Jo-Ann I. Sheppard

Quantitative interpretation of optical density measurements using PF4‐dependent enzyme‐immunoassays

Summary.  Background: Many laboratories test for heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) using a PF4‐dependent enzyme‐immunoassay (EIA). An advantage of the EIA is its simplicity; a disadvantage is that it only indirectly detects heparin‐dependent, platelet‐activating antibodies (‘HIT antibodies’). Objectives: To determine whether the magnitude of a positive EIA result, expressed in optical density (OD) units, predicts risk of HIT antibodies, defined as a strong‐positive platelet serotonin‐release assay (SRA) result (≥50% serotonin release). Patients/methods: We determined the risk of a strong‐positive SRA result for five categories of OD reactivity (<0.40, 0.40–<1.00, 1.00–<1.40, 1.40–<2.00, and ≥2.00 OD units) using two EIAs (commercial anti‐PF4/polyanion IgG/A/M and in‐house anti‐PF4/heparin–IgG). Results: For patient sera investigated for HIT antibodies, a weak‐positive result (0.40–<1.00 OD units) in either EIA indicated a low probability (≤5%) of a strong‐positive SRA; the risk increased to ∼90% with an OD ≥ 2.00 units. Quantifying the EIA–SRA relationship for 1553 referred patient sera, we found that for every increase of 0.50 OD units in the EIA–IgG, the risk of a strong‐positive SRA result increased by OR = 6.39 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.13, 7.95; P < 0.0001]. For every increase of 1.00 OD units in the EIA–IgG, the risk increased by OR = 40.81 (95% CI, 26.35, 63.20; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The probability of HIT antibodies (strong‐positive SRA result) inferred by a positive PF4‐dependent EIA varies considerably in relation to the magnitude of the EIA result, expressed as OD values. In our laboratory, the probability of HIT antibodies being present reached ≥50% only when the OD level was ≥1.40 units.

The temporal profile of the anti-PF4/heparin immune response

The immune response in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is puzzling: heparin-naive patients can develop IgG antibodies and clinical HIT as early as day 5, and evidence for an anamnestic response on heparin reexposure is lacking. We assessed daily serum samples by anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) in patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis. Of 435 patients, 56.1% showed an increase in EIA optical density (OD) of more than or equal to 15%, with more than 90% starting between days 4 and 14. After reaching maximum reactivity by days 10 to 12, ODs declined despite heparin continuation, including in 2 patients with clinical HIT. Individual IgG/A/M classes showed identical time of onset (median, day 6). Most (58.7%) antibody-positive patients developed all 3 Ig classes; only 11.3% lacked IgG response. IgG/A/M increase usually occurred simultaneously (+/- 1 day) with no general tendency for IgM precedence. Consistent with the transient immune response, none of the IgG-EIA-positive (OD > 0.5) patients at discharge developed clinically evident thrombosis during extended low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis. The rapid onset of the anti-PF4/heparin immune response, its transience, and the simultaneous appearance of antibodies of different classes with no IgM precedence suggest short-term activation of B cells that have previously undergone Ig-class switching even without previous pharmacologic heparin exposure.

Differences in the clinically effective molar concentrations of four direct thrombin inhibitors explain their variable prothrombin time prolongation.

Four direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban, and melagatran, differ in their ability to prolong the prothrombin time (PT). Paradoxically, the DTI in clinical use with the lowest affinity for thrombin (argatroban) causes the greatest PT prolongation. We compared the effects of these DTIs on various clotting assays and on inhibition of human and bovine factor Xa (FXa). On a mole-for-mole basis, lepirudin was most able to prolong the PT, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and thrombin clotting time (TCT), whereas argatroban had the least effect. At concentrations that doubled the APTT (argatroban, 1 micromol/l; melagatran, 0.5 micromol/l; bivalirudin, 0.25 micromol/l; lepirudin, 0.06 micromol/l), the rank order for PT prolongation was: argatroban > melagatran > bivalirudin > lepirudin. Although the Kis associated with inhibition of human FXa by melagatran (1.4 micromol/l) and argatroban (3.2 micromol/l) approach their therapeutic concentrations, inhibition of FXa did not appear to be a major contributor to PT prolongation, since argatroban also prolonged the PT of bovine plasma (despite a Ki for bovine FXa of 2,600 micromol/l). Only melagatran inhibited prothrombinase-bound FXa. We conclude that the differing effects of the DTIs on PT prolongation are primarily driven by their respective molar plasma concentrations required for clinical effect. DTIs with a relatively low affinity for thrombin require high plasma concentrations to double the APTT; these higher plasma concentrations, in turn, quench more of the thrombin generated in the PT, thereby more greatly prolonging the PT.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: towards standardization of platelet factor 4/heparin antigen tests

Summary.  Background: Laboratory confirmation of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is based on detection of heparin‐dependent platelet‐activating antibodies. Platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin enzyme‐immunoassays (EIA) are a widely available surrogate for platelet‐activating antibodies. Objective: Defining the optical density (OD) reactivity profiles of a PF4/heparin EIA in reference subject and patient populations and the correlation of the EIA results (expressed in OD units) with the prevalence of platelet‐activating antibodies. Patients/methods: Using quantile regression we determined the 97.5th percentile of PF4/heparin‐immunoglobulin G (IgG) EIA reactivities in non‐heparin‐treated individuals [blood donors (n = 935)] and patients before heparin therapy (n = 1207). In patients with suspected HIT, we compared the correlation of EIA‐IgG reactivities (Greifswald laboratory; n = 2821) and the heparin‐induced platelet activation assay (HIPA) with the correlation of reactivities of another EIA‐IgG (McMaster laboratory; n = 1956) with the serotonin‐release assay (SRA). Results: PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA OD reactivities had a lower OD 97.5th percentile in blood donors compared with patient groups before heparin treatment (P < 0.001). The percentage of sera testing positive in the functional assays strongly correlated with PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA OD reactivities in both laboratories with very similar results (correlation coefficient > 0.9) when normalized OD ranges (maximum OD divided by 10) were used instead of absolute OD values. Conclusions: Results of PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA should not be reported as only positive or negative as there is no single acceptable cut‐off value. Instead, reporting PF4/heparin‐IgG EIA OD results in ranges allows for risk‐stratified prediction for presence of platelet‐activating antibodies. Use of normalized OD ranges permits a standardized approach for inter‐laboratory comparisons.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia--therapeutic concentrations of danaparoid, unlike fondaparinux and direct thrombin inhibitors, inhibit formation of platelet factor 4-heparin complexes.

Summary.  Background: Treatment of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a disorder in which anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4)–heparin antibodies cause platelet activation and hypercoagulability, requires alternative (non‐heparin) anticoagulation. Treatment options include direct thrombin inhibitors [lepirudin and argatroban (approved), and bivalirudin], danaparoid (approved) (mixture of anticoagulant glycosaminoglycans), or fondaparinux (synthetic heparin‐mimicking pentasaccharide). PF4–heparin complexes form at optimal stoichiometric ratios. Objectives: To compare the effects of these various non‐heparin anticoagulants in disrupting the formation of PF4–heparin complexes, and PF4‐containing immune complexes. Patients/methods: Sera were obtained from patients with serologically confirmed HIT. The effects of the alternative anticoagulants on PF4 and PF4–heparin complex interactions with platelets, as well as HIT antibody binding and platelet activation, were investigated. Results: Danaparoid at very low concentrations increased PF4 binding to platelets. In therapeutic concentrations, however, it decreased PF4 binding to platelets (P = 0.0004), displaced PF4–heparin complexes from platelets (P = 0.0033) and PF4 from the surface of a PF4‐transfected HEK‐293 EBNA cell line expressing the PF4 receptor CXCR3‐B (P = 0.0408), reduced PF4–heparin complex size (P = 0.025), inhibited HIT antibody binding to PF4–heparin complexes (P = 0.001), and prevented platelet activation by HIT antibodies (P = 0.046). Although fondaparinux also interfered with PF4 binding to platelets, HIT antibody binding to PF4–heparin complexes, and activation of platelets by HIT antibodies, these effects occurred only at supratherapeutic concentrations. The direct thrombin inhibitors had no effect at any concentrations. Conclusions: Danaparoid uniquely interferes with the pathogenesis of HIT by disrupting PF4‐containing immune complexes at therapeutic dose concentrations. It is possible that these effects contribute to its therapeutic efficacy.

No significant improvement in diagnostic specificity of an anti-PF4/polyanion immunoassay with use of high heparin confirmatory procedure

Ann Emerg Med 2003; 42: 124–35. 11 Anderson DR, Wells Ph, Stiell I, MacLeod B, Simms M, Gray L, Robinson KS, Bormanis J, Mitchell M, Lewandowski B, Flowerdew G. Thrombosis in the emergency department: use of a clinical diagnosis model to safety avoid the need for urgent radiological investigation. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 477–82. 12 Tamariz LJ, Eng J, Segal JB, Krishnan JA, Bolger DT, Streiff MB, Jenckes MW, Bass EB. Usefulness of clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. Am J Med 2004; 117: 676–84. 13 Bigaroni A, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Is clinical probability assessment of deep vein thrombosis by a score really standardized? Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 788–9.

Serological investigation of patients with a previous history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who are reexposed to heparin

Heparin reexposure despite a history of previous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can be appropriate if platelet-activating antibodies are no longer detectable. We determined the frequency, timing, and magnitude of the antiplatelet factor 4 (anti-PF4)/heparin immune response (by serotonin-release assay [SRA] and enzyme-immunoassay [EIA]), and the frequency of recurrent HIT in 20 patients with previous HIT reexposed to heparin 4.4 years (mean) post-HIT; 17 patients were given heparin intraoperatively (without postoperative heparin) for cardiac/vascular surgery. One patient developed recurrent HIT beginning 7 days after cardiac surgery, with newly regenerated HIT antibodies exhibiting strong heparin-independent platelet-activating properties. Intraoperative heparin induced EIA seroconversion in 11/17 (65%) patients (immunoglobulin G [IgG]>IgA>IgM) and SRA seroconversion in 8/17 (47%), whereas none of 3 medical patients reexposed to heparin developed seroconversion. Anti-PF4/heparin IgG became detectable at day 7 (median), ie, no sooner than observed in typical-onset HIT. The high proportion of SRA positivity among EIA-seroconverting patients (8/11 [73%]) suggests that patients with previous HIT may be especially predisposed to forming recurrent antibodies with platelet-activating properties. We conclude that among patients with a previous history of HIT who are reexposed to intraoperative (but not postoperative) heparin, the risk of recurrent HIT appears to be low, but is possible if antibodies with strong heparin-independent platelet-activating properties are formed.

The use of well‐characterized sera for the assessment of new diagnostic enzyme‐immunoassays for the diagnosis of heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia

Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are frequently used to detect PF4-dependent antibodies implicated in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) [1]. One assay, the ‘PF4 Enhanced®’ (GTI Diagnostics, Waukesha, WI, USA), hereafter designated as ‘GTI-IgGAM’, utilizes PF4 bound to polyvinylsulfonate, and has

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Medical Surgical Critical Illness

BACKGROUND In a recent multicenter randomized trial comparing unfractionated heparin (UFH) with low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) for thromboprophylaxis in 3,746 critically ill patients, 17 patients (0.5%) developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) based on serotonin-release assay-positive (SRA+) status. A trend to a lower frequency of HIT with dalteparin vs UFH was observed in the intention-to-treat analysis (five vs 12 patients, P = .14), which was statistically significant (three vs 12 patients, P = .046) in a prespecified per-protocol analysis that excluded patients with DVT at study entry. We sought to characterize HIT outcomes and to determine how dalteparin thromboprophylaxis may reduce HIT frequency in patients in the ICU. METHODS In 17 patients with HIT, we analyzed platelet counts and thrombotic events in relation to the study drug and other open-label heparin, to determine whether the study drug plausibly explained seroconversion to SRA+ status and/or breakthrough of thrombocytopenia/thrombosis. We also compared antibody frequencies (dalteparin vs UFH) in 409 patients serologically investigated for HIT. RESULTS HIT-associated thrombosis occurred in 10 of 17 patients (58.8%) (8:1:1 venous:arterial:both). Dalteparin was associated with fewer study drug-attributable HIT-related events (P = .020), including less seroconversion (P = .058) and less breakthrough of thrombocytopenia/thrombosis (P = .032). Antiplatelet factor 4/heparin IgG antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were less frequent among patients receiving dalteparin vs UFH (13.5% vs 27.3%, P < .001). One patient with HIT-associated DVT died after UFH bolus (anaphylactoid reaction), whereas platelet counts recovered in two others with HIT-associated VTE despite continuation of therapeutic-dose UFH. CONCLUSIONS The lower risk of HIT in patients in the ICU receiving dalteparin appears related to both decreased antibody formation and decreased clinical breakthrough of HIT among patients forming antibodies.

Performance characteristics of a rapid assay for anti-PF4/heparin antibodies: the particle immunofiltration assay.

JM, Ponseille B, Ducos J, Blanc P, Vendrell JP. Detection of memory B lymphocytes specific to hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) from HBsAg-vaccinated or HBV-immunized subjects by ELISPOT assay. J Immunol Methods 2006; 315: 144–52. 5 Mannucci PM, Tuddenham EG. The hemophilias – from royal genes to gene therapy. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1773–9. 6 Wen L, Hanvanich M, Werner-Favre C, Brouwers N, Perrin LH, Zubler RH. Limiting dilution assay for human B cells based on their activation by mutant EL4 thymoma cells: total and antimalaria responder B cell frequencies. Eur J Immunol 1987; 17: 887–92. 7 Klein U, Rajewsky K, Kuppers R. Human immunoglobulin (Ig)M+IgD+ peripheral blood B cells expressing the CD27 cell surface antigen carry somatically mutated variable region genes: CD27 as a general marker for somatically mutated (memory) B cells. J Exp Med 1998; 188: 1679–89. 8 Brackmann HH, Gormsen J. Massive factor-VIII infusion in haemophiliac with factor-VIII inhibitor, high responder. Lancet 1977; 2: 933. 9 DiMichele D. Immune tolerance therapy for factor VIII inhibitors: moving from empiricism to an evidence-based approach. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5: 143–50. 10 Hausl C, Ahmad RU, Sasgary M, Doering CB, Lollar P, Richter G, Schwarz HP, Turecek PL, Reipert BM. High-dose factor VIII inhibits factor VIII-specific memory B cells in hemophilia A with factor VIII inhibitors. Blood 2005; 106: 3415–22.