Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joanne M. Donovan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joanne M. Donovan.


The American Journal of Medicine | 2001

Efficacy and safety of combination simvastatin and colesevelam in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

Howard H Knapp; Helmut G. Schrott; Patrick T.S. Ma; Robert H. Knopp; Bruce Chin; J. Michael Gaziano; Joanne M. Donovan; Steven K. Burke; Michael Davidson

PURPOSE To examine the efficacy and safety of colesevelam hydrochloride, a novel, nonsystemic, lipid-lowering agent, when coadministered with starting doses of simvastatin in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Subjects with hypercholesterolemia (plasma low density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol level > 160 mg/dL and triglyceride level < or = 300 mg/dL) were randomly assigned to receive daily doses of placebo (n = 33), colesevelam 3.8 g (recommended dose, n = 37), simvastatin 10 mg (n = 35), colesevelam 3.8 g with simvastatin 10 mg (n = 34), colesevelam 2.3 g (low dose, n = 36), simvastatin 20 mg (n = 39), or colesevelam 2.3 g with simvastatin 20 mg (n = 37), for 6 weeks. RESULTS Mean LDL cholesterol levels decreased relative to baseline in the placebo group (P < 0.05) and in all active treatment groups (P < 0.0001). For groups treated with combination therapy, the mean reduction in LDL cholesterol level was 42% (-80 mg/dL; P < 0.0001 compared with baseline), which exceeded the reductions for simvastatin 10 mg (-26%, -48 mg/dL) or 20 mg (-34%, -61 mg/dL) alone, or for colesevelam 2.3 g (-8%, -17 mg/dL) or 3.8 g (-16%, -31 mg/dL) alone (P < 0.001). The effects of combination therapy on serum HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels were similar to those for simvastatin alone. Side effects were similar among treatment groups, and there were no clinically important changes in laboratory parameters. CONCLUSION Coadministration of colesevelam and simvastatin was effective and well tolerated, providing additive reductions in LDL cholesterol levels compared with either agent alone.


Circulation | 2012

Apolipoprotein B Synthesis Inhibition with Mipomersen in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial to Assess Efficacy and Safety as Add-on Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Evan A. Stein; Robert Dufour; Claude Gagné; Daniel Gaudet; Cara East; Joanne M. Donovan; Wai Chin; Diane L. Tribble; Mary McGowan

Background— Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is a common genetic disorder leading to premature coronary artery disease. Despite statins and additional lipid-lowering therapies, many HeFH patients fail to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. We evaluated mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, to further lower LDL-C in HeFH patients with coronary artery disease. Methods and Results— This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial randomized patients with HeFH and coronary artery disease on maximally tolerated statin and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L (≥100 mg/dL) to weekly subcutaneous mipomersen 200 mg or placebo (2:1) for 26 weeks. The primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline at week 28. Safety assessments included adverse events, laboratory tests, and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of hepatic fat. Of 124 randomized patients (41 placebo, 83 mipomersen), 114 (41 placebo, 73 mipomersen) completed treatment. Mean (95% confidence interval) LDL-C decreased significantly with mipomersen (−28.0% [−34.0% to −22.1%] compared with 5.2% [−0.5% to 10.9%] increase with placebo; P <0.001). Mipomersen significantly reduced apolipoprotein B (−26.3%), total cholesterol (−19.4%), and lipoprotein(a) (−21.1%) compared with placebo (all P <0.001). No significant change occurred in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Adverse events included injection site reactions and influenza-like symptoms. Five mipomersen patients (6%) had 2 consecutive alanine aminotransferase values ≥3 times the upper limit of normal at least 7 days apart; none were associated with significant bilirubin increases. Hepatic fat content increased a median of 4.9% with mipomersen versus 0.4% with placebo ( P <0.001). Conclusions— Mipomersen is an effective therapy to further reduce apolipoprotein B–containing lipoproteins, including LDL and lipoprotein(a), in HeFH patients with coronary artery disease on statins and other lipid-lowering therapy. The significance of hepatic fat and transaminase increases remains uncertain at this time. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: . Unique identifier: [NCT00706849][1]. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-34} [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00706849&atom=%2Fcirculationaha%2F126%2F19%2F2283.atomBackground— Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is a common genetic disorder leading to premature coronary artery disease. Despite statins and additional lipid-lowering therapies, many HeFH patients fail to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. We evaluated mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, to further lower LDL-C in HeFH patients with coronary artery disease. Methods and Results— This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial randomized patients with HeFH and coronary artery disease on maximally tolerated statin and LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L (≥100 mg/dL) to weekly subcutaneous mipomersen 200 mg or placebo (2:1) for 26 weeks. The primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline at week 28. Safety assessments included adverse events, laboratory tests, and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of hepatic fat. Of 124 randomized patients (41 placebo, 83 mipomersen), 114 (41 placebo, 73 mipomersen) completed treatment. Mean (95% confidence interval) LDL-C decreased significantly with mipomersen (−28.0% [−34.0% to −22.1%] compared with 5.2% [−0.5% to 10.9%] increase with placebo; P<0.001). Mipomersen significantly reduced apolipoprotein B (−26.3%), total cholesterol (−19.4%), and lipoprotein(a) (−21.1%) compared with placebo (all P<0.001). No significant change occurred in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Adverse events included injection site reactions and influenza-like symptoms. Five mipomersen patients (6%) had 2 consecutive alanine aminotransferase values ≥3 times the upper limit of normal at least 7 days apart; none were associated with significant bilirubin increases. Hepatic fat content increased a median of 4.9% with mipomersen versus 0.4% with placebo (P<0.001). Conclusions— Mipomersen is an effective therapy to further reduce apolipoprotein B–containing lipoproteins, including LDL and lipoprotein(a), in HeFH patients with coronary artery disease on statins and other lipid-lowering therapy. The significance of hepatic fat and transaminase increases remains uncertain at this time. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00706849.


Atherosclerosis | 2001

Coadministration of colesevelam hydrochloride with atorvastatin lowers LDL cholesterol additively.

Donald B. Hunninghake; William Insull; David M Davidson; Joanne M. Donovan; Steven K. Burke

Colesevelam hydrochloride is a novel, potent, non-absorbed lipid-lowering agent previously shown to reduce low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. To examine the efficacy and safety of coadministration of colesevelam and atorvastatin, administration of these agents alone or in combination was examined in a double-blind study of 94 hypercholesterolemic men and women (baseline LDL cholesterol > or =160 mg/dl). After 4 weeks on the American Heart Association Step I diet, patients were randomized among five groups: placebo; colesevelam 3.8 g/day; atorvastatin 10 mg/day; coadminstered colesevelam 3.8 g/day plus atorvastatin 10 mg/day; or atorvastatin 80 mg/day. Fasting lipids were measured at screening, baseline and 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. LDL cholesterol decreased by 12-53% in all active treatment groups (P<0.01). LDL cholesterol reductions with combination therapy (48%) were statistically superior to colesevelam (12%) or low-dose atorvastatin (38%) alone (P<0.01), but similar to those achieved with atorvastatin 80 mg/day (53%). Total cholesterol decreased 6-39% in all active treatment groups (P<0.05). High density lipoprotein cholesterol increased significantly for all groups including placebo (P<0.05). Triglycerides decreased in patients taking atorvastatin alone (P<0.05), but were unaffected by colesevelam alone or in combination. The frequency of side effects did not differ among groups. At recommended starting doses of each agent, coadministration of colesevelam and atorvastatin was well tolerated, efficacious and produced additive LDL cholesterol reductions comparable to those observed with the maximum atorvastatin dose.


European Heart Journal | 2012

Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in high-risk statin-intolerant patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Maartje E. Visser; Gilbert Wagener; Brenda F. Baker; Richard S. Geary; Joanne M. Donovan; Ulrich Beuers; Aart J. Nederveen; Joanne Verheij; Mieke D. Trip; Dick C. Basart; John J. P. Kastelein; Erik S.G. Stroes

Aims A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB) synthesis inhibitor, in patients who are statin intolerant and at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods and results Thirty-three subjects, not receiving statin therapy because of statin intolerance, received a weekly subcutaneous dose of 200 mg mipomersen or placebo (2:1 randomization) for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was per cent change in LDL cholesterol (LDL-c) from the baseline to Week 28. The other efficacy endpoints were per cent change in apoB and lipoprotein a [Lp(a)]. Safety was determined using the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and clinical laboratory evaluations. After 26 weeks of mipomersen administration, LDL-c was reduced by 47 ± 18% (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). apoB and Lp(a) were also significantly reduced by 46 and 27%, respectively (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). Four mipomersen (19%) and two placebo subjects (17%) discontinued dosing prematurely due to AEs. Persistent liver transaminase increases ≥3× the upper limit of normal were observed in seven (33%) subjects assigned to mipomersen. In selected subjects, liver fat content was assessed, during and after treatment, using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Liver fat content in these patients ranged from 0.8 to 47.3%. Liver needle biopsy was performed in two of these subjects, confirming hepatic steatosis with minimal inflammation or fibrosis. Conclusion The present data suggest that mipomersen is a potential therapeutic option in statin-intolerant patients at high risk for CVD. The long-term follow-up of liver safety is required. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00707746


Mayo Clinic Proceedings | 2001

Effectiveness of colesevelam hydrochloride in decreasing LDL cholesterol in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a 24-week randomized controlled trial.

William Insull; Phillip Toth; William S. Mullican; Donald B. Hunninghake; Steven K. Burke; Joanne M. Donovan; Michael Davidson

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of colesevelam hydrochloride, a new nonsystemic lipid-lowering agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in 1998, 494 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia (low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol level > or = 130 mg/dL and < or = 220 mg/dL) were randomized to receive placebo or colesevelam (2.3 g/d, 3.0 g/d, 3.8 g/d, or 4.5 g/d) for 24 weeks. Fasting serum lipid profiles were measured to assess efficacy. Adverse events were monitored, and discontinuation rates and compliance rates were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the mean absolute change of LDL cholesterol from baseline to the end of the 24-week treatment period. RESULTS Colesevelam lowered mean LDL cholesterol levels 9% to 18% in a dose-dependent manner (P<.001), with a median LDL cholesterol reduction of 20% at 4.5 g/d. The reduction in LDL cholesterol levels was maximal after 2 weeks and sustained throughout the study. Mean total cholesterol levels decreased 4% to 10% (P<.001), while median high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased 3% to 4% (P<.001). Median triglyceride levels increased by 5% to 10% in placebo and colesevelam treatment groups relative to baseline (P<.05), but none of these differences were significantly different from placebo. Mean apolipoprotein B levels decreased 6% to 12% in an apparent dose-dependent manner (P<.001). No significant differences occurred in adverse events or discontinuation rates between groups, and compliance rates were between 88% and 92% for all groups. CONCLUSIONS Colesevelam was efficacious, decreasing mean LDL cholesterol levels by up to 18%, and well tolerated without serious adverse events.


Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy | 2000

Drug interactions with colesevelam hydrochloride, a novel, potent lipid-lowering agent

Joanne M. Donovan; Daria Stypinski; Mark Stiles; Timothy A. Olson; Steven K. Burke

Colesevelam hydrochloride (colesevelam) is a novel, potent, bile acid–binding agent that has been shown to lower LDL cholesterol a mean of 19% at a dose of 3.8 g/d. We studied the pharmacokinetics of colesevelam coadministered with six drugs: digoxin and warfarin, agents with narrow therapeutic indices; sustained-release verapamil and metoprolol; quinidine, an antiarrhythmic with a narrow therapeutic index; and valproic acid, an antiseizure medication. Six individual studies were single-dose, crossover, with or without a 4.5-g dose of colesevelam. Plasma levels were determined using validated analytical methods. Values for the ratio of ln[AUC(0-t)] with and without colesevelam were 107% for quinidine, 102% for valproic acid, 89% for digoxin, 102% for warfarin, 82% for verapamil, and 112% for metoprolol. Values for the ratio of ln[Cmax] with and without colesevelam were 107% for quinidine, 92% for valproic acid, 96% for digoxin, 99% for warfarin, 69% for verapamil, and 112% for metoprolol. The 90% confidence intervals for these ratios and for values of ln[AUC(0-inf)] that could be determined were within the 80–125% range, with the exception of verapamil. In this study, verapamil had great interindividual variability, with a 28-fold range in Cmax and an 11-fold range in AUC(0-t). In summary, pharmacokinetic studies with colesevelam did not show clinically significant effects on absorption of six other coadministered drugs.


Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2002

Absorption of Colesevelam Hydrochloride in Healthy Volunteers

Dennis P Heller; Steven K. Burke; David M Davidson; Joanne M. Donovan

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether colesevelam hydrochloride is absorbed in healthy volunteers. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, radiolabeled study was performed with 16 healthy volunteers. Subjects were administered non-radiolabeled colesevelam hydrochloride 1.9 g twice daily for 4 weeks, followed by a single dose of [14C]-colesevelam 2.4 g (480 μCi). These subjects continued to receive non-radioactive colesevelam 1.9 g twice daily for 4 days after administration of the radiolabeled dose. Blood, urine, and feces were collected immediately prior to administration of [14C]-colesevelam and at specified intervals after administration. The whole-blood equivalent concentration of colesevelam was calculated using data collected throughout the 96 hours following radiolabeled drug administration. The proportion of [14C]-colesevelam excreted through urine or feces was calculated based on the amount of radioactivity recovered up to 216 hours after the radiolabeled dose. RESULTS: The mean cumulative total recovery of [14C]-colesevelam in urine and feces was 0.05% and 74%, respectively. Excluding 2 subjects for whom cumulative recovery was <25%, the mean cumulative fecal recovery was 82%. The mean maximum whole-blood equivalent concentration of colesevelam was 0.165 ± 0.10 μg equiv/g 72 hours after administration of [14C]-colesevelam, which was estimated to be 0.04% of the administered dose. All blood samples contained <4 × the number of background counts (dpm). CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative recovery data in urine and feces are consistent with the conclusion that colesevelam is not absorbed and is excreted entirely through the gastrointestinal system.


Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2002

Effect of Colesevelam on Lovastatin Pharmacokinetics

Joanne M. Donovan; James C Kisicki; Mark Stiles; William G Tracewell; Steven K. Burke

OBJECTIVE: To assess potential interactions of colesevelam hydrochloride and lovastatin in healthy volunteers when lovastatin alone was administered with dinner, both lovastatin and colesevelam were administered with dinner, and colesevelam was administered with dinner and lovastatin was administered 4 hours later with a snack. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, 3-period, crossover drug interaction study was performed with 22 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected at specified intervals before and after dosing, and plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin hydroxyacid were measured using a liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy/mass spectroscopy method. RESULTS: Maximal concentration (Cmax), AUC from time 0 to the last time point measured (AUC0-t), and AUC0-∞ values for lovastatin were 102%, 94%, and 104%, and for lovastatin hydroxyacid were 102%, 91%, and 92%, respectively, of control values when colesevelam and lovastatin were coadministered with dinner. Administration of colesevelam with dinner and lovastatin 4 hours later with a snack resulted in a decreased Cmax and AUC0-t for lovastatin (63% and 37%, respectively; p < 0.05) and an increased Cmax and AUC0-t for lovastatin hydroxyacid (61% and 50%, respectively; p < 0.05), both compared with lovastatin alone administered with dinner. CONCLUSIONS: Colesevelam had no significant effect on lovastatin pharmacokinetics when coadministered with lovastatin at dinner. A split-dosing regimen resulted in alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters for lovastatin and lovastatin hydroxyacid that are likely due to known differences in the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin when administered to patients with meals or in a fasting state.


American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs | 2010

A 50-Week Extension Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Colesevelam in Adults with Primary Hypercholesterolemia

Michael Davidson; Joanne M. Donovan; Soamnauth Misir; Michael R. Jones

BackgroundColesevelam is a bile acid sequestrant that differs structurally from traditional bile acid sequestrants, allowing it to bind bile acids with greater affinity. Studies have shown that colesevelam significantly reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and, in some cases, significantly increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia.ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and efficacy of colesevelam in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia.Study DesignThis multicenter, open-label, titration-based extension study enrolled subjects who completed one of three multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II studies with colesevelam. This study consisted of a 4-week washout/dietary stabilization period, a 50-week open-label treatment period, and a 2-week follow-up period.SettingTen clinical centers within the US.SubjectsMales and females 18 years of age or older who had completed a previous short-term (4- or 6-week) phase II clinical study with colesevelam.InterventionAt week 0 (following a 4-week washout of all lipid-lowering medication), subjects initiated treatment with colesevelam at a dosage of 1.5 g/day. Colesevelam was uptitrated to a maximum dosage of 3.75 g/day as necessary to achieve a 15–30% reduction from baseline in LDL-C level. At week 12, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) or niacin (nicotinic acid) could be added if colesevelam 3.75 g/day was not sufficient to result in a 15–30% reduction from baseline in LDL-C level.Main Outcome MeasureThe primary efficacy measure was the change in LDL-C level from baseline to week 50 across all treatment regimens. Secondary efficacy parameters included the change and percent change in total cholesterol, HDL-C, and triglyceride levels from baseline to week 50. There were three cohorts analyzed: (i) colesevelam monotherapy (included all subjects who received colesevelam monotherapy, regardless of dose); (ii) all treatment regimens (included all subjects who received colesevelam monotherapy or colesevelam plus low-dose statin or niacin therapy); and (iii) combination therapy (included only subjects who received colesevelam plus low-dose statin therapy). Two additional cohorts were also evaluated: (iv) maximum-dose colesevelam monotherapy (included only subjects who received colesevelam 3.75 g/day monotherapy); and (v) all maximum-dose colesevelam treatment regimens (included all subjects who received colesevelam 3.75 g/day, either as monotherapy or in combination with low-dose statin or niacin therapy).ResultsIn total, 272 subjects were screened, 260 enrolled, and 186 completed the study. In total, 255 subjects were included in the intent-to-treat population. The maximum dosage of colesevelam (3.75 g/day) was taken by 50% of subjects (n = 94/188) at week 50; only 38 subjects received low-dose statin or niacin by study end. At week 50, LDL-C levels were significantly (p < 0.001) reduced from baseline across all treatment regimens (by 29.6 mg/dL [from 185.8 to 156.2 mg/dL; 15.0%]). Colesevelam also significantly reduced total cholesterol levels and significantly increased HDL-C and triglyceride levels across all treatment regimens (p <0.001 for all). Drug-related adverse events were reported by 36.2% of subjects across all treatment regimens (and by 47.4% of subjects who received colesevelam plus low-dose statin or niacin therapy).ConclusionIn this study, colesevelam was found to be safe and effective for the management of LDL-C levels in adults with primary hypercholesterolemia.


Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | 2005

Preclinical and Clinical Development of Deferitrin, a Novel, Orally Available Iron Chelator

Joanne M. Donovan; Melissa Plone; Rafif Dagher; Mark Bree; Judith Marquis

Abstract: Deferitrin, a novel, orally available iron chelator, is in the early stage of clinical development for the treatment of chronic iron overload due to transfusional therapy. Preclinical pharmacology studies demonstrate iron excretion largely by the fecal route. Initial clinical studies have shown deferitrin to be well absorbed. Further clinical studies are ongoing to determine the efficiency and safety of deferitrin.

Collaboration


Dive into the Joanne M. Donovan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cara East

Baylor University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Gaudet

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert Dufour

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge