Jirina Martinkova

MEROPENEM PHARMACOKINETICS IN THE NEWBORN

ABSTRACT We studied meropenem in 23 pre-term (gestational age, 29 to 36 weeks) and 15 full-term (gestational age, 37 to 42 weeks) neonates. Meropenem doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg were administered as single doses (30-min intravenous infusion) on a random basis. Blood was obtained for determining the meropenem concentration nine times. Each child required other antimicrobials for proven/suspected bacterial infections. Samples were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. Population pharmacokinetic parameter values were obtained by employing the BigNPAG program. Model building was performed by the likelihood ratio test. The final model included estimated creatinine clearance (CLcr) (Schwartz formula) and weight (Wt) in the calculation of clearance (meropenem clearance = 0.00112 × CLcr + 0.0925 × Wt + 0.156 liter/hr). The overall fit of the model to the data was good (observed = 1.037 × predicted − 0.096; r2 = 0.977). Given the distributions of estimated creatinine clearance and weight between pre-term and full-term neonates, meropenem clearance was substantially higher in the full-term group. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed using the creatinine clearance and weight distributions for pre-term and full-term populations separately, examining 20- and 40-mg/kg doses, 8- and 12-h dosing intervals, and 0.5-h and 4-h infusion times. The 8-h interval produced robust target attainments (both populations). If more resistant organisms were to be treated (MIC of 4 to 8 mg/liter), the 40-mg/kg dose and a prolonged infusion was favored. Treating clinicians need to balance dose choices for optimizing target attainment against potential toxicity. These findings require validation in clinical circumstances.

Morphological and functional changes in P-glycoprotein during dexamethasone-induced hepatomegaly

1 The effect of dexamethasone on hepatic and renal P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp) expression, localization and activity was investigated in rats after 4 days oral administration of two dose regimens (1 or 25 mg/kg per day). Simultaneous increases in liver weight were evaluated by quantitative histological examination. 2 In the liver, dexamethasone pretreatment produced hepatomegaly as a consequence of extensive periportal fat accumulation, which was quantified by densitometry of oil red O‐stained liver sections. Quantitative immunohistochemical analysis revealed preferential periportal zonation of P‐gp in control animals. Dexamethasone pretreatment resulted in spatially disproportional induction of P‐gp protein expression within the liver acinus characterized by preferential increase in pericentral areas, with consequent uniform panlobular distribution. Western blot analysis confirmed these results, showing increases in P‐gp protein. Quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed no statistically significant change in liver mdr1b mRNA expression after either dexamethasone treatment regimen. The expression of mdr1a mRNA was significantly decreased by 85–87%. 3 In the kidney, dexamethasone reduced mdr1a mRNA expression by 69–89%, whereas mdr1b mRNA expression was increased in a dose‐dependent manner. However, despite tendencies, no significant increases in P‐gp expression were observed at the protein level. 4 The in vivo function of P‐gp was evaluated by measuring renal and biliary secretion of rhodamine‐123 (Rho123) under a steady state plasma concentration. The biliary, renal and tubular secretory clearance of Rho123 was significantly increased only after high‐dose dexamethasone. 5 In conclusion, the present study suggests that drug interactions observed during corticosteroid therapy may be mediated, at least in part, through increased biliary, and also renal, excretion of P‐gp substrates. Expression of P‐gp in the liver showed primary periportal zonation with differential changes during induction. Accompanying hepatomegaly may be explained by severe microvesicular steatosis selectively localized to the periportal areas.

Intra‐individual variability and influence of urine collection period on dextromethorphan metabolic ratios in healthy subjects

Abstract— The aim of the study was to evaluate intra‐individual variability in metabolic ratios (MRs) of dextromethorphan (DM) in healthy volunteers and to compare the MRs in urine collected 0–4, 0–8 and 0–24 h post‐dose. Urinary molar ratios of DM to dextrorphan (MR1) and of DM to methoxymorphinan (MR2) were obtained after a single oral 27.5 mg dose of DM hydrobromide to ten healthy male and four female Caucasians (ten extensive metabolizers (EM) and four poor metabolizers (PM) of DM) to probe activities of CYP2D6 and CYP3A, respectively. Seven EM and one PM received DM on three additional occasions within 2 months. For the seven EM, the intra‐individual variability (CVW) in the MRs obtained in the three urine collections ranged from 11 to 93% (MR1) and from 8 to 77% (MR2). The mean CVW estimated separately for the 4, 8 and 24 h urines by two‐way analysis of variance reached 58, 57 and 44% for the MR1 and 50, 42 and 31% for the MR2, respectively. For all 14 subjects, the log‐transformed ratios (MR1) obtained in the 24 h urines were highly correlated with those in either the 8 h (rs = 0.967, P <0.0001) or 4 h urines (rs = 0.946, P <0.0001). Correlation between the log‐transformed MR2s were weaker (24 h vs. 8 h: rs = 0.829, P <0.0001, 24 h vs. 4 h: rs = 0.831, P <0.0001). The MRIs in 4 h and 8 h urines were only 2 and 9% less than those in 24 h urines (median differences) and varied from 48 and 47% below to 85 and 55% above (95% –CI for the differences). However, the MR2s in the 4 h and 8 h urines were shifted towards higher values by 49 and 23% and the corresponding 95% –CI limits were: 16–164% (4 h vs. 24 h) and 30–119% (8 h vs. 24 h). In conclusion, MR1 values in the 4 h urine collection agree well with those in longer collections and their use in epidemiological studies can be recommended. The intra‐individual variability of approximately 50% in the MR1 has to be taken into account in clinical studies with within‐subject design. Accurate determination of the MR2 requires at least a 24 h period of urine collection.

Tolerability and Outcomes of Kinetically Guided Therapy With Gentamicin in Critically Ill Neonates During the First Week of Life: An Open-Label, Prospective Study

BACKGROUND Aminoglycosides are bactericidal antibiotics used worldwide for the treatment of serious infections in critically ill patients, including neonates. Critically ill neonates constitute a unique challenge in dosing owing to the pathologic alterations that accompany severe illness and the rapidly changing conditions of these patients. OBJECTIVES The main objective of this study was to analyze the kinetically guided dosage adjustment of gentamicin in neonates critically ill during the first week of life based on plasma concentrations after the first dose and to identify the impact of covariates (eg, fluid intake, body fluid retention) with respect to gestational age (GA). Tolerability of therapy was also assessed. METHODS This 10-day, open-label, prospective study included neonates critically ill during the first week of life admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a childrens hospital between January 2006 and July 2009. Hearing and renal assessments were conducted over a 24-month follow-up period. The patients were treated with gentamicin for suspected sepsis, proven sepsis, or pneumonia as an early sign of sepsis. The first and second doses of gentamicin 4 mg/kg were adjusted according to birth weight and GA: group 1 (GA < 34 weeks), 48-hour interdose intervals; group 2 (GA 34-38 weeks), 36 hours; and group 3 (GA > 38 weeks), 24 or 48 hours. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated after the first dose (given in 30-minute intravenous infusions) using 4 concentrations. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by fitting the parameters of a 2-compartment model into 4 concentrations. The last 2 blood samples were taken 30 minutes before the fourth infusion (C(trough,3)) and 1 hour after its start (C(max,4)). Dosing was individualized to reach target ranges for the C(trough,3) (0.5-2.0 mg/L) and C(max,4) (6-10 mg/L) values. If needed, initial dosing was changed after the second dose by adjusting (reducing or increasing) the third and subsequent doses, or by adjusting (prolonging or shortening) the interdose intervals. C(trough,3) and C(max,4) were assessed to determine differences between predicted and assayed values. Fluid retention was registered as the difference between fluid intake and urine output at different intervals related to the first dose per kilogram of birth weight, and from the start of the first infusion (0 hour) to the day of the fourth infusion. The C(max)/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio was determined for assessment of optimal response. Tolerability was evaluated during the 24-month follow-up period using renal sonography to screen for nephrocalcinosis and transient evoked otoacoustic emission recordings to evaluate hearing abnormalities. RESULTS A total of 84 neonates (all white; 53 males, 31 females; birth weight range, 0.8-4.56 kg; GA range, 24-42 weeks) were enrolled in 3 groups: group 1, GA < 34 weeks, n = 27; group 2, GA 34-38 weeks, n = 22; and group 3, GA > 38 weeks, n = 35. The C(max) value detected 1 hour after the start of the first infusion (C(max,1)) reached the target range of 6-10 mg/L in 66 of the 84 neonates (79%). After the initial dose, C(max,1) was variable (%CV, 29%); the failure rate to reach 6 mg/L was 13%. V(d) decreased with GA (r = -0.30, P < 0.01) and achieved mean (SD) rates of 0.51 (0.10), 0.48 (0.13), and 0.40 (0.15) L/kg in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Neither C(max) nor V(d) was correlated with fluid intake relative to the first infusion. Mean gentamicin clearance measured after dose 1 (0.47 [0.23], 0.66 [0.26], and 0.76 [0.32] mL/min/kg) increased with GA (r = 0.45, P < 0.001). The interdose interval was prolonged after the second and subsequent infusions in 8 of 84 neonates (10%) or by decreasing the third dose and subsequent doses in 51 neonates (61%). The target C(max,4) and C(trough,3) values occurred in 63% (22 of 35) and 83% (29 of 35) of full-term patients (GA >38 weeks), respectively. In preterm neonates, the target range for C(max,4) was reached in 11 of 27 patients (41%) in group 1 and 11 of 22 patients (50%) in group 2; for C(trough,3), the target range was reached in 25 patients (93%) in group 1 and in 16 (73%) in group 2. C(trough,3) >2 mg/L was detected in 1 full-term neonate, and gentamicin was withdrawn. Suspected fluid retention within the time period of 0 hour to the day of the fourth infusion was well correlated with actual body weight (r = 0.58, P < 0.001), but it was negatively correlated with C(max,4) (r = -0.25, P = 0.02). Thirteen of the 84 neonates (15%) had confirmed sepsis. C(max)/MIC was >12 except for 2 resistant staphylococcal infections (C(max)/MIC = 0.4); amikacin and vancomycin were substituted for gentamicin in these cases. Clinical signs and laboratory data indicative of suspected sepsis disappeared in 5 to 10 days in 68 of 71 neonates. In 1 neonate, gentamicin was withdrawn after dose 4 because of a high C(trough,3) value. In the 3 remaining neonates, C-reactive protein was decreased >10 days without changing therapy. Two neonates died, 1 of severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy as a consequence of perinatal asphyxia and another of stage IV intraventricular hemorrhage. Transient renal dysfunction attributable to gentamicin was detected in 1 case. No signs of late toxicity (nephrocalcinosis) were found during the second year of follow-up. Two neonates were diagnosed with unilateral hearing loss, a secondary phenomenon of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy thought to be related to the severe perinatal asphyxia. CONCLUSIONS The initial dose of gentamicin 4 mg/kg for these critically ill premature and mature neonates with sepsis during the first week of life was high enough to reach bactericidal C(max,1) within 6-10 mg/L. C(max,1) <6 mg/L occurred in 13% of neonates. The interdose interval modified according to the recommendation resulted in C(trough) values within the target range of 0.5-2.0 mg/L in all but 2 neonates. The kinetically guided maintenance dosing of gentamicin based on plasma concentrations after the first dose should be optimized, taking into account actual body weight. (EudraCT number: 2005-002723-13).

Up-regulation of renal Mdr1 and Mrp2 transporters during amiodarone pretreatment in rats

Although amiodarone (AMD) is known to produce drug-drug interactions through inhibition of transporter-mediated excretion of drugs, its impact on these mechanisms during chronic treatment has not been described yet. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the influence of AMD pretreatment on the main multidrug transporting proteins, Mdr1 and Mrp2, in the liver and kidney. The expression of the transporters and pharmacokinetics of their substrates, rhodamine-123 (Rho123) and endogenous conjugated bilirubin (CB), were evaluated in rats after either AMD oral pretreatments (4-14 days) or single intravenous bolus. AMD pretreatment of all durations up-regulated renal Mdr1 and Mrp2 protein expression to 155-190% and 152-223% of the control values, respectively. In agreement, we observed a corresponding increase in renal clearance of both substrates. Hepatic expression was increased only for Mdr1 to 234-270% of controls, which was associated with increased biliary elimination of amiodarone without change in Rho123 biliary clearance. Interestingly, hepatic expression of another Mdr transporter, Mdr2, was progressively decreased by amiodarone administration. Acute administration of AMD reduced Rho123 biliary clearance by 64%. Our results indicate that repeated administration of AMD to rats is associated with significant increase in hepatic and renal expression of Mdr1 and Mrp2 transporters, which may contribute to variability in pharmacokinetics of AMD and simultaneously applied drugs.

Zonation of multidrug resistance‐associated protein 2 in rat liver after induction with dexamethasone

Background and Aim:  The present study was aimed to evaluate the hepatic zonation of multidrug resistance‐associated protein 2 (mrp2), an important drug transporter, and its potential changes during the induction of its expression by known inducer, dexamethasone (DEX).

P-glycoprotein function and expression during obstructive cholestasis in rats.

Objectives The present study was aimed at evaluation of in vivo biliary and renal excretion of rhodamine 123 (Rho123), a P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate, in rats during either acute or chronic cholestasis induced by bile duct obstruction (BDO). Methods The Rho123 clearance study was performed either one (BDO1) or seven (BDO7) days after BDO. Bile flow was reconstituted, and bile and urine were collected after steady-state plasma concentration of Rho123 was attained. Tissue expression of P-gp was evaluated by quantitative immunohistochemistry, and immunoblotting. Results Significant up-regulation of the liver P-gp protein was observed in acute and chronic cholestasis. Primary periportal location of P-gp was enlarged also to pericentral areas. In the kidneys, immunohistochemistry showed pancellular increase in P-gp after 1 day of BDO, which subsided after 7 days of BDO. Nevertheless, biliary and renal clearances (CLBile and CLR) of Rho123 did not reflect the induction of P-gp expression. While CLBile was reduced one day after cholestasis and restored on the seventh day, the CLR was preserved in BDO1 group and reduced in BDO7 group without change in glomerular filtration rate. In parallel, biliary and renal clearances of conjugated bilirubin were significantly reduced in both cholestatic groups compared with controls. Conclusion These findings suggest that extrahepatic cholestasis causes time-dependent changes in elimination of Rho123 which do not exactly reflect alteration of P-gp expression in the rat liver and kidney. These data may help to explain impaired elimination of P-gp substrates after short-term cholestasis that may commonly occur in clinical practice.

Amiodarone modulates pharmacokinetics of low‐dose methotrexate in rats

Clinical studies of low‐dose methotrexate (LDMTX) pharmacokinetics document increased plasma concentrations of MTX after co‐administration of the drug with amiodarone or macrolide antibiotics. As drug–drug interactions may increase the toxicity of LDMTX, a rat model was used to follow renal and biliary elimination of MTX during its constant‐rate i.v. infusion and concomitant single bolus i.v. injections of amiodarone or azithromycin. The mean steady‐state plasma concentration of 1.7±0.1 µmol/l was reached and the total clearance achieved 17.7±1.0 ml/min/kg. Administration of amiodarone decreased the biliary clearance of MTX to 73% of the control values (p<0.05). Correspondingly, the total clearance decreased to 72% and plasma MTX concentrations were augmented to 2.5±0.4 µmol/l (p<0.05). Amiodarone‐treated rats exhibited a 3.3‐fold decrease in the renal clearance (p<0.05) of conjugated bilirubin, which was associated with its increased plasma concentration. In contrast, azithromycin did not alter any of the MTX pharmacokinetic parameters. In conclusion, this is the first report describing the impairment of MTX hepatic elimination during co‐administration with amiodarone. This study also provides new insight into acute amiodarone‐induced hyperbilirubinaemia, where increased bilirubin production and decreased renal clearance may contribute to this effect. Importantly, azithromycin seems to be a safe co‐medication during LDMTX therapy. Copyright

Covariate determinants of effective dosing regimens for time-dependent beta-lactam antibiotics for critically ill patients

AIMS Critically ill patients undergoing aggressive fluid resuscitation and treated empirically with hydrosoluble time-dependent beta-lactam antibiotics are at risk for sub-therapeutic plasma concentrations. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of two covariates - creatinine clearance (Clcr) and cumulative fluid balance (CFB) on pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment within a week of treatment with meropenem (ME) or piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TZB). METHODS In this prospective observational pharmacokinetic (PK) study, 18 critically ill patients admitted to a surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were enrolled. The primary PK/PD target was free antibiotic concentrations above MIC at 100% of the dosing interval (100%fT>MIC) to obtain maximum bactericidal activity. Drug concentration was measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS The treatment of both 8 septic patients with IV extended ME dosing 2 g/3 h q8 h and 10 polytraumatized patients with IV intermittent PIP/TZB dosing 4.0/0.5 g q8 h was monitored. 8/18 patients (44%) manifested augmented renal clearence (ARC) where Clcr ≥130 mL/min/1.73 m2. Maximum changes were reported on days 2-3: the median positive CFB followed by the large median volume of distribution: Vdme=70.3 L (41.9-101.5), Vdpip = 46.8 L (39.7-60.0). 100%fTme>MIC was achieved in all patients on ME (aged ≥60 years), and only in two patients (non-ARC, aged ≥65 years) out of 10 on PIP/TZB. A mixed model analysis revealed positive relationship of CFBpip with Vdpip (P=0.021). CONCLUSION Assuming that the positive correlation between CFB and Vd exists for piperacillin in the setting of the pathological state, then CFB should predict Vdpip across subjects at each and every time point.