Jinglan Wang

One-shock versus three-shock defibrillation protocol significantly improves outcome in a porcine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest

Background— The success of resuscitation with a 1-shock versus the conventional 3-shock defibrillation protocol was investigated subject to the range of treatment variation imposed by automated external defibrillators (AEDs). Methods and Results— Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 44 domestic pigs. After 7 minutes of untreated VF, animals were randomized among 4 groups representing all combinations of the 1- versus 3-shock protocol and 2 different AED regimens (AED1, AED2). Because few AEDs support a 1-shock protocol, manual defibrillators were used to replicate the AED treatment regimen: electrical waveform, dose sequence, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) interruption intervals. Initial shock(s) were delivered, followed by 60 seconds of CPR, and the treatment was repeated until resuscitation was successful or for 15 minutes. The 1-shock protocol was associated with improved outcome, reducing CPR interruptions from 45% to 34% of total resuscitation time (P=0.019) and increasing survival from 64% to 100% (P=0.004). Survival was 91% for AED1 versus 36% for AED2 (P=0.024) with a 3-shock protocol but was increased to 100% for both by adoption of a 1-shock protocol. Improvements in postresuscitation left ventricular ejection fraction and stroke volume were observed with AED1 compared with AED2 (difference of means, 15% and 28% of baseline respectively, P<0.001) regardless of defibrillation protocol. Conclusions— Adoption of a 1-shock versus a 3-shock resuscitation protocol improved survival and minimized outcome differences imposed by variations in AED design and implementation. When a conventional 3-shock defibrillation protocol was used, however, the choice of AED had a significant impact on resuscitation outcome.

A lazaroid mitigates postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction.

ObjectiveLazaroids, a series of 21-aminosteroids, reduce free radical mediated injury after ischemia and reperfusion. We hypothesized that the lazaroid U-74389G would minimize postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction and thereby improve neurologically meaningful survival in a rodent model after resuscitation from 8 mins of ventricular fibrillation. DesignRandomized, controlled laboratory study. SettingUniversity-affiliated research institute. SubjectsSprague-Dawley rats. InterventionsVentricular fibrillation was electrically induced in ten anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats. The lazaroid agent U-74389G in a dose of 1 mg·kg−1 or its vehicle serving as a placebo was injected into the right atrium after 7 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation. One minute after injection of the compound, precordial compression was begun together with mechanical ventilation and continued for 6 mins before attempted electrical defibrillation. Measurements and Main ResultsAll animals were successfully resuscitated. Postresuscitation cardiac index, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, the rate of left ventricular pressure increase measured at a left ventricular pressure of 40 mm Hg, and the maximum rate of left ventricular pressure decline were significantly less impaired in lazaroid-treated animals. This contrasted with control animals, which had significantly greater myocardial impairment, greater neurologic deficit, and lesser duration of survival. ConclusionsThe lazaroid compound U-74389G, administered during cardiac arrest, mitigated postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction and improved survival.

Comparison of rectilinear biphasic waveform with biphasic truncated exponential waveform in a pediatric defibrillation model.

Objective:To compare the rectilinear biphasic waveform with a biphasic truncated exponential waveform for pediatric defibrillation. Design:Prospective, randomized study. Setting:Experimental laboratory of a university-affiliated research institute. Subjects:Male domestic piglets (4–24 kg). Interventions:Eleven piglets (4–8 kg), which represented a patient <1 yr old, and ten piglets (16–24 kg), which represented a pediatric patient between the ages of 2 and 8 yrs, were anesthetized, intubated, and mechanically ventilated. Ventricular fibrillation was induced and maintained for 30 secs, and a predetermined shock was then delivered to defibrillate. Following defibrillation, the animal was permitted to stabilize hemodynamically for 4 mins. Fifty shocks were applied to each animal using a randomization schedule based on a predetermined permutation of 50. The 50 shocks were 25 shocks for each rectilinear biphasic and biphasic truncated exponential waveforms, comprising five shocks at five energy settings. Each group of five shocks was fixed at a predetermined energy value, depending on the body weight of the animal. Dose-response curves were constructed using logistic regression. Aortic pressure, electrocardiogram, left ventricular pressure, and left ventricular pressure value of 40 mm Hg were continually measured. Measurements and Main Results:Dose-response curves determined defibrillation thresholds at 50% (D50) and 90% (D90) probability of success. The rectilinear biphasic waveform defibrillated with <90% of the D50 and D90 energies required for a biphasic truncated exponential waveform. The rectilinear biphasic waveform also successfully defibrillated with significantly less energy per body weight and per heart weight compared with a biphasic truncated exponential waveform. Conclusions:The rectilinear biphasic waveform has superior defibrillation performance compared with a biphasic truncated exponential waveform in a piglet defibrillation model for young children.

Effects of biphasic waveforms on outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest.

Objectives:The effects of two clinically available biphasic waveforms on the success of defibrillation and postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction after prolonged ventricular fibrillation were compared with two newly designed dual-path sequential and simultaneous rectilinear biphasic waveforms. Defibrillation via sequential pulses and encircling, overlapping multiple pathway may depolarize a larger myocardial mass and facilitate transthoracic defibrillation. Design:Animal study. Setting:Experimental laboratory. Subjects:Thirty-two 40 ± 3 kg pigs. Interventions:Ventricular fibrillation was ischemically induced in 32 pigs. After 7 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated and continued for 5 mins. Animals were then randomized to receive up to three shocks with a) single-path rectilinear biphasic waveform; b) single-path biphasic truncated exponential waveform; c) dual-path rectilinear biphasic sequential defibrillation; or d) dual-path rectilinear biphasic simultaneous defibrillation. Measurements and Main Results:Rectilinear biphasic, dual-path sequential defibrillation, and simultaneous defibrillation had significantly fewer shocks (1.1 ± 0.4, 1.4 ± 0.5, 1.3 ± 0.7, respectively) before restoration of spontaneous circulation than biphasic truncated exponential waveform (2.6 ± 1.4, p < .005) and less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction (p < .05). Also, dual-path sequential defibrillation had higher postresuscitation ejection fraction than rectilinear biphasic and dual-path simultaneous defibrillation (p < .005). Conclusions:The energy requirements for terminating ischemically induced ventricular fibrillation were significantly lower and minimized early postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction in the rectilinear biphasic, dual-path sequential defibrillation, and simultaneous defibrillation than the biphasic truncated exponential waveform. Dual-path sequential defibrillation had less postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction than rectilinear biphasic and dual-path simultaneous defibrillation, but at 72 hrs these differences were no longer significant.