Jody M. Shoemaker

Amphetamine Effects on Prepulse Inhibition Across-Species: Replication and Parametric Extension

Despite the similarities of prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex and its apparent neural regulation in rodents and humans, it has been difficult to demonstrate cross-species homology in the sensitivity of PPI to pharmacologic challenges. PPI is disrupted in rats by the indirect dopamine (DA) agonist amphetamine, and while studies in humans have suggested similar effects of amphetamine, these effects have been limited to populations characterized by smoking status and specific personality features. In the context of a study assessing the time course of several DA agonist effects on physiological variables, we failed to detect PPI-disruptive effects of amphetamine in a small group of normal males. The present study was designed to reexamine this issue, using a larger sample and a paradigm that should be more sensitive for detecting drug effects. PPI in rats was shown to be disrupted by the highest dose of amphetamine (3.0 mg/kg) at relatively longer prepulse intervals (>30 ms). In humans, between-subject comparisons of placebo (n=15) vs 20 mg amphetamine (n=15) failed to detect significant PPI-disruptive effects of amphetamine, but significant PPI-disruptive effects at short (10–20 ms) prepulse intervals were detected using within-subject analyses of postdrug PPI levels relative to each subjects baseline PPI. Post hoc comparisons failed to detect greater sensitivity to amphetamine among subjects characterized by different personality and physiological traits. Bioactivity of amphetamine was verified by autonomic and subjective changes. These results provide modest support for cross-species homology in the PPI-disruptive effects of amphetamine, but suggest that these effects in humans at the present dose are subtle and may be best detected using within-subject designs and specific stimulus characteristics.

The MCIC collection: a shared repository of multi-modal, multi-site brain image data from a clinical investigation of schizophrenia.

Expertly collected, well-curated data sets consisting of comprehensive clinical characterization and raw structural, functional and diffusion-weighted DICOM images in schizophrenia patients and sex and age-matched controls are now accessible to the scientific community through an on-line data repository (coins.mrn.org). The Mental Illness and Neuroscience Discovery Institute, now the Mind Research Network (MRN, http://www.mrn.org/), comprised of investigators at the University of New Mexico, the University of Minnesota, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the University of Iowa, conducted a cross-sectional study to identify quantitative neuroimaging biomarkers of schizophrenia. Data acquisition across multiple sites permitted the integration and cross-validation of clinical, cognitive, morphometric, and functional neuroimaging results gathered from unique samples of schizophrenia patients and controls using a common protocol across sites. Particular effort was made to recruit patients early in the course of their illness, at the onset of their symptoms. There is a relatively even sampling of illness duration in chronic patients. This data repository will be useful to 1) scientists who can study schizophrenia by further analysis of this cohort and/or by pooling with other data; 2) computer scientists and software algorithm developers for testing and validating novel registration, segmentation, and other analysis software; and 3) educators in the fields of neuroimaging, medical image analysis and medical imaging informatics who need exemplar data sets for courses and workshops. Sharing provides the opportunity for independent replication of already published results from this data set and novel exploration. This manuscript describes the inclusion/exclusion criteria, imaging parameters and other information that will assist those wishing to use this data repository.

Antipsychotic Effects on Prepulse Inhibition in Normal ‘Low Gating’ Humans and Rats

Development of new antipsychotics and their novel applications may be facilitated through the use of physiological markers in clinically normal individuals. Both genetic and neurochemical evidence suggests that reduced prepulse inhibition of startle (PPI) may be a physiological marker for individuals at-risk for schizophrenia, and the ability of antipsychotics to normalize PPI may reflect properties linked to their clinical efficacy. We assessed the effects of the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine (12.5 mg po) on PPI in 20 normal men with a ‘low PPI’ trait, based on PPI levels in the lowest 25% of a normal PPI distribution. The effects of quetiapine (7.5 mg/kg s.c.) on PPI were then assessed in rats with phenotypes of high PPI (Sprague Dawley (SD)) and low PPI (Brown Norway (BN)); effects of clozapine (7.5 mg/kg i.p.) and haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) on PPI were also tested in SD rats. At a time of maximal psychoactivity, quetiapine significantly enhanced PPI to short prepulse intervals (20–30 ms) in ‘low gating’ human subjects. Quetiapine increased PPI in low gating BN rats for prepulse intervals <120 ms; this effect of quetiapine was limited to 20 ms prepulse intervals in SD rats, who also exhibited this pattern in response to clozapine but not haloperidol. In both humans and rats, normal ‘low gating’ appears to be an atypical antipsychotic-sensitive phenotype. PPI at short intervals may be most sensitive to pro-gating effects of these drugs.

Convergence and Divergence in the Neurochemical Regulation of Prepulse Inhibition of Startle and N40 Suppression in Rats

Prepulse inhibition of startle (‘PPI’), a cross-species measure of sensorimotor gating, is impaired in schizophrenia patients. Suppression of P50 event-related potentials (ERPs) in response to the second of two clicks (‘P50 gating’) is also impaired in schizophrenia. Suppression of N40 ERPs to the second of two clicks (‘N40 gating’) is thought by some to be a rat homolog of human P50 gating. Emerging evidence suggests differences in the neurobiology of deficits detected by PPI vs P50 (or N40) gating. We recorded PPI and N40 gating contemporaneously in rats, to assess convergence and divergence in the neurochemical regulation of these measures. Dose–response studies examined the effects of apomorphine (APO), phencyclidine (PCP) or the 5HT2A agonist DOI on PPI, and on motor responses to stimuli (S1 and S2) that elicit N40 gating. Effects of optimal drug doses on PPI and N40 gating were then assessed in other rats with implanted cortical surface electrodes. APO, PCP and DOI caused dose-dependent disruptions of both PPI and gating of motor responses to N40 stimuli. Reduced PPI reflected diminished prepulse effectiveness, demonstrated by increased startle levels on prepulse+pulse trials. In contrast, reduced gating of motor responses to N40 stimuli reflected a reduced motor response to S1. In separate rats, robust PPI, N40 potentials and N40 gating could be detected within one test. PPI and N40 gating were disrupted by APO, PCP, and DOI. Again, drug effects on PPI reflected increased startle on prepulse+pulse trials, while those on N40 gating reflected reduced ERP responses to S1. In conslusion, when PPI and N40 gating were studied concurrently in rats, drug effects on PPI reflected reduced inhibition of startle by the prepulse, while diminished N40 gating reflected S1 response suppression. Despite similarities in drug sensitivity, these results suggest that distinct neurobiological mechanisms underlie drug-induced deficits in PPI and N40 gating.

Separable noradrenergic and dopaminergic regulation of prepulse inhibition in rats : implications for predictive validity and Tourette Syndrome

IntroductionStartle inhibition by lead stimuli (prepulse inhibition, “PPI”), and the disruption of this process by dopamine agonists and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, are used in predictive models for antipsychotic development. PPI is also disrupted by the norepinephrine α-1 agonist, cirazoline, and the PPI-disruptive effects of the indirect dopamine agonist amphetamine are opposed by the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, desipramine. The hypothesis that PPI may be regulated by norepinephrine, or by interactions between dopamine and norepinephrine substrates, was tested in a series of experiments with the α-2 agonist, clonidine, which is used clinically to treat Tourette Syndrome (TS).Materials and methodsPPI was measured in male Sprague–Dawley rats after pretreatment with clonidine or the D2 antagonist haloperidol, and treatment with cirazoline, amphetamine, the D1/D2 agonist apomorphine, or the NMDA antagonist, phencyclidine.ResultsPPI was disrupted by cirazoline; this effect was prevented by clonidine but not haloperidol. PPI was disrupted by apomorphine; this effect was prevented by haloperidol but not clonidine. Clonidine also failed to oppose the PPI-disruptive effects of amphetamine and augmented the PPI-disruptive effects of phencyclidine. Over a range of prepulse intervals, clonidine enhanced PPI at short intervals and opposed the PPI-disruptive effects of cirazoline at long intervals.ConclusionsPPI is regulated by both norepinephrine and dopamine substrates that are neurochemically separable. The PPI-protective effects of clonidine suggest that the noradrenergic regulation of PPI may have utility for predicting therapeutic benefit in TS for drugs other than antipsychotics. Clonidine’s failure to prevent the PPI-disruptive effects of apomorphine or phencyclidine further support the specificity of these PPI models for detecting drugs with antipsychotic properties.

Sensitivity to drug effects on prepulse inhibition in inbred and outbred rat strains

Genetic differences in the neurochemical regulation of PPI in rats may help clarify the neural basis of inherited PPI differences in neuropsychiatric disorders. We reported and characterized substantial heritable differences in sensitivity to PPI-disruptive effects of DA agonists in outbred Sprague Dawley (SDH) versus Long-Evans (LEH) rats. Other strains might yield large group separations and facilitate studies of the neural basis for these strain differences; inbred strains might also allow us to map genes associated with differential PPI sensitivity. Sensitivity to the PPI-disruptive effects of the DA agonist apomorphine (APO) and the NMDA antagonist phencyclidine (PCP) were compared across inbred and outbred strains. APO sensitivity was greatest in SDH and buffalo rats, but the effect in buffalo rats was complicated by significant APO-induced startle suppression. PPI APO sensitivity was least in ACI and LEH rats; F344s exhibited intermediate sensitivity and Lewis rats showed a nonlinear dose response (sensitivity at low but not higher doses). PPI APO insensitivity in ACI rats developed over time, with ACI pups exhibiting robust sensitivity. Substantial strain differences were observed in short-interval (10-30 ms) prepulse effects, and APO-induced increases in short-interval PPI occurred in SDH, LEH, and Lewis rats, but not in F344, ACI, or buffalo rats. Sensitivity to PPI-disruptive effects of PCP was generally greater in outbred than inbred rats. These findings identify strains suitable for comparisons of PPI neural circuitry and others for whom such comparisons would be complex and perhaps less informative.

Prefrontal D1 and ventral hippocampal N-methyl-D-aspartate regulation of startle gating in rats.

BACKGROUND Sensorimotor gating, as measured by prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex, is deficient in schizophrenia patients, and in rats after specific manipulations of limbic cortico-striato-pallido-thalamic circuitry. For example, prepulse inhibition in rats is disrupted after D1 blockade in the medial prefrontal cortex, and after N-methyl-D-aspartate infusion into the ventral hippocampus. In the present study, we examined whether these two substrates form part of an integrated circuit regulating sensorimotor gating, which might contribute to the loss of prepulse inhibition in patient populations. METHODS Prepulse inhibition was assessed in male Sprague-Dawley rats after systemic or intra-medial prefrontal cortex administration of the D1 antagonist, SCH 23390. Separate rats received intra-medial prefrontal cortex infusion of the retrograde transported label Fluoro-Gold. In rats with sham or electrolytic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex, prepulse inhibition was tested after infusion of N-methyl-D-aspartate or vehicle into ventral hippocampus regions that were determined to send projections to the medial prefrontal cortex. RESULTS Prepulse inhibition was disrupted after systemic SCH 23390 treatment and after infusion of SCH 23390 into medial prefrontal cortex sites within the prelimbic and cingulate cortices. Fluoro-Gold infusion into these medial prefrontal cortex sites labeled cells in the ventral hippocampus complex, including regions CA1 and entorhinal cortex. N-methyl-D-aspartate infusions into these ventral hippocampus regions disrupted prepulse inhibition in rats after sham but not electrolytic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex. CONCLUSIONS Prepulse inhibition appears to be regulated by interacting substrates within the ventral hippocampus and MPFC. Specifically, NMDA activation of the ventral hippocampus appears to disrupt prepulse inhibition in a manner that is dependent on the integrity of infralimbic or cingulate cortical regions that also support a D1-mediated regulation of prepulse inhibition. Conceivably, dysfunction within these hippocampal-frontal circuits may contribute to sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia.

Strain differences in the gating-disruptive effects of apomorphine: relationship to gene expression in nucleus accumbens signaling pathways.

BACKGROUND Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle is a measure of sensorimotor gating that is deficient in certain psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia. Sprague Dawley (SD) rats are more sensitive to PPI-disruptive effects of apomorphine (APO) at long interstimulus intervals (ISIs) (60-120 msec) and less sensitive to PPI-enhancing effects of APO at short ISIs (10-30 msec) compared with Long Evans (LE) rats. METHODS Prepulse inhibition was tested in SD and LE rats after APO (.5 mg/kg) or vehicle in a within- subject design and sacrificed 14 days later. Total RNA was extracted from the nucleus accumbens (NAC). Approximately 700 dopamine-relevant transcripts on the Affymetrix 230 2.0 microarray were analyzed. RESULTS As previously reported, SD rats exhibited greater APO-induced PPI deficits at long intervals and less APO-induced PPI enhancement at short intervals compared with LE rats. One hundred four genes exhibited significantly different NAC expression levels in these two strains. Pathway analysis revealed that many of these genes contribute to dopamine receptor signaling, synaptic long-term potentiation, or inositol phosphate metabolism. The expression of some genes significantly correlated with measures of APO-induced PPI sensitivity in either SD or LE rats. The expression of select genes was validated by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). CONCLUSIONS Differences in PPI APO sensitivity in SD versus LE rats are robust and reproducible and may be related to strain differences in the expression of genes that regulate signal transduction in the NAC. These genes could facilitate the identification of targets for ameliorating heritable gating deficits in brain disorders such as schizophrenia.

Heritable differences in the dopaminergic regulation of sensorimotor gating. I. Apomorphine effects on startle gating in albino and hooded outbred rat strains and their F1 and N2 progeny.

Sensorimotor gating, measured by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex, is reduced in schizophrenia patients and in rats treated with dopamine (DA) agonists. Strain and substrain differences in the sensitivity to the PPI-disruptive effects of DA agonists may provide insight into the basis for human population differences in sensorimotor gating. We have reported greater sensitivity to the PPI disruptive effects of the D1/D2 agonist apomorphine in Harlan Sprague-Dawley (SDH) versus Long Evans (LEH) rats. In the present study, we assessed the generational pattern of this phenotypic difference across parental SDH and LEH strains under in- and cross-fostering conditions, offspring (F1) of an SDH×LEH cross, and subsequent offspring (N2) of an SDH×F1 cross. Apomorphine sensitivity followed a gradient across generations that suggested relatively simple additive effects of multiple genes. Cross fostering studies confirmed that SDH>LEH apomorphine sensitivity did not reflect post-natal maternal influences. Generational patterns of PPI apomorphine sensitivity were not associated with albino versus hooded phenotypes per se, but apomorphine sensitivity in hooded N2 rats was strongly related to body surface area of fur pigmentation. The association between pigmentation and PPI apomorphine sensitivity may provide an important clue to specific biochemical and genetic substrates responsible for population differences in the regulation of sensorimotor gating.

Neurochemical analysis of rat strain differences in the startle gating-disruptive effects of dopamine agonists.

The disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI) in rats by dopamine (DA) agonists is used to study the neural basis of strain differences in dopaminergic function. We reported that, compared to Long-Evans (LEH) rats, Sprague-Dawley (SDH) rats are more sensitive to the PPI-disruptive effects of the direct D1/D2 agonist apomorphine (APO) and the indirect DA agonist d-amphetamine (AMPH). This strain difference is heritable, with PPI drug sensitivity following a generational pattern (SDH>N2>F1>LEH) suggestive of additive effects of multiple genes. Here, we assessed the neurochemical bases for these heritable strain differences by measuring tissue levels of dopamine, serotonin (5HT) and their respective metabolites in several forebrain regions after vehicle, APO or AMPH administration. SDH rats were more sensitive than LEH rats to the PPI-disruptive effects of both APO (0.5 mg/kg) and AMPH (4.5 mg/kg). Several significant SDH vs. LEH strain differences in regional neurochemical levels were detected, as were drug effects on these chemicals. However, SDH, LEH and F1 rats did not exhibit differential drug sensitivity in any neurochemical indices measures. These findings suggest that inherited differences in the dopaminergic regulation of sensorimotor gating do not likely reflect differences in presynaptic forebrain dopaminergic or serotonergic processes.