Jinhai Huo
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jinhai Huo.
Cancer | 2013
B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Jinhai Huo; Kai Ping Liao; Thomas A. Buchholz; Prajnan Das
Our goal was to investigate utilization trends for advanced radiation therapy (RT) technologies, such as intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), in the last year of life among patients diagnosed with metastatic cancer.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute | 2017
Benjamin D. Smith; Jing Jiang; Ya Chentina Shih; Sharon H. Giordano; Jinhai Huo; Reshma Jagsi; Adeyiza O. Momoh; Abigail S. Caudle; Kelly K. Hunt; Simona F. Shaitelman; Thomas A. Buchholz; Shervin M. Shirvani
Background: Guideline-concordant local therapy options for early breast cancer include lumpectomy plus whole breast irradiation (Lump+WBI), lumpectomy plus brachytherapy, mastectomy alone, mastectomy plus reconstruction, and, in older women, lumpectomy alone. We performed a comparative examination of each treatment’s complications and cost to assess their relative values. Methods: Using the MarketScan database of younger women with private insurance and the SEER-Medicare database of older women with public insurance, we identified 105 211 women with early breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2011. We used diagnosis and procedural codes to identify treatment complications within 24 months of diagnosis and compared complications by treatment using two-sided logistic regression. Mean total and complication-related cost, relative to Lump+WBI, were calculated from a payer’s perspective and adjusted for differences in covariables using linear regression. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Lump+WBI was the most commonly used treatment. Mastectomy plus reconstruction was associated with nearly twice the complication risk of Lump+WBI (Marketscan: 54.3% vs 29.6%, relative risk [RR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.82 to 1.91, P < .001; SEER-Medicare: 66.1% vs 37.6%, RR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.69 to 1.82, P < .001) and was also associated with higher adjusted total cost (Marketscan:
Cancer | 2017
Stephen B. Williams; Jinhai Huo; Karim Chamie; Marc C. Smaldone; Christopher D. Kosarek; Justin Edwin Fang; Leslie Ynalvez; Simon P. Kim; Karen E. Hoffman; Sharon H. Giordano; Brian F. Chapin
22 481 greater than Lump+WBI; SEER-Medicare:
European urology focus | 2017
Stephen B. Williams; Jinhai Huo; Karim Chamie; Jim C. Hu; Sharon H. Giordano; Karen E. Hoffman; Colin P. Dinney; Ashish M. Kamat; Ya Chen Tina Shih
1748 greater) and complication-related cost (Marketscan:
American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Jinhai Huo; Xianglin L. Du; David R. Lairson; Wenyaw Chan; Jing Jiang; Thomas A. Buchholz; B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo
9017 greater; SEER-Medicare:
The Breast | 2016
Jinhai Huo; Benjamin D. Smith; Sharon H. Giordano; Gregory P. Reece; Ya Chen Tina Shih
2092 greater). Brachytherapy had modestly higher total cost and complications than WBI. Lumpectomy alone entailed lower cost and complications in the SEER-Medicare cohort only. Conclusions: Mastectomy plus reconstruction results in substantially higher complications and cost than other guideline-concordant treatment options for early breast cancer. These findings are relevant to patients evaluating their local therapy options and to value-based population health management.
Evaluation and Program Planning | 2013
David R. Lairson; Jinhai Huo; Katharine A. Ball Ricks; Lara S. Savas; Maria E. Fernandez
The objective of this study was to compare the overall survival of patients who undergo radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy versus noncancer controls to discern whether there is a survival advantage according to prostate cancer treatment and the impact of selection bias on these results.
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2016
Chelsea C. Pinnix; Jatin J. Shah; Hubert H. Chuang; Colleen M. Costelloe; L. Jeffrey Medeiros; Christine F. Wogan; Valerie Klairisa Reed; Grace L. Smith; S.A. Milgrom; Krina Patel; Jinhai Huo; Francesco Turturro; Jorge Romaguera; Luis Fayad; Yasuhiro Oki; Michelle A. Fanale; Jason R. Westin; Loretta J. Nastoupil; Fredrick B. Hagemeister; Alma Rodriguez; Muzaffar H. Qazilbash; Nina Shah; Qaiser Bashir; Sairah Ahmed; Yago Nieto; Chitra Hosing; Eric Rohren; Bouthaina S. Dabaja
BACKGROUND Radical cystectomy is the standard surgical treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). OBJECTIVE We sought to identify population-based factors predicting the use of radical cystectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data for 3922 patients aged ≥66 yr diagnosed with clinical stage T2 MIBC from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2011. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We used univariate and multivariable regression analyses to identify factors predicting the use of radical cystectomy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze survival outcomes. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 740 (18.9%) patients with MIBC underwent radical cystectomy. Older age at diagnosis (>80 vs 65-69 yr, odds ratio [OR] 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.19; p<0.001) and higher comorbidity (Charlson comorbidity index 3+ vs 0, OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29-0.57; p<0.001) were associated with lower use of radical cystectomy. Moreover, non-Hispanic black patients were less likely than white patients to undergo radical cystectomy (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.96; p=0.032) and pelvic lymph node dissection (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.42-1.02; p=0.058). Overall survival was better for patients who underwent radical cystectomy alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.88; p=0.002) and with lymph node dissection (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.40-0.51; p<0.001). Limitations include the limited ability of retrospective analysis to demonstrate causality. CONCLUSIONS There is significant underutilization of radical cystectomy among patients diagnosed with MIBC, especially among older patients with significant comorbidities and non-Hispanic black patients. PATIENT SUMMARY Despite guideline recommendations, there is significant underutilization of radical cystectomy among patients diagnosed with bladder cancer, especially for non-Hispanic black patients and older patients with significant comorbidities.
American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Jinhai Huo; David R. Lairson; Xianglin L. Du; Wenyaw Chan; Jing Jiang; Thomas A. Buchholz; B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo
Objectives:To examine the patterns of utilization of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, surgery, and hospice at the end-of-life care for patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma. Methods:We identified 816 Medicare beneficiaries toward who were 65 years of age or older, with pathologically confirmed metastatic malignant melanoma between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2007. We evaluated trends and associations between sociodemographic and health service characteristics and the use of hospice care, chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. Results:We found increasing use of surgery for patients with metastatic melanoma from 13% in 2000 to 30% in 2007 (P=0.03 for trend), and no significant fluctuation in the use of chemotherapy (P=0.43) or radiation therapy (P=0.46). Older patients were less likely to receive radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The use of hospice care increased from 61% in 2000 to 79% in 2007 (P=0.07 for trend). Enrollment in short-term (1 to 3 d) hospice care use increased, whereas long-term hospice care (≥4 d) remained stable. Patients living in the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) northeast and south regions were less likely to undergo surgery. Patients enrolled in long-term hospice care used significantly less chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. Conclusions:Surgery and hospice care use increased over the years of this study, whereas the use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy remained consistent for patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma.
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology | 2017
J. Yue; Matthew R. McKeever; Terence T. Sio; Ting Xu; Jinhai Huo; Qiuling Shi; Q. Nguyen; Ritsuko Komaki; Daniel R. Gomez; Tinsu Pan; Xin Shelley Wang; Zhongxing Liao
BACKGROUND The objectives of this study were to compare, by patient obesity status, the contemporary utilization patterns of different reconstruction surgery types, understand postoperative complication profiles in the community setting, and analyze the financial impact on health care payers and patients. METHODS Using data from the MarketScan Health Risk Assessment Database and Commercial Claims and Encounters Database, we identified breast cancer patients who received breast reconstruction surgery following mastectomy between 2009 and 2012. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to evaluate the utilization pattern of breast reconstruction surgery. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to estimate the association between obesity status and infectious, wound, and perfusion complications within one year of surgery. A generalized linear model was used to compare total, complication-related, and out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS The rate of TE/implant-based reconstruction increased significantly for non-obese patients but not for obese patients during the years analyzed, whereas autologous reconstruction decreased for both patient groups. Obesity was associated with higher odds of infectious, wound, and perfusion complications after TE/implant-based reconstruction, and higher odds of perfusion complications after autologous reconstruction. The adjusted total healthcare costs and out-of-pocket costs were similar for obese and non-obese patients for either type of breast reconstruction surgery. CONCLUSIONS A greater likelihood of one-year complications arose from TE/implant-based vs autologous reconstruction surgery in obese patients. Given that out-of-pocket costs were independent of the type of reconstruction, greater emphasis should be placed on conveying the surgery-related complications to obese patients to aid in patient-based decision making with their plastic surgeons and oncologists.