Jo Harrold

What have human experimental overfeeding studies taught us about adipose tissue expansion and susceptibility to obesity and metabolic complications

Overfeeding experiments, in which we impose short-term positive energy balance, help unravel the cellular, physiological and behavioural adaptations to nutrient excess. These studies mimic longer-term mismatched energy expenditure and intake. There is considerable inter-individual heterogeneity in the magnitude of weight gain when exposed to similar relative caloric excess reflecting variable activation of compensatory adaptive mechanisms. Significantly, given similar relative weight gain, individuals may be protected from/predisposed to metabolic complications (insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, hypertension), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cardiovascular disease. Similar mechanistic considerations underpinning the heterogeneity of overfeeding responses are pertinent in understanding emerging metabolic phenotypes, for example, metabolically unhealthy normal weight and metabolically healthy obesity. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors modulate individuals’ overfeeding response: intrinsic factors include gender/hormonal status, genetic/ethnic background, baseline metabolic health and cardiorespiratory fitness; extrinsic factors include macronutrient (fat vs carbohydrate) content, fat/carbohydrate composition and overfeeding pattern. Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) analysis, coupled with metabolic assessment, with overfeeding have revealed how SAT remodels to accommodate excess nutrients. SAT remodelling occurs either by hyperplasia (increased adipocyte number) or by hypertrophy (increased adipocyte size). Biological responses of SAT also govern the extent of ectopic (visceral/liver) triglyceride deposition. Body composition analysis by DEXA/MRI (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry/magnetic resonance imaging) have determined the relative expansion of SAT (including abdominal/gluteofemoral SAT) vs ectopic fat with overfeeding. Such studies have contributed to the adipose expandability hypothesis whereby SAT has a finite capacity to expand (governed by intrinsic biological characteristics), and once capacity is exceeded ectopic triglyceride deposition occurs. The potential for SAT expandability confers protection from/predisposes to the adverse metabolic responses to overfeeding. The concept of a personal fat threshold suggests a large inter-individual variation in SAT capacity with ectopic depot expansion/metabolic decompensation once one’s own threshold is exceeded. This review summarises insight gained from overfeeding studies regarding susceptibility to obesity and related complications with nutrient excess.

Compensatory changes in energy balance during dapagliflozin treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial (ENERGIZE)-study protocol.

Introduction Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective blood-glucose-lowering medications with beneficial effects on body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, observed weight loss is less than that predicted from quantified glycosuria, suggesting a compensatory increase in energy intake or a decrease in energy expenditure. Studies using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) have suggested most body weight change is due to loss of adipose tissue, but organ-specific changes in fat content (eg, liver, skeletal muscle) have not been determined. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, we aim to study the compensatory changes in energy intake, eating behaviour and energy expenditure accompanying use of the SGLT2 inhibitor, dapagliflozin. Additionally, we aim to quantify changes in fat distribution using MRI, in liver fat using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) and in central nervous system (CNS) responses to food images using blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI). Methods and analysis This outpatient study will evaluate the effect of dapagliflozin (10 mg), compared with placebo, on food intake and energy expenditure at 7 days and 12 weeks. 52 patients with T2DM will be randomised to dapagliflozin or placebo for short-term and long-term trial interventions in a within participants, crossover design. The primary outcome is the difference in energy intake during a test meal between dapagliflozin and placebo. Intake data are collected automatically using a customised programme operating a universal eating monitor (UEM). Secondary outcomes include (1) measures of appetite regulation including rate of eating, satiety quotient, appetite ratings (between and within meals), changes in CNS responses to food images measured using BOLD-fMRI, (2) measures of energy expenditure and (3) changes in body composition including changes in liver fat and abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Ethical approval This study has been approved by the North West Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee (14/NW/0340) and is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Trial registration number ISRCTN14818531. EUDRACT number 2013-004264-60.

Stigmatization and obesity: unexpected consequences with public health relevance

The psychosocial nature of obesity is becoming a prominent research area that we and others have been studying using both experimental and cross-sectional approaches. As discussed in a recent edition of IJO, the stigma directed at and experienced by overweight and obese individuals is now well documented. Regardless of this, stigmatization of the overweight and obese is a prevailing theme in public health campaigns designed to tackle obesity, driven by a belief that this will be an effective way of reducing adiposity. Cross-sectional data indicate that experiencing weight stigma may actually be detrimental to weight management and could promote further weight gain, as individuals experiencing stigma may be less inclined to want to exercise in public and experience greater stress. However, to date there has been little or no causal examination of whether stigmatization of obesity may be counterproductive to public health. The main purpose of this letter is to draw attention to a study recently published by Major et al. in the Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology. The authors tested whether reading a mock newspaper article that stigmatized obese individuals causes overeating in self-identified overweight and obese participants (see Major et al. for a discussion of the proposed mechanism explaining this effect). The authors report that after exposure to the obesity stigma article, overweight and obese participants felt less able to control their eating and ate a much larger amount of high-calorie snack food than those in a control condition. On the basis of these findings the authors concluded that current public health messages targeted to combat obesity may actually be propagating it. As is the case with all studies, there are some limitations to note. The obesity stigma article predominantly included information about prejudice/stigma, but this was also confounded with information about the negative health consequences of obesity. Moreover, although well controlled and designed, it is a singlelaboratory study. Yet, the observed findings are in line with research showing that appetitive consumption behaviours can be influenced by sociocognitive factors and depletion of self-control. If additional studies replicate the basic pattern of results observed in Major et al., then we would be in a stronger position to argue against the stigmatization of overweight and obese individuals not only because it is morally questionable and damaging to well-being, but also because it could actually propagate ‘unhealthy eating habits’ and be detrimental to public health.

Clinical and biochemical assessment of depressive symptoms in patients with Alkaptonuria before and after two years of treatment with nitisinone

OBJECTIVE Concerns exist over hypertyrosinaemia that is observed following treatment with nitisinone. It has been suggested that tyrosine may compete with tryptophan for uptake into the central nervous system, and or inhibit tryptophan hydroxylase activity reducing serotonin production. At the National Alkaptonuria (AKU) Centre nitisinone is being used off-licence to treat AKU, and there is uncertainty over whether hypertyrosinaemia may alter mood. Herein results from clinical and biochemical assessments of depression in patients with AKU before and after treatment with nitisinone are presented. PATIENTS AND METHODS 63 patients were included pre-nitisinone treatment, of these 39 and 32 patients were followed up 12 and 24 months after treatment. All patients had Becks Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) assessments (scores can range from 0 to 63, the higher the score the more severe the category of depression), and where possible urinary monoamine neurotransmitter metabolites and serum aromatic amino acids were measured as biochemical markers of depression. RESULTS Mean (±standard deviation) BDI-II scores pre-nitisinone, and after 12 and 24 months were 10.1(9.6); 9.8(10.0) and 10.5(9.9) (p ≥ 0.05, all visits). Paired scores (n = 32), showed a significant increase at 24 months compared to baseline 10.5(9.9) vs. 8.6 (7.8) (p = 0.03). Serum tyrosine increased at least 6-fold following nitisinone (p ≤ 0.0001, all visits), and urinary 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT) increased at 12 and 24 months (p ≤ 0.0001), and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA) decreased at 12 months (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS BDI-II scores were significantly higher following 24 months of nitisinone therapy in patients that were followed up, however the majority of these patients remained in the minimal category of depression. Serum tyrosine and urinary 3-MT increased significantly following treatment with nitisinone. In contrast urinary 5-HIAA did not decrease consistently over the same period studied. Together these findings suggest nitisinone does not cause depression despite some observed effects on monoamine neurotransmitter metabolism.