Jinyong Hahn

Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design

Ž. THE REGRESSION DISCONTINUITY RD data design is a quasi-experimental design with the defining characteristic that the probability of receiving treatment changes discontinuously as a function of one or more underlying variables. This data design arises frequently in economic and other applications but is only infrequently exploited as a source of identifying information in evaluating effects of a treatment. In the first application and discussion of the RD method, Thistlethwaite and Campbell Ž. 1960 study the effect of student scholarships on career aspirations, using the fact that awards are only made if a test score exceeds a threshold. More recently, Van der Klaauw Ž. 1997 estimates the effect of financial aid offers on students’ decisions to attend a particular college, taking into account administrative rules that set the aid amount partly on the basis of a discontinuous function of the students’ grade point average and SAT Ž. score. Angrist and Lavy 1999 estimate the effect of class size on student test scores, taking advantage of a rule stipulating that another classroom be added when the average Ž. class size exceeds a threshold level. Finally, Black 1999 uses an RD approach to estimate parents’ willingness to pay for higher quality schools by comparing housing prices near geographic school attendance boundaries. Regression discontinuity methods have potentially broad applicability in economic research, because geographic boundaries or rules governing programs often create discontinuities in the treatment assignment mechanism that can be exploited under the method. Although there have been several discussions and applications of RD methods in the literature, important questions still remain concerning sources of identification and ways of estimating treatment effects under minimal parametric restrictions. Here, we show that identifying conditions invoked in previous applications of RD methods are often overly strong and that treatment effects can be nonparametrically identified under an RD design by a weak functional form restriction. The restriction is unusual in that it requires imposing continuity assumptions in order to take advantage of the known discontinuity in the treatment assignment mechanism. We also propose a way of nonparametrically estimating treatment effects and offer an interpretation of the Wald estimator as an RD estimator.

Weak Instruments: Diagnosis and Cures in Empirical Econometrics

What is the weak-instruments (WI) problem and what causes it? Universal agreement does not exist on these questions. We define weak instruments by two features: (i) two-stage least squares (2SLS) analysis is badly biased toward the ordinary least-squares (OLS) estimate, and alternative “unbiased” estimators such as limited-information maximum likelihood (LIML) may not solve the problem; and (ii) the standard (first-order) asymptotic distribution does not give an accurate framework for inference. Thus, a researcher may estimate “bad results” and not be aware of the outcome. The cause of WI is often stated to be a low R or F statistic of the reduced-form equation, in the most commonly occurring situation of one right-handside endogenous variable. We find the situation is more complex with an additional factor, the correlation between the stochastic disturbances of the structural equation and the reduced form, that needs to be taken into account. We discuss in this paper a specification test (Hahn and Hausman, 2002a) for WI, a caution against using “no moments” estimators such as LIML in the WI situation, and suggestions for different estimators, an approach to inference of Frank Kleibergen (2002) for WI. We end with a caution of how “small biases” can become “large biases” in the WI situation. We begin with the limited-information structural model under the assumptions of Hausman (1983):

An Alternative Estimator for the Censored Quantile Regression Model

This paper introduces an alternative estimator for the linear censored quantile regression model. The estimator also applies to cases where the censoring point is unknown. Since the objective function is globally convex and the estimator is a solution to a linear programming problem, a global minimizer is obtained in a finite number of simplex iterations. The estimator has a square root of n-convergence rate and is asymptotically normal. A Monte Carlo study performed shows that the suggested estimator has very desirable small sample properties.

Understanding bias in nonlinear panel models: Some recent developments

The purpose of this paper is to review recently developed methods of estimation of nonlinear fixed effects panel data models with reduced bias properties. We begin by describing fixed effects estimators and the incidental parameters problem. Next we explain how to construct analytical bias correction of estimators, followed by bias correction of the moment equation, and bias corrections for the concentrated likelihood. We then turn to discuss other approaches leading to bias correction based on orthogonalization and their extensions. The remaining sections consider quasi maximum likelihood estimation for dynamic models, the estimation of marginal effects, and automatic methods based on simulation.

Bootstrapping Quantile Regression Estimators

The asymptotic variance matrix of the quantile regression estimator depends on the density of the error. For both deterministic and random regressors, the bootstrap distribution is shown to converge weakly to the limit distribution of the quantile regression estimator in probability. Thus, the confidence intervals constructed by the bootstrap percentile method have asymptotically correct coverage probabilities.

BIAS REDUCTION FOR DYNAMIC NONLINEAR PANEL MODELS WITH FIXED EFFECTS

The fixed effects estimator of panel models can be severely biased because of well-known incidental parameter problems. It is shown that this bias can be reduced in nonlinear dynamic panel models. We consider asymptotics where n and T grow at the same rate as an approximation that facilitates comparison of bias properties. Under these asymptotics, the bias-corrected estimators we propose are centered at the truth, whereas fixed effects estimators are not. We discuss several examples and provide Monte Carlo evidence for the small sample performance of our procedure.

Notes on bias in estimators for simultaneous equation models

Abstract We derive an approximate finite sample bias expression for 2SLS. We apply it to the case of non-identification and local non-identification. We also calculate the similar expression for OLS. We find that 2SLS has less bias than OLS in all cases.

Average and Quantile Effects in Nonseparable Panel Models

Nonseparable panel models are important in a variety of economic settings, including discrete choice. This paper gives identification and estimation results for nonseparable models under time-homogeneity conditions that are like �time is randomly assigned� or �time is an instrument.� Partial-identification results for average and quantile effects are given for discrete regressors, under static or dynamic conditions, in fully nonparametric and in semiparametric models, with time effects. It is shown that the usual, linear, fixed-effects estimator is not a consistent estimator of the identified average effect, and a consistent estimator is given. A simple estimator of identified quantile treatment effects is given, providing a solution to the important problem of estimating quantile treatment effects from panel data. Bounds for overall effects in static and dynamic models are given. The dynamic bounds provide a partial-identification solution to the important problem of estimating the effect of state dependence in the presence of unobserved heterogeneity. The impact of T, the number of time periods, is shown by deriving shrinkage rates for the identified set as T grows. We also consider semiparametric, discrete-choice models and find that semiparametric panel bounds can be much tighter than nonparametric bounds. Computationally convenient methods for semiparametric models are presented. We propose a novel inference method that applies in panel data and other settings and show that it produces uniformly valid confidence regions in large samples. We give empirical illustrations.

A Practical Asymptotic Variance Estimator for Two-Step Semiparametric Estimators

The goal of this paper is to develop techniques to simplify semiparametric inference. We do this by deriving a number of numerical equivalence results. These illustrate that in many cases, one can obtain estimates of semiparametric variances using standard formulas derived in the well-known parametric literature. This means that for computational purposes, an empirical researcher can ignore the semiparametric nature of the problem and do all calculations as if it were a parametric situation. We hope that this simplicity will promote the use of semiparametric procedures.

How informative is the initial condition in the dynamic panel model with fixed effects

Abstract I consider estimation of the autoregressive panel model with fixed effects yit=ci+βyi,t−1+eit. I investigate the estimation method developed by Blundell and Bond (1998), which makes use of the stationarity of the initial levels. I do it by numerically comparing the semiparametric information bounds for the case that incorporates the stationarity of the initial condition and for the case that does not. It is found that the efficiency gain can be substantial.