Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Joel Abrams is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Joel Abrams.


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 1994

An analysis of prehospital mortality in an earthquake. Disaster Reanimatology Study Group.

Ernesto A. Pretto; Derek C. Angus; Joel Abrams; Baohua Shen; R. Bissell; V. M. Ruiz Castro; R. Sawyers; Yukihiro Watoh; N Ceciliano; Edmund M. Ricci

INTRODUCTION Anecdotal observations about prehospital emergency medical care in major natural and human-made disasters, such as earthquakes, have suggested that some injured victims survive the initial impact, but eventually die because of a delay in the application of life-saving medical therapy. METHODS A multidisciplinary, retrospective structured interview methodology to investigate injury risk factors, and causes and circumstances of prehospital death after major disasters was developed. In this study, a team of United States researchers and Costa Rican health officials conducted a survey of lay survivors and health care professionals who participated in the emergency medical response to the earthquake in Costa Rica on 22 April 1991. RESULTS Fifty-four deaths occurred prior to hospitalization (crude death rate = 0.4/1,000 population). Seventeen percent of these deaths (9/54) were of casualties who survived the initial impact but died at the scene or during transport. Twenty-two percent (2/9) were judged preventable if earlier emergency medical care had been available. Most injuries and deaths occurred in victims who were inside wooden buildings (p < .01) as opposed to other building types or were pinned by rubble from building collapse. Autopsies performed on a sample of victims showed crush injury to be the predominant cause of death. CONCLUSIONS A substantial proportion of earthquake mortality in Costa Rica was protracted. Crush injury was the principal mechanism of injury and cause of death. The rapid institution of enhanced prehospital emergency medical services may be associated with a significant life-saving potential in these events.


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 1989

Disaster reanimatology potentials : A structured interview study in Armenia : I. Methodology and preliminary results

Miroslav Klain; Edmund M. Ricci; Peter Safar; Victor Semenov; Ernesto A. Pretto; Samuel A. Tisherman; Joel Abrams; Louise K. Comfort

In general, preparations for disasters which result in mass casualties do not incorporate a modern resuscitation approach. We explored the life-saving potential of, and time limits for life-supporting first aid (LSFA), advanced trauma life support (ATLS), resuscitative surgery, and prolonged life support (PLS: intensive care) following the earthquake in Armenia on 7 December 1988. We used a structured, retrospective interview method applied previously to evaluation of emergency medical services (EMS) in the United States. A total of 120 survivors of, and participants in the earthquake in Armenia were interviewed on site (49 lay eyewitnesses, 20 search-rescue personnel, 39 medical personnel and records, and 12 administrators). Answers were verified by crosschecks. Preliminary results permit the following generalizations: 1) a significant number of victims died slowly as the result of injuries such as external hemorrhage, head injury with coma, shock, or crush syndrome; 2) early search and rescue was performed primarily by uninjured covictims using hand tools; 3) many lives potentially could have been saved by the use of LSFA and ATLS started during extrication of crushed victims. 4) medical teams from neighboring EMS systems started to arrive at the site at 2-3 hours and therefore, A TLS could have been provided in time to save lives and limbs; 5) some amputations had to be performed in the field to enable extrication; 6) the usefulness of other resuscitative surgery in the field needs to be clarified; 7) evacuations were rapid; 8) air evacuation proved essential; 9) hospital intensive care was well organized; and 10) international medical aid, which arrived after 48 hours, was too late to impact on resuscitation. Definitive analysis of data in the near future will lead to recommendations for local, regional, and National Disaster Medical Systems (NDMS).


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 1992

Disaster Reanimatology Potentials: A Structured Interview Study in Armenia. III. Results, Conclusions, and Recommendations

Ernesto A. Pretto; Edmund M. Ricci; Miroslav Klain; Peter Safar; Victor Semenov; Joel Abrams; Samuel A. Tisherman; David Crippen; Louise K. Comfort

National medical responses to catastrophic disasters have failed to incorporate a resuscitation component. Purpose: This study sought to determine the lifesaving potentials of modern resuscitation medicine as applied to a catastrophic disaster situation. Previous articles reported the preliminary results (I), and methodology (II) of a structured, retrospective interview study of the 1988 earthquake in Armenia. The present article (III) reports and discusses the definitive findings, formulates conclusions, and puts forth recommendations for future responses to catastrophic disasters anywhere in the world. Results: Observations include: 1) The lack of adequate construction materials and procedures in the Armenian region contributed significantly to injury and loss of life; 2) The uninjured, lay population together with medical teams including physicians in Armenia were capable of rapid response (within two hours); 3) Due to a lack of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) training for medical teams and of basic first-aid training of the lay public, and scarcity of supplies and equipment for extrication of casualties, they were unable to do much at the scene. As a result, an undetermined number of severely injured earthquake victims in Armenia died slowly without the benefit of appropriate and feasible resuscitation attempts. Recommendations: 1) Widespread adoption of seismic-resistant building codes for regions of high seismic risk; 2) The lay public living in these regions should be trained in life-supporting first-aid (LSFA) and basic rescue techniques; 3) Community-wide emergency medical services (EMS) systems should be developed world-wide (tai-lored to the emergency needs of each region) with ATLS capability for field resuscitation; 4) Such systems be prepared to extend coverage to mass casualties; 5) National disaster medical system (NDMS) plans should provide integration of existing trauma-EMS systems into regional systems linked with advanced (heavy) rescue (public works, fire, police); and 6) New techniques and devices for victim extrication should be developed to enable rapid extrication of earthquake casualties within 24 hours.


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 1993

Guidelines for rescue training of the lay public.

Joel Abrams; Ernesto A. Pretto; Derek C. Angus; Peter Safar

The fundamental goal of emergency medical response in disaster is to save lives and reduce injury and permanent disability. It has been observed that urgent emergency medical care of seriously injured earthquake casualties trapped under building rubble, cannot be provided unless the victims have been extricated and transported to medical facilities by friends or relatives, or are accessible to field rescue and medical teams. Equally important is the fact that extrication of seriously injured, trapped victims by laypersons is hazardous, unless the following conditions are met: 1) the rescuer has basic knowledge of extrication, and; 2) there is early application of effective life-supporting first-aid (LSFA) and/or advanced trauma life support (ATLS) at the scene. Time is the critical factor in such an effort. In previous studies of death and dying in earthquakes, it was noted that extrication of trapped victims will be attempted by survivors. Therefore, it is suggested that citizens living in regions of high seismic risk and trained in basic search and rescue and in LSFA are the most immediate resource for early response after an earthquake. An accompanying paper addresses the issue of citizen LSFA training. This paper focuses on the basic concepts of search and rescue training for the lay public.


Organization & Environment | 1989

From crisis to community: the Pittsburgh oil spill

Louise Comfort; Joel Abrams; John C. Camillus; Edmund M. Ricci

The interdependence of metropolitan communities generates a stubborn paradox in crisis. The infrastructure created to link local systems in productive action operates, with equal facility, to transmit failure, distortion and neglect. This function serves to escalate failure in a single system to failure in multiple systems in the metropolitan community. This article examines the effects of interdependence in escalating the 1988 tank collapse at the Ashland Oil Com panys storage site on the Monongahela River near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, to a full-scale crisis spanning two weeks and three states, and affecting ad versely the lives of approximately 830,000 people. An interactive information system is proposed as an alternative method of reducing risk and facilitating response to minimize crisis in metropolitan communities.


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 1993

Recommendations for Life-Supporting First-Aid training of the lay public for disaster preparedness.

Derek C. Angus; Ernesto A. Pretto; Joel Abrams; Peter Safar

In catastrophic disasters such as major earthquakes in densely populated regions, effective Life-Supporting First-Aid (LSFA) and basic rescue can be administered to the injured by previously trained, uninjured survivors (co-victims). Administration of LSFA immediately after disaster strikes can add to the overall medical response and help to diminish the morbidity and mortality that result from these events. Widespread training of the lay public also may improve bystander responses in everyday emergencies. However, for this scheme to be effective, a significant percentage of the lay population must learn in eight basic steps of LSFA. These have been developed by the International Resuscitation Research Center in collaboration with the World Association for Emergency and Disaster Medicine, the City of Pittsburgh Department of Public Safety, and the American Red Cross (Pennsylvania chapter). They include: 1) scene survey; 2) airway control; 3) rescue breathing (mouth-to-mouth); 4) circulation (chest compressions; may be omitted for disasters, but should be retained for everyday bystander response); 5) abdominal thrusts for choking (may be omitted for disasters, but retained for everyday bystander response); 6) control of external bleeding; 7) positioning for shock; and 8) call for help.


Journal of The Franklin Institute-engineering and Applied Mathematics | 1975

Governing equations for anisotropic thin shells with thermal loading

John L. Wilson; Joel Abrams

Abstract Governing equations are presented utilizing both tangent-normal and cartesian displacement components for shallow shells with the inclusion of thermal loads for the following types of material properties: anisotropic, orthotropic, generally orthotropic and isotropic. Displacement differential equations of equilibrium as well as the appropriate strain energy expressions are presented.


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 1997

Epidemiologic assessment of mortality, building collapse pattern, and medical response after the 1992 earthquake in Turkey

Derek C. Angus; Ernesto A. Pretto; Joel Abrams; N Ceciliano; Yukihiro Watoh; Bulent Kirimli; Agah Certug; Louise K. Comfort


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 1994

Post-Preparedness Medical Disaster Response in Costa Rica

Richard A. Bissell; Ernesto A. Pretto; Derek C. Angus; Bern Shen; Victor Ruíz; N Ceciliano; Roberto Sawyers; Dawn Shurtleff; Joel Abrams


Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 1997

Epidemiologic assessment of mortality, building collapse pattern, and medical response after the 1992 earthquake in Turkey. Disaster Reanimatology Study Group (DRSG).

Derek C. Angus; Ernesto A. Pretto; Joel Abrams; N Ceciliano; Yukihiro Watoh; Bulent Kirimli; A. Certug; Louise K. Comfort

Collaboration


Dive into the Joel Abrams's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Derek C. Angus

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N Ceciliano

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Safar

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yukihiro Watoh

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bulent Kirimli

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Miroslav Klain

University of Pittsburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge