Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joaquin Mateo is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joaquin Mateo.


Cell | 2015

Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer

Dan R. Robinson; Eliezer M. Van Allen; Yi Mi Wu; Nikolaus Schultz; Robert J. Lonigro; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Bruce Montgomery; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Colin C. Pritchard; Gerhardt Attard; Himisha Beltran; Wassim Abida; Robert K. Bradley; Jake Vinson; Xuhong Cao; Pankaj Vats; Lakshmi P. Kunju; Maha Hussain; Felix Y. Feng; Scott A. Tomlins; Kathleen A. Cooney; David C. Smith; Christine Brennan; Javed Siddiqui; Rohit Mehra; Yu Chen; Dana E. Rathkopf; Michael J. Morris; Stephen B. Solomon; Jeremy C. Durack

Toward development of a precision medicine framework for metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), we established a multi-institutional clinical sequencing infrastructure to conduct prospective whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing of bone or soft tissue tumor biopsies from a cohort of 150 mCRPC affected individuals. Aberrations of AR, ETS genes, TP53, and PTEN were frequent (40%-60% of cases), with TP53 and AR alterations enriched in mCRPC compared to primary prostate cancer. We identified new genomic alterations in PIK3CA/B, R-spondin, BRAF/RAF1, APC, β-catenin, and ZBTB16/PLZF. Moreover, aberrations of BRCA2, BRCA1, and ATM were observed at substantially higher frequencies (19.3% overall) compared to those in primary prostate cancers. 89% of affected individuals harbored a clinically actionable aberration, including 62.7% with aberrations in AR, 65% in other cancer-related genes, and 8% with actionable pathogenic germline alterations. This cohort study provides clinically actionable information that could impact treatment decisions for these affected individuals.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2015

DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Joaquin Mateo; Suzanne Carreira; Shahneen Sandhu; Susana Miranda; Helen Mossop; Raquel Perez-Lopez; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Dan R. Robinson; Aurelius Omlin; Nina Tunariu; Gunther Boysen; Nuria Porta; Penny Flohr; Alexa Gillman; Ines Figueiredo; Claire Paulding; George Seed; Suneil Jain; Christy Ralph; Andrew Protheroe; Syed A. Hussain; Robert Jones; Tony Elliott; Ursula McGovern; Diletta Bianchini; Jane Goodall; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Chris T. Williamson; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Ruth Riisnaes

BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease, but current treatments are not based on molecular stratification. We hypothesized that metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancers with DNA-repair defects would respond to poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition with olaparib. METHODS We conducted a phase 2 trial in which patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer were treated with olaparib tablets at a dose of 400 mg twice a day. The primary end point was the response rate, defined either as an objective response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, or as a reduction of at least 50% in the prostate-specific antigen level or a confirmed reduction in the circulating tumor-cell count from 5 or more cells per 7.5 ml of blood to less than 5 cells per 7.5 ml. Targeted next-generation sequencing, exome and transcriptome analysis, and digital polymerase-chain-reaction testing were performed on samples from mandated tumor biopsies. RESULTS Overall, 50 patients were enrolled; all had received prior treatment with docetaxel, 49 (98%) had received abiraterone or enzalutamide, and 29 (58%) had received cabazitaxel. Sixteen of 49 patients who could be evaluated had a response (33%; 95% confidence interval, 20 to 48), with 12 patients receiving the study treatment for more than 6 months. Next-generation sequencing identified homozygous deletions, deleterious mutations, or both in DNA-repair genes--including BRCA1/2, ATM, Fanconis anemia genes, and CHEK2--in 16 of 49 patients who could be evaluated (33%). Of these 16 patients, 14 (88%) had a response to olaparib, including all 7 patients with BRCA2 loss (4 with biallelic somatic loss, and 3 with germline mutations) and 4 of 5 with ATM aberrations. The specificity of the biomarker suite was 94%. Anemia (in 10 of the 50 patients [20%]) and fatigue (in 6 [12%]) were the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events, findings that are consistent with previous studies of olaparib. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib in patients whose prostate cancers were no longer responding to standard treatments and who had defects in DNA-repair genes led to a high response rate. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682772; Cancer Research UK number, CRUK/11/029.).


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2016

Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Colin C. Pritchard; Joaquin Mateo; Michael F. Walsh; N. De Sarkar; Wassim Abida; Himisha Beltran; Andrea Garofalo; Roman Gulati; S. Carreira; Rosalind Eeles; Olivier Elemento; Mark A. Rubin; Daniel H. Robinson; Robert J. Lonigro; Maha Hussain; Arul M. Chinnaiyan; Jake Vinson; Julie Filipenko; Levi A. Garraway; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Saud H. Aldubayan; Garam Han; M. Beightol; Colm Morrissey; B. Nghiem; Heather H. Cheng; Bruce Montgomery; Tom Walsh; Silvia Casadei; Michael F. Berger

BACKGROUND Inherited mutations in DNA-repair genes such as BRCA2 are associated with increased risks of lethal prostate cancer. Although the prevalence of germline mutations in DNA-repair genes among men with localized prostate cancer who are unselected for family predisposition is insufficient to warrant routine testing, the frequency of such mutations in patients with metastatic prostate cancer has not been established. METHODS We recruited 692 men with documented metastatic prostate cancer who were unselected for family history of cancer or age at diagnosis. We isolated germline DNA and used multiplex sequencing assays to assess mutations in 20 DNA-repair genes associated with autosomal dominant cancer-predisposition syndromes. RESULTS A total of 84 germline DNA-repair gene mutations that were presumed to be deleterious were identified in 82 men (11.8%); mutations were found in 16 genes, including BRCA2 (37 men [5.3%]), ATM (11 [1.6%]), CHEK2 (10 [1.9% of 534 men with data]), BRCA1 (6 [0.9%]), RAD51D (3 [0.4%]), and PALB2 (3 [0.4%]). Mutation frequencies did not differ according to whether a family history of prostate cancer was present or according to age at diagnosis. Overall, the frequency of germline mutations in DNA-repair genes among men with metastatic prostate cancer significantly exceeded the prevalence of 4.6% among 499 men with localized prostate cancer (P<0.001), including men with high-risk disease, and the prevalence of 2.7% in the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which includes 53,105 persons without a known cancer diagnosis (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In our multicenter study, the incidence of germline mutations in genes mediating DNA-repair processes among men with metastatic prostate cancer was 11.8%, which was significantly higher than the incidence among men with localized prostate cancer. The frequencies of germline mutations in DNA-repair genes among men with metastatic disease did not differ significantly according to age at diagnosis or family history of prostate cancer. (Funded by Stand Up To Cancer and others.).


The Journal of Pathology | 2013

Secondary mutations in BRCA2 associated with clinical resistance to a PARP inhibitor

Louise J. Barber; Shahneen Sandhu; Lina Chen; James Campbell; Iwanka Kozarewa; Kerry Fenwick; Ioannis Assiotis; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Jorge S. Reis-Filho; Victor Moreno; Joaquin Mateo; L. Rhoda Molife; Johann S. de Bono; Stan B. Kaye; Christopher J. Lord; Alan Ashworth

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) for the treatment of BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficient tumours are currently the focus of seminal clinical trials exploiting the concept of synthetic lethality. Although clinical resistance to PARPi has been described, the mechanism underlying this has not been elucidated. Here, we investigate tumour material from patients who had developed resistance to the PARPi olaparib, subsequent to showing an initial clinical response. Massively parallel DNA sequencing of treatment‐naive and post‐olaparib treatment biopsies identified tumour‐specific BRCA2 secondary mutations in olaparib‐resistant metastases. These secondary mutations restored full‐length BRCA2 protein, and most likely cause olaparib resistance by re‐establishing BRCA2 function in the tumour cells. Copyright


Clinical Cancer Research | 2015

Serial Next-Generation Sequencing of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Evaluating Tumor Clone Response To Molecularly Targeted Drug Administration

Jean Sebastien Frenel; Suzanne Carreira; Jane Goodall; Desam Roda; Raquel Perez-Lopez; Nina Tunariu; Ruth Riisnaes; Susana Miranda; Ines Figueiredo; Daniel Nava-Rodrigues; Alan Smith; Christophe Leux; Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Roberta Ferraldeschi; David Lorente; Joaquin Mateo; Michael Ong; Timothy A. Yap; Udai Banerji; Delila Gasi Tandefelt; Nicholas C. Turner; Gerhardt Attard; Johann S. de Bono

Purpose: We evaluated whether next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) could be used for patient selection and as a tumor clone response biomarker in patients with advanced cancers participating in early-phase clinical trials of targeted drugs. Experimental Design: Plasma samples from patients with known tumor mutations who completed at least two courses of investigational targeted therapy were collected monthly, until disease progression. NGS was performed sequentially on the Ion Torrent PGM platform. Results: cfDNA was extracted from 39 patients with various tumor types. Treatments administered targeted mainly the PI3K–AKT–mTOR pathway (n = 28) or MEK (n = 7). Overall, 159 plasma samples were sequenced with a mean sequencing coverage achieved of 1,685X across experiments. At trial initiation (C1D1), 23 of 39 (59%) patients had at least one mutation identified in cfDNA (mean 2, range 1–5). Out of the 44 mutations identified at C1D1, TP53, PIK3CA and KRAS were the top 3 mutated genes identified, with 18 (41%), 9 (20%), 8 (18%) different mutations, respectively. Out of these 23 patients, 13 received a targeted drug matching their tumor profile. For the 23 patients with cfDNA mutation at C1D1, the monitoring of mutation allele frequency (AF) in consecutive plasma samples during treatment with targeted drugs demonstrated potential treatment associated clonal responses. Longitudinal monitoring of cfDNA samples with multiple mutations indicated the presence of separate clones behaving discordantly. Molecular changes at cfDNA mutation level were associated with time to disease progression by RECIST criteria. Conclusions: Targeted NGS of cfDNA has potential clinical utility to monitor the delivery of targeted therapies. Clin Cancer Res; 21(20); 4586–96. ©2015 AACR.


European Urology | 2015

PTEN Protein Loss and Clinical Outcome from Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Abiraterone Acetate

Roberta Ferraldeschi; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Ruth Riisnaes; Susana Miranda; Ines Figueiredo; Pasquale Rescigno; Praful Ravi; Carmel Pezaro; Aurelius Omlin; David Lorente; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Joaquin Mateo; Amelia Altavilla; Spyridon Sideris; Diletta Bianchini; Emily Grist; Khin Thway; Raquel Perez Lopez; Nina Tunariu; Chris Parker; David P. Dearnaley; Alison Reid; Gerhardt Attard; Johann S. de Bono

Background Loss of the tumor suppressor phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) occurs frequently in prostate cancers. Preclinical evidence suggests that activation of PI3K/AKT signaling through loss of PTEN can result in resistance to hormonal treatment in prostate cancer. Objective To explore the antitumor activity of abiraterone acetate (abiraterone) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients with and without loss of PTEN protein expression. Design, setting, and participants We retrospectively identified patients who had received abiraterone and had hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) and/or CRPC tissue available for PTEN immunohistochemical analysis. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary end point was overall survival from initiation of abiraterone treatment. Relationship with outcome was analyzed using multivariate Cox regression and log-rank analyses. Results and limitations A total of 144 patients were identified who had received abiraterone post-docetaxel and had available tumor tissue. Overall, loss of PTEN expression was observed in 40% of patients. Matched HSPC and CRPC tumor biopsies were available for 41 patients. PTEN status in CRPC correlated with HSPC in 86% of cases. Loss of PTEN expression was associated with shorter median overall survival (14 vs 21 mo; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–2.55; p = 0.004) and shorter median duration of abiraterone treatment (24 vs 28 wk; HR: 1.6; 95% CI, 1.12–2.28; p = 0.009). PTEN protein loss, high lactate dehydrogenase, and the presence of visceral metastases were identified as independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Conclusions Our results indicate that loss of PTEN expression was associated with worse survival and shorter time on abiraterone treatment. Further studies in larger and prospective cohorts are warranted. Patient summary PTEN is a protein often lost in prostate cancer cells. In this study we evaluated if prostate cancers that lack this protein respond differently to treatment with abiraterone acetate. We demonstrated that the survival of patients with loss of PTEN is shorter than patients with normal PTEN expression.


Annals of Oncology | 2015

Baseline neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with survival and response to treatment with second-line chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer independent of baseline steroid use

David Lorente; Joaquin Mateo; Arnoud J. Templeton; Zafeiris Zafeiriou; Diletta Bianchini; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Amit Bahl; Liji Shen; Z. Su; Oliver Sartor; J. S. De Bono

BACKGROUND The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), proposed as an indicator of cancer-related inflammation, has known prognostic value in prostate cancer. We examine its association with survival (OS) and response in patients treated with second-line chemotherapy. METHODS We analysed patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated in the TROPIC trial, evaluating cabazitaxel versus mitoxantrone. Cox regression models were used to investigate the association of baseline NLR (BLNLR) with OS and the significance of a change in NLR count with treatment. Logistic regression models were used to determine the association of BLNLR counts with prostate specific antigen (PSA) and RECIST responses. The optimal NLR cut-off was established based on the concordance index of different values. RESULTS Data from 755, 654 and 405 patients was available for OS, PSA and RECIST response analysis respectively. Median OS was 14.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.2-14.8]. Median NLR was 2.9 (IQR: 1.9-5.1). BLNLR was associated with survival (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, P = 0.011) in multivariable analysis (MVA) independently of variables included in the Halabi nomogram, treatment arm and corticosteroid use. The optimal cut-off for a dichotomous NLR was selected at 3.0 based on its higher c-index related to survival. BLNLR ≥3.0 was associated with lower PSA response (40.1% versus 59.9%; P < 0.001) and RECIST response (7.7% versus 15.6%, P = 0.022) in MVA. Conversion from high (≥3) to low (<3) NLR was associated with improved survival (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.51-0.85; P = 0.001) and higher PSA response rates (66.4% versus 33.6%; P = 0.000). Use of corticosteroids at baseline did not modify the association between NLR and survival. CONCLUSIONS NLR is a valid prognostic biomarker in CRPC and is associated with survival, PSA and RECIST responses in patients treated with second-line chemotherapy. Changes in NLR counts with treatment may indicate benefit. NLR prognostic value is independent of prior use of corticosteroids. CLINICALTRIALSGOV NCT00417079.


Lancet Oncology | 2015

Sequencing of agents in castration-resistant prostate cancer

David Lorente; Joaquin Mateo; Raquel Perez-Lopez; Johann S. de Bono; Gerhardt Attard

Until 2010, docetaxel was the only agent with proven survival benefit for castration-resistant prostate cancer. The development of cabazitaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, radium-223, and sipuleucel-T has increased the number of treatment options. Because these agents were developed concurrently within a short period of time, prospective data on their sequential use efficacy are scarce. The challenge now is to reach a consensus on the best way to sequence effective treatments, ideally by the use of an approach specific to patient subgroups. However, the absence of robust surrogates of survival and the lack of predictive biomarkers makes data for the sequential use of these agents difficult to obtain and interpret.


Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology | 2013

Appraising iniparib, the PARP inhibitor that never was—what must we learn?

Joaquin Mateo; Michael Ong; David Sp Tan; Michael A. Gonzalez; Johann S. de Bono

Several drugs targeting poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes are under development. Responses have been observed in patients with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, with further data supporting antitumour activity of PARP inhibitors in sporadic ovarian cancer. Strategies to identify other predictive biomarkers remain under investigation. Iniparib was purported to be a PARP inhibitor that showed promising results in randomized phase II trials in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Negative results from a phase III study in this disease setting, however, tempered enthusiasm for this agent. Recently, data from in vitro experiments suggest that iniparib is not only structurally distinct from other described PARP inhibitors, but is also a poor inhibitor of PARP activity. In this context, the negative iniparib phase III data might have erroneously promulgated the notion that PARP inhibition is not an effective therapeutic strategy. Here, we scrutinize the development of iniparib from preclinical studies to registration trials, and identify and discuss the pitfalls in the development of anticancer drugs to prevent future late-stage trial failures.


European Urology | 2017

DNA Repair in Prostate Cancer: Biology and Clinical Implications

Joaquin Mateo; Gunther Boysen; Christopher E. Barbieri; Helen E. Bryant; Elena Castro; Peter S. Nelson; David Olmos; Colin C. Pritchard; Mark A. Rubin; Johann S. de Bono

CONTEXT For more precise, personalized care in prostate cancer (PC), a new classification based on molecular features relevant for prognostication and treatment stratification is needed. Genomic aberrations in the DNA damage repair pathway are common in PC, particularly in late-stage disease, and may be relevant for treatment stratification. OBJECTIVE To review current knowledge on the prevalence and clinical significance of aberrations in DNA repair genes in PC, particularly in metastatic disease. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search up to July 2016 was conducted, including clinical trials and preclinical basic research studies. Keywords included DNA repair, BRCA, ATM, CRPC, prostate cancer, PARP, platinum, predictive biomarkers, and hereditary cancer. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We review how the DNA repair pathway is relevant to prostate carcinogenesis and progression. Data on how this may be relevant to hereditary cancer and genetic counseling are included, as well as data from clinical trials of PARP inhibitors and platinum therapeutics in PC. CONCLUSIONS Relevant studies have identified genomic defects in DNA repair in PCs in 20-30% of advanced castration-resistant PC cases, a proportion of which are germline aberrations and heritable. Phase 1/2 clinical trial data, and other supporting clinical data, support the development of PARP inhibitors and DNA-damaging agents in this molecularly defined subgroup of PC following success in other cancer types. These studies may be an opportunity to improve patient care with personalized therapeutic strategies. PATIENT SUMMARY Key literature on how genomic defects in the DNA damage repair pathway are relevant for prostate cancer biology and clinical management is reviewed. Potential implications for future changes in patient care are discussed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Joaquin Mateo's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Johann S. de Bono

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Diletta Bianchini

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nina Tunariu

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Zafeiris Zafeiriou

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pasquale Rescigno

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Lorente

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerhardt Attard

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ines Figueiredo

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ruth Riisnaes

Institute of Cancer Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge