Jimmy J. Hwang

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Reirradiation of Head-and-Neck Cancer

PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an appealing treatment option after previous radiotherapy because of its precision, conformality, and reduced treatment duration. We report our experience with reirradiation using fractionated SRS for head-and-neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 2002 to 2008, 65 patients received SRS to the oropharynx (n = 13), hypopharynx (n = 8), nasopharynx (n = 7), paranasal sinus (n = 7), neck (n = 7), and other sites (n = 23). Thirty-eight patients were treated definitively and 27 patients with metastatic disease and/or untreated local disease were treated palliatively. Nine patients underwent complete macroscopic resection before SRS. Thirty-three patients received concurrent chemoradiation. The median initial radiation dose was 67 Gy, and the median reirradiation SRS dose was 30 Gy (21-35 Gy) in 2-5 fractions. RESULTS Median follow-up for surviving patients was 16 months. Fifty-six patients were evaluable for response: 30 (54%) had complete, 15 (27%) had partial, and 11 (20%) had no response. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 12 months. For definitively treated patients, the 2-year OS and locoregional control (LRC) rates were 41% and 30%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher total dose, surgical resection, and nasopharynx site were significantly associated with improved LRC; surgical resection and nonsquamous histology were associated with improved OS. Seven patients (11%) experienced severe reirradiation-related toxicity, including one treatment-attributed death. CONCLUSION SRS reirradiation for head-and-neck cancer is feasible. This study demonstrates encouraging response rates with acceptable toxicity. Fractionated SRS reirradiation with concurrent chemotherapy in select patients warrants further study.

Low overexpression of HER-2/PPPNeu in advanced colorectal cancer limits the usefulness of trastuzumab (herceptin®) and irinotecan as therapy. A phase II trial

Background: To determine the response rate of trastuzumab and irinotecan in HER-2/neu overexpressing advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), determine the frequency of HER-2/neu expression in CRC, and evaluate the pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab in a phase II study. Patients and Methods: Patients were screened for HER-2/neu by immunohistochemistry (DAKO HercepTest™). Prior chemotherapy was limited to one regimen. Trastuzumab was administered weekly (loading dose of 4 mg/kg IV and 2 mg/kg thereafter). Irinotecan 125 mg/m2, IV was administered weekly for 4 weeks with a 2-week rest period. Results: HER-2/neu overexpression was detected in 11 of 138 (8.0%) of screened tumors (2 + in 5 and 3 + in 6 patients). Nine patients were entered in the study; 6 had received prior chemotherapy. Partial responses were seen in 5 of 7 evaluable patients. Grade 3–4 toxicities in 31 cycles of therapy included diarrhea (19%), nausea (10%), and vomiting (6%). Leukopenia occurred in 6%, and congestive heart failure and acute renal failure (secondary to diarrhea and dehydration) were seen in 3% of cycles. The study was prematurely closed due to low accrual. Conclusions: The low overexpression rate of HER-2/neu (8.0%) in advanced CRC limits the potential for further investigation of regimens involving trastuzumab, despite evidence suggestive of activity. Irinotecan did not alter the pharmacokinetic disposition of trastuzumab.

Phase II Study of Everolimus in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Previously Treated with Bevacizumab-, Fluoropyrimidine-, Oxaliplatin-, and Irinotecan-Based Regimens

Purpose: Dysregulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mTOR pathway is seen in 40% to 60% of patients with colorectal cancer. Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of mTOR, showed efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancers in phase I studies. Experimental Design: In sequential phase II studies assessing two dosing schedules, patients with metastatic colorectal cancers refractory to bevacizumab-, fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based regimens received everolimus 70 mg/wk (n = 99) or 10 mg/d (n = 100). Primary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response or stable disease (SD). Tumor tissue was collected from all patients for predefined exploratory biomarker analyses. Results: Seventy-one patients were included in the per-protocol set for each cohort. DCRs of 31.0% and 32.4% (all SD) were seen in the weekly and daily schedules, respectively. Median duration of SD was 3.9 months in each cohort. Median PFS and OS were 1.8 and 4.9 months and 1.8 and 5.9 months, respectively, for the weekly and daily schedules. Among patients receiving daily everolimus, those with a KRAS mutation experienced significantly shorter median OS (P = 0.008) and lower DCR (P = 0.035) compared with those with wild-type KRAS in exploratory biomarker analyses. Conclusions: Everolimus 70 mg/wk or 10 mg/d was well tolerated but did not confer meaningful efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancers. Future studies may consider evaluating everolimus in combination with other agents or in patients with dysregulation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Clin Cancer Res; 19(14); 3987–95. ©2013 AACR.

Safety and efficacy of hypofractionated stereotactic body reirradiation in head and neck cancer: Long-term follow-up of a large series.

The purpose of this study was to report long‐term outcomes for a large cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) reirradiation.

A Phase II Study of Weekly Docetaxel in Combination with Capecitabine in Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinomas

Objective: Docetaxel and capecitabine are active agents in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal (GE) carcinomas. This multi-institutional phase II trial evaluates the combination of docetaxel and capecitabine as first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric and GE adenocarcinomas. Methods: Patients who had received 1 or no prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of a 21-day cycle with docetaxel 30 mg/m2 administered on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 administered twice daily on days 1–14. The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS). Results: Forty patients were enrolled in the study; 39 received treatment and were evaluable for response and toxicity. The median patient age was 61 years (range 21–84); 8 patients had received prior chemotherapy in the advanced or metastatic setting. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 15 patients (38%), including diarrhea in 5 patients (13%) and hand-foot syndrome in 5 patients (13%). The overall response rate was 32% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16.7–51.4]. The median time to progression and OS were 3.4 months (95% CI 2.7–5.8) and 10.7 months (95% CI 6.1–12.1), respectively. Conclusions: The regimen of docetaxel and capecitabine is a well-tolerated, easily administered and active outpatient regimen for advanced gastric and GE adenocarcinoma.

Comparative molecular analyses of left-sided colon, right-sided colon, and rectal cancers

Tumor sidedness has emerged as an important prognostic and predictive factor in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Recent studies demonstrate that patients with advanced right-sided colon cancers have a worse prognosis than those with left-sided colon or rectal cancers, and these patient subgroups respond differently to biological therapies. Historically, management of patients with metastatic colon and rectal cancers has been similar, and colon and rectal cancer patients have been grouped together in large clinical trials. Clearly, the differences in molecular biology among right-sided colon, left-sided colon, and rectal cancers should be further studied in order to account for disparities in clinical outcomes. We profiled 10,570 colorectal tumors (of which 2,413 were identified as arising from the left colon, right colon, or rectum) using next-generation sequencing, immunohistochemistry, chromogenic in-situ hybridization, and fragment analysis (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ). Right-sided colon cancers had higher rates of microsatellite instability, more frequent aberrant activation of the EGFR pathway including higher BRAF and PIK3CA mutation rates, and increased mutational burden compared to left-sided colon and rectal cancers. Rectal cancers had higher rates of TOPO1 expression and Her2/neu amplification compared to both left- and right-sided colon cancers. Molecular variations among right-sided colon, left-sided colon, and rectal tumors may contribute to differences in clinical behavior. The site of tumor origin (left colon, right colon, or rectum) should certainly be considered when selecting treatment regimens and stratifying patients for future clinical trials.

Treatment of resectable gastric cancer: current standards of care

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The local surgical treatment of gastric cancer varies geographically. However, there has been a confluence of opinion regarding the optimal therapy of gastric cancer toward multimodality therapy. In the East, many clinicians pursue adjuvant chemotherapy after a D2 resection. However, in the West, clinicians use either perioperative chemotherapy or postoperative chemoradiation. It remains unclear at this time whether either perioperative approach is the optimal approach.

Capecitabine: fulfilling the promise of oral chemotherapy.

Capecitabine is a synthetic oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate that is sequentially activated in a three-step process, which results in the preferential production of 5-fluorouracil in tumours, rather than in the normal surrounding tissue. Capecitabine is proven to be as effective as the combination of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin administered on the Mayo clinic schedule in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It has also been proven to be effective in patients with metastatic breast cancer that has progressed despite prior anthracyclines and taxoids. More recently, it has also been shown to increase survival in combination with docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer in comparison to docetaxel alone. This article reviews the pharmacology and clinical activity of capecitabine, as well as combinations of capecitabine with other chemotherapeutic agents and future directions of investigation with this convenient and widely active antitumour therapy.

A phase 1 study of cetuximab and lapatinib in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies

Acquired resistance to antiepidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR) therapy may be caused by EGFR–v‐erb‐b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 (ErbB2) heterodimerization and pathway reactivation. In preclinical studies, inhibiting ErbB2 blocked this resistance mechanism and resensitized cells to anti‐EGFR therapy. Cetuximab targets EGFR, whereas lapatinib inhibits both EGFR and ErbB2. The objective of this phase 1 trial was to assess the safety, dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs), and maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of cetuximab and lapatinib in patients with solid tumors.

A Phase I Trial of Bexarotene in Combination With Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to identify dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of docetaxel with a fixed-dose of bexarotene. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a phase I, single-center and open-label trial of dose-escalating docetaxel with a fixed-dose oral bexarotene. Successive cohorts of 3 patients (pts), with confirmed solid tumors refractory to standard therapy or for whom no standard therapy existed, received fixed-dose oral bexarotene (400 mg/m(2) daily) with escalating doses of docetaxel weekly (25, 30, or 35 mg/m(2)) for 3 weeks on a 4-week cycle. Cohorts were expanded to 6 pts if a DLT was noted. The MTD was determined based on the occurrence of DLT in at least 2 of 6 pts during the first cycle. RESULTS Nineteen pts were enrolled. Seven pts were treated at 25 mg/m(2), 6 at 30 mg/m(2), and 6 at 35 mg/m(2) of docetaxel. The MTD for docetaxel was 30 mg/m(2) with 400 mg/m(2) of daily bexarotene. Hypothyroidism, hypertriglyceridemia, and fatigue were common toxicities. Three pts developed pulmonary toxicity (possible radiation recall pneumonitis [n = 2] and pulmonary hypertension because of tumor emboli [n = 1]). Two pts withdrew consent because of Grade 3 fatigue. Ten of 19 pts were noted to have stable disease and received more than 2 cycles of therapy. Of the 10 pts with stable disease, 5 had non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and of those 5 pts, 1 had a partial response that persisted for eight cycles. conclusion: The MTD of docetaxel was 30 mg/m(2) in combination with daily bexarotene at 400mg/m(2). Careful monitoring may be indicated in pts with previously irradiated lung tumors.