JoAnn V. Pinkerton

Effects of Bazedoxifene/Conjugated Estrogens on the Endometrium and Bone: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE This phase 3 study evaluated the endometrial safety of bazedoxifene (BZA)/conjugated estrogens (CE) and bone mineral density (BMD) effects vs BZA alone, hormone therapy, and placebo (PBO). METHODS The Selective estrogens, Menopause, And Response to Therapy (SMART)-5 trial was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PBO- and active-controlled study in postmenopausal women with an intact uterus (N = 1843; aged 40-65 years) seeking treatment for menopausal symptoms. Subjects received daily oral BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 or 0.625 mg, BZA 20 mg, CE 0.45 mg/medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 1.5 mg, or PBO. Primary endpoints were incidence of endometrial hyperplasia and percent change in lumbar spine BMD at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included additional osteoporosis parameters and assessments of tolerability and safety. RESULTS At 12 months, endometrial hyperplasia incidence was low (<1%) and similar among groups. The BZA/CE group showed significantly greater increases in lumbar spine and total hip BMD vs decreases with PBO (P < .001); the CE/MPA group had increased lumbar spine BMD compared with that in the BZA/CE group. The BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 and 0.625 mg groups had cumulative amenorrhea rates similar to those with PBO and BZA and significantly higher than those with CE 0.45 mg/MPA 1.5 mg (P < .001). The incidence of breast tenderness with BZA/CE was similar to that with PBO and BZA and significantly lower than with that with CE/MPA (P < .01). Although adverse event (AE) rates were similar among the groups, the incidence of serious AEs overall and AE-related discontinuation rates were higher with CE/MPA than with BZA/CE, BZA, or PBO. CONCLUSIONS BZA/CE showed low rates of endometrial hyperplasia and improved lumbar spine and total hip BMD and was generally safe and well tolerated.

Sleep parameters and health-related quality of life with bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens: a randomized trial.

ObjectiveThe effects of bazedoxifene (BZA)/conjugated estrogens (CE) on sleep and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were evaluated in nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women who were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase 3 trial. MethodsThe sleep/HRQoL substudy enrolled 459 women with bothersome moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms who were randomized to BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg, BZA 20 mg, CE 0.45 mg/medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 1.5 mg, or placebo for 1 year. On months 3 and 12, sleep parameters were evaluated using the Medical Outcomes Study sleep scale, and HRQoL was assessed using the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire. ResultsBZA/CE and CE/MPA significantly improved sleep and HRQoL compared with placebo. On month 3, most Medical Outcomes Study sleep parameter improvements with BZA/CE and CE/MPA versus placebo were not significant. On month 12, both BZA/CE doses and CE/MPA significantly improved time to fall asleep and sleep disturbance (P < 0.05 vs placebo); BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg and CE/MPA also showed significant improvements in sleep adequacy and sleep problem indices I and II (P < 0.01 vs placebo). Both BZA/CE doses and CE/MPA significantly improved MENQOL vasomotor function score versus placebo at 3 and 12 months (P < 0.001). At 3 months, total MENQOL score was significantly improved with BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg and CE/MPA versus placebo (P < 0.05); at 12 months, both BZA/CE doses and CE/MPA showed significant improvements (P < 0.001). ConclusionsSymptomatic postmenopausal women who are treated with BZA/CE for 1 year demonstrate significant improvements in sleep and HRQoL, similar to women treated with CE/MPA.

Update on medical and regulatory issues pertaining to compounded and FDA-approved drugs, including hormone therapy.

Objective:We review the historical regulation of drug compounding, concerns about widespread use of non-Food and Drug Admiistration (FDA)-approved compounded bioidentical hormone therapies (CBHTs), which do not have proper labeling and warnings, and anticipated impact of the 2013 Drug Quality and Security Act (DQSA) on compounding. Methods:US government websites were searched for documents concerning drug compounding regulation and oversight from 1938 (passage of Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [FDCA]) through 2014, including chronologies, Congressional testimony, FDA guidelines and enforcements, and reports. The FDCA and DQSA were reviewed. PubMed and Google were searched for articles on compounded drugs, including CBHT. Results:Congress explicitly granted the FDA limited oversight of compounded drugs in a 1997 amendment to the FDCA, but the FDA has encountered obstacles in exercising that authority. After 64 patient deaths and 750 adversely affected patients from the 2012 meningitis outbreak due to contaminated compounded steroid injections, Congress passed the DQSA, authorizing the FDA to create a voluntary registration for facilities that manufacture and distribute sterile compounded drugs in bulk and reinforcing FDCA regulations for traditional compounding. Given history and current environment, concerns remain about CBHT product regulation and their lack of safety and efficacy data. Conclusions:The DQSA and its reinforcement of §503A of the FDCA solidifies FDA authority to enforce FDCA provisions against compounders of CBHT. The new law may improve compliance and accreditation by the compounding industry; support state and FDA oversight; and prevent the distribution of misbranded, adulterated, or inconsistently compounded medications, and false and misleading claims, thus reducing public health risk.

What are the concerns about custom-compounded "bioidentical" hormone therapy?

Unsubstantiated claims, lack of scientific safety and efficacy data, and lack of quality control surround custom-compounded bioidentical hormone products. FDA-approved hormone therapy provides tested and regulated therapy without the risks of unregulated and untested custom preparations.

Compounded non-FDA-approved menopausal hormone therapy prescriptions have increased: results of a pharmacy survey.

Objective:From a survey of compounding pharmacists, specific questions regarding compounded menopausal hormone therapy were used to estimate compounded hormone therapy (CHT) prescribing in the United States. Methods:A national online survey was conducted by Rose Research—a market research company consisting of 12,250 US pharmacists from independent community pharmacies (ICPs) and compounding pharmacies (CPs). Pharmacists who completed the survey and met the prespecified criteria were eligible. Data from the survey were extrapolated to estimate overall CHT prescription volume and annual costs of CHT prescriptions for the United States based upon industry data from the National Community Pharmacists Association and IBISWorld. Results:Surveys were completed by 483 pharmacies, including 365 ICPs and 118 CPs. On the basis of the survey responses and extrapolated industry data, an estimated 26 to 33 million CHT prescriptions were filled annually, with total sales estimated at

Ospemifene's effect on vasomotor symptoms: a post hoc analysis of phase 2 and 3 clinical data.

1.3 to

Timing and persistence of effect of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women.

1.6 billion. CPs (vs ICPs) accounted for a higher proportion of CHT prescriptions. More than half of the ICPs (52%) and CPs (75%) expected continued compounding business growth, with most predicting 5% to 25% growth within 2 years, despite the potential effect of restrictive legislation regarding compounding. Conclusions:On the basis of extrapolated data from numbers of prescriptions reported by pharmacists participating in the survey, the volume of CHT seems to approach that of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved menopausal hormone therapy, and growth in the CHT market is expected. Thus, physicians should educate themselves and the women consulting them about the differences between the FDA-approved and the less-tested CHT formulations. More research on the efficacy, safety, and consistency of non-FDA–approved CHT is needed.

Perspectives on the first randomized sham-controlled trial of stellate ganglion block for hot flashes.

Objective:To examine the effect of ospemifene 60 mg/d on vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women using clinical safety and efficacy data from five phase 2 and 3 studies. Methods:The incidence of hot flush treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was compiled from five randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies; baseline parameters associated with hot flush incidence were also identified. Ospemifenes effects on the frequency and severity of hot flushes were evaluated in a previously unpublished, 6-week, placebo-controlled study. Results:Analysis of pooled hot flush TEAE data for 2,166 women showed an incidence of hot flush of 8.5% for ospemifene and 3.2% for placebo (P < 0.0001). Hot flushes were most frequent during the first 4 weeks of ospemifene treatment and decreased in frequency thereafter. Logistic regression analysis revealed that hormone therapy within 6 months before study start (P = 0.0234), longer study treatment duration (P = 0.0234), and more hot flush days per month at baseline (P = 0.0313) were associated with more hot flushes. Ospemifene 60 mg/d did not worsen the frequency and severity of existing hot flushes in a 6-week, placebo-controlled trial of 198 postmenopausal women who were experiencing moderate to very severe hot flushes. Conclusions:In randomized trials, hot flush TEAEs were more frequent with ospemifene 60 mg/d than with placebo, particularly among women with prior history of hormone therapy use. The majority of hot flushes, however, waned after 4 weeks of ospemifene treatment. Ospemifene did not worsen existing hot flushes in women experiencing moderate to very severe hot flushes.

Conjugated estrogens and bazedoxifene in minority populations: pooled analysis of four phase 3 trials.

Objective:The aim of the study was to determine the time course of effect with conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene (CE/BZA) in nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women in five phase 3 trials. Methods:This post hoc analysis identified when CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg and CE 0.625 mg/BZA 20 mg first achieved a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) versus placebo in individual trials and the duration the difference persisted for prespecified efficacy endpoints. Results:CE/BZA significantly reduced hot flush frequency beginning at weeks 2 to 4 and severity at weeks 3 to 6; benefits were maintained through month 24. Significant improvements in lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter bone mineral density were evident at month 6 or 12 and changes in bone turnover markers at month 3 or 6; benefits were maintained throughout the studies (12 or 24 mo). In symptomatic women with less than 5% vaginal superficial cells at baseline, vaginal maturation index was significantly improved by week 4. Reductions in parabasal cells were maintained throughout the studies (through months 3 and 24), but superficial cell count changes persisted only with the higher CE/BZA dose. Menopause-Specific Quality of Life total and vasomotor domain scores were improved at all assessments, from months 3 through 24. Some measures of sleep, especially quality and time to fall asleep, improved during weeks 4 to 8 and were maintained in a majority of weeks thereafter. Conclusions:In the context of studies designed primarily to evaluate efficacy at final study endpoints, both doses of CE/BZA achieved significance versus placebo at early assessments for most outcomes, and benefits were well maintained.

Hot flush frequency and severity at baseline as predictors of time to transient and stable treatment success: pooled analysis of two Ce/bza studies

S tellate ganglion block (SGB) is being investigated for the relief of hot flashes following earlier reports of improvements in hyperhidrosis (excessive sweating) among women using SGB. In this month’s issue of Menopause, the report by Walega et al is the first known report of a randomized sham-controlled prospective trial in women with postmenopausal hot flashes. Although the study’s sample size is small (40 women), the results are favorable enough to recommend a larger, well-designed, blinded, sham-controlled intervention trial.