Jimmy A. Light

Evaluation of Intravenous Immunoglobulin as an Agent to Lower Allosensitization and Improve Transplantation in Highly Sensitized Adult Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: Report of the NIH IG02 Trial

Reported are the reduction of anti-HLA antibody levels and improvement of transplant rates by intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Between 1997 and 2000, a total of 101 adult patients with ESRD who were highly sensitized to HLA antigens (panel reactive antibody [PRA] > or =50% monthly for 3 mo) enrolled onto an NIH-sponsored trial (IG02). Patients received IVIG or placebo. Subjects received IVIG 2 g/kg monthly for 4 mo or an equivalent volume of placebo with additional infusions at 12 and 24 mo after entry if not transplanted. If transplanted, additional infusions were given monthly for 4 mo. Baseline PRA levels were similar in both groups. However, IVIG significantly reduced PRA levels in study subjects compared with placebo. Sixteen IVIG patients (35%) and eight placebo patients (17%) were transplanted. Rejection episodes occurred in 9 of 17 IVIG and 1 of 10 placebo subjects. Seven graft failures occurred (four IVIG, three placebo) among adherent patients with similar 2-yr graft survival rates (80% IVIG, 75% placebo). With a median follow-up of 2 yr after transplant, the viable transplants functioned normally with a mean +/- SEM serum creatinine of 1.68 +/- 0.28 for IVIG versus 1.28 +/- 0.13 mg/dl for placebo. Adverse events rates were similar in both groups. We conclude that IVIG is better than placebo in reducing anti-HLA antibody levels and improving transplantation rates in highly sensitized patients with ESRD. Transplant rates for highly sensitized patients with ESRD awaiting kidney transplants are improved with IVIG therapy.

Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in HIV-Infected Recipients

BACKGROUND The outcomes of kidney transplantation and immunosuppression in people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are incompletely understood. METHODS We undertook a prospective, nonrandomized trial of kidney transplantation in HIV-infected candidates who had CD4+ T-cell counts of at least 200 per cubic millimeter and undetectable plasma HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels while being treated with a stable antiretroviral regimen. Post-transplantation management was provided in accordance with study protocols that defined prophylaxis against opportunistic infection, indications for biopsy, and acceptable approaches to immunosuppression, management of rejection, and antiretroviral therapy. RESULTS Between November 2003 and June 2009, a total of 150 patients underwent kidney transplantation; survivors were followed for a median period of 1.7 years. Patient survival rates (±SD) at 1 year and 3 years were 94.6±2.0% and 88.2±3.8%, respectively, and the corresponding mean graft-survival rates were 90.4% and 73.7%. In general, these rates fall somewhere between those reported in the national database for older kidney-transplant recipients (≥65 years) and those reported for all kidney-transplant recipients. A multivariate proportional-hazards analysis showed that the risk of graft loss was increased among patients treated for rejection (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 6.6; P=0.02) and those receiving antithymocyte globulin induction therapy (hazard ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.6; P=0.03); living-donor transplants were protective (hazard ratio, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.8; P=0.02). A higher-than-expected rejection rate was observed, with 1-year and 3-year estimates of 31% (95% CI, 24 to 40) and 41% (95% CI, 32 to 52), respectively. HIV infection remained well controlled, with stable CD4+ T-cell counts and few HIV-associated complications. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of carefully selected HIV-infected patients, both patient- and graft-survival rates were high at 1 and 3 years, with no increases in complications associated with HIV infection. The unexpectedly high rejection rates are of serious concern and indicate the need for better immunotherapy. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00074386.).

Effects of tacrolimus on hyperlipidemia after successful renal transplantation: A southeastern organ procurement foundation multicenter clinical study

BACKGROUND Tacrolimus has been shown to have a less adverse effect on the lipid profiles of transplant patients when the drug is started as induction therapy. In order to determine the effect tacrolimus has on lipid profiles in stable cyclosporine-treated renal transplant patients with established hyperlipidemia, a randomized prospective study was undertaken by the Southeastern Organ Procurement Foundation. METHODS Patients of the 13 transplant centers, with cholesterol of 240 mg/dl or greater, who were at least 1 year posttransplant with stable renal function, were randomly assigned to remain on cyclosporine (control) or converted to tacrolimus. Patients converted to tacrolimus were maintained at a level of 5-15 ng/ml, and control patients remained at their previous levels of cyclosporine. Concurrent immunosuppressants were not changed. Levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides, total high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), very-low-density lipoprotein, and apoproteins A and B were monitored before conversion and at months 1, 3, and 6. Renal function and glucose control were evaluated at the beginning and end of the study (month 6). RESULTS A total of 65 patients were enrolled; 12 patients failed to complete the study. None were removed as a result of acute rejection or graft failure. Fifty-three patients were available for analysis (27 in the tacrolimus group and 26 controls). Demographics were not different between groups. In patients converted to tacrolimus treatment, there was a -55 mg/dl (-16%) (P=0.0031) change in cholesterol, a -48 mg/dl (-25%) (P=0.0014) change in LDL cholesterol, and a -36 mg/dl (-23%) (P=0.034) change in apolipoprotein B. There was no change in renal function, glycemic control, or incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus in the tacrolimus group. CONCLUSION Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus can be safely done after successful transplantation. Introduction of tacrolimus to a stable renal patient does not effect renal function or glycemic control. Tacrolimus can lower cholesterol, LDL, and apolipoprotein B. Conversion to tacrolimus from cyclosporine should be considered in the treatment of posttransplant hyperlipidemia.

Donor hepatitis C virus status does not adversely affect short-term outcomes in HCV+ recipients in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND Recipient hepatitis C virus (HCV) seropositivity has been associated with inferior outcomes in renal transplantation (RTx). We sought to determine whether donor HCV+ status influenced the incidence of rejection, liver dysfunction, and graft survival in HCV+ recipients. METHODS We reviewed 44 HCV+ recipients (R+) receiving RTx from HCV+ (D+) and HCV- (D-) donors between February 1991 and September 1996. All patients were followed to the end of the study period (mean=36 months, range=12-60 months). We compared the R+ group with a demographically matched cohort of 44 HCV- recipients (R-). RESULTS Of the 44 R+, 25 (57%) had a total of 48 rejection episodes. Among the 44 R-, 32 (73%) had 58 rejection episodes (P>0.1). Within the R+ group, 28 were D+/R+; of these 14 (50%) had 27 rejection episodes, whereas among the 16 D-/R+, 11 (68%) had 21 rejection episodes (P>0.3). Graft and patient survival was similar in both the groups (86.4% and 91%, respectively). Liver dysfunction was slightly increased in the R+ group (4/44 vs. 0/44, P>0.1), with one death due to liver failure in this group. CONCLUSION Donor HCV+ status had no influence on outcomes in HCV+ recipients after kidney transplantation in the short term. The incidence of rejection, graft loss, and mortality was comparable between the D+/R+ and D-/R+ groups. Furthermore, rejection, graft loss, and death were identical in R+ and R-groups throughout the 5-year study period. We therefore conclude that HCV+ recipients can safely receive kidney transplants without concern about donor HCV status or fear of adverse events from their own HCV+ status.

Benefits of HLA-A and HLA-B Matching on Graft and Patient Outcome after Cadaveric-Donor Renal Transplantation

Data collected prospectively on 3811 renal transplantations performed between June 1977 and July 1982 by the 42 member institutions of the South-Eastern Organ Procurement Foundation were analyzed to determine the influence of donor-recipient HLA-A and HLA-B matching on patient and graft outcome. Well-matched recipients were more likely to have received kidneys from outside their own centers, were more highly presensitized, included fewer blacks, and were more likely to have lost an earlier graft. Multivariate Cox regression analysis that included these and six other potential confounding variables revealed a significant association (P less than 0.001) between good HLA-A and B matching and increased graft survival. The difference in mean (+/- S.E.) actuarial graft survival between recipients worst matched and best matched for HLA-A and B antigens increased with time: 55 +/- 2 per cent as compared with 64 +/- 4 per cent at six months and 18 +/- 4 per cent as compared with 44 +/- 7 per cent at four years. Poor HLA matching of donor with recipient provided the greatest relative risk (2.16) of irreversible graft rejection of all the variables examined. Among patients with functioning grafts, well-matched recipients had lower serum creatinine levels and received significantly smaller amounts of glucocorticoids. Our findings indicate that good HLA-A and B matching is highly dependent on a system for sharing organs among institutions, and results in decreased graft rejection, better long-term graft function, and less need for post-transplantation immunosuppression.

Primary Cutaneous Fungal Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Case Series

Cutaneous fungal infections in solid‐organ transplant patients present in a variety of nonspecific ways, requiring a high index of suspicion to diagnose correctly. In the present series of four transplant recipients, subsequent primary cutaneous fungal infections presented as papules, plaques, ulcers and subcutaneous nodules. Transplantations included one cardiac, two renal and one renal–pancreatic transplant. Fungal infections were limited to the skin; there was no evidence of disseminated disease in any case. The pathogens isolated were Scedosporium apiospermum (Pseudallescheria boydii), Alternaria species, Aspergillus fumigatus, and a coelomycete in the Coniothyrium‐Microsphaeropsis complex of dark molds. Individuals were successfully treated with surgical debridement, antifungal agents, and reduction of immunosuppressive therapy. All patients and allografts survived. Accurate diagnosis, aggressive surgery and appropriate antifungal therapy, combined with close outpatient follow‐up, optimize the likelihood of a cure in a transplant population.

Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy here to stay

BACKGROUND Open live donor nephrectomy is safe and provides kidneys of excellent quality. The complexity of the laparoscopic donor technique has raised considerable concerns. METHOD Twenty-six laparoscopic live donor nephrectomies were done from October 1997 to October 1998. RESULTS All kidneys had immediate function. All recipients except 1 had serum creatinines less than 2.0 mg at 2 months posttransplantation. Three complications (wound infection, neuroma, reoperation) occurred. There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS Proper surgical training and patient selection can result in a safe donor operation that provides kidneys of excellent quality.

Bone marrow transfusions in cadaver renal allografts: pilot trials with concurrent controls

Abstract: Background:  The safety and immune tolerance potential of donor marrow infusion with cadaveric source renal transplants was evaluated in a series of non‐randomized multicenter pilot trials by the NIH Cooperative Clinical Trials in Transplantation (CCTT) Group.

The Utility of Cytodiagnostic Urinalysis for Monitoring Renal Allograft Injury

Cytodiagnostic urinalysis was tested to determine its utility in the evaluation of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant patients. Specimens were prepared using the Papanicolaou stain on cytocentrifuge preparations of standardized quantities of urine. Differential counts of blood cells (neutrophils, lymphocytes, red cells), renal tubule cells (convoluted, collecting duct, necrotic), and casts (i.e. hemoglobin, renal tubule cell) were included in the sediment evaluation. Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated collecting duct cell exfoliation at 20 per 10 hpf to be a more sensitive and specific reflector of acute rejection than lymphocytes at their optimum decision point of 13 per 10 hpf. Sixty-four percent of cytodiagnostic urinalysis diagnoses preceded the clinical diagnoses. Ciclosporin nephrotoxicity was differentiated by the exfoliation of renal tubule convoluted cells in excess of collecting duct cells. The advantages of this technique over membrane-filter or phase-microscopic techniques for examining urine sediment of both transplant and nephrology patients include improved sensitivity and specificity in identification of sediment elements and reliable quantitative data for use in detecting renal disease and for monitoring therapy.

A comparison of daclizumab to ATGAM induction in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients on triple maintenance immunosuppression

Daclizumab (DAC) is a molecularly engineered humanized IgGa monoclonal Ab directed against the alpha chain of the interleukin‐2 receptor (IL2R). Inhibiting the amplification of the immune response by blocking IL2R can reduce the frequency of acute rejection without the attendant risk of infection. 
The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare DAC to anti‐thymocyte (ATGAM) induction in 24 simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) transplants performed between September 1995 and September 1998. The primary endpoints were the incidence within 6 months post‐transplant of: 1) biopsy‐proven acute rejection; and 2) infection. The two groups (DAC, n=12; ATGAM, n=12) were matched on age, race, ESRD, number of HLA mismatches, PRA level, and cold ischemia time. DAC (1 mg/kg) was given on the day of transplant, then every other week (a total of five doses); ATGAM (15 mg/kg) was given on post‐transplant day 1, then daily for 7–10 d. Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporine (Neoral®– 8–10 mg/kg/d) or Prograf® (0.16–0.2 mg/kg/d), mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept®– 2–3 g/d) and steroids. 
Of the 12 DAC patients, 3 patients (25%) had biopsy‐proven acute rejection versus 8/12 (67%) of the ATGAM patients. The time to acute rejection was significantly different by group (DAC=110 d; ATGAM=26 d). There was a reduction in the number of patients receiving antilymphocyte drugs for moderate to severe rejection (DAC=2/12; ATGAM=4/12), with 2 of the 4 ATGAM patients experiencing more than two episodes of biopsy‐proven rejection. There was an increase in infection by group (DAC=4/12; ATGAM=7/12): total of three septic infections occurred in the ATGAM group opposed to none in the DAC group. Patient, pancreas, kidney 6‐month survival rates were 100% for both groups. 
We conclude that DAC induction coupled with triple immunosuppressive therapy reduces the incidence of rejection in SPK transplant patients. The time to acute rejection was prolonged in the DAC group compared with the ATGAM group without the attendant risks of rejection.