Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Jody L. Davis is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Jody L. Davis.


AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference | 2010

Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis: Exploration Class Simulation Overview and Results

Alicia M. DwyerCianciolo; Jody L. Davis; Jeremy D. Shidner; Richard W. Powell

NASA senior management commissioned the Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis (EDL-SA) Study in 2008 to identify and roadmap the Entry, Descent and Landing (EDL) technology investments that the agency needed to make in order to successfully land large payloads at Mars for both robotic and exploration or human-scale missions. The year one exploration class mission activity considered technologies capable of delivering a 40-mt payload. This paper provides an overview of the exploration class mission study, including technologies considered, models developed and initial simulation results from the EDL-SA year one effort.


AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference | 2010

Guidance and Control Algorithms for the Mars Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis

Jody L. Davis; Alicia M. CwyerCianciolo; Richard W. Powell; Jeremy D. Shidner; Eduardo Garcia-Llama

The purpose of the Mars Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis (EDL-SA) study was to identify feasible technologies that will enable human exploration of Mars, specifically to deliver large payloads to the Martian surface. This paper focuses on the methods used to guide and control two of the contending technologies, a mid- lift-to-drag (L/D) rigid aeroshell and a hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator (HIAD), through the entry portion of the trajectory. The Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories II (POST2) is used to simulate and analyze the trajectories of the contending technologies and guidance and control algorithms. Three guidance algorithms are discussed in this paper: EDL theoretical guidance, Numerical Predictor-Corrector (NPC) guidance and Analytical Predictor-Corrector (APC) guidance. EDL-SA also considered two forms of control: bank angle control, similar to that used by Apollo and the Space Shuttle, and a center-of-gravity (CG) offset control. This paper presents the performance comparison of these guidance algorithms and summarizes the results as they impact the technology recommendations for future study.


AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems (ADS) Conference | 2013

Parachute Models Used in the Mars Science Laboratory Entry, Descent, and Landing Simulation

Juan R. Cruz; David W. Way; Jeremy D. Shidner; Jody L. Davis; Richard W. Powell; Devin M. Kipp; Douglas S. Adams; Al Witkowski; Mike Kandis

An end-to-end simulation of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) entry, descent, and landing (EDL) sequence was created at the NASA Langley Research Center using the Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories II (POST2). This simulation is capable of providing numerous MSL system and flight software responses, including Monte Carlo-derived statistics of these responses. The MSL POST2 simulation includes models of EDL system elements, including those related to the parachute system. Among these there are models for the parachute geometry, mass properties, deployment, inflation, opening force, area oscillations, aerodynamic coefficients, apparent mass, interaction with the main landing engines, and off-loading. These models were kept as simple as possible, considering the overall objectives of the simulation. The main purpose of this paper is to describe these parachute system models to the extent necessary to understand how they work and some of their limitations. A list of lessons learned during the development of the models and simulation is provided. Future improvements to the parachute system models are proposed.


AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems (ADS) Conference | 2013

Reconstruction of the Mars Science Laboratory Parachute Performance and Comparison to the Descent Simulation

Juan R. Cruz; David W. Way; Jeremy D. Shidner; Jody L. Davis; Douglas S. Adams; Devin M. Kipp

The Mars Science Laboratory used a single mortar-deployed disk-gap-band parachute of 21.35 m nominal diameter to assist in the landing of the Curiosity rover on the surface of Mars. The parachute system s performance on Mars has been reconstructed using data from the on-board inertial measurement unit, atmospheric models, and terrestrial measurements of the parachute system. In addition, the parachute performance results were compared against the end-to-end entry, descent, and landing (EDL) simulation created to design, develop, and operate the EDL system. Mortar performance was nominal. The time from mortar fire to suspension lines stretch (deployment) was 1.135 s, and the time from suspension lines stretch to first peak force (inflation) was 0.635 s. These times were slightly shorter than those used in the simulation. The reconstructed aerodynamic portion of the first peak force was 153.8 kN; the median value for this parameter from an 8,000-trial Monte Carlo simulation yielded a value of 175.4 kN - 14% higher than the reconstructed value. Aeroshell dynamics during the parachute phase of EDL were evaluated by examining the aeroshell rotation rate and rotational acceleration. The peak values of these parameters were 69.4 deg/s and 625 deg/sq s, respectively, which were well within the acceptable range. The EDL simulation was successful in predicting the aeroshell dynamics within reasonable bounds. The average total parachute force coefficient for Mach numbers below 0.6 was 0.624, which is close to the pre-flight model nominal drag coefficient of 0.615.


AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference | 2010

Large Mass, Entry, Descent and Landing Sensitivity Results for Environmental, Performance, and Design Parameters

Jeremy D. Shidner; Jody L. Davis; Alicia Dwyer Cianciolo; Jamshid A. Samareh; Richard W. Powell

Landing on Mars has been a challenging task. Past NASA missions have shown resilience to increases in spacecraft mass by scaling back requirements such as landing site altitude, landing site location and arrival time. Knowledge of the partials relating requirements to mass is critical for mission designers to understand so that the project can retain margin throughout the process. Looking forward to new missions that will land 1.5 metric tons or greater, the current level of technology is insufficient, and new technologies will need to be developed. Understanding the sensitivity of these new technologies to requirements is the purpose of this paper.


34th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference | 2016

Aerodynamic Models for the Low Density Supersonic Decelerator (LDSD) Test Vehicles

John W. Van Norman; Artem A. Dyakonov; Mark Schoenenberger; Jody L. Davis; Suman Muppidi; Chun Y. Tang; Deepak Bose; Brandon Mobley; Ian G. Clark

An overview of aerodynamic models for the Low Density Supersonic Decelerator (LDSD) Supersonic Flight Dynamics Test (SFDT) campaign test vehicle is presented, with comparisons to reconstructed flight data and discussion of model updates. The SFDT campaign objective is to test Supersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (SIAD) and large supersonic parachute technologies at high altitude Earth conditions relevant to entry, descent, and landing (EDL) at Mars. Nominal SIAD test conditions are attained by lifting a test vehicle (TV) to 36 km altitude with a helium balloon, then accelerating the TV to Mach 4 and 53 km altitude with a solid rocket motor. Test flights conducted in June of 2014 (SFDT-1) and 2015 (SFDT-2) each successfully delivered a 6 meter diameter decelerator (SIAD-R) to test conditions and several seconds of flight, and were successful in demonstrating the SFDT flight system concept and SIAD-R technology. Aerodynamic models and uncertainties developed for the SFDT campaign are presented, including the methods used to generate them and their implementation within an aerodynamic database (ADB) routine for flight simulations. Pre- and post-flight aerodynamic models are compared against reconstructed flight data and model changes based upon knowledge gained from the flights are discussed. The pre-flight powered phase model is shown to have a significant contribution to off-nominal SFDT trajectory lofting, while coast and SIAD phase models behaved much as predicted.


Archive | 2010

Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis Study: Phase 1 Report

Alicia M. Dwyer-Cianciolo; Jody L. Davis; David R. Komar; Michelle M. Munk; Jamshid A. Samareh; Richard W. Powell; Jeremy D. Shidner; Douglas O. Stanley; Alan Wilhite; David J. Kinney; M. Kathleen McGuire; James O. Arnold; Austin R. Howard; Ronald R. Sostaric; Joseph W. Studak; Carlie H. Zumwalt; Eduardo G. Llama; Jordi Casoliva; Mark C. Ivanov; Ian G. Clark; Anita Sengupta


Archive | 2013

Assessment of the Mars Science Laboratory Entry, Descent, and Landing Simulation

David W. Way; Jody L. Davis; Jeremy D. Shidner


Archive | 2011

Entry, Descent and Landing Systems Analysis Study: Phase 2 Report on Exploration Feed-Forward Systems

Alicia M. Dwyer Ciancolo; Jody L. Davis; Walter C. Engelund; David R. Komar; Eric M. Queen; Jamshid A. Samareh; David W. Way; Thomas A. Zang; Jeff G. Murch; Shawn A. Krizan; Aaron D. Olds; Richard W. Powell; Jeremy D. Shidner; Daivd J. Kinney; M. Kathleen McGuire; James O. Arnold; M. Alan Covington; Ronald R. Sostaric; Carlie H. Zumwalt; Eduardo G. Llama


Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets | 2014

Reconstruction of the Mars Science Laboratory Parachute Performance

Juan R. Cruz; David W. Way; Jeremy D. Shidner; Jody L. Davis; Douglas S. Adams; Devin M. Kipp

Collaboration


Dive into the Jody L. Davis's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David W. Way

Langley Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Devin M. Kipp

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Juan R. Cruz

Langley Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark C. Ivanov

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Artem A. Dyakonov

National Institute of Aerospace

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge