Jin Sik Bae

Molecular cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding the luciferase from the firefly, Pyrocoelia rufa

To clone a cDNA encoding the luciferase of the firefly, Pyrocoelia rufa, we have constructed a cDNA library and isolated the luciferase gene using PCR with gene specific primers. Sequence analysis of the cDNA encoding the luciferase of P. rufa revealed that the 1647 bp cDNA has an open reading frame of 548 amino acid residues. The deduced amino acid sequences of the luciferase gene of P. rufa showed 98.9% homology to that of P. miyako. Phylogenetic analysis further confirmed the deduced amino acid sequences of the P. rufa luciferase gene belonged to the same subfamily, Lampyrinae. Southern blot analysis suggested possible presence of the P. rufa luciferase gene as a single copy and Northern blot analysis confirmed light organ-specific expression pattern at the transcriptional level. The cDNA encoding the luciferase of P. rufa was expressed as a 69 kDa band in baculovirus-infected insect cells and the recombinant baculovirus-infected cell extracts emitted luminescence in the luciferase activity assay.

Molecular cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding the luciferase from the firefly, Hotaria unmunsana

We have cloned and characterized a cDNA encoding the luciferase from the firefly, Hotaria unmunsana. The cDNA encoding the luciferase of H. unmunsana was isolated by RT-PCR with a gene-specific primer set. The cDNA encoding the luciferase of H. unmunsana is 1644 base pairs long with an open reading frame of 548 amino acid residues. The deduced amino acid sequence of the luciferase gene of H. unmunsana showed 98.0 and 96.8% identity to H. parvula and Luciola mingrelica, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis further confirmed that the deduced amino acid sequences of the H. unmunsana luciferase gene belonged to the same subfamily, Luciolinae. Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA suggested the presence of the H. unmunsana luciferase gene as a single copy and Northern blot analysis confirmed light organ-specific expression at the transcriptional level. The cDNA encoding the luciferase of H. unmunsana was expressed as a 61-kDa band in the baculovirus-infected insect cells and the extracts of the recombinant baculovirus-infected cells emitted luminescence in the luciferase activity assay.

Genomic structure of the luciferase gene and phylogenetic analysis in the Hotaria-group fireflies

The luminescent fireflies have species specific flash patterns, being recognized as sexual communication. The luciferase gene is the sole enzyme responsible for bioluminescence. We describe here the complete nucleotide sequence and the exon-intron structure of the luciferase gene of the Hotaria-group fireflies, H. unmunsana, H. papariensis and H. tsushimana. The luciferase gene of the Hotaria-group firefly including the known H. parvula spans 1950 bp and consisted of six introns and seven exons coding for 548 amino acid residues, suggesting highly conserved structure among the Hotaria-group fireflies. Although only one luciferase gene was cloned from H. papariensis, each of the two sequences of the gene was found in H. unmunsana (U1 and Uc) and H. tsushimana (T1 and T2). The amino acid sequence divergence among H. unmunsana, H. papariensis, and H. tsushimana only ranged from zero to three amino acid residues, but H. parvula differed by 10-11 amino acid residues from the other Hotaria-group fireflies, suggesting a divergent relationship of this species. Phylogenetic analysis using the deduced amino acid sequences of the luciferase gene resulted in a monophyletic group in the Hotaria excluding H. parvula, suggesting a close relationship among H. unmunsana, H. papariensis and H. tsushimana. Additionally, we also analyzed the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene of the Hotaria-group fireflies. The deduced amino acid sequence of the COI gene of H. unmunsana was identical to that of H. papariensis and H. tsushimana, but different by three positions from H. parvula. In terms of nucleotide sequences of the COI gene, intraspecific sequence divergence was sometimes larger than interspecies level, and phylogenetic analysis placed the three species into monophyletic groups unresolved among them, but excluded H. parvula. In conclusion, our results suggest that H. unmunsana, H. papariensis and H. tsushimana are very closely related or might be an identical species, at least based on the luciferase and COI genes.