Jiri Bartek

Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer

All life on earth must cope with constant exposure to DNA-damaging agents such as the Suns radiation. Highly conserved DNA-repair and cell-cycle checkpoint pathways allow cells to deal with both endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damage. How much an individual is exposed to these agents and how their cells respond to DNA damage are critical determinants of whether that individual will develop cancer. These cellular responses are also important for determining toxicities and responses to current cancer therapies, most of which target the DNA.

Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer.

Accumulation of mutations and chromosomal aberrations is one of the hallmarks of cancer cells. This enhanced genetic instability is fueled by defects in the genome maintenance mechanisms including DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Here, we discuss the emerging roles of the mammalian Chk1 and Chk2 kinases as key signal transducers within the complex network of genome integrity checkpoints, as candidate tumor suppressors disrupted in sporadic as well as some hereditary malignancies and as potential targets of new anticancer therapies.

ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks

It is generally thought that the DNA-damage checkpoint kinases, ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR), work independently of one another. Here, we show that ATM and the nuclease activity of meiotic recombination 11 (Mre11) are required for the processing of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to generate the replication protein A (RPA)-coated ssDNA that is needed for ATR recruitment and the subsequent phosphorylation and activation of Chk1. Moreover, we show that efficient ATM-dependent ATR activation in response to DSBs is restricted to the S and G2 cell cycle phases and requires CDK kinase activity. Thus, in response to DSBs, ATR activation is regulated by ATM in a cell-cycle dependent manner.

Checking on DNA damage in S phase

The precise replication of the genome and the continuous surveillance of its integrity are essential for survival and the avoidance of various diseases. Cells respond to DNA damage by activating a complex network of the so-called checkpoint pathways to delay their cell-cycle progression and repair the defects. In this review we integrate findings on the emerging mechanisms of activation, the signalling pathways and the spatio-temporal organization of the intra-S-phase DNA-damage checkpoint and its impact on the cell-cycle machinery, and discuss its biological significance.

DNA damage signalling guards against activated oncogenes and tumour progression.

DNA damage response (DDR), the guardian of genomic integrity, emerges as an oncogene-inducible biological barrier against progression of cancer beyond its early stages. Recent evidence from both cell culture and animal models as well as analyses of clinical specimens show that activation of numerous oncogenes and loss of some tumour suppressors result in DNA replication stress and DNA damage that alarm the cellular DDR machinery, a multifaceted response orchestrated by the ATR–Chk1 and ATM–Chk2 kinase signalling pathways. Such activation of the DDR network leads to cellular senescence or death of oncogene-transformed cells, resulting in delay or prevention of tumorigenesis. At the same time, the ongoing chronic DDR activation creates selective pressure that eventually favours outgrowth of malignant clones with genetic or epigenetic defects in the genome maintenance machinery, such as aberrations in the ATM–Chk2–p53 cascade and other DDR components. Furthermore, the executive DDR machinery is shared by at least two anticancer barriers, as both the oncogene-induced DNA replication stress and telomere shortening impact the cell fate decisions through convergence on DNA damage signalling. In this study, we highlight recent advances in this rapidly evolving area of cancer research, with particular emphasis on mechanistic insights, emerging issues of special conceptual significance and discussion of major remaining challenges and implications of the concept of DDR as a tumorigenesis barrier for experimental and clinical oncology.

Targeting the checkpoint kinases: chemosensitization versus chemoprotection

An important part of the cellular response to DNA damage is checkpoint activation — checkpoint kinases CHK1 and CHK2 phosphorylate key proteins to elicit cell-cycle blocks. Inhibiting these kinases was believed to sensitize tumour cells to cancer treatments that damage DNA, because in the absence of checkpoints and efficient DNA repair, the response would switch to cell death or senescence. Recent discoveries have, however, highlighted different and expanded roles for CHK1 and CHK2, so should the therapeutic hypothesis that is concerned with targeting so-called checkpoint kinases be modified?

Chk2 kinase — a busy messenger

Checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) is emerging as a key mediator of diverse cellular responses to genotoxic stress, guarding the integrity of the genome throughout eukaryotic evolution. Recent studies show the fundamental role of Chk2 in the network of genome-surveillance pathways that coordinate cell-cycle progression with DNA repair and cell survival or death. Defects in Chk2 contribute to the development of both hereditary and sporadic human cancers, and earmark this kinase as a candidate tumour suppressor and an attractive target for drug discovery.

Centrosome-associated Chk1 prevents premature activation of cyclin-B–Cdk1 kinase

Entry into mitosis occurs after activation of Cdk1, resulting in chromosome condensation in the nucleus and centrosome separation, as well as increased microtubule nucleation activity in the cytoplasm. The active cyclin-B1–Cdk1 complex first appears at the centrosome, suggesting that the centrosome may facilitate the activation of mitotic regulators required for the commitment of cells to mitosis. However, the signalling pathways involved in controlling the initial activation of Cdk1 at the centrosome remain largely unknown. Here, we show that human Chk1 kinase localizes to interphase, but not mitotic, centrosomes. Chemical inhibition of Chk1 resulted in premature centrosome separation and activation of centrosome-associated Cdk1. Forced immobilization of kinase-inactive Chk1 to centrosomes also resulted in premature Cdk1 activation. Conversely, under such conditions wild-type Chk1 impaired activation of centrosome-associated Cdk1, thereby resulting in DNA endoreplication and centrosome amplification. Activation of centrosomal Cdk1 in late prophase seemed to be mediated by cytoplasmic Cdc25B, whose activity is controlled by centrosome-associated Chk1. These results suggest that centrosome-associated Chk1 shields centrosomal Cdk1 from unscheduled activation by cytoplasmic Cdc25B, thereby contributing to proper timing of the initial steps of cell division, including mitotic spindle formation.

Rac and Cdc42 Are Potent Stimulators of E2F-dependent Transcription Capable of Promoting Retinoblastoma Susceptibility Gene Product Hyperphosphorylation

The Rho family of GTPases plays an important and diverse role in reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, transcriptional regulation, and multiple aspects of cell growth. Our study has examined their potential links to the cell cycle machinery. We find that constitutively active mutants of Rac and Cdc42, but not Rho, are potent inducers of E2F transcriptional activity in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. Furthermore, activated Rac and Cdc42, but again not Rho, are capable of inducing cyclin D1 accumulation and pRB hyperphosphorylation in serum-deprived cells, outlining one route leading to enhanced E2F-mediated transcription. The inhibitory effect of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p16 ink4 , p21 cip1 , and p27 cip on Rac/Cdc42-mediated E2F transcription corroborates a role for pRB family members and their functional inactivation by cyclin-dependent kinases in generating E2F activity. While the up-regulation of E2F transcriptional activity by Rac or Cdc42, not Rho, suffices for entry into S phase and DNA synthesis in Rat-1 R12 cells, this is clearly not the case in NIH 3T3, where additional requirements must exist.

Microcephalin and pericentrin regulate mitotic entry via centrosome-associated Chk1

Primary microcephaly, Seckel syndrome, and microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II (MOPD II) are disorders exhibiting marked microcephaly, with small brain sizes reflecting reduced neuron production during fetal life. Although primary microcephaly can be caused by mutations in microcephalin (MCPH1), cells from patients with Seckel syndrome and MOPD II harbor mutations in ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) or pericentrin (PCNT), leading to disturbed ATR signaling. In this study, we show that a lack of MCPH1 or PCNT results in a loss of Chk1 from centrosomes with subsequently deregulated activation of centrosomal cyclin B–Cdk1.