Jin-Seok Jang

Long term survival results for gastric GIST: is laparoscopic surgery for large gastric GIST feasible?

BackgroundRecently, laparoscopic resection for relatively small sized gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been widely accepted as minimally invasive surgery. However, no report on the long-term safety and efficacy of this surgery for large sized gastric GISTs has been published to date.MethodsBetween July 1998 and January 2011, 104 consecutive patients who underwent resection for gastric GISTs were enrolled in this retrospective study. We assessed the clinicopathological characteristics, postoperative outcomes, patient survival, and tumor recurrence.ResultsOf the 104 patients with gastric GISTs who were included in the study, there were 47 males and 57 females whose mean age was 59.8 years. Sixty-four patients (61.5%) had symptoms associated with tumor. Ten patients included in the group 1, 49 in the group 2, 15 in the group 3a, 9 in the group 5, 14 in the group 6a, and 7 in the group 6b. There was one minor complication and no mortalities. Recurrence was noted in 5 patients, with a median follow-up period of 49.3 months (range, 8.4 to 164.4). The 5-year overall and disease free survival rates of 104 patients were 98.6% and 94.8%, respectively. When comparing large tumor (5–10 cm) between laparoscopic and open surgery, there were statistically differences in age, tumor size, tumor location, and length of hospitalization. There were no statistical differences in the 5-year survival rate between laparoscopic and open surgery for large tumor (5-10cm).ConclusionLaparoscopic surgery is feasible and effective as an oncologic treatment of gastric GISTs. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery can be an acceptable alternative to open methods for gastric GISTs of size bigger than 5 cm.

Comparative Analysis of Five-Year Survival Results of Laparoscopy-Assisted Gastrectomy versus Open Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Case-Control Study Using a Propensity Score Method

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and open gastrectomy (OG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) using the case-control method with a sufficient follow-up period. Patients and Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed 89 patients who underwent LAG and 345 patients who underwent OG for AGC between August 1999 and June 2007. A total of 176 matched cases were included in the final analysis. Results: Except for tumor size and reconstruction, there were no statistically significant differences in the clinicopathological parameters between the two groups. Although operation time was significantly longer for LAG than OG (228.3 vs. 183.6 min, p < 0.0001), first flatus time and postoperative hospital stay without complications were significantly shorter in the LAG group (3.2 vs. 3.7 days, p < 0.0001; 7.0 vs. 10.4 days, p < 0.0001, respectively). Operation-related complications occurred in 7 cases (8.0%) in both groups. 13 patients (14.8%) in the LAG group and 15 patients (17.1%) in the OG group had recurrence. There was no statistically significant difference in the 5-year and disease-free survival rates between LAG and OG. Conclusions: LAG for AGC might be considered to be a minimally invasive surgery in some selected cases, although a well-designed prospective study comparing LAG with OG for AGC is needed.

Clinical outcome of pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS The purpose of this study is to elucidate the efficacy and safety of combined peginterferon and ribavirin therapy in Korean patients with chronic HCV infection. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 84 patients. Thirty five patients with genotype 1 HCV infection were treated with peginterferon alpha-2a 180 microg/week and ribavirin 1,000-1,200 mg/day for 48 weeks, and 49 patients with genotype non-1 were treated with peginterferon alpha-2a 180 microg/week and ribavirin 800 mg/day for 24 weeks. RESULTS An early virologic response was seen in 87.0% of patients with genotype 1 HCV. An end of treatment response (ETR) was seen in 82.6% and 97.6% of patients with genotype 1 and genotype non-1, respectively. An overall sustained virologic response (SVR) was seen in 53 patients (82.8%) of the 64 patients: in 16 (69.6%) of 23 patients with genotype 1 and in 37 (90.2%) of 41 patients with genotype non-1. An end of treatment biochemical response was seen in 58 patients (90.6%) [genotype 1, 20 patients (87.0%); genotype non-1, 38 patients (92.7%)], and a sustained biochemical response was achieved in 49 patients (76.6%) [genotype 1, 14 patients (60.9%); genotype non-1, 35 patients (85.4%)]. Independent factors affecting an SVR were HCV genotype and the baseline HCV RNA level. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that a combination therapy of peginterferon and ribavirin is highly effective for chronic HCV infection, producing a high SVR and ETR.

Endoscopic treatment and risk factors of postoperative anastomotic bleeding after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakage, bleeding, and stricture are major complications after gastrectomy. Of these complications, postoperative anastomotic bleeding is relatively rare, but lethal if not treated immediately. METHODS Of 2031 patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy (R0 resection) between January 2002 and December 2010, postoperative anastomotic bleeding was observed in 7 patients. The clinicopathological features, postoperative outcomes such as surgical procedures, bleeding sites and, methods used to achieve hemostasis, and the risk factors of anastomotic bleeding of these 7 patients were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 2031 patients, 1613 and 418 underwent distal and total gastrectomy, respectively. The bleeding sites were as follows: Billroth-I anastomosis using a circular stapler (n = 1), Billroth-II anastomosis by manual suture (n = 5), and esophagojejunostomy using a circular stapler (n = 1). All patients were treated with endoscopic clipping or epinephrine injection. There was no further endoscopic intervention or reoperation for anastomotic bleeding. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative anastomotic bleeding is an infrequent but potentially life-threatening complication. Scrupulous surgical procedures are essential for the prevention of postoperative bleeding, and endoscopy was useful for both the confirmation of bleeding and therapeutic intervention.