Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joe Carter is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joe Carter.


Archive | 2011

Generic repository design concepts and thermal analysis (FY11).

Rob L Howard; Mark Dupont; James A. Blink; Massimiliano Fratoni; Harris R. Greenberg; Joe Carter; Ernest Hardin; Mark Sutton

Reference concepts for geologic disposal of used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in the U.S. are developed, including geologic settings and engineered barriers. Repository thermal analysis is demonstrated for a range of waste types from projected future, advanced nuclear fuel cycles. The results show significant differences among geologic media considered (clay/shale, crystalline rock, salt), and also that waste package size and waste loading must be limited to meet targeted maximum temperature values. In this study, the UFD RD (2) waste generated from reprocessing of LWR UOX UNF to recover U and Pu, and subsequent direct disposal of used Pu-MOX fuel (also used in LWRs) in a modified-open cycle; and (3) waste generated by continuous recycling of metal fuel from fast reactors operating in a TRU burner configuration, with additional TRU material input supplied from reprocessing of LWR UOX fuel. The geologic setting provides the natural barriers, and establishes the boundary conditions for performance of engineered barriers. The composition and physical properties of the host medium dictate design and construction approaches, and determine hydrologic and thermal responses of the disposal system. Clay/shale, salt, and crystalline rock media are selected as the basis for reference mined geologic disposal concepts in this study, consistent with advanced international repository programs, and previous investigations in the U.S. The U.S. pursued deep geologic disposal programs in crystalline rock, shale, salt, and volcanic rock in the years leading up to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, or NWPA (Rechard et al. 2011). The 1987 NWPA amendment act focused the U.S. program on unsaturated, volcanic rock at the Yucca Mountain site, culminating in the 2008 license application. Additional work on unsaturated, crystalline rock settings (e.g., volcanic tuff) is not required to support this generic study. Reference disposal concepts are selected for the media listed above and for deep borehole disposal, drawing from recent work in the U.S. and internationally. The main features of the repository concepts are discussed in Section 4.5 and summarized in Table ES-1. Temperature histories at the waste package surface and a specified distance into the host rock are calculated for combinations of waste types and reference disposal concepts, specifying waste package emplacement modes. Target maximum waste package surface temperatures are identified, enabling a sensitivity study to inform the tradeoff between the quantity of waste per disposal package, and decay storage duration, with respect to peak temperature at the waste package surface. For surface storage duration on the order of 100 years or less, waste package sizes for direct disposal of SNF are effectively limited to 4-PWR configurations (or equivalent size and output). Thermal results are summarized, along with recommendations for follow-on work including adding additional reference concepts, verification and uncertainty analysis for thermal calculations, developing descriptions of surface facilities and other system details, and cost estimation to support system-level evaluations.


Archive | 2016

Cost Implications of an Interim Storage Facility in the Waste Management System

Joshua J Jarrell; Robert Anthony Joseph Iii; Rob L Howard; Gordon M Petersen; Mark Nutt; Joe Carter; Thomas Cotton

This report provides an evaluation of the cost implications of incorporating a consolidated interim storage facility (ISF) into the waste management system (WMS). Specifically, the impacts of the timing of opening an ISF relative to opening a repository were analyzed to understand the potential effects on total system costs.


ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference | 2016

Chloride-Induced Stress Corrosion Crack Growth Under Dry Salt Conditions: Application to Evaluate Growth Rates in Multipurpose Canisters

Poh-Sang Lam; Robert L. Sindelar; Joe Carter; Andrew J. Duncan; B. Garcia-Diaz; B.J. Wiersma

Many dry cask storage systems for spent nuclear fuel consist of a dry shielded canister (DSC) design that includes a welded construction (and weld-sealed) austenitic stainless steel multipurpose canister that is placed within a concrete overpack and stored on an outside pad. The present regulatory basis for dry cask storage is 60 years (20-year initial and up to 40-year relicense). Aging of the materials and structures of Dry Cask Storage Systems (DCSS) are considered in the demonstration that the safety functions are maintained throughout the license period. The sealed stainless steel canister provides a confinement function in a DCSS. Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) may occur when chloride-bearing salts and/or dust deliquesce on the external surface of the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) canister at weld residual stress regions. An SCC growth rate test was developed using instrumented bolt-load compact tension specimens (ASTM E1681) with experimental apparatus that allows an initially dried salt to deliquesce and infuse naturally to the crack front under temperature and humidity parameters relevant to the canister storage environmental conditions. The shakedown tests were conducted over a range of relative humidity controlled by the guidance in ASTM E104 at 50 °C with salt assemblages of (1) mixture of artificial dust and deliquescent salts (2) a mixture of artificial dust and ASTM simulated sea salt. After five months exposure the specimens were examined for evidence of CISCC and observations are reported for both salt/dust mixtures. The test specimen and apparatus designs will be modified to enhance the interaction between the deliquescing salt and the crack front for more accurate characterization of the crack growth rate as a function of stress intensity factor, which is an essential input to the determination of in-service inspection frequency of SNF canisters.


Volume 1: Low/Intermediate-Level Radioactive Waste Management; Spent Fuel, Fissile Material, Transuranic and High-Level Radioactive Waste Management | 2013

Used Fuel Management System Architecture and Interface Analyses

Mark Nutt; Rob L Howard; Ingrid K. Busch; Joe Carter; Alexcia Delley; Elena Arkadievna Kalinina; Ernest Hardin; Thomas Cotton

Preliminary system-level analyses of the interfaces between at-reactor used fuel management, consolidated storage facilities, and disposal facilities, along with the development of supporting logistics simulation tools, have been initiated to provide the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and other stakeholders with information regarding the various alternatives for managing used nuclear fuel (UNF) generated by the current fleet of light water reactors operating in the United States. An important UNF management system interface consideration is the need for ultimate disposal of UNF assemblies contained in waste packages that are sized to be compatible with different geologic media. Thermal analyses indicate that waste package sizes for the geologic media under consideration by the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign may be significantly smaller than the canisters being used for on-site dry storage by the nuclear utilities. Therefore, at some point along the UNF disposition pathway, there could be a need to repackage fuel assemblies already loaded and being loaded into the dry storage canisters currently in use. The implications of where and when the packaging or repackaging of commercial UNF will occur are key questions being addressed in this evaluation. The analysis demonstrated that thermal considerations will have a major impact on the operation of the system and that acceptance priority, rates, and facility start dates have significant system implications.Copyright


Archive | 2010

End of FY10 Report - Used Fuel Disposition Technical Bases and Lessons Learned Legal and Regulatory Framework for High-Level Waste Disposition in the United States

Ruth F. Weiner; James A. Blink; Robert P. Rechard; Frank V. Perry; Hank C. Jenkins-Smith; Joe Carter; Mark Nutt; Tom Cotton

This report examines the current policy, legal, and regulatory framework pertaining to used nuclear fuel and high level waste management in the United States. The goal is to identify potential changes that if made could add flexibility and possibly improve the chances of successfully implementing technical aspects of a nuclear waste policy. Experience suggests that the regulatory framework should be established prior to initiating future repository development. Concerning specifics of the regulatory framework, reasonable expectation as the standard of proof was successfully implemented and could be retained in the future; yet, the current classification system for radioactive waste, including hazardous constituents, warrants reexamination. Whether or not consideration of multiple sites are considered simultaneously in the future, inclusion of mechanisms such as deliberate use of performance assessment to manage site characterization would be wise. Because of experience gained here and abroad, diversity of geologic media is not particularly necessary as a criterion in site selection guidelines for multiple sites. Stepwise development of the repository program that includes flexibility also warrants serious consideration. Furthermore, integration of the waste management system from storage, transportation, and disposition, should be examined and would be facilitated by integration of the legal and regulatory framework. Finally, in order to enhance acceptability of future repository development, the national policy should be cognizant of those policy and technical attributes that enhance initial acceptance, and those policy and technical attributes that maintain and broaden credibility.


Archive | 2013

Categorization of Used Nuclear Fuel Inventory in Support of a Comprehensive National Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategy - 13575

John C. Wagner; Joshua L. Peterson; Don Mueller; Jess C Gehin; Andrew Worrall; Temitope A. Taiwo; Mark Nutt; Mark A. Williamson; Mike Todosow; Roald Wigeland; William Halsey; Ronald P. Omberg; Peter N. Swift; Joe Carter


Archive | 2011

Technical Lessons to Learn in Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High Level Waste.

Robert P. Rechard; Thomas Cotton; William Mark Nutt; Joe Carter; Frank V. Perry; Ruth F. Weiner; James A. Blink


Archive | 2017

Potential Cost Implications of an Interim Storage Facility for Commercial SNF

Joshua J Jarrell; Robert Anthony Joseph Iii; Rob L Howard; Riley M Cumberland; Gordon M Petersen; Mark Nutt; Joe Carter; Thomas Cotton


ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference | 2017

Containers for Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel

Joe Carter; Robert H. Jones


ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference | 2017

CRACK GROWTH RATE TESTING WITH INSTRUMENTED BOLT-LOAD COMPACT TENSION SPECIMENS UNDER CHLORIDE-INDUCED STRESS CORROSION CRACKING CONDITIONS IN SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL CANISTERS

Andrew J. Duncan; Poh-Sang Lam; Robert L. Sindelar; Joe Carter

Collaboration


Dive into the Joe Carter's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rob L Howard

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ernest Hardin

Science Applications International Corporation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Nutt

Argonne National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. Blink

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John M Scaglione

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew J. Duncan

Savannah River National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank V. Perry

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Harris R. Greenberg

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Poh-Sang Lam

Savannah River National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge