivan, Weiru Wang, Peter Yin, Aihe Zhou, Marcia Belvin, Mark Merchant, John G. Moffat. Discovery of GDC-0994, a potent and selective ERK1/2 inhibitor in early clinical development. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr DDT02-03. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-DDT02-03
Cancer Research | 2010
Kurtis D. Davies; Michael J. Humphries; Francis J. Sullivan; Ira von Carlowitz; Yvan Le Huerou; Peter Mohr; Bin Wang; Jim Blake; Michael Lyon; Indrani W. Gunawardana; Mark Joseph Chicarelli; Eli M. Wallace; Stefan Gross
Chk1 is a serine/threonine kinase that plays important roles in the cellular response to genotoxic stress. For this reason, there is a great deal of interest in using inhibitors of Chk1 to potentiate the effects of DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics. In addition, multiple studies have demonstrated that Chk1 activity is essential during an unperturbed cell cycle to ensure proper DNA replication and maintain genomic integrity. Therefore, it is plausible that a Chk1 inhibitor could also be efficacious as a single-agent therapeutic for human cancer. Here we show that treatment with Chk1-A, a potent and selective inhibitor of Chk1, alone is anti-proliferative against a wide array of cancer cell lines with varying degrees of potency. We sought to understand the mechanisms by which Chk1 inhibition derives the observed anti-proliferative effect. Employing the human leukemia cell line HEL92.1.7, a line particularly sensitive to Chk1 inhibition in terms of proliferation, we characterized the biochemical and functional effects of Chk1-A treatment. We observed concentration-dependent increases in phosphorylation of H2A. X, Chk1, and Chk2, which are markers of DNA damage and cell-cycle checkpoint activation. These biochemical events correlated with S-phase accumulation and eventual apoptosis. In vivo, we found that HEL92.1.7 tumor xenografts were sensitive to oral administration of Chk1-A at a dose that was well tolerated. Together, these studies suggest that inhibition of Chk1 results in DNA damage that induces apoptosis and that use of a Chk1 inhibitor as a single-agent could be an effective strategy to treat certain types of human cancers. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3874.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2009
Michael J. Humphries; Ira von Carlowitz; Yvan Le Huerou; Nikole Randolph; Peter Mohr; Bin Wang; Michael Lyon; Indrani W. Gunawardana; Mark Joseph Chicarelli; Jim Blake; Michael L. Schrag; Shannon L. Winski; Eli M. Wallace
Loss of coordination between cell cycle checkpoints and DNA damage repair is a fundamental feature tumor cells rely on for unregulated growth and developing chemotherapeutic resistance. The protein kinase Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) is a sentinel molecule essential for cell cycle arrest at the S and G2M checkpoints, as well as regulating homologous recombination DNA repair. In tumor cells exposed to chemotherapy, Chk1 inhibition overrides cell cycle arrest and DNA repair functions, effectively driving tumor cells into a state of mitotic catastrophe and, ultimately, cell death. We have previously reported in schedule‐dependence studies, using Chk1 inhibitors and irinotecan (CPT‐11), that oral administration of Chk1 inhibitors allows for multi‐day target‐coverage, and thus continuous inhibition of Chk1 for a finite period of time, which maximizes anti‐tumor efficacy. Here, we extend these studies and investigate the pharmacodynamic relationship to efficacy, as well as the specific biomarkers that are predictive of an anti‐tumor effect, when Chk1 inhibitors are administered on a multi‐day dosing schedule. Utilizing potent (IC50=24–27nM), selective, and orally bio‐available small molecule Chk1 inhibitors of which Chk1‐A and Chk1‐C are representative, we find only modest inhibition of the functional biomarker phospho‐cdc2, following a single dose of a Chk1 inhibitor. Alternatively, on multi‐day Chk1 inhibitor dose schedules, we find dose‐related pharmacodynamic inhibition of Chk1 signaling that is maximized at doses where we see significant tumor growth inhibition in efficacy experiments. Furthermore, multi‐day dosing of Chk1 inhibitors induces marked inhibition of phospho‐cdc2 and Rad51 protein levels, suggesting tumoricidal activity related to Chk1 inhibition is due to both checkpoint override and impairment of DNA damage repair. In human tumor xenografts administered combination therapy with gemcitabine, an orally‐delivered Chk1 inhibitor dosed on a multi‐day schedule shows superior efficacy over an IV administered compound. Taken together, our findings show a clear correlative relationship between pharmacodynamic target inhibition and anti‐tumor activity that is exclusively achieved on multi‐day dose schedules. These results demonstrate the need for prolonged Chk1 inhibition to provide robust pharmacodynamic inhibition and maximal anti‐tumor efficacy. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):B254.
Cancer Research | 2004
Eli Wallace; Tammie Yeh; Joe Lyssikatos; Jim Winkler; Patrice Lee; Allison L. Marlow; Brian T. Hurley; Vivienne Marsh; Bryan Bernat; Ronald M. Evans; Heidi Colwell; Josh Ballard; Tony Morales; Darin Smith; Barb Brandhuber; Stefan Gross; Greg Poch; Kevin Litwiler; Gary P. Hingorani; Jennifer Otten; Francis J. Sullivan; Jim Blake; Tracy Pheneger; Michelle Goyette; Kevin Koch
Archive | 2012
Eli M. Wallace; Hong Woon Yang; Jim Blake
Archive | 2014
Jim Blake; Huifen Chen; Mark Joseph Chicarelli; John Joseph Gaudino; Lewis J. Gazzard; Sam Kintz; Pete Mohr; Kirk Robarge; Jacob Bradley Schwarz; Aihe Zhou
Archive | 2006
Eli M. Wallace; Hong Woon Yang; Jim Blake
Archive | 2009
Jim Blake; Rebecca Jane Booth; Mark Richard Fielding; John Leonard; Joseph P. Lyssikatos; Allison L. Marlow; John David Pittam; Jeongbeob Seo; Richard Anthony Storey; Eli M. Wallace; Hong Woon Yang; ウォリス、エリ; ストレイ、リチャード、アンソニー; ソ、ジョンビョブ; ピッタム、ジョン、デーヴィッド; フィールディング、マーク、リチャード; ブース、レベッカ、ジェーン; ブレーク、ジム; マーロウ、アリソン、エル.; ヤン、ホン、ウーン; ライシカトス、ジョセフ、ピー.; レオナルド、ジョン
Archive | 2013
Jim Blake; Huifen Chen; Mark Joseph Chicarelli; John Joseph Gaudino; Lewis J. Gazzard; Sam Kintz; Pete Mohr; Kirk Robarge; Jacob Bradley Schwarz; Aihe Zhou
Archive | 2012
Allison L. Marlow; マーロウ、アリソン、エル.; Eli M. Wallace; ウォリス、エリ; Jeongbeob Seo; ソ、ジョンビョブ; Joseph P. Lyssikatos; ライシカトス、ジョセフ、ピー.; Hong Woon Yang; ヤン、ホン、ウーン; Jim Blake; ブレーク、ジム; Richard Anthony Storey; ストレイ、リチャード、アンソニー; Rebecca Jane Booth; ブース、レベッカ、ジェーン; John David Pittam; ピッタム、ジョン、デーヴィッド; John Leonard; レオナルド、ジョン; Mark Richard Fielding; フィールディング、マーク、リチャード