Joachim Weil

Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND Activation of renal sympathetic nerves is key to pathogenesis of essential hypertension. We aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of catheter-based renal denervation for reduction of blood pressure in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. METHODS In this multicentre, prospective, randomised trial, patients who had a baseline systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or more (≥150 mm Hg for patients with type 2 diabetes), despite taking three or more antihypertensive drugs, were randomly allocated in a one-to-one ratio to undergo renal denervation with previous treatment or to maintain previous treatment alone (control group) at 24 participating centres. Randomisation was done with sealed envelopes. Data analysers were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary effectiveness endpoint was change in seated office-based measurement of systolic blood pressure at 6 months. Primary analysis included all patients remaining in follow-up at 6 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00888433. FINDINGS 106 (56%) of 190 patients screened for eligibility were randomly allocated to renal denervation (n=52) or control (n=54) groups between June 9, 2009, and Jan 15, 2010. 49 (94%) of 52 patients who underwent renal denervation and 51 (94%) of 54 controls were assessed for the primary endpoint at 6 months. Office-based blood pressure measurements in the renal denervation group reduced by 32/12 mm Hg (SD 23/11, baseline of 178/96 mm Hg, p<0·0001), whereas they did not differ from baseline in the control group (change of 1/0 mm Hg [21/10], baseline of 178/97 mm Hg, p=0·77 systolic and p=0·83 diastolic). Between-group differences in blood pressure at 6 months were 33/11 mm Hg (p<0·0001). At 6 months, 41 (84%) of 49 patients who underwent renal denervation had a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or more, compared with 18 (35%) of 51 controls (p<0·0001). We noted no serious procedure-related or device-related complications and occurrence of adverse events did not differ between groups; one patient who had renal denervation had possible progression of an underlying atherosclerotic lesion, but required no treatment. INTERPRETATION Catheter-based renal denervation can safely be used to substantially reduce blood pressure in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients. FUNDING Ardian.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Changes after Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension

Background— Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces office blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension according to office BP. Less is known about the effect of RDN on 24-hour BP measured by ambulatory BP monitoring and correlates of response in individuals with true or pseudoresistant hypertension. Methods and Results— A total of 346 uncontrolled hypertensive patients, separated according to daytime ambulatory BP monitoring into 303 with true resistant (office systolic BP [SBP] 172.2±22 mm Hg; 24-hour SBP 154±16.2 mm Hg) and 43 with pseudoresistant hypertension (office SBP 161.2±20.3 mm Hg; 24-hour SBP 121.1±19.6 mm Hg), from 10 centers were studied. At 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up, office SBP was reduced by 21.5/23.7/27.3 mm Hg, office diastolic BP by 8.9/9.5/11.7 mm Hg, and pulse pressure by 13.4/14.2/14.9 mm Hg (n=245/236/90; P for all <0.001), respectively. In patients with true treatment resistance there was a significant reduction with RDN in 24-hour SBP (−10.1/−10.2/−11.7 mm Hg, P<0.001), diastolic BP (−4.8/−4.9/−7.4 mm Hg, P<0.001), maximum SBP (−11.7/−10.0/−6.1 mm Hg, P<0.001) and minimum SBP (−6.0/−9.4/−13.1 mm Hg, P<0.001) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. There was no effect on ambulatory BP monitoring in pseudoresistant patients, whereas office BP was reduced to a similar extent. RDN was equally effective in reducing BP in different subgroups of patients. Office SBP at baseline was the only independent correlate of BP response. Conclusions— RDN reduced office BP and improved relevant aspects of ambulatory BP monitoring, commonly linked to high cardiovascular risk, in patients with true-treatment resistant hypertension, whereas it only affected office BP in pseudoresistant hypertension. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00664638 and NCT00888433.

Rationale and design of a large registry on renal denervation: The Global SYMPLICITY registry

AIMS Hypertension is a global healthcare concern associated with a wide range of comorbidities. The recognition that elevated sympathetic drive plays an important role in the pathogenesis of hypertension led to the use of renal artery denervation to interrupt the efferent and afferent sympathetic nerves between the brain and kidneys to lower blood pressure. Clinical trials of the Symplicity™ renal denervation system have demonstrated that radiofrequency ablation of renal artery nerves is safe and significantly lowers blood pressure in patients with severe resistant (systolic BP >160 mmHg) hypertension. Smaller ancillary studies in hypertensive patients suggest a benefit from renal denervation in a variety of conditions such as chronic kidney disease, glucose intolerance, sleep apnoea and heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS The Global SYMPLICITY registry, which incorporates the GREAT SYMPLICITY registry initiated in Germany, is being conducted worldwide to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment with the Symplicity renal denervation system in real-world uncontrolled hypertensive patients, looking first at subjects with severe resistant hypertension to confirm the results of prior clinical trials, but then also subjects with a wider range of baseline blood pressure and coexisting comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS The rationale, design and first baseline data from the Global SYMPLICITY registry are presented.

Catheter-based renal denervation in patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED): a randomised, sham-controlled, proof-of-concept trial

BACKGROUND Previous randomised renal denervation studies did not show consistent efficacy in reducing blood pressure. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the absence of antihypertensive medications. METHODS SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED was a multicentre, international, single-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, proof-of-concept trial. Patients were enrolled at 21 centres in the USA, Europe, Japan, and Australia. Eligible patients were drug-naive or discontinued their antihypertensive medications. Patients with an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 150 mm Hg or greater and less than 180 mm Hg, office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90 mm Hg or greater, and a mean 24-h ambulatory SBP of 140 mm Hg or greater and less than 170 mm Hg at second screening underwent renal angiography and were randomly assigned to renal denervation or sham control. Patients, caregivers, and those assessing blood pressure were blinded to randomisation assignments. The primary endpoint, change in 24-h blood pressure at 3 months, was compared between groups. Drug surveillance was done to ensure patient compliance with absence of antihypertensive medication. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety events were assessed at 3 months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02439749. FINDINGS Between June 25, 2015, and Jan 30, 2017, 353 patients were screened. 80 patients were randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=38) or sham control (n=42) and followed up for 3 months. Office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months in the renal denervation group: 24-h SBP -5·5 mm Hg (95% CI -9·1 to -2·0; p=0·0031), 24-h DBP -4·8 mm Hg (-7·0 to -2·6; p<0·0001), office SBP -10·0 mm Hg (-15·1 to -4·9; p=0·0004), and office DBP -5·3 mm Hg (-7·8 to -2·7; p=0·0002). No significant changes were seen in the sham-control group: 24-h SBP -0·5 mm Hg (95% CI -3·9 to 2·9; p=0·7644), 24-h DBP -0·4 mm Hg (-2·2 to 1·4; p=0·6448), office SBP -2·3 mm Hg (-6·1 to 1·6; p=0·2381), and office DBP -0·3 mm Hg (-2·9 to 2·2; p=0·8052). The mean difference between the groups favoured renal denervation for 3-month change in both office and 24-h blood pressure from baseline: 24-h SBP -5·0 mm Hg (95% CI -9·9 to -0·2; p=0·0414), 24-h DBP -4·4 mm Hg (-7·2 to -1·6; p=0·0024), office SBP -7·7 mm Hg (-14·0 to -1·5; p=0·0155), and office DBP -4·9 mm Hg (-8·5 to -1·4; p=0·0077). Baseline-adjusted analyses showed similar findings. There were no major adverse events in either group. INTERPRETATION Results from SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED provide biological proof of principle for the blood-pressure-lowering efficacy of renal denervation. FUNDING Medtronic.

Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 gene are associated with prevalence of hypertension

UNLABELLED Infusion of the endogenous nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) causes an elevation of blood pressure and depression of cardiac output. Polymorphisms in the promoter region of the ADMA-degrading enzyme dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 (DDAH2) gene have been associated with elevated ADMA concentrations and adverse outcomes in critically ill patients. We hypothesized that two DDAH2 promoter -1151 A/C and -449 G/C polymorphisms (rs805304 and rs805305) will be associated with blood pressure levels, hypertension prevalence and measures of cardiac structure and function in the general population. METHODS AND RESULTS We genotyped rs805304 and rs805305 in 783 participants of the population-based Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) Augsburg S3 study. Plasma ADMA concentrations did not differ by rs805304 and rs805305 genotypes. Both polymorphisms were associated with a higher prevalence of hypertension. The odds ratio (adjusted for age, gender and body mass index) for hypertension was 1.70 (95%CI: 1.22-2.36: p=0.002) for those homozygous (n=348) for the -1151A allele and 1.80 (95%CI: 1.29-2.49, p<0.001) for individuals homozygous for the -449G allele (n=350). However, both polymorphisms were not related to measures of cardiac structure and function (left ventricular [LV] mass, LV wall thickness, LV end-diastolic diameter, ejection fraction, E/A ratio, isovolumetric relaxation time) in multivariable-adjusted models. CONCLUSION The present study indicates that the -1151 A/C and -449 G/C polymorphisms in the DDAH2 promoter region are not related to plasma ADMA levels or measures of cardiac structure and function but are associated with an increased prevalence of hypertension. The mechanisms of this association need further investigation.

Pathophysiologie der chronischen Herzinsuffizienz

Heart failure is a progressive and often fatal disease process. In general, the pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for progressive myocyte dysfunction and cell loss, cardiac remodeling and arrhythmias involve signaling mechanisms that alter myocardial gene expression. These changes in gene expression are complex and involve contractile proteins, ion channels, Ca(++) handling, apoptosis, cell metabolism, the extracellular matrix, signal transduction pathways and growth factors. In the failing heart, several changes occur in cardiac adrenergic receptor-signal transduction pathways. The most striking of these changes occur in beta-adrenergic receptors, and of the changes in beta-adrenergic receptors beta1-receptor down-regulation is the most prominent. Other changes include uncoupling of beta2-adrenergic receptors and increased activity of the inhibitory G-protein. Most of these changes appear to be related to increased activity of the adrenergic nervous system, i.e. increased exposure to norepinephrine. Antagonists of the adrenergic nervous system may improve left ventricular function and outcome in patients with heart failure. This fact supports the notion that activation of these neurohormonal systems exerts a net long-term detrimental effect on the natural history of chronic heart failure and that myocardial adrenergic desensitization phenomena are at least partially maladaptive in the setting of left ventricular dysfunction. In addition to functional alterations structural remodeling plays a major role in the progression of various heart diseases to congestive heart failure. Major contributors to this remodeling process in the heart include alterations in myocyte shape, myocyte number and extracellular matrix. However, it is unclear as to which of these changes is most critical in the development of congestive heart failure, and this may vary by etiology.ZusammenfassungDie chronische Herzinsuffizienz ist eine fortschreitende Erkrankung, die bei vielen Patienten zum Tode führt. Veränderungen in der intrazellulären Signaltransduktion sowie in der Genexpression sind die vorwiegenden pathophysiologischen Mechanismen, die für die myokardiale Dysfunktion, den fortschreitenden Zellverlust und das daraus resultierende Remodeling ursächlich sind. Diese komplexen Veränderungen umfassen den kontraktilen Apparat, verschiedene Ionenkanäle und Signaltransduktionswege, den Zellmetabolismus und die extrazelluläre Matrix der Kardiomyozyten. Die Herunterregulation der β1-adrenergen Rezeptoren und Desensitivierung des nachgeschalteten Signaltransduktionsweges sind bei der chronischen Herzinsuffizienz extrem wichtig. Die oben genannten Veränderungen sind wahrscheinlich Folge der dauerhaften Aktivierung neurohumoraler Systeme (Sympathikus, Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosteron-System). Diese Hypothese wird durch den günstigen therapeutischen Effekt der Beta-Blocker beziehungsweise der ACE-Hemmer bei der Behandlung von Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz gestützt. Die Aktivierung der neurohumoralen Systeme erlaubt kurzfristig eine Stabilisierung der Myokardfunktion und damit der Perfusion lebenswichtiger Organe. Bei chronischer Aktivierung tragen dieselben Mechanismen jedoch wesentlich zur Progression der Herzinsuffizienz bei. Den strukturellen Veränderungen des Herzens liegen molekulare Prozesse zugrunde, die das Fortschreiten der Herzinsuffizienz ebenfalls beschleunigen und somit auch eine zentrale Bedeutung in der Pathogenese der Herzinsuffizienz haben. Welche dieser Veränderungen hauptsächlich für die Entwicklung oder Progression der chronischen Herzinsuffizienz ursächlich sind, ist derzeit nicht geklärt.SummaryHeart failure is a progressive and often fatal disease process. In general, the pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for progressive myocyte dysfunction and cell loss, cardiac remodeling and arrhythmias involve signaling mechanisms that alter myocardial gene expression. These changes in gene expression are complex and involve contractile proteins, ion channels, Ca++ handling, apoptosis, cell metabolism, the extracellular matrix, signal transduction pathways and growth factors. In the failing heart, several changes occur in cardiac adrenergic receptor-signal transduction pathways. The most striking of these changes occur in beta-adrenergic receptors, and of the changes in beta-adrenergic receptors beta1-receptor down-regulation is the most prominent. Other changes include uncoupling of beta2-adrenergic receptors and increased activity of the inhibitory G-protein. Most of these changes appear to be related to increased activity of the adrenergic nervous system, i.e. increased exposure to norepinephrine. Antagonists of the adrenergic nervous system may improve left ventricular function and outcome in patients with heart failure. This fact supports the notion that activation of these neurohormonal systems exerts a net long-term detrimental effect on the natural history of chronic heart failure and that myocardial adrenergic desensitization phenomena are at least partially maladaptive in the setting of left ventricular dysfunction. In addition to functional alterations structural remodeling plays a major role in the progression of various heart diseases to congestive heart failure. Major contributors to this remodeling process in the heart include alterations in myocyte shape, myocyte number and extracellular matrix. However, it is unclear as to which of these changes is most critical in the development of congestive heart failure, and this may vary by etiology.

Effect of renal denervation on blood pressure in the presence of antihypertensive drugs: 6-month efficacy and safety results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED proof-of-concept randomised trial

BACKGROUND Previous catheter-based renal denervation studies have reported variable efficacy results. We aimed to evaluate safety and blood pressure response after renal denervation or sham control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension on antihypertensive medications with drug adherence testing. METHODS In this international, randomised, single-blind, sham-control, proof-of-concept trial, patients with uncontrolled hypertension (aged 20-80 years) were enrolled at 25 centres in the USA, Germany, Japan, UK, Australia, Austria, and Greece. Eligible patients had an office systolic blood pressure of between 150 mm Hg and 180 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher; a 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure of between 140 mm Hg and 170 mm Hg at second screening; and were on one to three antihypertensive drugs with stable doses for at least 6 weeks. Patients underwent renal angiography and were randomly assigned to undergo renal denervation or sham control. Patients, caregivers, and those assessing blood pressure were masked to randomisation assignments. The primary efficacy endpoint was blood pressure change from baseline (measured at screening visit two), based on ambulatory blood pressure measurements assessed at 6 months, as compared between treatment groups. Drug surveillance was used to assess medication adherence. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety events were assessed through 6 months as per major adverse events. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02439775, and follow-up is ongoing. FINDINGS Between July 22, 2015, and June 14, 2017, 467 patients were screened and enrolled. This analysis presents results for the first 80 patients randomly assigned to renal denervation (n=38) and sham control (n=42). Office and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure decreased significantly from baseline to 6 months in the renal denervation group (mean baseline-adjusted treatment differences in 24 h systolic blood pressure -7·0 mm Hg, 95% CI -12·0 to -2·1; p=0·0059, 24 h diastolic blood pressure -4·3 mm Hg, -7·8 to -0·8; p=0.0174, office systolic blood pressure -6·6 mm Hg, -12·4 to -0·9; p=0·0250, and office diastolic blood pressure -4·2 mm Hg, -7·7 to -0·7; p=0·0190). The change in blood pressure was significantly greater at 6 months in the renal denervation group than the sham-control group for office systolic blood pressure (difference -6·8 mm Hg, 95% CI -12·5 to -1·1; p=0·0205), 24 h systolic blood pressure (difference -7·4 mm Hg, -12·5 to -2·3; p=0·0051), office diastolic blood pressure (difference -3·5 mm Hg, -7·0 to -0·0; p=0·0478), and 24 h diastolic blood pressure (difference -4·1 mm Hg, -7·8 to -0·4; p=0·0292). Evaluation of hourly changes in 24 h systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure showed blood pressure reduction throughout 24 h for the renal denervation group. 3 month blood pressure reductions were not significantly different between groups. Medication adherence was about 60% and varied for individual patients throughout the study. No major adverse events were recorded in either group. INTERPRETATION Renal denervation in the main renal arteries and branches significantly reduced blood pressure compared with sham control with no major safety events. Incomplete medication adherence was common. FUNDING Medtronic.

Improvement in health-related quality of life after renal sympathetic denervation in real-world hypertensive patients: 12-month outcomes in the Global SYMPLICITY Registry

Renal denervation has been shown to reduce blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, but less is known about its impact on quality of life. This analysis evaluated 12‐month blood pressure and quality of life outcomes in 934 patients from the Global SYMPLICITY Registry who completed the EuroQoL five‐dimensions three‐level questionnaire (EQ‐5D‐3L). At baseline, 32% of patients reported anxiety/depression and 48% reported pain/discomfort. At 12 months (n=496), office and 24‐hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure were reduced by 13.9±26.6 and 7.7±19.3 mm Hg, respectively, and 8% (P<.001) more patients reported no problems in anxiety/depression. Furthermore, numerically more patients reported no problems in pain/discomfort (4%, P=.08). Perceived health‐related quality of life (visual analog scale) improved from baseline to 12 months (68±18 vs 73±17, P<.001), and the improvement was largest among patients with severe anxiety/depression at baseline (50±24 vs 64±22, P=.005 [n=32]). In this analysis, renal denervation was associated with a significant improvement in health‐related quality of life, particularly anxiety/depression.

Diagnosis and management of a massive true inferobasal ventricular aneurysm ante perforationem

Jörg Gellissen, MD Universitätsklinik Schleswig Holstein Campus Lübeck Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Ratzeburger Allee 16