Joel G. DeKoven
University of Toronto
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Joel G. DeKoven.
Dermatitis | 2013
Erin M. Warshaw; Donald V. Belsito; James S. Taylor; Denis Sasseville; Joel G. DeKoven; Matthew J. Zirwas; Anthony F. Fransway; C. G. Toby Mathias; Kathryn A. Zug; Vincent A. DeLeo; Joseph F. Fowler; James G. Marks; Melanie D. Pratt; Frances J. Storrs; Howard I. Maibach
Background Patch testing is an important diagnostic tool for determination of substances responsible for allergic contact dermatitis. Objective This study reports the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) patch testing results from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2010. Methods At 12 centers in North America, patients were tested in a standardized manner with a screening series of 70 allergens. Data were manually verified and entered into a central database. Descriptive frequencies were calculated, and trends were analyzed using &khgr;2 statistics. Results A total of 4308 patients were tested. Of these, 2614 (60.7%) had at least 1 positive reaction, and 2284 (46.3%) were ultimately determined to have a primary diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. Four hundred twenty-seven (9.9%) patients had occupationally related skin disease. There were 6855 positive allergic reactions. As compared with the previous reporting period (2007–2008), the positive reaction rates statistically decreased for 20 allergens (nickel, neomycin, Myroxylon pereirae, cobalt, formaldehyde, quaternium 15, methydibromoglutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol, methylchlorisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, potassium dichromate, diazolidinyl urea, propolis, dimethylol dimethylhydantoin, 2-bromo-2-nitro-1,3-propanediol, methyl methacrylate, ethyl acrylate, glyceryl thioglycolate, dibucaine, amidoamine, clobetasol, and dimethyloldihydroxyethyleneurea; P < 0.05) and statistically increased for 4 allergens (fragrance mix II, iodopropynyl butylcarbamate, propylene glycol, and benzocaine; P < 0.05). Approximately one quarter of tested patients had at least 1 relevant allergic reaction to a non-NACDG allergen. Hypothetically, approximately one quarter of reactions detected by NACDG allergens would have been missed by TRUE TEST (SmartPractice Denmark, Hillerød, Denmark). Conclusions These results affirm the value of patch testing with many allergens.
Contact Dermatitis | 2015
Erin M. Warshaw; Howard I. Maibach; James S. Taylor; Denis Sasseville; Joel G. DeKoven; Matthew J. Zirwas; Anthony F. Fransway; C. G. Toby Mathias; Kathryn A. Zug; Vincent A. DeLeo; Joseph F. Fowler; James G. Marks; Melanie D. Pratt; Frances J. Storrs; Donald V. Belsito
BackgroundPatch testing is an important diagnostic tool for assessment of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). ObjectiveThis study documents the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) patch-testing results from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012. MethodsAt 12 centers in North America, patients were tested in a standardized manner with a series of 70 allergens. Data were manually verified and entered into a central database. Descriptive frequencies were calculated, and trends analyzed using &khgr;2 statistics. ResultsFour thousand two hundred thirty-eight patients were tested; of these, 2705 patients (63.8%) had at least 1 positive reaction, and 2029 (48.0%) were ultimately determined to have a primary diagnosis of ACD. Four hundred eight patients (9.6%) had occupationally related skin disease. There were 7532 positive allergic reactions. As compared with previous reporting periods (2009–2010 and 2000–2010), positive reaction rates statistically increased for 6 allergens: methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (5.0%; risk ratios [RRs]: 2.01 [1.60–2.52], 1.87 [1.61–2.18]), lanolin alcohol (4.6%; RRs 1.83 [1.45–2.30], 2.10 [1.79–2.47]), cinnamic aldehyde (3.9%; 1.69 [1.32–2.15], 1.53 [1.28–1.82]), glutaral (1.5%; 1.67 [1.13–2.48], 1.31 [1.00–1.71]), paraben mix (1.4%; 1.77 [1.16–2.69], 1.44 [1.09–1.92]), and fragrance mix I (12.1%; RRs 1.42 [1.25–1.61], 1.24 [1.14–1.36]). Compared with the previous decade, positivity rates for all formaldehyde-releasing preservatives significantly decreased (formaldehyde 6.6%; RR, 0.82 [0.73, 0.93]; quaternium-15 6.4% RR 0.75 [0.66, 0.85]; diazolidinyl urea 2.1%; RR, 0.67 [0.54, 0.84]; imidazolidinyl urea 1.6%, 0.60 [0.47, 0.77]; bronopol 1.6%; RR, 0.60 [0.46, 0.77]; DMDM hydantoin 1.6%; RR, 0.59 [0.54, 0.84]). Approximately a quarter of patients had at least 1 relevant allergic reaction to a non-NACDG allergen. In addition, approximately one-fourth to one-third of reactions detected by NACDG allergens would have been hypothetically missed by T.R.U.E. TEST (SmartPractice Denmark, Hillerød, Denmark). ConclusionsThese data document the beginning of the epidemic of sensitivity to methylisothiazolinones in North America, which has been well documented in Europe. Patch testing with allergens beyond a standard screening tray is necessary for complete evaluation of occupational and nonoccupational ACD.
Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology | 2003
Jaggi Rao; Joel G. DeKoven; J.David Beatty; Glenn Jones
Three cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma of the breast that arose in irradiated skin tissue in women who had previously undergone treatment for breast carcinoma are reported. A review of the literature identified 55 cases of cutaneous angiosarcoma following radiation therapy as part of the treatment of carcinoma of the breast. For all 58 assembled cases, the mean age at the time of adjuvant radiation therapy for breast carcinoma was 64 years (range 42-83). The mean time to subsequent diagnosis in irradiated skin was 75 months (range 12-192). The estimated 3-year overall survival for all 58 patients was only 20%, similar to that of patients with the general form of angiosarcoma. Postirradiation angiosarcoma of the breast has a variety of presentations; thus diagnosis is often delayed. Early diagnosis relies on a high index of suspicion and appropriate histopathologic studies, as the clinical and histopathologic findings may be confused with other conditions. Treatment should be aggressive and include local surgery with consideration of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.
Dermatitis | 2013
Anthony F. Fransway; Kathryn A. Zug; Donald V. Belsito; Vincent A. DeLeo; Joseph F. Fowler; Howard I. Maibach; James G. Marks; C. G. Toby Mathias; Melanie D. Pratt; Robert L. Rietschel; Denis Sasseville; Frances J. Storrs; James S. Taylor; Erin M. Warshaw; Joel G. DeKoven; Matthew J. Zirwas
BackgroundThe North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) tests patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis to a broad series of screening allergens and publishes periodic reports. ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to report the NACDG patch-testing results from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2008, and to compare results to pooled test data from the previous 2 and 10 years to analyze trends in allergen sensitivity. Methods and MaterialsStandardized patch testing with 65 allergens was used at 13 centers in North America. &khgr;2 analysis was used for comparisons. ResultsA total of 5085 patients were tested; 11.8% (598) had an occupationally related skin condition, and 65.3% (3319) had at least 1 allergic patch test reaction, which is identical to the NACDG data from 2005 to 2006. The top 15 most frequently positive allergens were nickel sulfate (19.5%), Myroxylon pereirae (11.0%), neomycin (10.1%), fragrance mix I (9.4%), quaternium-15 (8.6%), cobalt chloride (8.4%), bacitracin (7.9%), formaldehyde (7.7%), methyldibromoglutaronitrile/phenoxyethanol (5.5%), p-phenylenediamine (5.3%), propolis (4.9%), carba mix (4.5%), potassium dichromate (4.1%), fragrance mix II (3.6%), and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (3.6%). There were significant increases in positivity rates to nickel, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, and benzophenone-3. During the same period of study, there were significant decreases in positivity rates to neomycin, fragrance mix I, formaldehyde, thiuram mix, cinnamic aldehyde, propylene glycol, epoxy resin, diazolidinyl urea, amidoamine, ethylenediamine, benzocaine, p-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin, dimethylol dimethyl hydantoin, cocamidopropyl betaine, glutaraldehyde, mercaptobenzothiazole, tosylamide formaldehyde resin, budesonide, disperse blue 106, mercapto mix, and chloroxylenol. Twenty-four percent (1221) had a relevant positive reaction to a non-NACDG supplementary allergen; and 180 of these reactions were occupationally relevant. ConclusionsPeriodic analysis, surveillance, and publication of multicenter study data sets document trends in allergen reactivity incidence assessed in the patch test clinic setting and provide information on new allergens of relevance.
Dermatitis | 2014
Kathryn A. Zug; Anh Khoa Pham; Donald V. Belsito; Joel G. DeKoven; Vincent A. DeLeo; Joseph F. Fowler; Anthony F. Fransway; Howard I. Maibach; James G. Marks; C. G. Toby Mathias; Melanie D. Pratt; Denis Sasseville; Frances J. Storrs; James S. Taylor; Erin M. Warshaw; Matthew J. Zirwas
BackgroundAllergic contact dermatitis is common in children. Epicutaneous patch testing is an important tool for identifying responsible allergens. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to provide the patch test results from children (aged ⩽18 years) examined by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 2005 to 2012. MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of children patch-tested with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 65- or 70-allergen series. Frequencies and counts were compared with previously published data (2001–2004) using &khgr;2 statistics. ConclusionsA total of 883 children were tested during the study period. A percentage of 62.3% had ≥1 positive patch test and 56.7% had ≥1 relevant positive patch test. Frequencies of positive patch test and relevant positive patch test reaction were highest with nickel sulfate (28.1/25.6), cobalt chloride (12.3/9.1), neomycin sulfate (7.1/6.6), balsam of Peru (5.7/5.5), and lanolin alcohol 50% petrolatum vehicle (5.5/5.1). The ≥1 positive patch test and ≥1 relevant positive patch test in the children did not differ significantly from adults (≥19 years) or from previously tested children (2001–2004). The percentage of clinically relevant positive patch tests for 27 allergens differed significantly between the children and adults. A total of 23.6% of children had a relevant positive reaction to at least 1 supplemental allergen. Differences in positive patch test and relevant positive patch test frequencies between children and adults as well as test periods confirm the importance of reporting periodic updates of patch testing in children to enhance clinicians’ vigilance to clinically important allergens.
Dermatitis | 2017
Joel G. DeKoven; Erin M. Warshaw; Donald V. Belsito; Denis Sasseville; Howard I. Maibach; James S. Taylor; James G. Marks; Joseph F. Fowler; C. G. Toby Mathias; Vince A. DeLeo; Melanie D. Pratt; Matthew J. Zirwas; Kathryn A. Zug
Background Patch testing is the most important diagnostic tool for the assessment of allergic contact dermatitis. Objective This study documents the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) patch testing results from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014. Methods At 13 centers in North America, patients were tested in a standardized manner with a screening series of 70 allergens. Data were manually verified and entered into a central database. Descriptive frequencies were calculated, and trends were analyzed using &khgr;2 test. Results A total of 4871 patients were tested. There were 3255 patients (66.8%) who had at least 1 positive reaction and 2412 patients (49.5%) who were ultimately determined to have a primary diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. A total of 434 patients (8.9%) had occupationally related skin disease. There were 9726 positive allergic reactions. Compared with the previous reporting periods (2011–2012 and 2001–2012, including at least three 2-year cycles), positive reaction rates for the top 25 screening allergens statistically increased for 2 allergens: methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (6.4%; risk ratios, 1.26 [1.07–1.50] and 2.08 [1.84–2.37]) and hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2.6%; risk ratios, 1.34 [1.02–1.76] and 1.23 [1.00–1.51]). Methylisothiazolinone, which was added to the screening series for this 2013–2014 cycle, had the third highest positive reaction rate of allergens tested (10.9%). Four other newly added allergen preparations—formaldehyde 2% (7%), diphenylguanidine (3.8%), propylene glycol 100% (2.8%), and benzophenone-4 (2.1%)—all had reaction rates greater than 2%. Twenty-one percent of tested patients had at least 1 relevant allergic reaction to an allergen not on the NACDG series; 14.6% of these were occupationally related. The T.R.U.E. TEST (SmartPractice Denmark, Hillerød, Denmark) would have hypothetically missed one quarter to one third of reactions detected by the NACDG screening series. Conclusions These results confirm that the epidemic of sensitivity to methylisothiazolinone previously documented in Europe is also occurring in North America. Patch testing with allergens beyond a standard screening tray is necessary for the complete evaluation of occupational and nonoccupational allergic contact dermatitis.
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery | 2006
Patrick Tang; Scott Walsh; Christian Murray; Cecilia Alterman; Monali Varia; George Broukhanski; Pamela Chedore; Joel G. DeKoven; Dalai Assaad; Wayne L. Gold; Danny Ghazarian; Michael Finkelstein; Marjolyn Pritchard; Barbara Yaffe; Frances Jamieson; Bonnie Henry; E. Phillips
Background: Cutaneous atypical mycobacterial infections have been increasingly described in association with cosmetic and alternative procedures. Objective: We report an outbreak of acupuncture-associated mycobacteriosis. Between April and December 2002, 32 patients developed cutaneous mycobacteriosis after visiting an acupuncture practice in Toronto, Canada. Results: Of 23 patients whose lesions were biopsied, 6 (26.1%) had culture-confirmed infection with Mycobacterium abscessus. These isolates were genetically indistinguishable by amplified fragment length polymorphism. The median incubation period was 1 month. Of 24 patients for whom clinical information was available, 23 (95.8%) had resolution of their infection. All patients developed residual scarring or hyperpigmentation. Conclusion: Nontuberculous mycobacteria should be recognized as an emerging, but preventable, cause of acupuncture-associated infections.
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery | 2012
Kim Papp; Joel G. DeKoven; Laurie Parsons; Syed Pirzada; Michael Robern; Lynne H. Robertson; Jerry K. L. Tan
Background: Previous publications have described practical considerations for initiating biologic therapy in psoriasis patients. However, most publications have focused on anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Objective: To create an evidence-based, practical tool that provides guidance on patient management for all biologics currently approved in Canada and the United States. Methods: Psoriasis publications regarding safety issues in the initiation or monitoring of adalimumab, alefacept, etanercept, infliximab, or ustekinumab therapy were identified through a PubMed search. Phase III trials and open-label extensions (regardless of indication) and relevant guidelines from Health Canada were used to compile this review. Results: Although these biologic agents have demonstrated efficacy in patients with psoriasis and are generally considered safe and well tolerated, rare but serious safety issues (ie, demyelination, infection, tuberculosis, malignancy, lymphoma, cardiovascular outcomes, hepatitis, pregnancy, surgery, and vaccination) have been observed. Attention to specific aspects of patient management (ie, prescreening requirements, symptoms to watch for, appropriate treatment, and referrals) is required to mitigate risk. Conclusion: Much of the evidence regarding the long-term safety of these agents has been based on experience in other patient populations. However, it does serve to guide us in understanding the risks that may impact the management of psoriasis patients.
Dermatitis | 2012
Joseph F. Fowler; Howard I. Maibach; Matthew J. Zirwas; James S. Taylor; Joel G. DeKoven; Denis Sasseville; Erin M. Warshaw; Donald V. Belsito; Frances J. Storrs; Kathryn A. Zug; Melanie D. Pratt; C. G. Toby Mathias; Vincent A. DeLeo; Anthony F. Fransway; James G. Marks
the present case and in the other case reports of the literature. The present case emphasizes the role of olanzapine in the development of occupational contact dermatitis, even when using appropriate personal protective equipment. In this situation, it is major to educate employees in following proper protective measures in their workplace. In addition, it is recommended to inspect the local facilities of the patient’s workplace to ensure that these measures are pursued. When sensitization occurs, avoidance of the allergen is fundamental for the resolution of the skin condition. In more serious cases, it is necessary to provide the patient a job relocation or even changing profession.
Dermatitis | 2014
Erin M. Warshaw; Jaime L. Kingsley-Loso; Joel G. DeKoven; Donald V. Belsito; Kathryn A. Zug; Matthew J. Zirwas; Howard I. Maibach; James S. Taylor; Denis Sasseville; Joseph F. Fowler; Charles T. Mathias; Vincent A. DeLeo; Melanie D. Pratt; James G. Marks; Anthony F. Fransway
ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the association between piercing and patch test sensitivity to metals (nickel, cobalt, and chromium) in North America. MethodsA retrospective analysis of 9334 patients tested by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group from 2007 to 2010 was conducted. ResultsNickel sensitivity was statistically associated with at least 1 piercing (risk ratio [RR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.26–2.81; P < 0.0001) and nickel sensitivity rates increased with the number of piercings (16% for 1 piercing to 32% for ≥5 piercings). Prevalence of nickel sensitivity was higher in females (23.2%) than in males (7.1%), but the association with piercing was stronger in males (RR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.72–3.30; P < 0.0001) than in females (RR, 1.30; CI, 1.13–1.49; P = 0.0002). Crude analysis indicated that cobalt sensitivity was statistically associated with piercing (RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.40–1.91; P < 0.0001); however, stratified analysis showed that this relationship was confounded by nickel. After adjusting for nickel sensitivity, the adjusted risk ratio for piercing and cobalt was 0.78 (not significant). Chromium sensitivity was negatively associated with piercing (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48–0.75; P < 0.0001). ConclusionsPiercing was statistically associated with sensitivity to nickel. This relationship was dose dependent and stronger in males. Cobalt sensitivity was not associated with piercing when adjusted for nickel. Chromium sensitivity was negatively associated with piercing.