Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jochen Krauss is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jochen Krauss.


Trends in Ecology and Evolution | 2009

Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation

Mikko Kuussaari; Riccardo Bommarco; Risto K. Heikkinen; Aveliina Helm; Jochen Krauss; Regina Lindborg; Erik Öckinger; Meelis Pärtel; Joan Pino; Ferran Rodà; Constantí Stefanescu; Tiit Teder; Martin Zobel; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter

Local extinction of species can occur with a substantial delay following habitat loss or degradation. Accumulating evidence suggests that such extinction debts pose a significant but often unrecognized challenge for biodiversity conservation across a wide range of taxa and ecosystems. Species with long generation times and populations near their extinction threshold are most likely to have an extinction debt. However, as long as a species that is predicted to become extinct still persists, there is time for conservation measures such as habitat restoration and landscape management. Standardized long-term monitoring, more high-quality empirical studies on different taxa and ecosystems and further development of analytical methods will help to better quantify extinction debt and protect biodiversity.


Ecology Letters | 2010

Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time‐delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels

Jochen Krauss; Riccardo Bommarco; Moisès Guardiola; Risto K. Heikkinen; Aveliina Helm; Mikko Kuussaari; Regina Lindborg; Erik Öckinger; Meelis Pärtel; Joan Pino; Juha Pöyry; Katja M. Raatikainen; Anu Sang; Constantí Stefanescu; Tiit Teder; Martin Zobel; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter

Intensification or abandonment of agricultural land use has led to a severe decline of semi-natural habitats across Europe. This can cause immediate loss of species but also time-delayed extinctions, known as the extinction debt. In a pan-European study of 147 fragmented grassland remnants, we found differences in the extinction debt of species from different trophic levels. Present-day species richness of long-lived vascular plant specialists was better explained by past than current landscape patterns, indicating an extinction debt. In contrast, short-lived butterfly specialists showed no evidence for an extinction debt at a time scale of c. 40 years. Our results indicate that management strategies maintaining the status quo of fragmented habitats are insufficient, as time-delayed extinctions and associated co-extinctions will lead to further biodiversity loss in the future.


Ecology Letters | 2010

Life-history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: a cross-continental synthesis

Erik Öckinger; Oliver Schweiger; Thomas O. Crist; Diane M. Debinski; Jochen Krauss; Mikko Kuussaari; Jessica D. Petersen; Juha Pöyry; Josef Settele; Keith S. Summerville; Riccardo Bommarco

There is a lack of quantitative syntheses of fragmentation effects across species and biogeographic regions, especially with respect to species life-history traits. We used data from 24 independent studies of butterflies and moths from a wide range of habitats and landscapes in Europe and North America to test whether traits associated with dispersal capacity, niche breadth and reproductive rate modify the effect of habitat fragmentation on species richness. Overall, species richness increased with habitat patch area and connectivity. Life-history traits improved the explanatory power of the statistical models considerably and modified the butterfly species-area relationship. Species with low mobility, a narrow feeding niche and low reproduction were most strongly affected by habitat loss. This demonstrates the importance of considering life-history traits in fragmentation studies and implies that both species richness and composition change in a predictable manner with habitat loss and fragmentation.


Nature | 2016

Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality

Santiago Soliveres; Fons van der Plas; Peter Manning; Daniel Prati; Martin M. Gossner; Swen C. Renner; Fabian Alt; Hartmut Arndt; Vanessa Baumgartner; Julia Binkenstein; Klaus Birkhofer; Stefan Blaser; Nico Blüthgen; Steffen Boch; Stefan Böhm; Carmen Börschig; François Buscot; Tim Diekötter; Johannes Heinze; Norbert Hölzel; Kirsten Jung; Valentin H. Klaus; Till Kleinebecker; Sandra Klemmer; Jochen Krauss; Markus Lange; E. Kathryn Morris; Jörg Müller; Yvonne Oelmann; Jörg Overmann

Many experiments have shown that loss of biodiversity reduces the capacity of ecosystems to provide the multiple services on which humans depend. However, experiments necessarily simplify the complexity of natural ecosystems and will normally control for other important drivers of ecosystem functioning, such as the environment or land use. In addition, existing studies typically focus on the diversity of single trophic groups, neglecting the fact that biodiversity loss occurs across many taxa and that the functional effects of any trophic group may depend on the abundance and diversity of others. Here we report analysis of the relationships between the species richness and abundance of nine trophic groups, including 4,600 above- and below-ground taxa, and 14 ecosystem services and functions and with their simultaneous provision (or multifunctionality) in 150 grasslands. We show that high species richness in multiple trophic groups (multitrophic richness) had stronger positive effects on ecosystem services than richness in any individual trophic group; this includes plant species richness, the most widely used measure of biodiversity. On average, three trophic groups influenced each ecosystem service, with each trophic group influencing at least one service. Multitrophic richness was particularly beneficial for ‘regulating’ and ‘cultural’ services, and for multifunctionality, whereas a change in the total abundance of species or biomass in multiple trophic groups (the multitrophic abundance) positively affected supporting services. Multitrophic richness and abundance drove ecosystem functioning as strongly as abiotic conditions and land-use intensity, extending previous experimental results to real-world ecosystems. Primary producers, herbivorous insects and microbial decomposers seem to be particularly important drivers of ecosystem functioning, as shown by the strong and frequent positive associations of their richness or abundance with multiple ecosystem services. Our results show that multitrophic richness and abundance support ecosystem functioning, and demonstrate that a focus on single groups has led to researchers to greatly underestimate the functional importance of biodiversity.


Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences | 2012

Altitude acts as an environmental filter on phylogenetic composition, traits and diversity in bee communities

Bernhard Hoiss; Jochen Krauss; Simon G. Potts; Stuart Roberts; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter

Knowledge about the phylogeny and ecology of communities along environmental gradients helps to disentangle the role of competition-driven processes and environmental filtering for community assembly. In this study, we evaluated patterns in species richness, phylogenetic structure and life-history traits of bee communities along altitudinal gradients in the Alps, Germany. We found a linear decline in species richness and abundance but increasing phylogenetic clustering in communities with increasing altitude. The proportion of social- and ground-nesting species, as well as mean body size and altitudinal range of bee communities, increased with increasing altitude, whereas the mean geographical distribution decreased. Our results suggest that community assembly at high altitudes is dominated by environmental filtering effects, whereas the relative importance of competition increases at low altitudes. We conclude that inherent phylogenetic and ecological species attributes at high altitudes pose a threat for less competitive alpine specialists with ongoing climate change.


Nature Communications | 2015

Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization

Sagrario Gámez‐Virués; David J. Perović; Martin M. Gossner; Carmen Börschig; Nico Blüthgen; Heike de Jong; Nadja K. Simons; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Jochen Krauss; Gwen Maier; Christoph Scherber; Juliane Steckel; Christoph Rothenwöhrer; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Christiane N. Weiner; Wolfgang W. Weisser; Michael Werner; Teja Tscharntke; Catrin Westphal

Biodiversity loss can affect the viability of ecosystems by decreasing the ability of communities to respond to environmental change and disturbances. Agricultural intensification is a major driver of biodiversity loss and has multiple components operating at different spatial scales: from in-field management intensity to landscape-scale simplification. Here we show that landscape-level effects dominate functional community composition and can even buffer the effects of in-field management intensification on functional homogenization, and that animal communities in real-world managed landscapes show a unified response (across orders and guilds) to both landscape-scale simplification and in-field intensification. Adults and larvae with specialized feeding habits, species with shorter activity periods and relatively small body sizes are selected against in simplified landscapes with intense in-field management. Our results demonstrate that the diversity of land cover types at the landscape scale is critical for maintaining communities, which are functionally diverse, even in landscapes where in-field management intensity is high.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Interannual variation in land-use intensity enhances grassland multidiversity

Eric Allan; Oliver Bossdorf; Carsten F. Dormann; Daniel Prati; Martin M. Gossner; Teja Tscharntke; Nico Blüthgen; Michaela Bellach; Klaus Birkhofer; Steffen Boch; Stefan Böhm; Carmen Börschig; Antonis Chatzinotas; Sabina Christ; Rolf Daniel; Tim Diekötter; Christiane Fischer; Thomas Friedl; Karin Glaser; Christine Hallmann; Ladislav Hodač; Norbert Hölzel; Kirsten Jung; Alexandra-Maria Klein; Valentin H. Klaus; Till Kleinebecker; Jochen Krauss; Markus Lange; E. Kathryn Morris; Jörg Müller

Significance Land-use intensification is a major threat to biodiversity. So far, however, studies on biodiversity impacts of land-use intensity (LUI) have been limited to a single or few groups of organisms and have not considered temporal variation in LUI. Therefore, we examined total ecosystem biodiversity in grasslands varying in LUI with a newly developed index called multidiversity, which integrates the species richness of 49 different organism groups ranging from bacteria to birds. Multidiversity declined strongly with increasing LUI, but changing LUI across years increased multidiversity, particularly of rarer species. We conclude that encouraging farmers to change the intensity of their land use over time could be an important strategy to maintain high biodiversity in grasslands. Although temporal heterogeneity is a well-accepted driver of biodiversity, effects of interannual variation in land-use intensity (LUI) have not been addressed yet. Additionally, responses to land use can differ greatly among different organisms; therefore, overall effects of land-use on total local biodiversity are hardly known. To test for effects of LUI (quantified as the combined intensity of fertilization, grazing, and mowing) and interannual variation in LUI (SD in LUI across time), we introduce a unique measure of whole-ecosystem biodiversity, multidiversity. This synthesizes individual diversity measures across up to 49 taxonomic groups of plants, animals, fungi, and bacteria from 150 grasslands. Multidiversity declined with increasing LUI among grasslands, particularly for rarer species and aboveground organisms, whereas common species and belowground groups were less sensitive. However, a high level of interannual variation in LUI increased overall multidiversity at low LUI and was even more beneficial for rarer species because it slowed the rate at which the multidiversity of rare species declined with increasing LUI. In more intensively managed grasslands, the diversity of rarer species was, on average, 18% of the maximum diversity across all grasslands when LUI was static over time but increased to 31% of the maximum when LUI changed maximally over time. In addition to decreasing overall LUI, we suggest varying LUI across years as a complementary strategy to promote biodiversity conservation.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2007

Habitat specialization, body size, and family identity explain lepidopteran density–area relationships in a cross-continental comparison

Peter A. Hambäck; Keith S. Summerville; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Jochen Krauss; Göran Englund; Thomas O. Crist

Habitat fragmentation may strongly affect species density, species interactions, and the rate of ecosystem processes. It is therefore important to understand the observed variability among species responses to fragmentation and the underlying mechanisms. In this study, we compare density–area relationships (DARs) for 344 lepidopteran species belonging to 22 families (butterflies and moths). This analysis suggested that the DARslope is generally positive for moths and negative for butterflies. The differences are suggested to occur because moths are largely olfactory searchers, whereas most butterflies are visual searchers. The analysis also suggests that DARs vary as a function of habitat specialization and body size. In butterflies, generalist species had a more negative DARslope than specialist species because of a lower patch size threshold. In moths, the differences in DARslope between forest and open habitat species were large for small species but absent for large species. This difference is argued to occur because the DARslope in large species mainly reflects their search mode, which does not necessarily vary between moth groups, whereas the slope in small species reflects population growth rates.


PLOS ONE | 2011

Decreased Functional Diversity and Biological Pest Control in Conventional Compared to Organic Crop Fields

Jochen Krauss; Iris Gallenberger; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter

Organic farming is one of the most successful agri-environmental schemes, as humans benefit from high quality food, farmers from higher prices for their products and it often successfully protects biodiversity. However there is little knowledge if organic farming also increases ecosystem services like pest control. We assessed 30 triticale fields (15 organic vs. 15 conventional) and recorded vascular plants, pollinators, aphids and their predators. Further, five conventional fields which were treated with insecticides were compared with 10 non-treated conventional fields. Organic fields had five times higher plant species richness and about twenty times higher pollinator species richness compared to conventional fields. Abundance of pollinators was even more than one-hundred times higher on organic fields. In contrast, the abundance of cereal aphids was five times lower in organic fields, while predator abundances were three times higher and predator-prey ratios twenty times higher in organic fields, indicating a significantly higher potential for biological pest control in organic fields. Insecticide treatment in conventional fields had only a short-term effect on aphid densities while later in the season aphid abundances were even higher and predator abundances lower in treated compared to untreated conventional fields. Our data indicate that insecticide treatment kept aphid predators at low abundances throughout the season, thereby significantly reducing top-down control of aphid populations. Plant and pollinator species richness as well as predator abundances and predator-prey ratios were higher at field edges compared to field centres, highlighting the importance of field edges for ecosystem services. In conclusion organic farming increases biodiversity, including important functional groups like plants, pollinators and predators which enhance natural pest control. Preventative insecticide application in conventional fields has only short-term effects on aphid densities but long-term negative effects on biological pest control. Therefore conventional farmers should restrict insecticide applications to situations where thresholds for pest densities are reached.


Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences | 2006

Fungal plant endosymbionts alter life history and reproductive success of aphid predators

Claudio de Sassi; Christine B. Müller; Jochen Krauss

Endosymbionts occur in most plant species and may affect interactions among herbivores and their predators through the production of toxic alkaloids. Here, we ask whether effects of mycotoxins produced by the symbiosis of the fungal endophyte Neotyphodium lolii and the grass Lolium perenne are transmitted to the aphidophagous ladybird Coccinella septempunctata when feeding on cereal aphids Rhopalosiphum padi on infected plants. The larval development of coccinellids was extended, while their survival was reduced when feeding exclusively on aphids from infected plants. Ladybirds developing on aphids from infected plants showed reduced fecundity and impaired reproductive performance. Body size and symmetries of ladybird adults were not affected by the endophytes. Consistently strong, negative effects of endophytes on the lifetime performance of ladybirds indicates that mycotoxins are transmitted along food chains, causing significant damage for top predators. Such cascading effects will influence the population dynamics of aphid predators in the long term and could feedback to the primary plant producers.

Collaboration


Dive into the Jochen Krauss's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Riccardo Bommarco

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge