Joel Gehman

Complexity Arrangements for Sustained Innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation

Innovation processes are complex. It is through local interactions among people and technologies that diverse and novel outcomes emerge. Even when governed by simple rules, such interactions can generate nonlinear temporal dynamics. Given such complexities, how might an organization sustain innovation for continued growth and vitality? Drawing on an in-depth study of innovation practices and journeys at 3M Corporation, we identify how combinations of practices — which we conceptualize as complexity arrangements — afford multiple agentic orientations simultaneously for the actors involved and thereby facilitate sustained innovation.

Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited

In this article, we theorize a novel approach to addressing the world’s grand challenges based on the philosophical tradition of American pragmatism and the sociological concept of robust action. Grounded in prior empirical organizational research, we identify three robust strategies that organizations can employ in tackling issues such as climate change and poverty alleviation: participatory architecture, multivocal inscriptions and distributed experimentation. We demonstrate how these strategies operate, the manner in which they are linked, the outcomes they generate, and why they are applicable for resolving grand challenges. We conclude by discussing our contributions to research on robust action and grand challenges, as well as some implications for research on stakeholder theory, institutional theory and theories of valuation.

Categorization by Association: Nuclear Technology and Emission Free Electricity

At different points in time, energy harnessed from nuclear technology for commercial purposes has been qualified as atoms for peace, too cheap to meter, unsafe, sustainable, and emission free. We explore how these associations – between nuclear technology (a category used in a descriptive way) and qualities such as emission free (a category used in an evaluative way) – are materially anchored, institutionally performed, socially relevant, and entrepreneurially negotiated. By considering all these factors, our analysis shows that it is possible to understand how and why categories and their meanings continue to change over time. We flesh out the implications of these observations and suggest avenues for future research.

Comparative analysis of hydraulic fracturing wastewater practices in unconventional shale development: Water sourcing, treatment and disposal practices

This paper is the first of a two-part series designed to assess and summarize extant knowledge regarding hydraulic fracturing water and wastewater management practices using a comparative, multidisciplinary approach. To provide context for both papers, the water and wastewater practices are summarized for the four focus plays: Montney, Duvernay, Barnett, and Marcellus. In Alberta and British Columbia, which host the less-studied Duvernay and Montney plays, play-scale unconventional water and wastewater data are extracted and combined from three databases: FracFocus.ca, geoSCOUT, and AccuMap. A reasonable picture of hydraulic fracturing water use and practices in western Canada emerges from the over 4,000 wells studied. From late 2011 to early 2014, the average number of fracturing stages reported increased from 7 to over 14, while reported cumulative water use approached approximately 15 million m3 in 2013, the first year for which full data in all three databases was available. The majority of wells consuming 10,000 to 50,000 m3 of water are slickwater type, located largely in the two target plays; however, several wells using >50,000 m3 of water appear in the Horn River Formation in BC. While it is possible to identify in the databases wastewater treatment facilities and deep wastewater injection wells, it is at present difficult to constrain wastewater disposal practices and chemistry in Alberta and British Columbia. The analysis points to the need for further coordination between academics, industry, and governmental agencies to develop publicly available, searchable databases that carefully document water sourcing, wastewater recycling/reuse/disposal, and chemistry, in order to properly form hydraulic fracturing water management strategies.

Finding Theory-Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building

This article, together with a companion video, provides a synthesized summary of a Showcase Symposium held at the 2016 Academy of Management Annual Meeting in which prominent scholars—Denny Gioia, Kathy Eisenhardt, Ann Langley, and Kevin Corley—discussed different approaches to theory building with qualitative research. Our goal for the symposium was to increase management scholars’ sensitivity to the importance of theory–method “fit” in qualitative research. We have integrated the panelists’ prepared remarks and interactive discussion into three sections: an introduction by each scholar, who articulates her or his own approach to qualitative research; their personal reflections on the similarities and differences between approaches to qualitative research; and answers to general questions posed by the audience during the symposium. We conclude by summarizing insights gleaned from the symposium about important distinctions among these three qualitative research approaches and their appropriate usages.

Fracking Patents: The Emergence of Patents as Information Containment Tools in Shale Drilling

The advantages of new sources of energy must often be weighed against environmental, health and safety concerns related to new production technology. The rapid development of unconventional oil and gas fields, such as the Barnett and Marcellus Shales, are no exception. Information about extraction hazards is an extremely important issue. In general, patents are viewed as a positive force in this regard, providing a vehicle for disseminating information in exchange for a limited property right over an invention. However, there is an emerging recognition that patents can also be used to control the creation of new information by limiting the evaluation of an invention by third parties. Such control is more likely in situations where third-party use and assessment may produce information damaging to the patent owner. This paper will explore the relationship between patents and information control in the context of natural gas extraction. It will describe the substantial growth of patents in hydraulic fracturing, the technology used to extract gas from the widely discussed Marcellus Shale in the eastern United States. The paper will then explain how patents on hydraulic fracturing fluids could potentially be used to prevent testing by third parties. Analogies in agricultural biotech and genetic treatments are used to support these claims. An understanding of the role of patents as information control mechanisms is critical to the safe employment of new technology. If patents substantially limit information creation or disclosure, government intervention to permit experimental use and environmental, health and safety testing may be necessary. However, options do exist under current law that should be considered before patent rights are encumbered.

Cultural Entrepreneurship: From Making Culture to Cultural Making

We summarize three perspectives on cultural entrepreneurship (CE). Originating in sociology, CE 1.0 focuses on making culture, or the processes by which high culture organizations and popular culture products are created. With roots in strategic management and organization theory, CE 2.0 focuses on deploying culture, or the processes by which culture constitutes a toolkit for legitimating new ventures. We interpret recent scholarship as suggesting the emergence of a third wave, CE 3.0, which emphasizes cultural making, the distributed and intertemporal processes whereby value is created across multiple and fluid repertoires and registers of meaning. We close by speculating on two issues: the performativity of cultural entrepreneurship, and the cult of entrepreneurship.

RESEARCH ARTICLE: An Analysis of Unconventional Gas Well Reporting under Pennsylvania's Act 13 of 2012

In response to growing concerns about the impact of shale gas development, Pennsylvanias Act 13 of 2012 established an unconventional gas well fee and required the states Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to report on the number of such wells. In this article, we analyze the extent to which the DEP complied with its reporting requirements under Act 13. Using publicly available data, we find that the DEP likely omitted between 15,300 and 25,100 unconventional gas wells from its Act 13 report. Left uncorrected, we estimate that Pennsylvanias state, county, and municipal governments could forfeit fees of

Standing Out and Fitting In: Charting the Emergence of Certified B Corporations by Industry and Region

205–

Comparative analysis of hydraulic fracturing wastewater practices in unconventional shale developments: Regulatory regimes

303 million in 2012 and up to