Joan W. Mayfield

Gender differences in memory test performance among children and adolescents

Gender differences among children and adolescents were examined on 14 separate measures of short-term memory. A nationally stratified sample of 1,279 children and adolescents, 637 males and 642 females, ranging in age between 5 and 19 years, were assessed on the 14 subtests of the Test of Memory and Learning (TOMAL). Factor structure of the TOMAL was determined to be invariant as a function of gender. Using age-corrected deviation scaled scores calculated at 1-year intervals, results of a one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed only two significant differences in absolute scores across gender on the 14 memory subtests. A profile of normal variations in patterns of memory test performance across gender revealing relative strengths for females on verbal tasks and males on spatial tasks is presented for clinical use and future normative comparisons.

Memory and Attention Profiles in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes heterogeneous patterns of neurocognitive deficits. In an attempt to identify homogenous subgroups within this heterogeneity, cluster analysis was used to examine memory and attention abilities as measured by the Test of Memory and Learning (TOMAL) in 300 children, 150 with TBI and 150 matched nonbrain injured controls (standardization sample [SS]). Significant differences were present between the TBI and the SS groups on all TOMAL subscale and index scores, with the TBI groups performing approximately 1.3 SD below the SS. Factor analysis of the TOMAL indicated six factors that assessed various aspects of verbal and nonverbal learning and memory, as well as attention/concentration. Cluster analyses of TOMAL factor scores indicated that a four-cluster solution was optimal for the SS group, and a five-cluster solution for the TBI group. For the TBI clusters, differences were present for clinical, achievement, neurocognitive, and behavioral variables, providing some support for the validity of the cluster solution. These findings suggest that TBI results in unique patterns of neurocognitive impairment that are not accounted for by individual differences in test performance commonly observed in normal populations. Additionally, neurocognitive profiles identified using cluster analysis may prove useful for identifying homogeneous subgroups of children with TBI that are differentiated by a number of important clinical, cognitive, and behavioral variables associated with treatment and outcomes.

Structure of Attention in Children with Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common cause of disability among children in the United States, and attention deficits are frequently observed in both the acute and chronic phases of injury. The current study investigated models of attention in children with TBI and examined differential sensitivity of various components of these attention models to the severity of the brain injury. Participants included 151 children and adolescents (mean age 12.9 years, SD = 2.6) who had suffered TBI, and 50 normal controls (mean age 12.5 years old, SD = 2.2). All children were administered neuropsychological tests of attention as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery for brain injury (TBI group) or for the purposes of the current investigation (normal controls). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the attention tests indicated that a four-factor model of attention composed of Shift, Focus, Encode, and Sustain factors provided the best fit of the TBI group data. Factor scores were subsequently created and used to predict the severity of brain injury. All four factors were sensitive to TBI in that those with TBI performed significantly worse than the controls, but regression analysis indicated that only the Shift and Focus factors were significant predictors of TBI severity. These findings support the utility of a multicomponent model of attention to understand attention deficits resulting from TBI, and may be useful in determining those aspects of attention that are differentially impacted by TBI, in order to assist in assessment and rehabilitation planning.

Memory functioning in children with traumatic brain injuries: a TOMAL validity study.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) leads the causes of death and disability among children and adolescents. Despite the prevalence of TBI among children, few studies have examined memory in children. The purpose of this study was to compare memory functioning, as measured by the Test of Memory and Learning (TOMAL), of children with and without TBI and with moderate and severe TBI to determine if differences existed. Of the 140 participants, 70 had sustained a head trauma and 70 served as controls. The results indicated that, when the TBI and control group were compared, significant differences were found on all of the TOMAL indexes. With the exception of the verbal delayed recall items, significant differences were demonstrated on all the TOMAL subtests. No differences were identified when moderate and severe groups were compared. These findings further the understanding of memory following pediatric TBI, as well as have implications for interventions with this population.

WISC-IV profiles in children with traumatic brain injury: similarities to and differences from the WISC-III.

The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV; D. Wechsler, 2003a) is often utilized to assess children with traumatic brain injury (TBI), although little information is available regarding its psychometric properties in these children. The current study examined WISC-IV performance in a sample of 61 children with TBI. As compared to the standardization sample, results indicated that the TBI group exhibited relative deficits on all subtest and index scores, with the greatest deficits on the Processing Speed Index (PSI) and Coding subtest scores. However, the Perceptual Reasoning Index score was not uniquely sensitive to brain injury, and the Cognitive Processing Index score was less sensitive to TBI than the PSI score. Also, the PSI did not uniquely predict learning and memory abilities, as had been reported in previous studies of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III; D. Wechsler, 1991). The present findings indicate substantive differences between the WISC-III and WISC-IV profiles of children with TBI.

IQ profiles are associated with differences in behavioral functioning following pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Research suggests that IQ profiles identify subgroups of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) based on sparing and impairment of cognitive abilities, but little information is available regarding whether these subgroups are differentiated on variables that are important for TBI outcome, such as behavioral functioning. The current study examined behavioral disturbances in 123 children with TBI in association with profiles of intellectual abilities identified using cluster analysis. On the basis of prior research, four clusters were hypothesized. Consistent with the hypothesis, cluster analysis identified four IQ clusters in the current sample. Comparisons among the clusters on behavior variables assessed from the Behavioral Assessment System for Children parent ratings indicated significant differences among the four IQ clusters, with the most impaired cluster exhibiting the severest disturbances. Results of the current study indicate that subgroups of children with TBI can be identified using IQ tests and that these subgroups are stable across different samples, and more importantly are moderately associated with behavioral disturbances that persist during the recovery period.

Sensitivity of the comprehensive trail making test to traumatic brain injury in adolescents

The current study examined the sensitivity of the Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT Reynolds) to neurocognitive deficits in adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants included 60 adolescents, 30 who had sustained TBI and 30 healthy controls (HC) that were individually matched to the TBI sample on age, gender, ethnicity, and geographical region. For both the TBI and HC groups the mean age was 15.0 years (S.D.=2.3 years, range=11-19). The TBI group had a mean IQ of 81.7 (S.D.=14.9), had sustained moderate to severe brain injury, and was assessed an average of 21.1 months (S.D.=20.7) following injury. The TBI group performed approximately 2 standard deviations below the control sample mean on each of the five CTMT trails as well as on the composite index and these differences were significant (p<.001). Significant correlations were present between the CTMT trails and clinical variables associated with brain injury severity. Finally, receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated good classification of the TBI and control cases for the CTMT, although some variability in classification accuracy was present among the various trails. Results suggest that the CTMT is sensitive to TBI in adolescents but continued research is needed with larger samples of individuals with TBI and other types of neurological disorders to further establish the present findings.

Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration performance in children with traumatic brain injury and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Evaluation of visuoconstructional abilities is a common part of clinical neuropsychological assessment, and the Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI; K. E. Beery & N. A. Beery, 2004) is often used for this purpose. However, few studies have examined its psychometric properties when used to assess children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), even though these are among the most common acquired and neurodevelopmental forms of brain dysfunction in children. This study examined the validity of VMI scores in 123 children with TBI and 65 with ADHD. The TBI and ADHD groups performed significantly worse than the standardization sample, obtaining VMI mean scores of 87.2 (SD = 13.7) and 93.5 (SD = 11.27). Previous research has noted decrements in visuoconstructional abilities in TBI but relative sparing in ADHD. To examine the criterion validity of VMI scores, the authors therefore compared these 2 groups. As anticipated, the TBI group performed significantly worse than the ADHD group, but receiver operator characteristic analysis indicated that VMI scores were poor at discriminating between groups. Nonetheless, convergent validity evidence supported interpretation of VMI scores as measuring perceptual organization in both groups. In particular, principal components analysis indicated that VMI total scores loaded with perceptual organization tests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 3rd ed. (WISC-III; D. Wechsler, 1997), and its highest correlation was with the WISC-III Perceptual Organization Index. Also, the VMI correlated significantly with the Grooved Pegboard test for the group with TBI. These findings suggest that VMI scores are sensitive to visuoconstructional and motor deficits in children with developmental and acquired brain dysfunction.

Construct and Criterion Validity of the Comprehensive Trail Making Test in Children and Adolescents with Traumatic Brain Injury

The current study examined the construct and criterion validity of the Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT) when used to evaluate children and adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Participants included 100 children and adolescents, 50 who had sustained TBI and 50 normal comparisons (NC). Analyses indicated that the CTMT factor scores were significantly correlated with tests of perceptual organizational ability, processing speed, and motor function and provided support for its construct validity. Additionally, correlations between the various CTMT scores suggested that a different pattern of associations was present in the TBI group compared to the NC group. Finally, the TBI group performed significantly worse (p < .001) on all of the CTMT scores, including each of the five CTMT trails as well as the factor and composite index scores. Results support the construct and criterion validity of the CTMT when used to assess children and adolescents with TBI.

Alternating hemiplegia of childhood: a study of neuropsychological functioning.

Alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC) is a rare chronic neurological disorder characterized by alternating transient attacks of hemiplegia. Evidence from recent studies suggests the disorder is characterized by tonic fits, dystonic posturing, and ocular motor abnormalities. Although widely observed, deficits in cognitive functioning are among one of the least described features of AHC. Most studies describe global deficits, however, no study has provided a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of a child with AHC. This study presents neuropsychological findings from a comprehensive assessment of a single child with AHC. Results showed significant deficits in intellectual, academic, memory, attention, and executive functioning. Additional deficits in language, psychomotor abilities, and psychosocial functioning were noted. Preliminary longitudinal data are also offered to examine the progressive nature of this disorder. Cognitive strengths and weaknesses are discussed at length as well as recommendations for the classroom and future research.