Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jo-Ann Mulligan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jo-Ann Mulligan.


Social Science & Medicine | 1998

Income inequality and population health

Ken Judge; Jo-Ann Mulligan; Michaela Benzeval

A number of studies have suggested that inequalities in the distribution of income may be an important cause of variations in the average level of population health among rich industrial nations. However, what is missing from the debate so far is any systematic review of evidence about the relationship between different measures of income distribution and indicators of population health. This paper aims to bridge that gap. First, it summarizes the recent English language literature on this topic and illustrates the methodological problems that weaken the inferences that can be derived from it. Secondly, it presents new empirical estimates of the relationship between different measures of income distribution, infant mortality and life expectancy based on the most authoritative data published to date. In contrast to most earlier studies, we find very little support for the view that income inequality is associated with variations in average levels of national health in rich industrial countries. Some possible explanations for these differences are outlined.


Malaria Journal | 2008

Costs and effects of the Tanzanian national voucher scheme for insecticide-treated nets

Jo-Ann Mulligan; Joshua Yukich; Kara Hanson

BackgroundThe cost-effectiveness of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) in reducing morbidity and mortality is well established. International focus has now moved on to how best to scale up coverage and what financing mechanisms might be used to achieve this. The approach in Tanzania has been to deliver a targeted subsidy for those most vulnerable to the effects of malaria while at the same time providing support to the development of the commercial ITN distribution system. In October 2004, with funds from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS Tuberculosis and Malaria, the government launched the Tanzania National Voucher Scheme (TNVS), a nationwide discounted voucher scheme for ITNs for pregnant women and their infants. This paper analyses the costs and effects of the scheme and compares it with other approaches to distribution.MethodsEconomic costs were estimated using the ingredients approach whereby all resources required in the delivery of the intervention (including the user contribution) are quantified and valued. Effects were measured in terms of number of vouchers used (and therefore nets delivered) and treated nets years. Estimates were also made for the cost per malaria case and death averted.Results and ConclusionThe total financial cost of the programme represents around 5% of the Ministry of Healths total budget. The average economic cost of delivering an ITN using the voucher scheme, including the user contribution, was


Journal of Health Services Research & Policy | 2000

The British quasi-market in health care: a balance sheet of the evidence.

Nicholas Mays; Jo-Ann Mulligan; Nick Goodwin

7.57. The cost-effectiveness results are within the benchmarks set by other malaria prevention studies. The Government of Tanzanias approach to scaling up ITNs uses both the public and private sectors in order to achieve and sustain the level of coverage required to meet the Abuja targets. The results presented here suggest that the TNVS is a cost-effective strategy for delivering subsidized ITNs to targeted vulnerable groups.


Tropical Medicine & International Health | 2006

The costs of changing national policy: lessons from malaria treatment policy guidelines in Tanzania

Jo-Ann Mulligan; R. Mandike; Natasha Palmer; Williams Ha; Salim Abdulla; Peter B. Bloland; Anne Mills

Objectives: To summarise the findings from a comprehensive review of research on the effects of the three main elements of the quasi-market reforms of the UK National Health Service (NHS) introduced in 1991/92: General practices becoming fundholders by volunteering to purchase elective care for their patients; Health authorities becoming purchasers of emergency, unplanned and elective services, together with a range of alternatives to fundholding operating under their auspices; The conversion of providers of hospital and community health services to NHS trusts separate from their local health authorities. Methods: Published and unpublished studies which included any data on the impact of the three main planks of the quasi-market changes, produced between 1991 and late 1998, were identified using a combination of electronic databases, library catalogues at the Kings Fund, London, bibliographies, reference lists of individual studies, a survey of NHS directors of public health and consultations with subject area experts. Each main element of the quasi-market was assessed in relation to its impact on: efficiency (primarily productivity); equity; quality; choice and responsiveness; and accountability. Results: There was relatively little measurable change that could be related unequivocally to the core mechanisms of the quasi-market. Conclusions: The incentives were generally too weak and the constraints too strong to generate the consequences predicted by either proponents or critics of the quasi-market. On the other hand, the way in which the NHS operates was changed irrevocably by the reforms.


Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation | 2006

Economic evaluations of non-communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the evidence base

Jo-Ann Mulligan; Damian Walker; Julia Fox-Rushby

Objective  To document the cost incurred by the Tanzanian government by changing the policy on first‐line treatment of malaria, from chloroquine to sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine.


Journal of Health Services Research & Policy | 2000

Conceptual and Practical Difficulties with the Economic Evaluation of Health Services Developments

Joanna Coast; Martin Hensher; Jo-Ann Mulligan; Sasha Shepperd; Jeremy Jones

BackgroundDemographic projections suggest a major increase in non-communicable disease (NCD) mortality over the next two decades in developing countries. In a climate of scarce resources, policy-makers need to know which interventions represent value for money. The prohibitive cost of performing multiple economic evaluations has generated interest in transferring the results of studies from one setting to another. This paper aims to bridge the gap in the current literature by critically evaluating the available published data on economic evaluations of NCD interventions in developing countries.MethodsWe identified and reviewed the methodological quality of 32 economic evaluations of NCD interventions in developing countries. Developing countries were defined according to the World Bank classification for low- and lower middle-income countries. We defined NCDs as the 12 categories listed in the 1993 World Bank report Investing in Health. English language literature was searched for the period January 1984 and January 2003 inclusive in Medline, Science Citation Index, HealthStar, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and Embase using medical subheading terms and free text searches. We then assessed the quality of studies according to a set of pre-defined technical criteria.ResultsWe found that the quality of studies was poor and resource allocation decisions made by local and global policy-makers on the basis of this evidence could be misleading. Furthermore we have identified some clear gaps in the literature, particularly around injuries and strategies for tackling the consequences of the emerging tobacco epidemic.ConclusionIn the face of poor evidence the role of so-called generalised cost-effectiveness analyses has an important role to play in aiding public health decision-making at the global level. Further research is needed to investigates the causes of variation among cost, effects and cost-effectiveness data within and between settings. Such analyses still need to take a broad view, present data in a transparent manner and take account of local constraints.


Tropical Medicine & International Health | 2006

The costs of changing national policy: lessons from changing malaria treatment policy in Tanzania

Jo-Ann Mulligan; R. Mandike; Natasha Palmer; Williams Ha; Salim Abdulla; Peter B. Bloland; Anne Mills

Five recent economic evaluations comparing hospital at home schemes with acute hospital care faced remarkably similar problems. This paper outlines these problems and considers what strategies can be derived from these experiences, which will be relevant to economic evaluations of other aspects of the organisation of care, particularly those crossing the interfaces between primary and secondary health care or the interface between health and social services. The difficulties experienced can be divided into conceptual and practical problems. Conceptual problems were primarily associated with issues of context and related to the choice of comparator, capacity constraints and size of schemes, and the choice between a short or a long run perspective. Practical problems were connected with the time at which schemes were evaluated, the type of clinical study alongside which studies were conducted and the types of data available for use in the analysis. Strategies which can be pursued in conducting economic evaluations of organisational change include giving greater attention to conceptual and hence contextual problems as well as reporting these contextual issues in detail, accepting the need for repeated economic evaluations as organisational changes become more widespread and considering carefully the clinical study design where economic evaluations of organisational change are conducted alongside. These strategies are of importance not just to those conducting economic evaluations but also to those funding appraisals of changes in the organisation of care. Use of different strategies such as those suggested here should be evaluated.


Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2008

Beyond fragmentation and towards universal coverage: insights from Ghana, South Africa and the United Republic of Tanzania

Diane McIntyre; Bertha Garshong; Gemini Mtei; Filip Meheus; Michael Thiede; James Akazili; Mariam Ally; Moses Aikins; Jo-Ann Mulligan; Jane Goudge

Objective  To document the cost incurred by the Tanzanian government by changing the policy on first‐line treatment of malaria, from chloroquine to sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine.


Archive | 1998

Learning from the NHS internal market : a review of the evidence

Julian Le Grand; Nicholas Mays; Jo-Ann Mulligan


Malaria Journal | 2008

Costs and consequences of large-scale vector control for malaria

Joshua Yukich; Christian Lengeler; Fabrizio Tediosi; Nick Brown; Jo-Ann Mulligan; Des Chavasse; Warren Stevens; John Justino; Lesong Conteh; Rajendra Maharaj; Marcy Erskine; Dirk H Mueller; Virginia Wiseman; Tewolde Ghebremeskel; Mehari Zerom; Catherine Goodman; David McGuire; Juan Manuel Urrutia; Fana Sakho; Kara Hanson; Brian Sharp

Collaboration


Dive into the Jo-Ann Mulligan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mariam Ally

Ministry of Health and Social Welfare

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ken Judge

University of Glasgow

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jane Goudge

University of the Witwatersrand

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge