Jody R. Tversky
Johns Hopkins University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jody R. Tversky.
Clinical & Experimental Allergy | 2008
Jody R. Tversky; Trong V. Le; Anja P. Bieneman; Kristin L. Chichester; Robert G. Hamilton; John T. Schroeder
Background High‐affinity IgE receptor (FcɛRI) expression on blood dendritic cells reportedly correlates with serum IgE levels. Our studies demonstrate that plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) secrete pro‐inflammatory cytokines (IL‐6, TNF‐α) following FcɛRI stimulation – a mode of activation that simultaneously reduces expression of Toll‐like receptor 9 (TLR9). Whether or not TLR9 and/or FcɛRI levels and their function on dendritic cells relate to allergic status is unknown.
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2009
Trong V. Le; Jody R. Tversky; Kristin L. Chichester; Anja P. Bieneman; Shau Ku Huang; Robert A. Wood; John T. Schroeder
BACKGROUND Immature human blood monocytoid dendritic cells (mDCs) express high-affinity receptors for IgE (Fc epsilon RI), yet their exact function and regulation remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVE We sought to characterize Fc epsilon RI-dependent cytokine responses and their regulation in circulating human blood mDCs. METHODS Fc epsilon RI-dependent cytokine responses of circulating mDCs were studied by using anti-Fc epsilon RI alpha stimulation. Plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) cross-regulation through Toll-like receptor 9 on these responses was investigated by examining the effects of exogenous IFN-alpha pretreatment and by coculturing pDCs and mDCs stimulated with CpG. Culture supernatants were analyzed by means of ELISA to determine cytokine levels. Cell markers were determined by means of flow cytometry. RESULTS mDCs express marked levels of Fc epsilon RI (net mean fluorescence intensity, 196 +/- 49; n = 4). After Fc epsilon RI-dependent activation in mDCs, TNF-alpha (2189 +/- 864 pg/10(6) mDCs, n = 3) levels were upregulated within 4 hours, whereas IL-10 (112 +/- 47 pg/10(6) mDCs, n = 3) levels were detectable only after 24 hours of incubation. After adding IL-10-neutralizing antibody, TNF-alpha Fc epsilon RI-dependent responses were significantly augmented (3903 +/- 197 pg/10(6) mDCs, P < .01, n = 3). Conversely, recombinant IL-10 dose-dependently inhibited Fc epsilon RI-mediated TNF-alpha responses up to 86% +/- 3% (n = 3, P < .001). Pretreatment of mDCs with IFN-alpha (100 U/mL) enhanced Fc epsilon RI-dependent secretion of IL-10 by 3.2-fold (183 +/- 11 pg/10(6) mDCs, n = 4) compared with that seen in untreated cells (57 +/- 33 pg/10(6) mDCs, P < .001, n = 4). In pDC/mDC cocultures pretreated with CpG, Fc epsilon RI-dependent IL-10 secretion by mDCs was similarly augmented by 3-fold. CONCLUSIONS Autocrine secretion of IL-10, a critical autoregulator of Fc epsilon RI-dependent proinflammatory responses in mDCs, is cross-regulated by IFN-alpha, a major product of Toll-like receptor 9 responses in pDCs that normally promotes T(H)1 immunity.
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice | 2015
Jody R. Tversky; Yohalakshmi Chelladurai; John McGready; Robert G. Hamilton
BACKGROUND Allergen skin prick testing remains an essential tool for diagnosing atopic disease and guiding treatment. Sensitivity needs to be defined for newly introduced devices. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to compare the performance of 10 current allergy skin prick test devices. METHODS Single- and multiheaded skin test devices (n = 10) were applied by a single operator in a prospective randomized manner. Histamine (1 and 6 mg/mL) and control diluent were introduced at 6 randomized locations onto the upper and lower arms of healthy subjects. Wheal and flare reactions were measured independently by 2 masked technicians. RESULTS Twenty-four subjects provided consent, and 768 skin tests were placed. Mean wheal diameter among devices differed from 3.0 mm (ComforTen; Hollister-Stier, Spokane, Wash) to 6.8 mm (UniTest PC; Lincoln Diagnostics, Decatur, Ill) using 1 mg/mL histamine (P < .001) and 4.8 mm (GREER Pick; Greer, Lenoir, NC) to 8.4 mm (Duotip-Test II; Lincoln Diagnostics, Decatur, Ill; and Sharp-Test; Panatrex, Placentia, Calif) using 6 mg/mL histamine (P < .001). The false-negative rates ranged from 0% to 45% with 1 mg/mL histamine. The analytical specificity was 100% for all devices tested. All devices were well tolerated, with average pain score of less than 4 on a 10-point visual analog scale. Pain scores were higher among women, but this did not reach statistical significance. The Multi-Test PC and the UniTest PC had the lowest pain scores compared with the other devices. CONCLUSIONS All 10 skin prick test devices displayed good analytical sensitivity and specificity; however, 3 mm cannot arbitrarily be used as a positive threshold. The use of histamine at 1 mg/mL is unacceptable for certain devices but may be preferable for the most sensitive devices. On average, there was no pain score difference between multiheaded and single-head devices.
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology | 2018
Sarah K. Wise; Sandra Y. Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R. Orlandi; Cezmi A. Akdis; Jeremiah A. Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M. Baroody; Claus Bachert; G. Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne P. Corey; Linda S. Cox; Peter S. Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam S. DeConde; John M. DelGaudio; Charles S. Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E. Flanagan; Wytske J. Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh A. Halderman; Robert G. Hamilton; Hans Jürgen Hoffman; Jens M. Hohlfeld
Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR).
Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology | 2018
Maria Shtessel; Jody R. Tversky
BACKGROUND Percutaneous allergen skin testing remains an established benchmark for diagnosing atopic disease. The reliability of skin testing depends greatly on the performance of allergen extracts used, methods used, and the presence of antihistamine medications. OBJECTIVE To determine the differential effect of cetirizine on 2 different concentrations of histamine control solution and 5 common allergens used for percutaneous skin testing. METHODS Twelve individuals underwent skin testing with histamine (1 and 6 mg/mL), control diluent, and 5 common aeroallergens. Wheal and flare measurements were measured in a masked fashion by a single operator. Cetirizine was administered for 4 consecutive days to determine the effect on both histamine and allergen wheal and flare responses. RESULTS A total of 384 skin tests were performed on 12 volunteers. Cetirizine began to suppress wheal and flare responses at 1 hour (P < .05), with maximum suppression at day 5 (P < .05). Wheal and flare responses returned to greater than 90% baseline within 4 days of not taking cetirizine. Suppression was more apparent with 1 vs 6 mg/mL of histamine (62% vs 33%). Four of the 12 individuals taking cetirizine had a positive skin test result using 6 mg/mL of histamine control when the 1-mg/mL histamine test result was negative. Importantly, twice as many individuals had false-negative allergen responses using 6 mg/mL of histamine vs the 1 mg/mL as a positive control, although this finding did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION The use of a 6-mg/mL histamine control for some percutaneous skin test devices may result in more false-negative allergen responses because of the inability to detect the presence of antihistamines.
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2013
Changda Liu; Ying Song; Nan Yang; Jody R. Tversky; Jessica Reid-Adam; Xiu-Min Li
Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology | 2018
Jody R. Tversky; Maria Shtessel
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2015
Roy A. Orden; Dea M. Cunningham; Jody R. Tversky
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2013
William Holder; Changda Liu; Ying Song; Nan Yang; Jody R. Tversky; Xiu-Min Li
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2013
Elena S. Resnick; Maria Rosalinda Reyes; Beth Eve Corn; Jody R. Tversky